100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: ZIONISTS WON'T LET YOU SEE THIS ON YOUR TV | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
It is called Freedom of speech. The opposition is against a political movement called Zionism. They (statements and news) are backed up with references and news sources and books. You can believe anything you choose and nobody expects you to agree with our opinions, but don't try to get in the way of freedom of speech. I don't necessarily equate dissemination of propaganda as something to be afforded the protections of the first amendment.. I would certainly have no issue with you stating that it's your opinion, but when you start throwing around its a known fact or there is a consensus.. then I begin to take issue with it. I have little interest in this particular subject, but this reminds me of the 9-11 conspiracy threads that eventually end up being debated the same way.. Take all the issue you want. That is your freedom to do so. But the dissemination of "propaganda" is what you see every day on the national news in my opinion. What you think is "known fact" and what I think is "known fact" can be debated. If you don't believe what is being said, and if you don't agree with 9-11 theories that is certainly your right to do so. I have look closely at the official spin and I don't buy it. I've made up my mind that it is not the truth. But I have a reason for what I say and I have sources that I respect so I take issue with you telling me that I am spreading "propaganda." I find it very interesting that when hate threads about Muslims get started nobody seems to take issue with that. I do not support extreme Islamist any more than I support extreme Zionists. I just feel that both sides of the story need to be told. I usually always have references or links to consider. I don't pull this stuff out of my hat. I don't mind intelligent debate. But I do mind people who continually try to silence me just because they don't believe or agree with what I am saying. If you don't believe it, and if you don't want to hear it, just don't read the thread. Propaganda is everywhere. I see it on both sides of the issue all the time. It is up to the individual to try to ascertain what it true and what is not. I have yet to hear a valid argument in favor of Zionism or a valid reason why anyone should support it. Have you got any? This isn't as simple as saying you either support zionism or you don't Call me crazy, but I look at it as whether you support tolerance or intolerance. Agreements were made agreements were broken on both sides. It didn't help that the gutless cowards that created the whole mess decided to wash their hands of it when the situation on the ground was toxic and explosive. There is no debating the fact that at the end of world war 1 there was a mandate created for palestine and it was agreed to by both sides.. It clearly states in the preamble that the mandate includes a national homeland for Jews in palestine.. There is no debating that.. What happened after that is a clusterf**k and there are many people and nations to blame. Putting all this on the Jews is disingenuous and factually false.. My personal belief is that the One State solution offered in the Mandate was the way to go is the way to go and will be the only way to stop them from killing eachother. In response to: Putting all this on the Jews is disingenuous and factually false.
No one is putting this on "the Jews." Our own British forefathers (whom we fought a civil war against for our own freedom) can be totally blamed for caving in to pressure from Baron Rothschild (Walter Rothschild, 2nd Baron Rothschild). The Balfour Declaration was nothing more than one crime family handing a piece of his empire over to another crime family to do with anything they wished with it. Sort of like saying: Go forth and rape and plunder that land, we will not interfere. That is what the Balfour Declaration was. The Balfour Declaration of 1917 (dated 2 November 1917) was a letter from the British Foreign Secretary Arthur James Balfour to Baron Rothschild (Walter Rothschild, 2nd Baron Rothschild), a leader of the British Jewish community, for transmission to the Zionist Federation of Great Britain and Ireland. His Majesty's government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country. The statement was issued through the efforts of Chaim Weizmann and Nahum Sokolow, the principal Zionist leaders based in London; as they had asked for the reconstitution of Palestine as "the" Jewish national home, the declaration fell short of Zionist expectations. The "Balfour Declaration" was later incorporated into the Sèvres peace treaty with Turkey and the Mandate for Palestine. The original document is kept at the British Library. My ancestors were from Norway.. I know what the Balfour declaration was.. I also know what Sykes-Picot was.. I also know what the debate at the League Of Nations was.. What you neglected to include was that the final draft of the mandate was approved by the arab representatives at the convention.. You don't find that as important? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Albert Pike received a vision, which he described in a letter that he wrote to Mazzini, dated August 15, 1871. This letter graphically outlined plans for three world wars that were seen as necessary to bring about the One World Order, and we can marvel at how accurately it has predicted events that have already taken place All wars are planned and executed for a single purpose. There are those who strongly believe that ultimately the world must fall under the same governance. There are plans being made and implicated to eventually dissolve the boarders in North and South America and Canada. In the future, any separation will be nothing more than the way our United States are separated. They will all fall under the same world governance. Are you talking about The North American Union? Is that what they call it? Yep... I guess that is what I'm talking about. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Jeanniebean
