100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: 9/11 Conspiracy Theories Get Destroyed | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
There was a young man who came in and said to the vice president "The plane [Flight 77] is 50 miles out" [from Washington], "The plane is 30 miles out", and when it got down to "The plane is 10 miles out" the young man also said to the vice president "Do the orders still stand?", and the vice president turned and whipped his neck around and said "Of course the orders still stand, have you heard anything to the contrary?" WMV video download (1.8 MB) It is obvious the above orders did not involve defending Washington http://whatreallyhappened.com/ Really? Were you there? Did you hear it with your own ears? You can view his testimony before the 911 commision here. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDfdOwt2v3Y Oh, so people under oath always tell the truth?  Just look at Bill Clinton if you want the answer to that one! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Its not only that though that is a huge point. The fact that it would take weeks to plant explosives and wire. They would have to tear out walls and stuff to properly place them. Its not something that can be done secretly. That fact alone should be enough to shut people up who are talking about explosives. But I have a hunch we'll hear more. |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
esebulldog
on
Tue 08/30/11 03:34 PM
|
|
Its not only that though that is a huge point. The fact that it would take weeks to plant explosives and wire. They would have to tear out walls and stuff to properly place them. Its not something that can be done secretly. That fact alone should be enough to shut people up who are talking about explosives. But I have a hunch we'll hear more. this thread needs a threadkiller |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There was a young man who came in and said to the vice president "The plane [Flight 77] is 50 miles out" [from Washington], "The plane is 30 miles out", and when it got down to "The plane is 10 miles out" the young man also said to the vice president "Do the orders still stand?", and the vice president turned and whipped his neck around and said "Of course the orders still stand, have you heard anything to the contrary?" WMV video download (1.8 MB) It is obvious the above orders did not involve defending Washington http://whatreallyhappened.com/ Really? Were you there? Did you hear it with your own ears? You can view his testimony before the 911 commision here. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDfdOwt2v3Y Oh, so people under oath always tell the truth? Just look at Bill Clinton if you want the answer to that one! |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Jeanniebean
on
Tue 08/30/11 07:35 PM
|
|
Its not only that though that is a huge point. The fact that it would take weeks to plant explosives and wire. They would have to tear out walls and stuff to properly place them. Its not something that can be done secretly. That fact alone should be enough to shut people up who are talking about explosives. But I have a hunch we'll hear more. There was a floor that was unoccupied. People (men in cover-alls like workers... unknown function) were seen coming and going from the building weeks before the event. Noises were heard coming from the vacant floor. Yes, it took weeks to set up the explosives in the higher floor, but in the basement, all one would have to do is to drive a truck into the building. Security was lax. Not only that, the security company was a Bush owned security company. Also the security companies in charge of both airports where the planes took off were Bush owned. Inside job folks. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Concusion: The 9-11 "conspiracy theories" have NOT been "destroyed" or debunked. Not in the slightest.
