1 2 22 23 24 26 28 29 30 49 50
Topic: 50 reasons to be ashamed (and not a fan) of Jesus
msharmony's photo
Sat 06/09/12 04:42 PM











And understanding the words they use and the meaning of those words are two different things. Many words can be used in many ways.


Cowboy...then learn Hebrew...why would you based your after-life on a book of mis-translations
Yep the bible is more Greek influence of the afterlife not Ancient hebrew tradtions.


imagine trying to disfuse a bomb using the bible.....

ok first let's unhook the green wire....

but green doesn't mean the color green it might mean green with envy

ok then let's find the wire that appears to represent Jealousy

forget that....hand me that Jewish bible before we blow our apses into Heaven



different books different purposes

a million different analogies could be made, that wouldnt really dispute the usefulness or accuracy of a book

I doubt one would defuse a bomb using a cookbook either

or use a bomb manual to bake a cake

neither analogy really lessens the purpose of a manual or a cookbook though


MsHarmony...concerning the bible and the term "bomb"... bomb isn't really a bomb...bomb in Hebrew means "false gospel"...

in a cookbook "bomb" isn't really a bomb...the Hebrew word for bomb is "falling cake" ...

that was just a sample of what you guys constantly do with the english bible ...everytime a word you do not like is there..then you try to change the meaning of the word by running to Satan's Dictionary or claim that the word means something else in Hebrew by running to one of those Satan websites

the passage clearly used the word "Hate" ...but Christian somehow "dyslexically" view it as the term for Love

perhaps this is what happens psychologically to people when they are commanded to love everyone...even their enemies...a form of "Stockholm Syndrome" and there is no longer a line of distinction between the concepts of love and hate

I love you so much that I hate you



You can't forget the infamous take another verse from another gospel and use it to try and make the misinterpreted verse legit.



yes, context

the new enemy of the intelligent anti religious,,,
haha believers do it too nice try when you question the verse they post they start posting more from a different gospel.The enemy isn't the nonbelievers the enemy is fideism.


the enemy isnt understanding context either, its actually a relevant part of reading comprehension that they teach in elementary school,,,,
well the bible contradicts itself just read how Luke and Matthew do it to each other taking a vesrse out of context is meaningless cause to many contradictions to even care.And the bible is kind of funny to comprehend it you must first find what denomination you feel comfortable with in their interpretation.So are you actually comprehending it then?



the christian denominations have only slight variances, they still use the same bible and the individual reading it still perceives it in their own way,, which may be different than billions of others readers or the same ,,,,

thats the nature of large numbers of people reading the same book,,,
kind of like the game 'telephone',, and like the game, some people are bound to be 'hearing it right',,,,

RKISIT's photo
Sat 06/09/12 04:49 PM












And understanding the words they use and the meaning of those words are two different things. Many words can be used in many ways.


Cowboy...then learn Hebrew...why would you based your after-life on a book of mis-translations
Yep the bible is more Greek influence of the afterlife not Ancient hebrew tradtions.


imagine trying to disfuse a bomb using the bible.....

ok first let's unhook the green wire....

but green doesn't mean the color green it might mean green with envy

ok then let's find the wire that appears to represent Jealousy

forget that....hand me that Jewish bible before we blow our apses into Heaven



different books different purposes

a million different analogies could be made, that wouldnt really dispute the usefulness or accuracy of a book

I doubt one would defuse a bomb using a cookbook either

or use a bomb manual to bake a cake

neither analogy really lessens the purpose of a manual or a cookbook though


MsHarmony...concerning the bible and the term "bomb"... bomb isn't really a bomb...bomb in Hebrew means "false gospel"...

in a cookbook "bomb" isn't really a bomb...the Hebrew word for bomb is "falling cake" ...

that was just a sample of what you guys constantly do with the english bible ...everytime a word you do not like is there..then you try to change the meaning of the word by running to Satan's Dictionary or claim that the word means something else in Hebrew by running to one of those Satan websites

the passage clearly used the word "Hate" ...but Christian somehow "dyslexically" view it as the term for Love

perhaps this is what happens psychologically to people when they are commanded to love everyone...even their enemies...a form of "Stockholm Syndrome" and there is no longer a line of distinction between the concepts of love and hate