on
Wed 11/30/11 12:17 PM
|
|
It is called Freedom of speech. The opposition is against a political movement called Zionism. They (statements and news) are backed up with references and news sources and books. You can believe anything you choose and nobody expects you to agree with our opinions, but don't try to get in the way of freedom of speech. I don't necessarily equate dissemination of propaganda as something to be afforded the protections of the first amendment.. I would certainly have no issue with you stating that it's your opinion, but when you start throwing around its a known fact or there is a consensus.. then I begin to take issue with it. I have little interest in this particular subject, but this reminds me of the 9-11 conspiracy threads that eventually end up being debated the same way.. Take all the issue you want. That is your freedom to do so. But the dissemination of "propaganda" is what you see every day on the national news in my opinion. What you think is "known fact" and what I think is "known fact" can be debated. If you don't believe what is being said, and if you don't agree with 9-11 theories that is certainly your right to do so. I have look closely at the official spin and I don't buy it. I've made up my mind that it is not the truth. But I have a reason for what I say and I have sources that I respect so I take issue with you telling me that I am spreading "propaganda." I find it very interesting that when hate threads about Muslims get started nobody seems to take issue with that. I do not support extreme Islamist any more than I support extreme Zionists. I just feel that both sides of the story need to be told. I usually always have references or links to consider. I don't pull this stuff out of my hat. I don't mind intelligent debate. But I do mind people who continually try to silence me just because they don't believe or agree with what I am saying. If you don't believe it, and if you don't want to hear it, just don't read the thread. Propaganda is everywhere. I see it on both sides of the issue all the time. It is up to the individual to try to ascertain what it true and what is not. I have yet to hear a valid argument in favor of Zionism or a valid reason why anyone should support it. Have you got any? This isn't as simple as saying you either support zionism or you don't Call me crazy, but I look at it as whether you support tolerance or intolerance. Agreements were made agreements were broken on both sides. It didn't help that the gutless cowards that created the whole mess decided to wash their hands of it when the situation on the ground was toxic and explosive. There is no debating the fact that at the end of world war 1 there was a mandate created for palestine and it was agreed to by both sides.. It clearly states in the preamble that the mandate includes a national homeland for Jews in palestine.. There is no debating that.. What happened after that is a clusterf**k and there are many people and nations to blame. Putting all this on the Jews is disingenuous and factually false.. My personal belief is that the One State solution offered in the Mandate was the way to go is the way to go and will be the only way to stop them from killing eachother. In response to: Putting all this on the Jews is disingenuous and factually false.
No one is putting this on "the Jews." Our own British forefathers (whom we fought a civil war against for our own freedom) can be totally blamed for caving in to pressure from Baron Rothschild (Walter Rothschild, 2nd Baron Rothschild). The Balfour Declaration was nothing more than one crime family handing a piece of his empire over to another crime family to do with anything they wished with it. Sort of like saying: Go forth and rape and plunder that land, we will not interfere. That is what the Balfour Declaration was. The Balfour Declaration of 1917 (dated 2 November 1917) was a letter from the British Foreign Secretary Arthur James Balfour to Baron Rothschild (Walter Rothschild, 2nd Baron Rothschild), a leader of the British Jewish community, for transmission to the Zionist Federation of Great Britain and Ireland. His Majesty's government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country. The statement was issued through the efforts of Chaim Weizmann and Nahum Sokolow, the principal Zionist leaders based in London; as they had asked for the reconstitution of Palestine as "the" Jewish national home, the declaration fell short of Zionist expectations. The "Balfour Declaration" was later incorporated into the Sèvres peace treaty with Turkey and the Mandate for Palestine. The original document is kept at the British Library. My ancestors were from Norway.. I know what the Balfour declaration was.. I also know what Sykes-Picot was.. I also know what the debate at the League Of Nations was.. What you neglected to include was that the final draft of the mandate was approved by the arab representatives at the convention.. You don't find that as important? I bet the people didn't vote on it. 
