Whatever.....

Funny how the first thing the 911 commission says "a failure of imagination". Funny on how 9/11 we where doing war exercises of planes crashing into buildings! If the military pilots would have had the right real world air traffic control system, every plane would have been intercepted.

Most openminded people can already see quite clearly. The government lied about 9-11 and slyly admits to lying, assuming that most Americans are stupid and gullible enough to believe their twisted logic.

The 9-11 OFFICIAL STORY is filled with lies and almost weekly, another lie is exposed to the light of truth

How much longer can they keep this fraud going?

Since no one wants to give it up, and just want to force their beliefs upon others no matter how futile...

Those of you who want truth have been barking up the wrong tree. You will not have adequate government disclosure for at least another 40 years without a change in law. An adequate change in law is unlikely to ever happen.

The Freedom of Information Act has 9 exemption clauses.

They are (as listed in Title 5 of the United States Code, section 552):

1) (A) specifically authorized under criteria established by an Executive order to be kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign policy and (B) are in fact properly classified pursuant to such Executive order;

2) related solely to the internal personnel rules and practices of an agency;

3) specifically exempted from disclosure by statute (other than section 552b of this title), provided that such statute (A) requires that the matters be withheld from the public in such a manner as to leave no discretion on the issue, or (B) establishes particular criteria for withholding or refers to particular types of matters to be withheld; FOIA Exemption 3 Statutes

4) trade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a person and privileged or confidential;

5) inter-agency or intra-agency memoranda or letters which would not be available by law to a party other than an agency in litigation with the agency;

6) personnel and medical files and similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy;

7) records or information compiled for law enforcement purposes, but only to the extent that the production of such law enforcement records or information (A) could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings, (B) would deprive a person of a right to a fair trial or an impartial adjudication, (C) could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, (D) could reasonably be expected to disclose the identity of a confidential source, including a State, local, or foreign agency or authority or any private institution which furnished information on a confidential basis, and, in the case of a record or information compiled by a criminal law enforcement authority in the course of a criminal investigation or by an agency conducting a lawful national security intelligence investigation, information furnished by a confidential source, (E) would disclose techniques and procedures for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions, or would disclose guidelines for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions if such disclosure could reasonably be expected to risk circumvention of the law, or (F) could reasonably be expected to endanger the life or physical safety of any individual;

8) contained in or related to examination, operating, or condition reports prepared by, on behalf of, or for the use of an agency responsible for the regulation or supervision of financial institutions; or

9) geological and geophysical information and data, including maps, concerning wells.


Of these, number 1 is the most vague and most commonly used by government. For reasons of national security, I don't see the government ever being willing to give this one up. At best, we may be able to shorten the length of time that certain documents are required to remain sealed. Presently, Presidential documents are required to remain sealed for 50 years, or until the President in question becomes deceased, whichever is longer. This is meant to protect the President and his immediate family after he has left office. Otherwise, declassifying documents is at the discretion of the government.

There are ways to get around many of the exemptions, but it's a bureaucratic nightmare.

Since most of the officials and federal agencies who dealt with 9/11 fall under the Executive Branch of government, it is unlikely that full disclosure will ever happen before 2058. Even if Congress demanded access to classified documents, they are going to be very hesitant to order a full public release. I'm not 100% sure, but I think the only other way to those documents can be released is if G.W. Bush consents. That would mean opening his family up to any repercussions, be they foreign or domestic or even life-threatening. Seeing how there reportedly has already been an assassination attempt on his father, I doubt G.W. would consent to early disclosure.

But you're all free to try.

After all, the classified clause is way overused, and there are non-9/11 issues that should be declassified under the public's right to know. Even then, I'm not sure everyone will believe what the declassified documents say. This is America....You don't know unless you try.

Since no one wants to give it up, and just want to force their beliefs upon others no matter how futile...

Those of you who want truth have been barking up the wrong tree. You will not have adequate government disclosure for at least another 40 years without a change in law. An adequate change in law is unlikely to ever happen.

The Freedom of Information Act has 9 exemption clauses.