I love you so much that I hate you



You can't forget the infamous take another verse from another gospel and use it to try and make the misinterpreted verse legit.



yes, context

the new enemy of the intelligent anti religious,,,
haha believers do it too nice try when you question the verse they post they start posting more from a different gospel.The enemy isn't the nonbelievers the enemy is fideism.


the enemy isnt understanding context either, its actually a relevant part of reading comprehension that they teach in elementary school,,,,
well the bible contradicts itself just read how Luke and Matthew do it to each other taking a vesrse out of context is meaningless cause to many contradictions to even care.And the bible is kind of funny to comprehend it you must first find what denomination you feel comfortable with in their interpretation.So are you actually comprehending it then?



the christian denominations have only slight variances, they still use the same bible and the individual reading it still perceives it in their own way,, which may be different than billions of others readers or the same ,,,,

thats the nature of large numbers of people reading the same book,,,
kind of like the game 'telephone',, and like the game, some people are bound to be 'hearing it right',,,,
slight variances?some preachers preach you'll go to hell and suffer eternal damnation others preach you just remain dead and don't receive eternal happiness.

RKISIT's photo
Sat 06/09/12 04:56 PM
some christians are taught that satan is actually a hebrew word for opponent and that satan actually was a king of babylon.
Then you have that satan is Lucifer who God tossed from heaven and walks the earth.
Then you have satan is this Pagan looking horned God that runs hell.

msharmony's photo
Sat 06/09/12 04:56 PM













And understanding the words they use and the meaning of those words are two different things. Many words can be used in many ways.


Cowboy...then learn Hebrew...why would you based your after-life on a book of mis-translations
Yep the bible is more Greek influence of the afterlife not Ancient hebrew tradtions.


imagine trying to disfuse a bomb using the bible.....

ok first let's unhook the green wire....

but green doesn't mean the color green it might mean green with envy

ok then let's find the wire that appears to represent Jealousy

forget that....hand me that Jewish bible before we blow our apses into Heaven



different books different purposes

a million different analogies could be made, that wouldnt really dispute the usefulness or accuracy of a book

I doubt one would defuse a bomb using a cookbook either

or use a bomb manual to bake a cake

neither analogy really lessens the purpose of a manual or a cookbook though


MsHarmony...concerning the bible and the term "bomb"... bomb isn't really a bomb...bomb in Hebrew means "false gospel"...

in a cookbook "bomb" isn't really a bomb...the Hebrew word for bomb is "falling cake" ...

that was just a sample of what you guys constantly do with the english bible ...everytime a word you do not like is there..then you try to change the meaning of the word by running to Satan's Dictionary or claim that the word means something else in Hebrew by running to one of those Satan websites

the passage clearly used the word "Hate" ...but Christian somehow "dyslexically" view it as the term for Love

perhaps this is what happens psychologically to people when they are commanded to love everyone...even their enemies...a form of "Stockholm Syndrome" and there is no longer a line of distinction between the concepts of love and hate

I love you so much that I hate you



You can't forget the infamous take another verse from another gospel and use it to try and make the misinterpreted verse legit.



yes, context

the new enemy of the intelligent anti religious,,,
haha believers do it too nice try when you question the verse they post they start posting more from a different gospel.The enemy isn't the nonbelievers the enemy is fideism.


the enemy isnt understanding context either, its actually a relevant part of reading comprehension that they teach in elementary school,,,,
well the bible contradicts itself just read how Luke and Matthew do it to each other taking a vesrse out of context is meaningless cause to many contradictions to even care.And the bible is kind of funny to comprehend it you must first find what denomination you feel comfortable with in their interpretation.So are you actually comprehending it then?



the christian denominations have only slight variances, they still use the same bible and the individual reading it still perceives it in their own way,, which may be different than billions of others readers or the same ,,,,

thats the nature of large numbers of people reading the same book,,,
kind of like the game 'telephone',, and like the game, some people are bound to be 'hearing it right',,,,
slight variances?some preachers preach you'll go to hell and suffer eternal damnation others preach you just remain dead and don't receive eternal happiness.