I don't have much faith in so-called representatives, but then the American Indians were promised a lot of things too, and given pretty trinkets for their land. Then made to walk the trail of tears. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The North American Union (NAU) is a theoretical economic union, in some instances also a political union, of Canada, Mexico, and the United States. The concept is loosely based on the European Union, occasionally including a common currency called the Amero or the North American Dollar.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The North American Union (NAU) is a theoretical economic union, in some instances also a political union, of Canada, Mexico, and the United States. The concept is loosely based on the European Union, occasionally including a common currency called the Amero or the North American Dollar. What do you mean by "theoretical?" What does that actually mean? Sorry to be getting off topic. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yep just a group of crime families dividing up the spoils.
Sykes–Picot Agreement From wiki:
The Sykes–Picot Agreement of 1916 was a secret agreement between the governments of the United Kingdom and France,[1] with the assent of Imperial Russia, defining their respective spheres of influence and control in Western Asia after the expected downfall of the Ottoman Empire during World War I. It effectively divided the Arab provinces of the Ottoman Empire outside the Arabian peninsula into areas of future British and French control or influence.[2] The agreement was concluded on 16 May 1916.[3] The terms were negotiated by the French diplomat François Georges-Picot and British Sir Mark Sykes. The Russian Tsarist government was a minor party to the Sykes-Picot agreement and when, following the Russian Revolution of October 1917, the Bolsheviks exposed the agreement, 'the British were embarrassed, the Arabs dismayed and the Turks delighted.' |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Jeanniebean
on
Wed 11/30/11 01:05 PM
|
|
So is that the excepted way of the world? The big fish eats the little fish? Ownership by conquest?
If you want something, just take it? Shall we just say that's the way it is in this world? If so, please don't villinize the people you are stealing from if they decide to fight back to protect their home and what is theirs with stick and stones or anything they can get their hands on. And don't try to justify your actions by making laws and drawing up documents. Thieves are thieves, and apparently to the victor go the spoils. This is the way of the world, I accept that. But don't continue to whine that people hate and persecute you. I "own" and live on land taken from the comanche Indians. Maybe after my parents pass away I'll give it back to them or make it into a sovereign reservation and build a casino on it. I wonder if that's possible. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Optomistic69
on
Wed 11/30/11 01:25 PM
|
|
The North American Union (NAU) is a theoretical economic union, in some instances also a political union, of Canada, Mexico, and the United States. The concept is loosely based on the European Union, occasionally including a common currency called the Amero or the North American Dollar. What do you mean by "theoretical?" What does that actually mean? Sorry to be getting off topic. You Said Every major war I, II and III have, at its foundation, religious and Zionist roots. I mentioned Albert Pike...3 world wars You mentioned ...There are plans being made and implicated to eventually dissolve the boarders in North and South America and Canada NAU North American Union and I came up with this The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the "agentur" of the "Illuminati" between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other I can link everything 
If its off topic then I apologize 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The North American Union (NAU) is a theoretical economic union, in some instances also a political union, of Canada, Mexico, and the United States. The concept is loosely based on the European Union, occasionally including a common currency called the Amero or the North American Dollar. What do you mean by "theoretical?" What does that actually mean? Sorry to be getting off topic. You Said Every major war I, II and III have, at its foundation, religious and Zionist roots. I mentioned Albert Pike...3 world wars You mentioned ...There are plans being made and implicated to eventually dissolve the boarders in North and South America and Canada NAU North American Union and I came up with this The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the "agentur" of the "Illuminati" between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other I can link everything
If its off topic then I apologize