They are (as listed in Title 5 of the United States Code, section 552):

1) (A) specifically authorized under criteria established by an Executive order to be kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign policy and (B) are in fact properly classified pursuant to such Executive order;

2) related solely to the internal personnel rules and practices of an agency;

3) specifically exempted from disclosure by statute (other than section 552b of this title), provided that such statute (A) requires that the matters be withheld from the public in such a manner as to leave no discretion on the issue, or (B) establishes particular criteria for withholding or refers to particular types of matters to be withheld; FOIA Exemption 3 Statutes

4) trade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a person and privileged or confidential;

5) inter-agency or intra-agency memoranda or letters which would not be available by law to a party other than an agency in litigation with the agency;

6) personnel and medical files and similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy;

7) records or information compiled for law enforcement purposes, but only to the extent that the production of such law enforcement records or information (A) could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings, (B) would deprive a person of a right to a fair trial or an impartial adjudication, (C) could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, (D) could reasonably be expected to disclose the identity of a confidential source, including a State, local, or foreign agency or authority or any private institution which furnished information on a confidential basis, and, in the case of a record or information compiled by a criminal law enforcement authority in the course of a criminal investigation or by an agency conducting a lawful national security intelligence investigation, information furnished by a confidential source, (E) would disclose techniques and procedures for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions, or would disclose guidelines for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions if such disclosure could reasonably be expected to risk circumvention of the law, or (F) could reasonably be expected to endanger the life or physical safety of any individual;

8) contained in or related to examination, operating, or condition reports prepared by, on behalf of, or for the use of an agency responsible for the regulation or supervision of financial institutions; or

9) geological and geophysical information and data, including maps, concerning wells.


Of these, number 1 is the most vague and most commonly used by government. For reasons of national security, I don't see the government ever being willing to give this one up. At best, we may be able to shorten the length of time that certain documents are required to remain sealed. Presently, Presidential documents are required to remain sealed for 50 years, or until the President in question becomes deceased, whichever is longer. This is meant to protect the President and his immediate family after he has left office. Otherwise, declassifying documents is at the discretion of the government.

There are ways to get around many of the exemptions, but it's a bureaucratic nightmare.

Since most of the officials and federal agencies who dealt with 9/11 fall under the Executive Branch of government, it is unlikely that full disclosure will ever happen before 2058. Even if Congress demanded access to classified documents, they are going to be very hesitant to order a full public release. I'm not 100% sure, but I think the only other way to those documents can be released is if G.W. Bush consents. That would mean opening his family up to any repercussions, be they foreign or domestic or even life-threatening. Seeing how there reportedly has already been an assassination attempt on his father, I doubt G.W. would consent to early disclosure.

But you're all free to try.

After all, the classified clause is way overused, and there are non-9/11 issues that should be declassified under the public's right to know. Even then, I'm not sure everyone will believe what the declassified documents say. This is America....You don't know unless you try.

WOW! I actually agree with you on this! It's what I have stated!

It is obvious that the pilots of the airlines on 9/11 were half alien genetically engineered clones of George Bush and I dare anyone to prove me wrong!!!




The whole conspiracy mentality about 9/11 does not speak well of American education.

It is obvious that the pilots of the airlines on 9/11 were half alien genetically engineered clones of George Bush and I dare anyone to prove me wrong!!!




The whole conspiracy mentality about 9/11 does not speak well of American education.

It is obvious that the pilots of the airlines on 9/11 were half alien genetically engineered clones of George Bush and I dare anyone to prove me wrong!!!




The whole conspiracy mentality about 9/11 does not speak well of American education.

So in 2058 we all get to see the missle that hit The Pentagon.

Exactly we have the flight recorders from United 175 and American 11. Yet the government says we never recovered them from Ground Zero. Bullcrap! Ten volunteer workers discovered them and they where taken away by FBI agents. Why play Flight 93's recording, but not the one's that hit the World Trade Center? Exeption clause for a flight recorder.

So in 2058 we all get to see the missle that hit The Pentagon.

It is obvious that the pilots of the airlines on 9/11 were half alien genetically engineered clones of George Bush and I dare anyone to prove me wrong!!!




The whole conspiracy mentality about 9/11 does not speak well of American education.

Actually I think the opposite is true, it's those who just go along with the government that doesn't speak well of American education. But then the education system is designed for people to think like that.