1 2 15 16 17 19 21 22 23 49 50
Topic: 9/11 Conspiracy Theories Get Destroyed
no photo
Thu 08/04/11 12:44 PM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Thu 08/04/11 12:45 PM
Bull. The only tapes they made were probably the ones that their handlers (The CIA black ops) made for them.:tongue:

You all think they were smart enough to plan and execute 9-11 attacks with no inside help, and now you expect me to believe they can't make a decent video? ppsssffftt!!

First, I would at least expect they speak English, and that Osama himself would be in the tape instead of a not very good fake lookalike.

geeeze.

Chazster's photo
Thu 08/04/11 12:45 PM

so the new tvs are 240+ frames per second and the pentagon 1 frame per second.

what century are you living in?

so if i drive more that 1 frame per second they wont see me?

i guess they only have 1 camera too?

Its not a tv its a surveillance camera. Its there to watch the grounds and be protected from environmental factors not for speedy shots. The less frames it holds the less space is required to store the information and the less time it takes to view the footage. Think logically. They didn't build cameras in anticipation of a plane flying into it.

Its made like that for a reason. You can't drive that fast towards the camera as it is on the ground level.

Bestinshow's photo
Thu 08/04/11 01:24 PM
conspiracy. However, it has come almost exclusively to refer to any fringe theory which explains a historical or current event as the result of a secret plot by conspirators of almost superhuman power and cunning. To conspire means "to join in a secret agreement to do an unlawful or wrongful act or to use such means to accomplish a lawful end. "The term "conspiracy theory" is frequently used by scholars and in popular culture to identify secret military, banking, or political actions aimed at stealing power, money, or freedom, from "the people".

To many, conspiracy theories are just human nature. Not all people in this world are honest, hard working and forthcoming about their intentions.Certainly we can all agree on this.So how did the term “conspiracy theory” get grouped in with fiction, fantasy and folklore? Maybe that’s a conspiracy, just kidding. Or am I?


What is MK Ultra?

Mk Ultra was a code name declassified in the 1970's Church Committee and other lawsuits brought against the government where the public was informed that thousands of people, patients from hospitals, mental health patients, prisoners in the... justice system, and even public citizens were selected for testing without their consent. Testing was conducted int he 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s and 90s. Some claim they still go on today and provide evidence. The testing includes torture, drugs and exotic hypnosis experiments in an effort to explore the mind, propaganda and other related patterns. One sub department of the operation included a group of lunatic scientists who were looking to create an assassins program, to see if it was possible to kidnap someone, say an enemy in a country, conduct hypnosis and other techniques learned in Mk Ultra, and send them back to the country with a plan to assassinate their leaders. That plan is what scares people most. MK Ultra was carried out by the CIA illegally and in the 1970s, hundreds of patients sued the federal government for damages, and the government settled and paid millions of dollars.

Now here is the really trippy, scary info. Some of these patients where MK Ultra was used include Ted Kazinsky (the unabpmber), mark David Chapman (the man who shot Lennon), Sirhan Sirhan (the man who shot Bobby Kennedy) and even Lee Harvey Oswald is rumored to have attended a base in japan before heading to Russia where MK Ultra experiments were taking place. David Ferrie, Oswalds boss for a long period of time, is said to have been an MK Ultra specialist and specialized in hypnosis and believe it or not, sexual molestation to mess with his patients heads. David Ferrie was a convicted child predator who left the Catholic Church to train Black Operations hitmen for the invasion of Cuba. David Ferrie taught the Louisiana Civial Air Patrol where both Lee Harvey Oswald and Barry Seal joined as 15 year old children. Barry Seal became the primary operative in Iran-Contra who ran drugs for the CIA and was an active contract hitman, Oswlad was accused of killing John F Kennedy. David Ferrie was murdered, made to look like a suicide, the night before his testimony in a trial Jim Garrison brought against the CIA where he accused Ferrie and others of using Oswald as a patsy...

Operation Mockingbird: Also in the 1950s to '70s, the CIA paid a number of well-known domestic and foreign journalists (from big-name media outlets like Time, The Washington Post, The New York Times, CBS and others) to publish CIA propaganda. The CIA also reportedly funded at least one movie, the animated "Animal Farm," by George Orwell. The Church Committee finally exposed the activities in 1975.

In 1953, Joseph Alsop, then one of America's leading syndicated columnists, went to the Philippines to cover an election. He did not go because he was asked to do so by his syndicate. He did not go because he was asked to do so by the newspapers that printed his column. He went at the request of the CIA.

