1 2 4 6 7 8 9 18 19
Topic: 'Jew-hate stems from conflict'
no photo
Sun 12/04/11 07:14 PM


Ah, it was just copied and pasted? I didn't bother to look at the link.


I am just as lazy as youlaugh

But what I copy and paste I believe in.

Nice and easy does it.


It's not being lazy. It's that I find no point in looking at your anti-jew sites that you post bs from all the time.

Optomistic69's photo
Sun 12/04/11 07:16 PM



Ah, it was just copied and pasted? I didn't bother to look at the link.


I am just as lazy as youlaugh

But what I copy and paste I believe in.

Nice and easy does it.


It's not being lazy. It's that I find no point in looking at your anti-jew sites that you post bs from all the time.


On your own admission you do not check the links so how can you make a judgment.

no photo
Sun 12/04/11 07:19 PM




Ah, it was just copied and pasted? I didn't bother to look at the link.


I am just as lazy as youlaugh

But what I copy and paste I believe in.

Nice and easy does it.


It's not being lazy. It's that I find no point in looking at your anti-jew sites that you post bs from all the time.


On your own admission you do not check the links so how can you make a judgment.


I asked you if you were speaking for American Jews. You said you copied ad pasted it.

You always post stuff like that, so why bother looking at the links? It's all the same crap over and over.

Optomistic69's photo
Sun 12/04/11 07:21 PM
Edited by Optomistic69 on Sun 12/04/11 07:22 PM





Ah, it was just copied and pasted? I didn't bother to look at the link.


I am just as lazy as youlaugh

But what I copy and paste I believe in.

Nice and easy does it.


It's not being lazy. It's that I find no point in looking at your anti-jew sites that you post bs from all the time.



On your own admission you do not check the links so how can you make a judgment.


I asked you if you were speaking for American Jews. You said you copied ad pasted it.

You always post stuff like that, so why bother looking at the links? It's all the same crap over and over.



How do you know its crap if you don't read it?

s1owhand's photo
Sun 12/04/11 07:21 PM
Edited by s1owhand on Sun 12/04/11 08:07 PM

Huh. The I love jews thread is gone already and yet several jew bashing threads stick around? Interesting.


I think it is as bad or worse than threads attacking individual
mingle2 members! In multiple spammed topics the same people keep
posting over and over again anti-jewish and Israel bashing
propaganda attacking whole swaths of the membership.

whoa


no photo
Sun 12/04/11 07:24 PM






Ah, it was just copied and pasted? I didn't bother to look at the link.


I am just as lazy as youlaugh

But what I copy and paste I believe in.

Nice and easy does it.


It's not being lazy. It's that I find no point in looking at your anti-jew sites that you post bs from all the time.



On your own admission you do not check the links so how can you make a judgment.


I asked you if you were speaking for American Jews. You said you copied ad pasted it.

You always post stuff like that, so why bother looking at the links? It's all the same crap over and over.



How do you know its crap if you don't read it?


Didn't you JUST say that you copied and pasted from the website? Seems you do that a lot. If I read what you've written here, why go to a site like that and read more? Come on man, common sense!

no photo
Sun 12/04/11 07:25 PM


Huh. The I love jews thread is gone already and yet several jew bashing threads stick around? Interesting.


I think it is as bad or worse than threads attacking individual
mingle2 members! It multiple spammed topics the same people keep
posting over and over again anti-jewish and Israel bashing
propaganda attacking whole swaths of the membership.

whoa




I thought it was very weird that the thread was removed so fast. I wonder if someone reported it for some reason?

Optomistic69's photo
Sun 12/04/11 07:26 PM
@ singme

I read and post.

You just comment and ask questions.

Simple...

Optomistic69's photo
Sun 12/04/11 07:28 PM



Huh. The I love jews thread is gone already and yet several jew bashing threads stick around? Interesting.


I think it is as bad or worse than threads attacking individual
mingle2 members! It multiple spammed topics the same people keep
posting over and over again anti-jewish and Israel bashing
propaganda attacking whole swaths of the membership.

whoa




I thought it was very weird that the thread was removed so fast. I wonder if someone reported it for some reason?


Common sense...Next thing you know we would have

I Love the drinker Irish

no photo
Sun 12/04/11 07:28 PM

@ singme

I read and post.

You just comment and ask questions.

Simple...


Wouldn't commenting and asking questions be reading and posting here? whoa

Optomistic69's photo
Sun 12/04/11 07:31 PM


@ singme

I read and post.

You just comment and ask questions.

Simple...


Wouldn't commenting and asking questions be reading and posting here? whoa


I post a few lines from an article and provide a link.

You comment on the few lines and consider you have read the article.

It seems you are more interested in me than readingdrinker

no photo
Sun 12/04/11 07:35 PM



@ singme

I read and post.

You just comment and ask questions.

Simple...


Wouldn't commenting and asking questions be reading and posting here? whoa


I post a few lines from an article and provide a link.

You comment on the few lines and consider you have read the article.

It seems you are more interested in me than readingdrinker


Isn't the point of this forum to discuss things? We can all post a few lines from an article and a link. You avoid discussion of any sort unless it's about something you agree with.

And don't flatter yourself. slaphead

msharmony's photo
Sun 12/04/11 07:38 PM









That is like saying that African Americans brought lynchings upon
themselves by moving into "white areas" or by trying to sit at the
lunch counter or ride in the front of the bus.

African Americans did not create hatred towards themselves by
creating conflict. African Americans found themselves perpetually
in conflict because of racial prejudice and discrimination.

It is exactly the same case in Israel. Israel is attacked because
they are not welcome in the neighborhood and this is the origin of
the conflict.

If the Arabs laid down their arms and accepted the Jewish state of
Israel then the conflict is over.
Edited by s1owhand on Sun 12/04/11 12:10 PM


I think you have that scenario backwards.



Terrorism is not land disputes. Terrorism is planting bombs in
buses, cafes, marketplaces and schools. Terrorism is shooting
rockets indiscriminately into cities to try to kill innocent
civilians.