I am not speaking personal and individual PASTORAL interpretations

IM speaking about the universally recognized DOCTRINES of the different denominations,,,

RKISIT's photo
Sat 06/09/12 05:02 PM

I am not speaking personal and individual PASTORAL interpretations

IM speaking about the universally recognized DOCTRINES of the different denominations,,,
------------------------------------------------------------------


But because he has his own interpretations the people in the pews are gonna assume it's true,cause he is a man of God preaching his interpretations.

msharmony's photo
Sat 06/09/12 05:04 PM


I am not speaking personal and individual PASTORAL interpretations

IM speaking about the universally recognized DOCTRINES of the different denominations,,,
------------------------------------------------------------------


But because he has his own interpretations the people in the pews are gonna assume it's true,cause he is a man of God preaching his interpretations.


yes , and there are math teachers who dont teach math correctly

but what is recognized as 'math' doesnt change in any universal way

we can find exceptions to just about everything that would make general discussions pretty obsolete,,,

no photo
Sat 06/09/12 05:08 PM



And understanding the words they use and the meaning of those words are two different things. Many words can be used in many ways.


Cowboy...then learn Hebrew...why would you based your after-life on a book of mis-translations



Who ever said anything about a mistranslation?


you were one of those that said this ...you either have short term memory or "selective memory" ...I vote for the latter

POSTED BY COWBOY:
Things loose it's true meaning when translated time after time. People and what they "think" was ment, will be altered.


so I ask again....why would you base your immortal soul on such a book that even you claim to have doubts regarding it's accuracy....

and then have the unmitigated gall to preach it to others as if it was accurate

RKISIT's photo
Sat 06/09/12 05:17 PM



I am not speaking personal and individual PASTORAL interpretations

IM speaking about the universally recognized DOCTRINES of the different denominations,,,
------------------------------------------------------------------


But because he has his own interpretations the people in the pews are gonna assume it's true,cause he is a man of God preaching his interpretations.


yes , and there are math teachers who dont teach math correctly

but what is recognized as 'math' doesnt change in any universal way

we can find exceptions to just about everything that would make general discussions pretty obsolete,,,
Algebra and geometry are taught different ways so people can understand it easy.preachers on the other hand preach their interpretations and are either true or false.

msharmony's photo
Sat 06/09/12 05:23 PM




I am not speaking personal and individual PASTORAL interpretations

IM speaking about the universally recognized DOCTRINES of the different denominations,,,
------------------------------------------------------------------


But because he has his own interpretations the people in the pews are gonna assume it's true,cause he is a man of God preaching his interpretations.


yes , and there are math teachers who dont teach math correctly

but what is recognized as 'math' doesnt change in any universal way

we can find exceptions to just about everything that would make general discussions pretty obsolete,,,
Algebra and geometry are taught different ways so people can understand it easy.preachers on the other hand preach their interpretations and are either true or false.


Im not speaking about teaching math in DIFFERENT Way, I am speaking about teachers who stray from recognized formulas and processes to teach INCORRECTLY based upon what they wrongly believe will work

it happens, but it is as much the exception as the above scenarios,,,

RKISIT's photo
Sat 06/09/12 05:30 PM





I am not speaking personal and individual PASTORAL interpretations

IM speaking about the universally recognized DOCTRINES of the different denominations,,,
------------------------------------------------------------------


But because he has his own interpretations the people in the pews are gonna assume it's true,cause he is a man of God preaching his interpretations.


yes , and there are math teachers who dont teach math correctly

but what is recognized as 'math' doesnt change in any universal way

we can find exceptions to just about everything that would make general discussions pretty obsolete,,,
Algebra and geometry are taught different ways so people can understand it easy.preachers on the other hand preach their interpretations and are either true or false.


Im not speaking about teaching math in DIFFERENT Way, I am speaking about teachers who stray from recognized formulas and processes to teach INCORRECTLY based upon what they wrongly believe will work

it happens, but it is as much the exception as the above scenarios,,,
Well my spelling teacher wasn't worthy i realized i misspelled "rely" wrong like 3 times or maybe it was "really" need to see how i was using the word:tongue:

CowboyGH's photo
Sat 06/09/12 06:42 PM




And understanding the words they use and the meaning of those words are two different things. Many words can be used in many ways.


Cowboy...then learn Hebrew...why would you based your after-life on a book of mis-translations



Who ever said anything about a mistranslation?


you were one of those that said this ...you either have short term memory or "selective memory" ...I vote for the latter

POSTED BY COWBOY:
Things loose it's true meaning when translated time after time. People and what they "think" was ment, will be altered.


so I ask again....why would you base your immortal soul on such a book that even you claim to have doubts regarding it's accuracy....

and then have the unmitigated gall to preach it to others as if it was accurate


I don't base my immortal soul on such a book that even I claim to have doubts regarding it's accuracy.