Alsop is one of more than 400 American journalists who in the past 25 years have secretly carried out assignments for the Central Intelligence Agency according to documents on file at CIA headquarters. Some of these journalists' relationships with the Agency were tacit; some were explicit. There was cooperation, accommodation and overlap. Journalists provided a full range of clandestine services -- from simple intelligence-gathering to serving as go-betweens with spies in Communist countries. Reporters shared their notebooks with the CIA. Editors shared their staffs. Some of the journalists were Pulitzer Prize winners, distinguished reporters who considered themselves ambassadors without portfolio for their country. Most were less exalted: foreign correspondents who found that their association with the Agency helped their work; stringers and freelancers who were as interested in the derring-do of the spy business as in filing articles; and, the smallest category, full-time CIA employees masquerading as journalists abroad. In many instances, CIA documents show, journalists were engaged to perform tasks for the CIA with the consent of the managements of America's leading news organizations.

The history of the CIA's involvement with the American press continues to be shrouded by an official policy of obfuscation and deception for the following principal reasons:

The use of journalists has been among the most productive means of intelligence-gathering employed by the CIA. Although the agency has cut back sharply on the use of reporters since 1973 (primarily as a result of pressure from the media), some journalists are still posted abroad.
Further investigation into the matter, CIA officials say, would inevitably reveal a series of embarrassing relationships in the 1950's and 1960's with some of the most powerful organizations and individuals in American journalism.
Among the executives who lent their cooperation to the Agency were William Paley of the Columbia Broadcasting System, Henry Luce of Time Inc., Arthur Hays Sulzberger of the New York Times, Barry Bingham Sr. of the Louisville Courier-Journal, and James Copley of the Copley News Services. Other organizations which cooperated with the CIA include the American Broadcasting Company, the National Broadcasting Company, the Associated Press, United Press International, Reuters, Hearst Newspapers, Scripps-Howard, Newsweek magazine, the Mutual Broadcasting System, the Miami Herald and the old Saturday Evening Post and New York Herald-Tribune.

"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media."
--William Colby, former CIA Director, quoted by Dave Mcgowan, Derailing Democracy

"You could get a journalist cheaper than a good call girl, for a couple hundred dollars a month."
--CIA operative, discussing the availability and prices of journalists willing to peddle CIA propaganda and cover stories. Katherine the Great, by Deborah Davis

"There is quite an incredible spread of relationships. You don’t need to manipulate Time magazine, for example, because there are [Central Intelligence] Agency people at the management level."
--William B. Bader, former CIA intelligence officer, briefing members of the Senate Intelligence Committee, The CIA and the Media, by Carl Bernstein

"The Agency's relationship with [The New York] Times was by far its most valuable among newspapers, according to CIA officials. [It was] general Times policy ... to provide assistance to the CIA whenever possible."
--The CIA and the Media, by Carl Bernstein

"Senator William Proxmire has pegged the number of employees of the federal intelligence community at 148,000 ... though Proxmire's number is itself a conservative one. The "intelligence community" is officially defined as including only those organizations that are members of the U.S. Intelligence Board (USIB); a dozen other agencies, charged with both foreign and domestic intelligence chores, are not encompassed by the term.... The number of intelligence workers employed by the federal government is not 148,000, but some undetermined multiple of that number."
--Jim Hougan, Spooks

"For some time I have been disturbed by the way the CIA has been diverted from its original assignment. It has become an operational and at times a policy-making arm of the government.... I never had any thought that when I set up the CIA that it would be injected into peacetime cloak and dagger operations."
--former President Harry Truman, 22 December 1963, one month after the JFK assassination, op-ed section of the Washington Post, early edition

6.Asbestos: Between 1930 and 1960, manufacturers did all they could to prevent the link between asbestos and respiratory diseases, including cancer, becoming known, so they could avoid prosecution. American workers had in fact sued the Johns Manville company as far back as 1932, but it was not until 1962 that epidemiologists finally established beyond any doubt what company bosses had known for a long time – asbestos causes cancer.



7.Watergate: Republican officials spied on the Democratic National Headquarters from the Watergate Hotel in 1972. While conspiracy theories suggested underhanded dealings were taking place, it wasn't until 1974 that White House tape recordings linked President Nixon to the break-in and forced him to resign.



8.The Tuskegee Syphilis Study: The United States Public Health Service carried out this clinical study on 400 poor, African-American men with syphilis from 1932 to 1972. During the study the men were given false and sometimes dangerous treatments, and adequate treatment was intentionally withheld so the agency could learn more about the disease. While the study was initially supposed to last just six months, it continued for 40 years. Close to 200 of the men died from syphilis or related complications by the end of the study.