Bus, cafe, market bombs and rocket attacks on cities are the
tactics of Hamas not Israel. This is why Hamas and Hezbollah
are recognized the world over as terrorist organizations and
why Iran who supports them is considered the worlds worst state
sponsor of terrorist attacks.

To try to blame the Israel victims of the terrorist attacks for
the actions of Hamas, Hezbollah and Iran in killing innocent
people is just both laughable and revolting.

No one is buying it.

laugh whoa


Nothing to buy sir.
The facts speak for themselves. anti-Semitism is at a verry high level and its not because people hate jews for being jews.

Anti-Semitism is the charge that Israel flings at anyone who criticizes them. Its a real fraud and irony that Israel treats the Palastinians as Hitler treated Poland.

I think most people once informed are revolted by what the state of Israel is doing. It is verry hard to change peoples conditioning being they are naturaly sympathetic to the Jewish cause, so its a real sad testement to Israels current leadership and the crimes they are commiting in the name of stopping terrorism.


The Israelis are not committing the crimes though!

Israel conducts checkpoints and inspections.

Hamas kills children on buses and social gatherings.

Compare.

I will help you. The terrorists are the ones actively trying to
kill innocent Israeli women and children on purpose. The checkpoints
and inspections at airports and borders are the price we have to
all pay to avoid more hijackings and bombings but these are not
crimes but prudent protective measures.

Bus bombers on the other hand are war crimes.

Most people can distinguish the difference - and should support
the Israelis strongly in their effort to build a safe and non-violent
country for their children. If only the Palestinians would do the same.

Jew-hatred or antisemitism predates 1948 by a good 1000 years.
Jew-hate is the cause of the irrational and self-defeating attacks
against the Jewish State of Israel and likewise the source of the
anguish and misery on both sides. It should stop and the Arabs
have the ability to put it to rest so easily by accepting Israel
as a Jewish state and laying down their arms.



this comes back down to looking at BOTH sides, what they have done to each other

its not enough to just look at today and point out which side is striking without considering the whole HISTORY and the ongoing tensions that have remained because of it

israelis have indeed allowed innocent palistinans to be massacred in the past, so their hands are not free of blood and guilt, blood and guilt that Im sure is not easily forgotten by those who are or have PERSONALLY lived through it and with it as a way of life




As I said before, I am not unsympathetic to the pathetic plight of
the Palestinians but there would be no Palestinians if there had
been acceptance of Israel and repeated unprovoked attacks on Israel
by the Arabs and Arafat etc.

It has never been Israeli policy to kill and murder Palestinians.
Israel has only battled back in self-defense. This is the real history
for those who actually look into it.

Hamas, Hezbollah, Al-Aqsa and their ilk on the other hand have always
had the POLICY of teaching jew-hatred in their schools, and
attacking known civilians on purpose to try to kill people.

When they have laid down their arms as did Jordan and Egypt then
the Israelis have always respected their peace agreements. This
is the truth of the matter.


killing innocent palestinians is not excused by whether or not palestinians 'accepted' Israel

Israeli doesnt have to have an official 'policy' to be engaged in wrongdoing

Israel has allowed innocent palestinians to be slaughtered by others, and I Believe has its own bigots who do their fair share of killing as well

they are too equally human to be so inhumanly perfect as to not have innocent blood on their hands that is just as inexcused as any other loss of innocent blood,,,


Israel has not "allowed" innocent people to be killed.
Terrorist groups are not tolerated in Israel or the U.S.

Not to say that there haven't been defensive wars.
But Israel has not allowed innocent people to be killed
Israel goes out of their way to warn civilians and always
has military targets who are firing at them before returning
fire.

When there have been mistakes, those responsible have been
vigorously prosecuted in Israel.

By contrast, Hamas holds celebrations and gives out candy when
innocent civilians are successfully killed.




and its easy for people to seperate a governments military from a government?


the israeli military has permitted and possibly committed innocent bloodshed in their past,,,,even if israeli 'commissions' may have later found them responsible


look up sabra and shatila and explain why those people should feel like they brought that upon themself or that they should trust and be happy living under israeli military?

s1owhand's photo
Sun 12/04/11 08:24 PM










That is like saying that African Americans brought lynchings upon
themselves by moving into "white areas" or by trying to sit at the
lunch counter or ride in the front of the bus.

African Americans did not create hatred towards themselves by
creating conflict. African Americans found themselves perpetually
in conflict because of racial prejudice and discrimination.

It is exactly the same case in Israel. Israel is attacked because
they are not welcome in the neighborhood and this is the origin of
the conflict.

If the Arabs laid down their arms and accepted the Jewish state of
Israel then the conflict is over.
Edited by s1owhand on Sun 12/04/11 12:10 PM


I think you have that scenario backwards.



Terrorism is not land disputes. Terrorism is planting bombs in
buses, cafes, marketplaces and schools. Terrorism is shooting
rockets indiscriminately into cities to try to kill innocent
civilians.

Bus, cafe, market bombs and rocket attacks on cities are the
tactics of Hamas not Israel. This is why Hamas and Hezbollah
are recognized the world over as terrorist organizations and
why Iran who supports them is considered the worlds worst state
sponsor of terrorist attacks.

To try to blame the Israel victims of the terrorist attacks for
the actions of Hamas, Hezbollah and Iran in killing innocent
people is just both laughable and revolting.

No one is buying it.

laugh whoa


Nothing to buy sir.
The facts speak for themselves. anti-Semitism is at a verry high level and its not because people hate jews for being jews.

Anti-Semitism is the charge that Israel flings at anyone who criticizes them. Its a real fraud and irony that Israel treats the Palastinians as Hitler treated Poland.

I think most people once informed are revolted by what the state of Israel is doing. It is verry hard to change peoples conditioning being they are naturaly sympathetic to the Jewish cause, so its a real sad testement to Israels current leadership and the crimes they are commiting in the name of stopping terrorism.


The Israelis are not committing the crimes though!