I base my immortal soul on Jesus Christ, based on a personal walk with my God and savior. And I don't preach or even discuss a specific translation of the scriptures, I teach the world of God. It's called cross referencing. I don't use just one translation. I start with KJV, then when something doesn't seem right, or there seems to be a "contradiction", I cross reference between different interpretations and pray about it.

It is not God's duity, or job, to hand us this knowledge. It is our job to search for the truth. God is not responsible, we are responsible for ourselves.

no photo
Sun 06/10/12 05:02 AM



I am not speaking personal and individual PASTORAL interpretations

IM speaking about the universally recognized DOCTRINES of the different denominations,,,
------------------------------------------------------------------


But because he has his own interpretations the people in the pews are gonna assume it's true,cause he is a man of God preaching his interpretations.


yes , and there are math teachers who dont teach math correctly

but what is recognized as 'math' doesnt change in any universal way

we can find exceptions to just about everything that would make general discussions pretty obsolete,,,


MsHarmony....do the Math teachers claim that the math in the books are not accurate...or that the Math Formulas has been mis-translated from Hebrew....

do all the Math teachers get different answers when each of them do the Math problems

do they need Faith to believe in Math

this is why your analogy to compare those that teach math to those that preach the bible is inaccurate

no photo
Sun 06/10/12 05:22 AM





And understanding the words they use and the meaning of those words are two different things. Many words can be used in many ways.


Cowboy...then learn Hebrew...why would you based your after-life on a book of mis-translations



Who ever said anything about a mistranslation?


you were one of those that said this ...you either have short term memory or "selective memory" ...I vote for the latter

POSTED BY COWBOY:
Things loose it's true meaning when translated time after time. People and what they "think" was ment, will be altered.


so I ask again....why would you base your immortal soul on such a book that even you claim to have doubts regarding it's accuracy....

and then have the unmitigated gall to preach it to others as if it was accurate


I don't base my immortal soul on such a book that even I claim to have doubts regarding it's accuracy.

I base my immortal soul on Jesus Christ, based on a personal walk with my God and savior. And I don't preach or even discuss a specific translation of the scriptures, I teach the world of God. It's called cross referencing. I don't use just one translation. I start with KJV, then when something doesn't seem right, or there seems to be a "contradiction", I cross reference between different interpretations and pray about it.

It is not God's duity, or job, to hand us this knowledge. It is our job to search for the truth. God is not responsible, we are responsible for ourselves.


all you know about Jesus is what you read in that book that you claim is mis-translated

as for your personal walk with Jesus...since the bible according to you is mis-translated then you wouldn't have a clue if it was Jesus or not...it more likely either Satan or a delusion since you have admitted to sinning as Jesus stood next to you ...what type of Christian intentionally sins as their savior is looking at them ...sounds religiously kinky

this is why to based ones after-life on a mis-translated book or adhere their soul to a character in one of these mis-translated books is either due to peer pressure or not being all that concern about their soul

CowboyGH's photo
Sun 06/10/12 08:54 AM






And understanding the words they use and the meaning of those words are two different things. Many words can be used in many ways.


Cowboy...then learn Hebrew...why would you based your after-life on a book of mis-translations



Who ever said anything about a mistranslation?


you were one of those that said this ...you either have short term memory or "selective memory" ...I vote for the latter

POSTED BY COWBOY:
Things loose it's true meaning when translated time after time. People and what they "think" was ment, will be altered.


so I ask again....why would you base your immortal soul on such a book that even you claim to have doubts regarding it's accuracy....

and then have the unmitigated gall to preach it to others as if it was accurate


I don't base my immortal soul on such a book that even I claim to have doubts regarding it's accuracy.

I base my immortal soul on Jesus Christ, based on a personal walk with my God and savior. And I don't preach or even discuss a specific translation of the scriptures, I teach the world of God. It's called cross referencing. I don't use just one translation. I start with KJV, then when something doesn't seem right, or there seems to be a "contradiction", I cross reference between different interpretations and pray about it.