Links bad! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com/2011/08/news-from-egypt-damn-those-jews-are.html
Friday, August 19, 2011 News From Egypt, DAMN Those Jews are GOOD! There is an old story about a Jewish man who goes to his rabbi to let him know he is converting to Christianity and joining a Neo-Nazi party. Shocked the rabbi says, "But Bernie, you are such an observant Jew, you keep kosher, go to Synagogue and pray 3x every day, you are our number one Torah reader. what would make you do something like convert and become a Nazi?" "Well Rabbi," says Bernie, "I come to Synagogue and and hear talk to the other Jews, all I hear is bad stuff, the Arabs hate us, the Europeans hate Jews, the President hates us. I hear the same thing, over and over and over. "But the Nazi party?" Says the Rabbi? "You Bet," says Bernie, "I went to one meeting and there was nothing bad, all they kept saying was the Jews own the Banks, the Jews run the government, the Jews own the media and Hollywood. It made me so proud. I know how Bernie feels especially when reading about Antisemitism in Egypt. They are so creative. Sure they pass along the hateful propaganda that Jew own the media, Hollywood, banks and control the US government, but they also come up with such unusual ways to slander the Jewish people. Remember what happened last December when Egyptian swimmers were attacked by sharks. An Egyptian official claimed that a shark that killed one person and left four others injured in Egypt could have been placed there by agents from Mossad, the Israeli spy agency. It wasn't some low level official either, Mohamed Abdel Fadil Shousha, the regional governor, claimed it was not "out of the question" that Israel could have planned the attacks on tourists to dent the Egyptian economy. After reading that story, all I could think was "Damn We're good, even though I knew the story was nonsense. The latest news from Egypt contains another one of those "Damn We're Good" moments, combined with a little bit of nonsense from Adam Sandler's movie, You Don't Mess with the Zohan. Israeli citizen Ofir Harrari, recently accused by Egypt of spying for Israel, was allegedly involved in a complicated scheme intended to harm Egyptian reproduction abilities, Egypt's official state paper Al-Ahram has claimed. Harrari, accused by Egypt of being an agent of the Mossad, is set be tried in absentia on charges of "spying for a foreign country with the purpose of harming Egyptian national interest," news agency MENA reported on Sunday. "According to the public prosecutor's office's investigation, 'Mossad agent Ofir Harrari' instructed Jordanian Ibrahim abu-Zaid to set up a company in Egypt which would exclusively import an Israeli hair product, for both men and women, which causes infertility. This in order to completely destroy Egyptian reproduction abilities," Al-Ahram states. Gee whiz, the Mossad messing with Egyptian hair products as to make Egyptians sterile. Isn't it great how one of only two nation's that has made peace with the Jewish State has such great respect for the Jewish people that they make up stories just to show our brilliance? Damn, Those Jews are good! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
s1owhand
on
Wed 11/30/11 05:28 PM
|
|
So is that the excepted way of the world? The big fish eats the little fish? Ownership by conquest? If you want something, just take it? Shall we just say that's the way it is in this world? If so, please don't villinize the people you are stealing from if they decide to fight back to protect their home and what is theirs with stick and stones or anything they can get their hands on. And don't try to justify your actions by making laws and drawing up documents. Thieves are thieves, and apparently to the victor go the spoils. This is the way of the world, I accept that. But don't continue to whine that people hate and persecute you. I "own" and live on land taken from the comanche Indians. Maybe after my parents pass away I'll give it back to them or make it into a sovereign reservation and build a casino on it. I wonder if that's possible. Yes - The Palestinian Arabs should not be allowed to try to take Israel away from its indigenous people the Zionists who founded the first documented country there 3000 years ago or so and were later driven mostly from the areas named for them Like Hebron and Judea by early colonizers like the Romans and Babylonians. Fortunately many Jews remained and always welcomed their dispersed relatives back to their land of origin even when the rest of the world turned their backs and shut their borders. The Israelis are the American Indians of the Middle East but they have miraculously re-united and re-established their homeland and have made it a wonderful place to live - an oasis of learning amid the swamps of theocratic thuggery and terrorists surrounding them.