Israel conducts checkpoints and inspections.

Hamas kills children on buses and social gatherings.

Compare.

I will help you. The terrorists are the ones actively trying to
kill innocent Israeli women and children on purpose. The checkpoints
and inspections at airports and borders are the price we have to
all pay to avoid more hijackings and bombings but these are not
crimes but prudent protective measures.

Bus bombers on the other hand are war crimes.

Most people can distinguish the difference - and should support
the Israelis strongly in their effort to build a safe and non-violent
country for their children. If only the Palestinians would do the same.

Jew-hatred or antisemitism predates 1948 by a good 1000 years.
Jew-hate is the cause of the irrational and self-defeating attacks
against the Jewish State of Israel and likewise the source of the
anguish and misery on both sides. It should stop and the Arabs
have the ability to put it to rest so easily by accepting Israel
as a Jewish state and laying down their arms.



this comes back down to looking at BOTH sides, what they have done to each other

its not enough to just look at today and point out which side is striking without considering the whole HISTORY and the ongoing tensions that have remained because of it

israelis have indeed allowed innocent palistinans to be massacred in the past, so their hands are not free of blood and guilt, blood and guilt that Im sure is not easily forgotten by those who are or have PERSONALLY lived through it and with it as a way of life




As I said before, I am not unsympathetic to the pathetic plight of
the Palestinians but there would be no Palestinians if there had
been acceptance of Israel and repeated unprovoked attacks on Israel
by the Arabs and Arafat etc.

It has never been Israeli policy to kill and murder Palestinians.
Israel has only battled back in self-defense. This is the real history
for those who actually look into it.

Hamas, Hezbollah, Al-Aqsa and their ilk on the other hand have always
had the POLICY of teaching jew-hatred in their schools, and
attacking known civilians on purpose to try to kill people.

When they have laid down their arms as did Jordan and Egypt then
the Israelis have always respected their peace agreements. This
is the truth of the matter.


killing innocent palestinians is not excused by whether or not palestinians 'accepted' Israel

Israeli doesnt have to have an official 'policy' to be engaged in wrongdoing

Israel has allowed innocent palestinians to be slaughtered by others, and I Believe has its own bigots who do their fair share of killing as well

they are too equally human to be so inhumanly perfect as to not have innocent blood on their hands that is just as inexcused as any other loss of innocent blood,,,


Israel has not "allowed" innocent people to be killed.
Terrorist groups are not tolerated in Israel or the U.S.

Not to say that there haven't been defensive wars.
But Israel has not allowed innocent people to be killed
Israel goes out of their way to warn civilians and always
has military targets who are firing at them before returning
fire.

When there have been mistakes, those responsible have been
vigorously prosecuted in Israel.

By contrast, Hamas holds celebrations and gives out candy when
innocent civilians are successfully killed.




and its easy for people to seperate a governments military from a government?


the israeli military has permitted and possibly committed innocent bloodshed in their past,,,,even if israeli 'commissions' may have later found them responsible


look up sabra and shatila and explain why those people should feel like they brought that upon themself or that they should trust and be happy living under israeli military?


I've heard of that...from the Wiki - these were not carried out by
the Israelis or with the consent of the Israelis. This was done by
a Christian militia in Lebanon. In subsequent investigations it was
determined that Israeli forces found out that a massacre was going
on but failed to intervene. Arguments were made that they did not
wish to jeopardize themselves by getting in between the two warring
Lebanese factions. Nevertheless the Israeli government found that
Ariel Sharon and other officers were indirectly responsible for not
interceding to try to limit the bloodshed.

From the Wiki:

The Sabra and Shatila massacre took place in the Sabra and Shatila Palestinian refugee camps in Beirut, Lebanon between September 16 and September 18, 1982, during the Lebanese civil war. Palestinian and Lebanese civilians were massacred in the camps by Christian Lebanese Phalangists while the camp was surrounded by the Israel Defense Force.

In 1982, an independent commission chaired by Sean MacBride concluded that the Israeli authorities or forces were, directly or indirectly, responsible.[4] The Israeli government established the Kahan Commission to investigate, and in early 1983 it found that Israeli military personnel were aware that a massacre was in progress without taking serious steps to stop it. Therefore it regarded Israel as having indirect responsibility. The commission held Ariel Sharon personally responsible for having disregarded the prospect of acts of bloodshed by the Phalangists against the population of the refugee camps and not preventing their entry.[5]

So this was not "allowed" by the Israelis and not condoned by them.
But they did investigate the events themselves and took indirect
responsibility even though it was the Christian Lebanese Phalangists
who perpetrated the attacks. Efforts were made to ensure such things
would not happen again and none have. So at least it was one of those
instances where the Israelis did not tolerate or condone such
killings but took action to prevent such attacks in the future when
this happened 30 years ago.

This is very different from Hamas massacres of innocent Israelis.

When Hamas succeeds in DIRECTLY killing innocent Israelis they throw
candy!

msharmony's photo
Sun 12/04/11 08:26 PM











That is like saying that African Americans brought lynchings upon
themselves by moving into "white areas" or by trying to sit at the
lunch counter or ride in the front of the bus.

African Americans did not create hatred towards themselves by
creating conflict. African Americans found themselves perpetually
in conflict because of racial prejudice and discrimination.

It is exactly the same case in Israel. Israel is attacked because
they are not welcome in the neighborhood and this is the origin of
the conflict.

If the Arabs laid down their arms and accepted the Jewish state of
Israel then the conflict is over.
Edited by s1owhand on Sun 12/04/11 12:10 PM


I think you have that scenario backwards.



Terrorism is not land disputes. Terrorism is planting bombs in
buses, cafes, marketplaces and schools. Terrorism is shooting
rockets indiscriminately into cities to try to kill innocent
civilians.

Bus, cafe, market bombs and rocket attacks on cities are the
tactics of Hamas not Israel. This is why Hamas and Hezbollah
are recognized the world over as terrorist organizations and
why Iran who supports them is considered the worlds worst state
sponsor of terrorist attacks.