It is not God's duity, or job, to hand us this knowledge. It is our job to search for the truth. God is not responsible, we are responsible for ourselves.


all you know about Jesus is what you read in that book that you claim is mis-translated

as for your personal walk with Jesus...since the bible according to you is mis-translated then you wouldn't have a clue if it was Jesus or not...it more likely either Satan or a delusion since you have admitted to sinning as Jesus stood next to you ...what type of Christian intentionally sins as their savior is looking at them ...sounds religiously kinky

this is why to based ones after-life on a mis-translated book or adhere their soul to a character in one of these mis-translated books is either due to peer pressure or not being all that concern about their soul



all you know about Jesus is what you read in that book that you claim is mis-translated


Ah, but you are incorrect. For one, the walk with Jesus is a personal walk. Not from reading anything out of a book, or anything besides Jesus. Someone could know Jesus and not have ever read the bible, or even possibly have ever even just seen the bible. The scriptures are purely knowledge. Jesus is not in that book. And also, this is why I cross referance between multiple different translations, to see exactly what it's talking about.


what type of Christian intentionally sins as their savior is looking at them


A weak person. A person that chooses to do what pleases him specifically. A person that made/makes mistakes. A person that then leans on his savior for strength not to continue in that sin he once did.


this is why to based ones after-life on a mis-translated book or adhere their soul to a character in one of these mis-translated books is either due to peer pressure or not being all that concern about their soul


Again, I base nothing after a book. I base my eternal soul on Jesus, which is only eternal through him. And has absolutely nothing to do with "peer-pressure". Again, the walk with Jesus is a personal walk. It's not a walk with Jesus, your uncle, your friend, your dad, ect. It's a walk with just you and Jesus.

RKISIT's photo
Sun 06/10/12 05:06 PM
Edited by RKISIT on Sun 06/10/12 05:10 PM
well why do people claim the serpant in the adam and eve story was satan when lucifer wasn't cast out of heaven yet?

I'm still waiting for an answer for this.Let me guess theres a trinity for Lucifer also.

CowboyGH's photo
Sun 06/10/12 06:04 PM

well why do people claim the serpant in the adam and eve story was satan when lucifer wasn't cast out of heaven yet?

I'm still waiting for an answer for this.Let me guess theres a trinity for Lucifer also.



Just because he wasn't cast from Heaven yet, doesn't mean he couldn't walk the Earth.

What do the two have to do with one another?

RKISIT's photo
Sun 06/10/12 06:13 PM


well why do people claim the serpant in the adam and eve story was satan when lucifer wasn't cast out of heaven yet?

I'm still waiting for an answer for this.Let me guess theres a trinity for Lucifer also.



Just because he wasn't cast from Heaven yet, doesn't mean he couldn't walk the Earth.

What do the two have to do with one another?
dam cowboy i thought you would bring out the truth that satan and lucifer aren't the same

msharmony's photo
Sun 06/10/12 11:12 PM




I am not speaking personal and individual PASTORAL interpretations

IM speaking about the universally recognized DOCTRINES of the different denominations,,,
------------------------------------------------------------------


But because he has his own interpretations the people in the pews are gonna assume it's true,cause he is a man of God preaching his interpretations.


yes , and there are math teachers who dont teach math correctly

but what is recognized as 'math' doesnt change in any universal way

we can find exceptions to just about everything that would make general discussions pretty obsolete,,,


MsHarmony....do the Math teachers claim that the math in the books are not accurate...or that the Math Formulas has been mis-translated from Hebrew....

do all the Math teachers get different answers when each of them do the Math problems

do they need Faith to believe in Math

this is why your analogy to compare those that teach math to those that preach the bible is inaccurate



numbers are much less complex, and yet not all teachers teach math CORRECTLY

the analogy is significant BECAUSE of the fact that if something as straightforwards as math can have instructors who dont get it

something as COMPLEX as a translation from one language and the context of the language 2000 years ago, is certain to likewise have discrepancies in how some 'instructors' relay it to others,,,m

Jesally's photo
Mon 06/11/12 03:26 AM

I think this thread is not about to be exhausted, it will definately linger for some good time!





Jesally's photo
Mon 06/11/12 03:26 AM
Edited by Jesally on Mon 06/11/12 03:27 AM






1 2 22 23 24 26 28 29 30 49 50