On land which was safeguarded for them as a haven from violence as a result of the division of the Ottoman Empire via the allies after World War I. This is the Is-reality! http://youtu.be/lYJd5pT1T78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So is that the excepted way of the world? The big fish eats the little fish? Ownership by conquest? If you want something, just take it? Shall we just say that's the way it is in this world? If so, please don't villinize the people you are stealing from if they decide to fight back to protect their home and what is theirs with stick and stones or anything they can get their hands on. And don't try to justify your actions by making laws and drawing up documents. Thieves are thieves, and apparently to the victor go the spoils. This is the way of the world, I accept that. But don't continue to whine that people hate and persecute you. I "own" and live on land taken from the comanche Indians. Maybe after my parents pass away I'll give it back to them or make it into a sovereign reservation and build a casino on it. I wonder if that's possible. Yes - The Palestinian Arabs should not be allowed to try to take Israel away from its original settlers the Zionists who founded the first documented country there 3000 years ago or so and were later driven mostly from the areas named for them Like Hebron and Judea by early colonizers like the Romans and Babylonians. The Israelis are the American Indians of the Middle East but they have miraculously re-united and re-established their homeland and have made it a wonderful place to live - an oasis of learning amid the swamps of theocratic thuggery and terrorists surrounding them.
On land which was granted to them from the allies after World War I. This is the Is-reality! http://youtu.be/lYJd5pT1T78 Unsubstantiated rumors, just like the myths of the Bible which can't be proven. And it was 3000 years ago. Give me a break. They aren't the same people. What a crock of myth and propaganda. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So is that the excepted way of the world? The big fish eats the little fish? Ownership by conquest? If you want something, just take it? Shall we just say that's the way it is in this world? If so, please don't villinize the people you are stealing from if they decide to fight back to protect their home and what is theirs with stick and stones or anything they can get their hands on. And don't try to justify your actions by making laws and drawing up documents. Thieves are thieves, and apparently to the victor go the spoils. This is the way of the world, I accept that. But don't continue to whine that people hate and persecute you. I "own" and live on land taken from the comanche Indians. Maybe after my parents pass away I'll give it back to them or make it into a sovereign reservation and build a casino on it. I wonder if that's possible. Yes - The Palestinian Arabs should not be allowed to try to take Israel away from its indigenous people the Zionists who founded the first documented country there 3000 years ago or so and were later driven mostly from the areas named for them Like Hebron and Judea by early colonizers like the Romans and Babylonians. Fortunately many Jews remained and always welcomed their dispersed relatives back to their land of origin even when the rest of the world turned their backs and shut their borders. The Israelis are the American Indians of the Middle East but they have miraculously re-united and re-established their homeland and have made it a wonderful place to live - an oasis of learning amid the swamps of theocratic thuggery and terrorists surrounding them.
On land which was safeguarded for them as a haven from violence as a result of the division of the Ottoman Empire via the allies after World War I. This is the Is-reality! http://youtu.be/lYJd5pT1T78 Unsubstantiated rumors, just like the myths of the Bible which can't be proven. And it was 3000 years ago. Give me a break. They aren't the same people. What a crock of myth and propaganda. Hahahahaha....Israel is the oldest and best documented history in the history of history!
There is no denying the existence of ancient Israel!
Our earliest historical documents of the Western world discuss the state of Israel and the subsequent forced exiles of its Jewish Zionist founders to whom Jews all over the world now trace their ideological and genetic identity. Can't fight DNA evidence or all the historians from antiquity onward.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Jeanniebean
on
Wed 11/30/11 05:48 PM
|
|
Not at all convincing.