To try to blame the Israel victims of the terrorist attacks for
the actions of Hamas, Hezbollah and Iran in killing innocent
people is just both laughable and revolting.

No one is buying it.

laugh whoa


Nothing to buy sir.
The facts speak for themselves. anti-Semitism is at a verry high level and its not because people hate jews for being jews.

Anti-Semitism is the charge that Israel flings at anyone who criticizes them. Its a real fraud and irony that Israel treats the Palastinians as Hitler treated Poland.

I think most people once informed are revolted by what the state of Israel is doing. It is verry hard to change peoples conditioning being they are naturaly sympathetic to the Jewish cause, so its a real sad testement to Israels current leadership and the crimes they are commiting in the name of stopping terrorism.


The Israelis are not committing the crimes though!

Israel conducts checkpoints and inspections.

Hamas kills children on buses and social gatherings.

Compare.

I will help you. The terrorists are the ones actively trying to
kill innocent Israeli women and children on purpose. The checkpoints
and inspections at airports and borders are the price we have to
all pay to avoid more hijackings and bombings but these are not
crimes but prudent protective measures.

Bus bombers on the other hand are war crimes.

Most people can distinguish the difference - and should support
the Israelis strongly in their effort to build a safe and non-violent
country for their children. If only the Palestinians would do the same.

Jew-hatred or antisemitism predates 1948 by a good 1000 years.
Jew-hate is the cause of the irrational and self-defeating attacks
against the Jewish State of Israel and likewise the source of the
anguish and misery on both sides. It should stop and the Arabs
have the ability to put it to rest so easily by accepting Israel
as a Jewish state and laying down their arms.



this comes back down to looking at BOTH sides, what they have done to each other

its not enough to just look at today and point out which side is striking without considering the whole HISTORY and the ongoing tensions that have remained because of it

israelis have indeed allowed innocent palistinans to be massacred in the past, so their hands are not free of blood and guilt, blood and guilt that Im sure is not easily forgotten by those who are or have PERSONALLY lived through it and with it as a way of life




As I said before, I am not unsympathetic to the pathetic plight of
the Palestinians but there would be no Palestinians if there had
been acceptance of Israel and repeated unprovoked attacks on Israel
by the Arabs and Arafat etc.

It has never been Israeli policy to kill and murder Palestinians.
Israel has only battled back in self-defense. This is the real history
for those who actually look into it.

Hamas, Hezbollah, Al-Aqsa and their ilk on the other hand have always
had the POLICY of teaching jew-hatred in their schools, and
attacking known civilians on purpose to try to kill people.

When they have laid down their arms as did Jordan and Egypt then
the Israelis have always respected their peace agreements. This
is the truth of the matter.


killing innocent palestinians is not excused by whether or not palestinians 'accepted' Israel

Israeli doesnt have to have an official 'policy' to be engaged in wrongdoing

Israel has allowed innocent palestinians to be slaughtered by others, and I Believe has its own bigots who do their fair share of killing as well

they are too equally human to be so inhumanly perfect as to not have innocent blood on their hands that is just as inexcused as any other loss of innocent blood,,,


Israel has not "allowed" innocent people to be killed.
Terrorist groups are not tolerated in Israel or the U.S.

Not to say that there haven't been defensive wars.
But Israel has not allowed innocent people to be killed
Israel goes out of their way to warn civilians and always
has military targets who are firing at them before returning
fire.

When there have been mistakes, those responsible have been
vigorously prosecuted in Israel.

By contrast, Hamas holds celebrations and gives out candy when
innocent civilians are successfully killed.




and its easy for people to seperate a governments military from a government?


the israeli military has permitted and possibly committed innocent bloodshed in their past,,,,even if israeli 'commissions' may have later found them responsible


look up sabra and shatila and explain why those people should feel like they brought that upon themself or that they should trust and be happy living under israeli military?


I've heard of that...from the Wiki - these were not carried out by
the Israelis or with the consent of the Israelis. This was done by
a Christian militia in Lebanon. In subsequent investigations it was
determined that Israeli forces found out that a massacre was going
on but failed to intervene. Arguments were made that they did not
wish to jeopardize themselves by getting in between the two warring
Lebanese factions. Nevertheless the Israeli government found that
Ariel Sharon and other officers were indirectly responsible for not
interceding to try to limit the bloodshed.

From the Wiki:

The Sabra and Shatila massacre took place in the Sabra and Shatila Palestinian refugee camps in Beirut, Lebanon between September 16 and September 18, 1982, during the Lebanese civil war. Palestinian and Lebanese civilians were massacred in the camps by Christian Lebanese Phalangists while the camp was surrounded by the Israel Defense Force.

In 1982, an independent commission chaired by Sean MacBride concluded that the Israeli authorities or forces were, directly or indirectly, responsible.[4] The Israeli government established the Kahan Commission to investigate, and in early 1983 it found that Israeli military personnel were aware that a massacre was in progress without taking serious steps to stop it. Therefore it regarded Israel as having indirect responsibility. The commission held Ariel Sharon personally responsible for having disregarded the prospect of acts of bloodshed by the Phalangists against the population of the refugee camps and not preventing their entry.[5]

So this was not "allowed" by the Israelis and not condoned by them.
But they did investigate the events themselves and took indirect
responsibility even though it was the Christian Lebanese Phalangists
who perpetrated the attacks. Efforts were made to ensure such things
would not happen again and none have. So at least it was one of those
instances where the Israelis did not tolerate or condone such
killings but took action to prevent such attacks in the future when
this happened 30 years ago.

This is very different from Hamas massacres of innocent Israelis.

When Hamas succeeds in DIRECTLY killing innocent Israelis they throw
candy!



well I wasnt there so I cant confirm or deny the stories on either side

but I have talked to someone who was a child there during the time and who has stories of ISRAELI Soldiers killing and raping,,, and I have no reason to believe it wasnt possible and that those types of un reported, unofficial, non policy, atrocities could have contributed to how many palistinians feel about the israeli and their military

s1owhand's photo
Sun 12/04/11 08:34 PM
Edited by s1owhand on Sun 12/04/11 08:36 PM












That is like saying that African Americans brought lynchings upon
themselves by moving into "white areas" or by trying to sit at the
lunch counter or ride in the front of the bus.