9.Operation Northwoods: In the early 1960s, American military leaders drafted plans to create public support for a war against Cuba, to oust Fidel Castro from power. The plans included committing acts of terrorism in U.S. cities, killing innocent people and U.S. soldiers, blowing up a U.S. ship, assassinating Cuban émigrés, sinking boats of Cuban refugees, and hijacking planes. The plans were all approved by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, but were reportedly rejected by the civilian leadership, then kept secret for nearly 40 years.

Author James Bamford, "A Pretext For War", discusses the declassified "Operation Northwoods" documents revealing that in 1962 the CIA was planning to stage phony terrorist attacks on the US and blame it on Cuba to start a war:


http://www.newworldorderreport.com/News/tabid/266/ID/980/33-Conspiracy-Theories-That-Turned-Out-To-Be-True-What-Every-Person-Should-Know-Updated-Revised-and-Extended.aspx


The list goes on and on......

s1owhand's photo
Thu 08/04/11 02:21 PM




laugh

There is so much evidence that Al-Qaida terrorists brought the WTC
towers down on 911 and no evidence at all to the contrary!


It's more like the other way around I'm afraid.


al queada admitted responsibility for 911. where's this 'other way around' evidence of which you speak? not the personal innuendo you've been spouting. actual evidence.


The Bin Ladin tapes are fake!!

No he did not admit it.

They even admitted that it was an old tape.

Pay attention!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0JwRe5i_VDQ&feature=player_embedded

Clearly they are fakes.

Don't be so gullible. Do you actually believe that propaganda??


The reports of Bin Laden tapes being fakes are FAKES!

laugh laugh laugh

no photo
Thu 08/04/11 02:29 PM





laugh

There is so much evidence that Al-Qaida terrorists brought the WTC
towers down on 911 and no evidence at all to the contrary!


It's more like the other way around I'm afraid.


al queada admitted responsibility for 911. where's this 'other way around' evidence of which you speak? not the personal innuendo you've been spouting. actual evidence.


The Bin Ladin tapes are fake!!

No he did not admit it.

They even admitted that it was an old tape.

Pay attention!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0JwRe5i_VDQ&feature=player_embedded

Clearly they are fakes.

Don't be so gullible. Do you actually believe that propaganda??


The reports of Bin Laden tapes being fakes are FAKES!

laugh laugh laugh


Where is your proof that Bin Laden admitted on video that he was responsible for 9-11?

Please link to your evidence. You made the claim. Prove your claim. I want to see your video. I want to see your proof.




metalwing's photo
Thu 08/04/11 02:37 PM
laugh

s1owhand's photo
Thu 08/04/11 02:43 PM
Edited by s1owhand on Thu 08/04/11 02:44 PM






laugh

There is so much evidence that Al-Qaida terrorists brought the WTC
towers down on 911 and no evidence at all to the contrary!


It's more like the other way around I'm afraid.


al queada admitted responsibility for 911. where's this 'other way around' evidence of which you speak? not the personal innuendo you've been spouting. actual evidence.


The Bin Ladin tapes are fake!!

No he did not admit it.

They even admitted that it was an old tape.

Pay attention!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0JwRe5i_VDQ&feature=player_embedded

Clearly they are fakes.

Don't be so gullible. Do you actually believe that propaganda??


The reports of Bin Laden tapes being fakes are FAKES!

laugh laugh laugh


Where is your proof that Bin Laden admitted on video that he was responsible for 9-11?

Please link to your evidence. You made the claim. Prove your claim. I want to see your video. I want to see your proof.


Well there is this one...(4:46 and following)...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qloshSGAJ1s

and this one...
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/binladen_10-29-04.html

and more reports from that tape...
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,137095,00.html

And here is a further summary of the events...

Bin Laden, who orchestrated the attacks,[92] initially denied but later admitted involvement.[1][93] Al Jazeera broadcast a statement by bin Laden on September 16, 2001, stating "I stress that I have not carried out this act, which appears to have been carried out by individuals with their own motivation."[94] In November 2001, U.S. forces recovered a videotape from a destroyed house in Jalalabad, Afghanistan, in which bin Laden is seen talking to Khaled al-Harbi and admits foreknowledge of the attacks.[95] On December 27, 2001, a second bin Laden video was released. In the video, he states, "Terrorism against America deserves to be praised because it was a response to injustice, aimed at forcing America to stop its support for Israel, which kills our people", but he stopped short of admitting responsibility for the attacks.[96]