It doesn't matter how many times you say it, post it, or publish it. As long as the investigators leave out testimonies, ignore evidence, don't even check for explosives, and hundreds of other ridiculous facts ignored, there will always be theories that disagree, debunk, and challenge the official fabrication you call the 9-11 commission report, and the sloppy NIST investigation, you are never going to debunk anyone. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Its not only that though that is a huge point. The fact that it would take weeks to plant explosives and wire. They would have to tear out walls and stuff to properly place them. Its not something that can be done secretly. That fact alone should be enough to shut people up who are talking about explosives. But I have a hunch we'll hear more. There was a floor that was unoccupied. People (men in cover-alls like workers... unknown function) were seen coming and going from the building weeks before the event. Noises were heard coming from the vacant floor. Yes, it took weeks to set up the explosives in the higher floor, but in the basement, all one would have to do is to drive a truck into the building. Security was lax. Not only that, the security company was a Bush owned security company. Also the security companies in charge of both airports where the planes took off were Bush owned. Inside job folks. A demolition isn't in 1 unoccupied floor. It would have to be in several floors. A bomb driven in a van wouldn't cause a collapse either. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Its not only that though that is a huge point. The fact that it would take weeks to plant explosives and wire. They would have to tear out walls and stuff to properly place them. Its not something that can be done secretly. That fact alone should be enough to shut people up who are talking about explosives. But I have a hunch we'll hear more. There was a floor that was unoccupied. People (men in cover-alls like workers... unknown function) were seen coming and going from the building weeks before the event. Noises were heard coming from the vacant floor. Yes, it took weeks to set up the explosives in the higher floor, but in the basement, all one would have to do is to drive a truck into the building. Security was lax. Not only that, the security company was a Bush owned security company. Also the security companies in charge of both airports where the planes took off were Bush owned. Inside job folks. A demolition isn't in 1 unoccupied floor. It would have to be in several floors. A bomb driven in a van wouldn't cause a collapse either. Several bombs, and a plane would do the job just fine. I'm sure there were bombs in a lot of places. There was easy access to planting bombs in the right places when there was an unoccupied floor with people coming and going. With access to that floor, and elevators, they had private access to anywhere they needed to go to plant bombs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That fact alone should be enough to shut people up who are talking about explosives. But I have a hunch we'll hear more. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Jeanniebean
on
Tue 08/30/11 08:34 PM
|
|
That fact alone should be enough to shut people up who are talking about explosives. But I have a hunch we'll hear more. There is not one thing wrong with finding the truth. I know shoddy investigation when I see it. You believe anything your political authority spews at you. Gullible. LOL P.S. I don't know what you are talking about "not scientifically possible?" What explanation? I have not seen any convincing explanation at all that supports the official story and I read the official 9-11 commission report and the so-called debunking book put out by popular mechanics magazine, which by the way has all new people working there who are connected to the NSA and the CIA and other government people who spew propaganda. The more I try to believe the official story, the more I am convinced it is total fabrication, bad investigation, and totally an inside job. Security in both airports.... Bush family controlled. Security in the world trade center... Bush family controlled. It so obvious it screams inside job. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Too bad there is no cure for stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That fact alone should be enough to shut people up who are talking about explosives. But I have a hunch we'll hear more. There is not one thing wrong with finding the truth. I know shoddy investigation when I see it. You believe anything your political authority spews at you. Gullible. LOL P.S. I don't know what you are talking about "not scientifically possible?" What explanation? I have not seen any convincing explanation at all that supports the official story and I read the official 9-11 commission report and the so-called debunking book put out by popular mechanics magazine, which by the way has all new people working there who are connected to the NSA and the CIA and other government people who spew propaganda. The more I try to believe the official story, the more I am convinced it is total fabrication, bad investigation, and totally an inside job. Security in both airports.... Bush family controlled. Security in the world trade center... Bush family controlled. It so obvious it screams inside job. The planes flying into the buildings? Total Hoax?! The fires? Fabrication!?! The structural analyses from all the experts agreeing that the Al-Qaida piloted planes under Bin Laden's orders were quite sufficient to bring down the buildings?! Lies Lies Lies!! Oh C'mon you got to be funnin us!! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you can't post anything useful I'm not interested in this thread.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nobody knows who piloted the planes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nobody knows who piloted the planes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Jeanniebean
on
Tue 08/30/11 10:49 PM
|
|
Nobody knows who piloted the planes. How could they possibly know? Were bodies recovered? Why the rolling heads? What is so funny? Is this the way you have a conversation? Present your evidence. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
two people were in the room when bill got a bj. how long did it take for all of america to hear the truth. if 9/11 was an inside job, and more than one person was involved, wtf is keeping any of those persons involved quiet this thread needs a threadkiller |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actually, Ese....we just need Lpdon to ask the mods to lock the thread. He started it, and he has the right to request it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Several bombs would not due fine to cause an implosion of a building. Demolition is very precise. You called someone else out on evidence but there is not one shred of evidence supporting bombs in the building or a demoliton. The collapse started at the point of impact which was notcan unoccupied floor. Bombs anywhere lower in the building wouldn't effect that.
|
|
|
|
|