African Americans did not create hatred towards themselves by
creating conflict. African Americans found themselves perpetually
in conflict because of racial prejudice and discrimination.

It is exactly the same case in Israel. Israel is attacked because
they are not welcome in the neighborhood and this is the origin of
the conflict.

If the Arabs laid down their arms and accepted the Jewish state of
Israel then the conflict is over.
Edited by s1owhand on Sun 12/04/11 12:10 PM


I think you have that scenario backwards.



Terrorism is not land disputes. Terrorism is planting bombs in
buses, cafes, marketplaces and schools. Terrorism is shooting
rockets indiscriminately into cities to try to kill innocent
civilians.

Bus, cafe, market bombs and rocket attacks on cities are the
tactics of Hamas not Israel. This is why Hamas and Hezbollah
are recognized the world over as terrorist organizations and
why Iran who supports them is considered the worlds worst state
sponsor of terrorist attacks.

To try to blame the Israel victims of the terrorist attacks for
the actions of Hamas, Hezbollah and Iran in killing innocent
people is just both laughable and revolting.

No one is buying it.

laugh whoa


Nothing to buy sir.
The facts speak for themselves. anti-Semitism is at a verry high level and its not because people hate jews for being jews.

Anti-Semitism is the charge that Israel flings at anyone who criticizes them. Its a real fraud and irony that Israel treats the Palastinians as Hitler treated Poland.

I think most people once informed are revolted by what the state of Israel is doing. It is verry hard to change peoples conditioning being they are naturaly sympathetic to the Jewish cause, so its a real sad testement to Israels current leadership and the crimes they are commiting in the name of stopping terrorism.


The Israelis are not committing the crimes though!

Israel conducts checkpoints and inspections.

Hamas kills children on buses and social gatherings.

Compare.

I will help you. The terrorists are the ones actively trying to
kill innocent Israeli women and children on purpose. The checkpoints
and inspections at airports and borders are the price we have to
all pay to avoid more hijackings and bombings but these are not
crimes but prudent protective measures.

Bus bombers on the other hand are war crimes.

Most people can distinguish the difference - and should support
the Israelis strongly in their effort to build a safe and non-violent
country for their children. If only the Palestinians would do the same.

Jew-hatred or antisemitism predates 1948 by a good 1000 years.
Jew-hate is the cause of the irrational and self-defeating attacks
against the Jewish State of Israel and likewise the source of the
anguish and misery on both sides. It should stop and the Arabs
have the ability to put it to rest so easily by accepting Israel
as a Jewish state and laying down their arms.



this comes back down to looking at BOTH sides, what they have done to each other

its not enough to just look at today and point out which side is striking without considering the whole HISTORY and the ongoing tensions that have remained because of it

israelis have indeed allowed innocent palistinans to be massacred in the past, so their hands are not free of blood and guilt, blood and guilt that Im sure is not easily forgotten by those who are or have PERSONALLY lived through it and with it as a way of life




As I said before, I am not unsympathetic to the pathetic plight of
the Palestinians but there would be no Palestinians if there had
been acceptance of Israel and repeated unprovoked attacks on Israel
by the Arabs and Arafat etc.

It has never been Israeli policy to kill and murder Palestinians.
Israel has only battled back in self-defense. This is the real history
for those who actually look into it.

Hamas, Hezbollah, Al-Aqsa and their ilk on the other hand have always
had the POLICY of teaching jew-hatred in their schools, and
attacking known civilians on purpose to try to kill people.

When they have laid down their arms as did Jordan and Egypt then
the Israelis have always respected their peace agreements. This
is the truth of the matter.


killing innocent palestinians is not excused by whether or not palestinians 'accepted' Israel

Israeli doesnt have to have an official 'policy' to be engaged in wrongdoing

Israel has allowed innocent palestinians to be slaughtered by others, and I Believe has its own bigots who do their fair share of killing as well

they are too equally human to be so inhumanly perfect as to not have innocent blood on their hands that is just as inexcused as any other loss of innocent blood,,,


Israel has not "allowed" innocent people to be killed.
Terrorist groups are not tolerated in Israel or the U.S.

Not to say that there haven't been defensive wars.
But Israel has not allowed innocent people to be killed
Israel goes out of their way to warn civilians and always
has military targets who are firing at them before returning
fire.

When there have been mistakes, those responsible have been
vigorously prosecuted in Israel.

By contrast, Hamas holds celebrations and gives out candy when
innocent civilians are successfully killed.




and its easy for people to seperate a governments military from a government?


the israeli military has permitted and possibly committed innocent bloodshed in their past,,,,even if israeli 'commissions' may have later found them responsible


look up sabra and shatila and explain why those people should feel like they brought that upon themself or that they should trust and be happy living under israeli military?


I've heard of that...from the Wiki - these were not carried out by
the Israelis or with the consent of the Israelis. This was done by
a Christian militia in Lebanon. In subsequent investigations it was
determined that Israeli forces found out that a massacre was going
on but failed to intervene. Arguments were made that they did not
wish to jeopardize themselves by getting in between the two warring
Lebanese factions. Nevertheless the Israeli government found that
Ariel Sharon and other officers were indirectly responsible for not
interceding to try to limit the bloodshed.

From the Wiki:

The Sabra and Shatila massacre took place in the Sabra and Shatila Palestinian refugee camps in Beirut, Lebanon between September 16 and September 18, 1982, during the Lebanese civil war. Palestinian and Lebanese civilians were massacred in the camps by Christian Lebanese Phalangists while the camp was surrounded by the Israel Defense Force.

