blah, blah, blah, dishonest, blah, blah,
blah, blah, , incoherent, blah, blah, blah,
blah, blah, blah, error, blah, blah, blah, blah,

But Peterpan,

Creative is right that no two religions agree on the Bible. If what you say is true, then everyone should agree on what it means, and what scriptures are divinely inspired.

Probably no two persons agree.

So you don't make a lot of sense.

Do you think animal or human sacrifice is devine?

Divine.

Why, because I apply logic as well as personal judgement?


Regarding the passage that predicts myths being introduced, did I not provide proof of the myth with the mention of Hades? Any sane, logical person would agree that Hades is a Greek myth, no?


As for the sacrifices, did I not provide passages that condemned them? If a later prophet after the "laws" were written condemned sacrifices and said that God never commanded them concerning sacrifices, shouldn't a logical person read that as it is stated? And as a fail-safe, you check with your "heart".


Do you think animal or human sacrifice is devine?

I think sacrifice is sick and demented.


What's your question?

So do I. I was correctly spelling the word.

But sacrifice in itself originated through religion.

Thus, it is "divine" in origin.

If you are asking for my personal opinion regarding that subject, I don't have one.

But that was not my point.

But sacrifice in itself originated through religion.

Thus, it is "divine" in origin.

If, and only if, the sacrificial part was divinely inspired, it could have been mistaken.

P.S.

Starting a sentence with:

"... Any sane, logical person would agree that ......"?

sets up a trap that anyone who disagrees with what follows that is not sane or logical.

The term "divine" implies it comes from God. One would have to believe in God to even use the term.

Could have been, but regardless; eons upon eons ago, it began. Whether a mistake or not, isn't my right to state.

What's your opinion on the logical reasoning I've illustrated?

I know that, I only use "that" line of debate with others who use it...


Kinda irks ya, does it not?

If you base your logic on something you read in scriptures concerning what some prophet said, or allegedly condemned, I would say that you were simply basing your belief on what you are reading or on someone else's opinions. You are simply taking sides.

And since I don't base my belief on said scriptures and what some long dead prophet had to say, I don't think much of the logic either.

So it doesn't apply to me at all, and I still have no opinion about it.