(And I have never seen any DNA evidence.) That's just propaganda, and it is irrelevant of anything today anyway. Just because you think something people called "Israel" existed long time ago because of a fraudulent plagiarized book called the Bible or some other scripture, does not mean that anyone today has a right to invade and steal land from the current occupants by way of war and conquest. And if it does, then the people who waged the war to occupy the land should stop complaining if people living there resist their occupation by hating them and defending their home. Its just like I said. British crime families were dividing up territory they feel they own by war and conquest under the pressure of Baron Rothschild. That is the reality. It is time for Zionists to stop claiming to be Jews and stop whining about being hated and persecuted. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
s1owhand
on
Wed 11/30/11 06:18 PM
|
|
It is called Freedom of speech. The opposition is against a political movement called Zionism. They (statements and news) are backed up with references and news sources and books. You can believe anything you choose and nobody expects you to agree with our opinions, but don't try to get in the way of freedom of speech. I don't necessarily equate dissemination of propaganda as something to be afforded the protections of the first amendment.. I would certainly have no issue with you stating that it's your opinion, but when you start throwing around its a known fact or there is a consensus.. then I begin to take issue with it. I have little interest in this particular subject, but this reminds me of the 9-11 conspiracy threads that eventually end up being debated the same way.. Take all the issue you want. That is your freedom to do so. But the dissemination of "propaganda" is what you see every day on the national news in my opinion. What you think is "known fact" and what I think is "known fact" can be debated. If you don't believe what is being said, and if you don't agree with 9-11 theories that is certainly your right to do so. I have look closely at the official spin and I don't buy it. I've made up my mind that it is not the truth. But I have a reason for what I say and I have sources that I respect so I take issue with you telling me that I am spreading "propaganda." I find it very interesting that when hate threads about Muslims get started nobody seems to take issue with that. I do not support extreme Islamist any more than I support extreme Zionists. I just feel that both sides of the story need to be told. I usually always have references or links to consider. I don't pull this stuff out of my hat. I don't mind intelligent debate. But I do mind people who continually try to silence me just because they don't believe or agree with what I am saying. If you don't believe it, and if you don't want to hear it, just don't read the thread. Propaganda is everywhere. I see it on both sides of the issue all the time. It is up to the individual to try to ascertain what it true and what is not. I have yet to hear a valid argument in favor of Zionism or a valid reason why anyone should support it. Have you got any? This isn't as simple as saying you either support zionism or you don't Call me crazy, but I look at it as whether you support tolerance or intolerance. Agreements were made agreements were broken on both sides. It didn't help that the gutless cowards that created the whole mess decided to wash their hands of it when the situation on the ground was toxic and explosive. There is no debating the fact that at the end of world war 1 there was a mandate created for palestine and it was agreed to by both sides.. It clearly states in the preamble that the mandate includes a national homeland for Jews in palestine.. There is no debating that.. What happened after that is a clusterf**k and there are many people and nations to blame. Putting all this on the Jews is disingenuous and factually false.. My personal belief is that the One State solution offered in the Mandate was the way to go is the way to go and will be the only way to stop them from killing eachother. In response to: Putting all this on the Jews is disingenuous and factually false.
No one is putting this on "the Jews." Our own British forefathers (whom we fought a civil war against for our own freedom) can be totally blamed for caving in to pressure from Baron Rothschild (Walter Rothschild, 2nd Baron Rothschild). The Balfour Declaration was nothing more than one crime family handing a piece of his empire over to another crime family to do with anything they wished with it. Sort of like saying: Go forth and rape and plunder that land, we will not interfere. That is what the Balfour Declaration was. The Balfour Declaration of 1917 (dated 2 November 1917) was a letter from the British Foreign Secretary Arthur James Balfour to Baron Rothschild (Walter Rothschild, 2nd Baron Rothschild), a leader of the British Jewish community, for transmission to the Zionist Federation of Great Britain and Ireland. His Majesty's government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country. The statement was issued through the efforts of Chaim Weizmann and Nahum Sokolow, the principal Zionist leaders based in London; as they had asked for the reconstitution of Palestine as "the" Jewish national home, the declaration fell short of Zionist expectations. The "Balfour Declaration" was later incorporated into the Sèvres peace treaty with Turkey and the Mandate for Palestine. The original document is kept at the British Library. My ancestors were from Norway.. I know what the Balfour declaration was.. I also know what Sykes-Picot was.. I also know what the debate at the League Of Nations was.. What you neglected to include was that the final draft of the mandate was approved by the arab representatives at the convention.. You don't find that as important? Here is a discussion on how the later partition plan really was a bit of a swindle on the original plan accepted by the 1919 Paris peace conference - the Allied Powers distribution worked out for the distribution of Ottoman lands which established a Jewish state of Palestine for Hebrews as the indigenous original occupants of the territory. Really excellent video. http://youtu.be/lYJd5pT1T78 Note in particular that the original legally binding agreement includes within the Jewish state all of Jerusalem, the West Bank and the Gaza strip in addition to what is now modern Israel! The UN partition plan was a violation of this agreement going against international law and this is part of the reason why UN 181 was never respected by either the Jewish Zionists nor the Arabs. |
|
|
|
|