In 1982, an independent commission chaired by Sean MacBride concluded that the Israeli authorities or forces were, directly or indirectly, responsible.[4] The Israeli government established the Kahan Commission to investigate, and in early 1983 it found that Israeli military personnel were aware that a massacre was in progress without taking serious steps to stop it. Therefore it regarded Israel as having indirect responsibility. The commission held Ariel Sharon personally responsible for having disregarded the prospect of acts of bloodshed by the Phalangists against the population of the refugee camps and not preventing their entry.[5]

So this was not "allowed" by the Israelis and not condoned by them.
But they did investigate the events themselves and took indirect
responsibility even though it was the Christian Lebanese Phalangists
who perpetrated the attacks. Efforts were made to ensure such things
would not happen again and none have. So at least it was one of those
instances where the Israelis did not tolerate or condone such
killings but took action to prevent such attacks in the future when
this happened 30 years ago.

This is very different from Hamas massacres of innocent Israelis.

When Hamas succeeds in DIRECTLY killing innocent Israelis they throw
candy!



well I wasnt there so I cant confirm or deny the stories on either side

but I have talked to someone who was a child there during the time and who has stories of ISRAELI Soldiers killing and raping,,, and I have no reason to believe it wasnt possible and that those types of un reported, unofficial, non policy, atrocities could have contributed to how many palistinians feel about the israeli and their military


Don't believe everything you hear. There were very vigorous
inquiries by both Israelis and independent investigators but
despite the hysterical claims you may have heard no credible
evidence was ever found that any Israelis participated in the
massacres. If the Israelis had been directly involved there
would have been evidence for sure given that so many wanted to
blame the Israelis any way possible for the Phalangists attack.

Remember the Goldstone report? It was eventually repudiated by
the author (Goldstone) when he found out that the claims of
massacres against the Israelis were false rumors initiated by
members of Hamas who wished to effect anti-Israel and anti-Jewish
animosity with lies.

no photo
Sun 12/04/11 09:21 PM


..does the actions of a few reflect the thoughts of all,does the actions of many reflect the thoughts of the one...spock

msharmony's photo
Sun 12/04/11 11:35 PM













That is like saying that African Americans brought lynchings upon
themselves by moving into "white areas" or by trying to sit at the
lunch counter or ride in the front of the bus.

African Americans did not create hatred towards themselves by
creating conflict. African Americans found themselves perpetually
in conflict because of racial prejudice and discrimination.

It is exactly the same case in Israel. Israel is attacked because
they are not welcome in the neighborhood and this is the origin of
the conflict.

If the Arabs laid down their arms and accepted the Jewish state of
Israel then the conflict is over.
Edited by s1owhand on Sun 12/04/11 12:10 PM


I think you have that scenario backwards.



Terrorism is not land disputes. Terrorism is planting bombs in
buses, cafes, marketplaces and schools. Terrorism is shooting
rockets indiscriminately into cities to try to kill innocent
civilians.

Bus, cafe, market bombs and rocket attacks on cities are the
tactics of Hamas not Israel. This is why Hamas and Hezbollah
are recognized the world over as terrorist organizations and
why Iran who supports them is considered the worlds worst state
sponsor of terrorist attacks.

To try to blame the Israel victims of the terrorist attacks for
the actions of Hamas, Hezbollah and Iran in killing innocent
people is just both laughable and revolting.

No one is buying it.

laugh whoa


Nothing to buy sir.
The facts speak for themselves. anti-Semitism is at a verry high level and its not because people hate jews for being jews.

Anti-Semitism is the charge that Israel flings at anyone who criticizes them. Its a real fraud and irony that Israel treats the Palastinians as Hitler treated Poland.

I think most people once informed are revolted by what the state of Israel is doing. It is verry hard to change peoples conditioning being they are naturaly sympathetic to the Jewish cause, so its a real sad testement to Israels current leadership and the crimes they are commiting in the name of stopping terrorism.


The Israelis are not committing the crimes though!

Israel conducts checkpoints and inspections.

Hamas kills children on buses and social gatherings.

Compare.

I will help you. The terrorists are the ones actively trying to
kill innocent Israeli women and children on purpose. The checkpoints
and inspections at airports and borders are the price we have to
all pay to avoid more hijackings and bombings but these are not
crimes but prudent protective measures.

Bus bombers on the other hand are war crimes.

Most people can distinguish the difference - and should support
the Israelis strongly in their effort to build a safe and non-violent
country for their children. If only the Palestinians would do the same.

Jew-hatred or antisemitism predates 1948 by a good 1000 years.
Jew-hate is the cause of the irrational and self-defeating attacks
against the Jewish State of Israel and likewise the source of the
anguish and misery on both sides. It should stop and the Arabs
have the ability to put it to rest so easily by accepting Israel
as a Jewish state and laying down their arms.



this comes back down to looking at BOTH sides, what they have done to each other

its not enough to just look at today and point out which side is striking without considering the whole HISTORY and the ongoing tensions that have remained because of it

israelis have indeed allowed innocent palistinans to be massacred in the past, so their hands are not free of blood and guilt, blood and guilt that Im sure is not easily forgotten by those who are or have PERSONALLY lived through it and with it as a way of life




As I said before, I am not unsympathetic to the pathetic plight of
the Palestinians but there would be no Palestinians if there had
been acceptance of Israel and repeated unprovoked attacks on Israel
by the Arabs and Arafat etc.

It has never been Israeli policy to kill and murder Palestinians.
Israel has only battled back in self-defense. This is the real history
for those who actually look into it.

Hamas, Hezbollah, Al-Aqsa and their ilk on the other hand have always
had the POLICY of teaching jew-hatred in their schools, and
attacking known civilians on purpose to try to kill people.

When they have laid down their arms as did Jordan and Egypt then
the Israelis have always respected their peace agreements. This
is the truth of the matter.


killing innocent palestinians is not excused by whether or not palestinians 'accepted' Israel

Israeli doesnt have to have an official 'policy' to be engaged in wrongdoing

Israel has allowed innocent palestinians to be slaughtered by others, and I Believe has its own bigots who do their fair share of killing as well

they are too equally human to be so inhumanly perfect as to not have innocent blood on their hands that is just as inexcused as any other loss of innocent blood,,,


Israel has not "allowed" innocent people to be killed.
Terrorist groups are not tolerated in Israel or the U.S.