Shortly before the U.S. presidential election in 2004, in a taped statement, bin Laden publicly acknowledged al-Qaeda's involvement in the attacks on the U.S. and admitted his direct link to the attacks. He said that the attacks were carried out because "we are free... and want to regain freedom for our nation. As you undermine our security we undermine yours."[97] Bin Laden said he had personally directed his followers to attack the World Trade Center.[93][98] Another video obtained by Al Jazeera in September 2006 shows bin Laden with Ramzi bin al-Shibh, as well as two hijackers, Hamza al-Ghamdi and Wail al-Shehri, as they make preparations for the attacks.[99]

The U.S. never formally indicted bin Laden for the 9/11 attacks,[100] and on May 1, 2011, he was killed by American forces in Abbottabad, Pakistan.[101][102]

see the original Wiki article for more references...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11_attacks#Osama_bin_Laden

laugh

no photo
Thu 08/04/11 05:33 PM
Well apparently everyone likes to take the credit for 9-111.

The alleged mastermind of the 9/11 attacks has admitted his role in them, and 30 other plots in a hearing at Guantanamo Bay, the Pentagon says.

"I was responsible for the 9/11 operation, from A to Z," said Khalid Sheikh Mohammed in a partial transcript from a closed-door hearing.

He also claims he was tortured at Guantanamo Bay.

I don't know... It think these guys are just soldiers. I think they take orders from someone higher than Osama Bin Laden.

Kleisto's photo
Thu 08/04/11 05:40 PM





laugh

There is so much evidence that Al-Qaida terrorists brought the WTC
towers down on 911 and no evidence at all to the contrary!


It's more like the other way around I'm afraid.


al queada admitted responsibility for 911. where's this 'other way around' evidence of which you speak? not the personal innuendo you've been spouting. actual evidence.


If you want it bad enough you can find it, I won't do your work for you, especially if you're just gonna take a crap on it. No point. I have better things to do than waste time on someone who isn't gonna listen.


WEAK SAUCE! That is what you fall back no time and time again! SHOW YOUR PROOF! You are beginning to sound a lot like a classic Liberal! Politically I disagree a lot with jrbogie but this time even he is asking you to prove your words and this is your answer AGAIN? WE HAVE TO PROVE YOU WRONG WHEN WE OFFER PROOF OF THAT?

You CAN'T back your position, can you? You just are itching to justify hating our government for any reason!


No I CAN back it, but if you're just gonna refute anything I say, what the hell is the point? Like I said before, I won't put my pearls before swine.

s1owhand's photo
Thu 08/04/11 05:42 PM

Well apparently everyone likes to take the credit for 9-111.

The alleged mastermind of the 9/11 attacks has admitted his role in them, and 30 other plots in a hearing at Guantanamo Bay, the Pentagon says.

"I was responsible for the 9/11 operation, from A to Z," said Khalid Sheikh Mohammed in a partial transcript from a closed-door hearing.

He also claims he was tortured at Guantanamo Bay.

I don't know... It think these guys are just soldiers. I think they take orders from someone higher than Osama Bin Laden.


Al-Qaida was responsible. Everyone associated with the 911 attacks
was from Al-Qaida. Osama Bin Laden was the leader of Al-Qaida. There
was no one in the organization higher than Bin Laden and Bin Laden
did not take orders from anyone else apparently.

Kleisto's photo
Thu 08/04/11 05:44 PM







laugh

There is so much evidence that Al-Qaida terrorists brought the WTC
towers down on 911 and no evidence at all to the contrary!


It's more like the other way around I'm afraid.


al queada admitted responsibility for 911. where's this 'other way around' evidence of which you speak? not the personal innuendo you've been spouting. actual evidence.


The Bin Ladin tapes are fake!!

No he did not admit it.

They even admitted that it was an old tape.

Pay attention!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0JwRe5i_VDQ&feature=player_embedded

Clearly the are fakes.

Don't be so gullible. Do you actually believe that propaganda??

I don't see anything clearly fake there and I recognize the voice of the guy narrating and he is a conspiracy nut that has his own radio show. He says its clearly a cartoon etc. The video isn't even high enough quality to look like a cartoon.

Get a video specialists with no history of following conspiracies to do an analysis and if he can show with science reasons to think its fake I will believe him. I give no credit to radio hosts though.


I don't like that guy either, but there are plenty more videos and opinions. I have yet to see a Bin laden video that is not really bad or fake.

So where is YOUR proof that Osama Bin Laden admitted responsibility on any video tape? Where is it? Show me your proof.

The burden of proof is on you people who make the claim.

No you are making a claim that it is fake. I also think that the fact that he was in hiding and made no claims that it wasn't him point to the story being true. He knew people were hunting for him. Don't you think he is smart enough to try to claim innocence if he really was innocent? Sending information to other countries in the UN would be my first step if I were him. He had 10 years to claim innocence and didnt.