Not to say that there haven't been defensive wars.
But Israel has not allowed innocent people to be killed
Israel goes out of their way to warn civilians and always
has military targets who are firing at them before returning
fire.

When there have been mistakes, those responsible have been
vigorously prosecuted in Israel.

By contrast, Hamas holds celebrations and gives out candy when
innocent civilians are successfully killed.




and its easy for people to seperate a governments military from a government?


the israeli military has permitted and possibly committed innocent bloodshed in their past,,,,even if israeli 'commissions' may have later found them responsible


look up sabra and shatila and explain why those people should feel like they brought that upon themself or that they should trust and be happy living under israeli military?


I've heard of that...from the Wiki - these were not carried out by
the Israelis or with the consent of the Israelis. This was done by
a Christian militia in Lebanon. In subsequent investigations it was
determined that Israeli forces found out that a massacre was going
on but failed to intervene. Arguments were made that they did not
wish to jeopardize themselves by getting in between the two warring
Lebanese factions. Nevertheless the Israeli government found that
Ariel Sharon and other officers were indirectly responsible for not
interceding to try to limit the bloodshed.

From the Wiki:

The Sabra and Shatila massacre took place in the Sabra and Shatila Palestinian refugee camps in Beirut, Lebanon between September 16 and September 18, 1982, during the Lebanese civil war. Palestinian and Lebanese civilians were massacred in the camps by Christian Lebanese Phalangists while the camp was surrounded by the Israel Defense Force.

In 1982, an independent commission chaired by Sean MacBride concluded that the Israeli authorities or forces were, directly or indirectly, responsible.[4] The Israeli government established the Kahan Commission to investigate, and in early 1983 it found that Israeli military personnel were aware that a massacre was in progress without taking serious steps to stop it. Therefore it regarded Israel as having indirect responsibility. The commission held Ariel Sharon personally responsible for having disregarded the prospect of acts of bloodshed by the Phalangists against the population of the refugee camps and not preventing their entry.[5]

So this was not "allowed" by the Israelis and not condoned by them.
But they did investigate the events themselves and took indirect
responsibility even though it was the Christian Lebanese Phalangists
who perpetrated the attacks. Efforts were made to ensure such things
would not happen again and none have. So at least it was one of those
instances where the Israelis did not tolerate or condone such
killings but took action to prevent such attacks in the future when
this happened 30 years ago.

This is very different from Hamas massacres of innocent Israelis.

When Hamas succeeds in DIRECTLY killing innocent Israelis they throw
candy!



well I wasnt there so I cant confirm or deny the stories on either side

but I have talked to someone who was a child there during the time and who has stories of ISRAELI Soldiers killing and raping,,, and I have no reason to believe it wasnt possible and that those types of un reported, unofficial, non policy, atrocities could have contributed to how many palistinians feel about the israeli and their military


Don't believe everything you hear. There were very vigorous
inquiries by both Israelis and independent investigators but
despite the hysterical claims you may have heard no credible
evidence was ever found that any Israelis participated in the
massacres. If the Israelis had been directly involved there
would have been evidence for sure given that so many wanted to
blame the Israelis any way possible for the Phalangists attack.

Remember the Goldstone report? It was eventually repudiated by
the author (Goldstone) when he found out that the claims of
massacres against the Israelis were false rumors initiated by
members of Hamas who wished to effect anti-Israel and anti-Jewish
animosity with lies.



just as I dont assume that everything reported is true, I also dont assume that whatever is not 'reported' or found isnt true

I have less reason not to trust the stories I was told by someeone who actually GREW UP there, than I do the government which is accused of being accomplice to such things,,,,

there is also no 'evidence' found that the Bush admin allowed 9/11 to happen, but I have every reason to believe they did


Bestinshow's photo
Mon 12/05/11 01:22 AM
THE LAVON AFFAIR
IS HISTORY REPEATING ITSELF?
In 1954, Israeli agents working in Egypt planted bombs in several buildings, including a United States diplomatic facility, and left evidence behind implicating Arabs as the culprits. The ruse would have worked, had not one of the bombs detonated prematurely, allowing the Egyptians to capture and identify one of the bombers, which in turn led to the round up of an Israeli spy ring.
Some of the spies were from Israel, while others were recruited from the local Jewish population. Israel responded to the scandal with claims in the media that there was no spy ring, that it was all a hoax perpetrated by "anti-Semites".


Honorable Chairman, members of the Knesset. The trial that started two days ago in Egypt against 13 Jews is disturbing everybody and brings about an emotional turmoil and deep bitterness in the country [Israel] and in the whole Jewish world. Indeed, it must cause concern and anxiety in the hearts of all justice-seeking people around the universe. The Committee for Foreign Affairs and Security has alreadv dealt and will further deal with this serious issue. But at this stage I feel obliged to make a short announcement. In my speech in the Knesset on November 15 1 said "The uncontrolled behavior of' Egypt . . . does not indicate . . . that its leadership . . . is seeking moderate approaches and peace. How far Egypt is from this spirit [of moderation and peace] can be learned from the plot woven in Alexandria, the show-trial which is being organized there against a group of Jews who became victims of false accusations of espionage, and who, it seems, are being threatened and tortured in order to extract from them confessions in imaginary crimes." This gloomy assumption was verified and was revealed to be a cruel and shocking fact, by the declaration of the accused Victorin Ninyo in the military court in Cairo that was published this morning. [According to this declaration] she was tortured during the interrogation which preceded the trial and by that torture they extracted from her false confessions to crimes which did not happen. The government of Israel strongly protests this practice, which revives in the Middle East the methods used by the Inquisition in the Middle Ages. The government of Israel strongly rejects the false accusations of the general Egyptian prosecution, which relegates to the Israeli authorities horrible deeds and diabolic conspiracies against the security and the international relations of Egypt. From this stand we have protested many times in the past persecution and false accusations of Jews in various countries. We see in the innocent Jews accused by the Egyptian authorities of such severe crimes, victims of vicious hostility to the State of Israel and the Jewish people. If their crime is being Zionist and devoted to Israel, millions of Jews around the world share this crime. We do not think that the rulers of Egypt should be interested in being responsible for shedding Jewish blood. We call upon all those who believe in peace, stability and human relations among nations to prevent fatal injustice.
But as the public trial progressed, it was evident that Israel had indeed been behind the bombing. Eventually, Israeli's Defense Minister Pinhas Lavon was brought down by the scandal, although it appears that he was himself the victim of a frame-up by the real authors of the bombing project, code named "Operation Susannah."

It is therefore a fact that Israel has a prior history of setting off bombs with the intent to blame Arabs for them.

This is not the only example of a "False Flag" operation designed to trick the United States into attacking Israel's enemies. According to Victor Ostrovsky, a Mossad defector now living in Canada, Ronald Reagan was tricked into bombing Libya by means of a radio transmitter smuggled into Tripoli by the Mossad, which broadcast messages designed to fool the United States into thinking Libya was about to launch a massive terror attack on the west. On the basis of this fake evidence, the US bombed Libya, killing Khadaffi's daughter.

The Jews of Iraq is a story by a Jewish writer revealing yet another false flag operation where Israelis used bombs and planted the blame on Arabs

More recently, Captain Ward Boston, who served as senior legal counsel for the Navy's Court of Inquiry into the Israeli attack on USS Liberty, has come forward to report that the Court of Inquiry was ORDERED to conclude that the attack was an accident by President Lyndon Johnson. In hindsight, given the use of unmarked aircraft and boats by Israel during the actual attack, it appears that Israel intended to sink the US ship and frame Egypt for the attack, tricking the US into the war against Egypt.
http://whatreallyhappened.com/

Conrad_73's photo
Mon 12/05/11 01:27 AM

THE LAVON AFFAIR
IS HISTORY REPEATING ITSELF?
In 1954, Israeli agents working in Egypt planted bombs in several buildings, including a United States diplomatic facility, and left evidence behind implicating Arabs as the culprits. The ruse would have worked, had not one of the bombs detonated prematurely, allowing the Egyptians to capture and identify one of the bombers, which in turn led to the round up of an Israeli spy ring.
Some of the spies were from Israel, while others were recruited from the local Jewish population. Israel responded to the scandal with claims in the media that there was no spy ring, that it was all a hoax perpetrated by "anti-Semites".


Honorable Chairman, members of the Knesset. The trial that started two days ago in Egypt against 13 Jews is disturbing everybody and brings about an emotional turmoil and deep bitterness in the country [Israel] and in the whole Jewish world. Indeed, it must cause concern and anxiety in the hearts of all justice-seeking people around the universe. The Committee for Foreign Affairs and Security has alreadv dealt and will further deal with this serious issue. But at this stage I feel obliged to make a short announcement. In my speech in the Knesset on November 15 1 said "The uncontrolled behavior of' Egypt . . . does not indicate . . . that its leadership . . . is seeking moderate approaches and peace. How far Egypt is from this spirit [of moderation and peace] can be learned from the plot woven in Alexandria, the show-trial which is being organized there against a group of Jews who became victims of false accusations of espionage, and who, it seems, are being threatened and tortured in order to extract from them confessions in imaginary crimes." This gloomy assumption was verified and was revealed to be a cruel and shocking fact, by the declaration of the accused Victorin Ninyo in the military court in Cairo that was published this morning. [According to this declaration] she was tortured during the interrogation which preceded the trial and by that torture they extracted from her false confessions to crimes which did not happen. The government of Israel strongly protests this practice, which revives in the Middle East the methods used by the Inquisition in the Middle Ages. The government of Israel strongly rejects the false accusations of the general Egyptian prosecution, which relegates to the Israeli authorities horrible deeds and diabolic conspiracies against the security and the international relations of Egypt. From this stand we have protested many times in the past persecution and false accusations of Jews in various countries. We see in the innocent Jews accused by the Egyptian authorities of such severe crimes, victims of vicious hostility to the State of Israel and the Jewish people. If their crime is being Zionist and devoted to Israel, millions of Jews around the world share this crime. We do not think that the rulers of Egypt should be interested in being responsible for shedding Jewish blood. We call upon all those who believe in peace, stability and human relations among nations to prevent fatal injustice.
But as the public trial progressed, it was evident that Israel had indeed been behind the bombing. Eventually, Israeli's Defense Minister Pinhas Lavon was brought down by the scandal, although it appears that he was himself the victim of a frame-up by the real authors of the bombing project, code named "Operation Susannah."

It is therefore a fact that Israel has a prior history of setting off bombs with the intent to blame Arabs for them.

This is not the only example of a "False Flag" operation designed to trick the United States into attacking Israel's enemies. According to Victor Ostrovsky, a Mossad defector now living in Canada, Ronald Reagan was tricked into bombing Libya by means of a radio transmitter smuggled into Tripoli by the Mossad, which broadcast messages designed to fool the United States into thinking Libya was about to launch a massive terror attack on the west. On the basis of this fake evidence, the US bombed Libya, killing Khadaffi's daughter.

The Jews of Iraq is a story by a Jewish writer revealing yet another false flag operation where Israelis used bombs and planted the blame on Arabs

More recently, Captain Ward Boston, who served as senior legal counsel for the Navy's Court of Inquiry into the Israeli attack on USS Liberty, has come forward to report that the Court of Inquiry was ORDERED to conclude that the attack was an accident by President Lyndon Johnson. In hindsight, given the use of unmarked aircraft and boats by Israel during the actual attack, it appears that Israel intended to sink the US ship and frame Egypt for the attack, tricking the US into the war against Egypt.
http://whatreallyhappened.com/

rofl rofl rofl

1 2 4 6 7 8 9 18 19