Except in the immediate aftermath he DID.

Kleisto's photo
Thu 08/04/11 05:44 PM





laugh

There is so much evidence that Al-Qaida terrorists brought the WTC
towers down on 911 and no evidence at all to the contrary!


It's more like the other way around I'm afraid.


al queada admitted responsibility for 911. where's this 'other way around' evidence of which you speak? not the personal innuendo you've been spouting. actual evidence.


If you want it bad enough you can find it, I won't do your work for you, especially if you're just gonna take a crap on it. No point. I have better things to do than waste time on someone who isn't gonna listen.


rofl That's because you know it doesn't exist. rofl


Right cause you CLEARLY know my mind......NOT.

AndyBgood's photo
Thu 08/04/11 05:45 PM






laugh

There is so much evidence that Al-Qaida terrorists brought the WTC
towers down on 911 and no evidence at all to the contrary!


It's more like the other way around I'm afraid.


al queada admitted responsibility for 911. where's this 'other way around' evidence of which you speak? not the personal innuendo you've been spouting. actual evidence.


If you want it bad enough you can find it, I won't do your work for you, especially if you're just gonna take a crap on it. No point. I have better things to do than waste time on someone who isn't gonna listen.


WEAK SAUCE! That is what you fall back no time and time again! SHOW YOUR PROOF! You are beginning to sound a lot like a classic Liberal! Politically I disagree a lot with jrbogie but this time even he is asking you to prove your words and this is your answer AGAIN? WE HAVE TO PROVE YOU WRONG WHEN WE OFFER PROOF OF THAT?

You CAN'T back your position, can you? You just are itching to justify hating our government for any reason!


No I CAN back it, but if you're just gonna refute anything I say, what the hell is the point? Like I said before, I won't put my pearls before swine.


That is Bull my friend!

Kleisto's photo
Thu 08/04/11 05:48 PM







laugh

There is so much evidence that Al-Qaida terrorists brought the WTC
towers down on 911 and no evidence at all to the contrary!


It's more like the other way around I'm afraid.


al queada admitted responsibility for 911. where's this 'other way around' evidence of which you speak? not the personal innuendo you've been spouting. actual evidence.


If you want it bad enough you can find it, I won't do your work for you, especially if you're just gonna take a crap on it. No point. I have better things to do than waste time on someone who isn't gonna listen.


WEAK SAUCE! That is what you fall back no time and time again! SHOW YOUR PROOF! You are beginning to sound a lot like a classic Liberal! Politically I disagree a lot with jrbogie but this time even he is asking you to prove your words and this is your answer AGAIN? WE HAVE TO PROVE YOU WRONG WHEN WE OFFER PROOF OF THAT?

You CAN'T back your position, can you? You just are itching to justify hating our government for any reason!


No I CAN back it, but if you're just gonna refute anything I say, what the hell is the point? Like I said before, I won't put my pearls before swine.


That is Bull my friend!


Think what you want, I really don't give a damn, but until you can show me you actually are open minded enough to debate instead of just call me crazy, the point stands.

no photo
Thu 08/04/11 06:18 PM


Well apparently everyone likes to take the credit for 9-111.

The alleged mastermind of the 9/11 attacks has admitted his role in them, and 30 other plots in a hearing at Guantanamo Bay, the Pentagon says.

"I was responsible for the 9/11 operation, from A to Z," said Khalid Sheikh Mohammed in a partial transcript from a closed-door hearing.

He also claims he was tortured at Guantanamo Bay.

I don't know... It think these guys are just soldiers. I think they take orders from someone higher than Osama Bin Laden.


Al-Qaida was responsible. Everyone associated with the 911 attacks
was from Al-Qaida. Osama Bin Laden was the leader of Al-Qaida. There
was no one in the organization higher than Bin Laden and Bin Laden
did not take orders from anyone else apparently.


Okay let's assume that is true. Let's assume that there was no one at all working on the inside of our government. Let's assume these terrorists did this all completely on their own.

This means that what they said in that video about us being "stupid" and about the attack with planes being "so easy" is true. How incompetent are we that we did not heed the many warnings that just this kind of attack was going to happen. Then we just sit there for a whole hour between the first attack and the last plane and still we have not done anything to prevent this attack from continuing.

What else was going on that we were so pre-occupied that we let this happen? Was there really an attempt at an assassination and coup? If so who was behind the coup? Who would have taken over the country if Bush had been killed in that attempt?

Or are we as stupid and unprotected as Al-Qaeda said?

no photo
Thu 08/04/11 06:22 PM
Bush’s actions on September 11 have been the subject of lively debate, mostly on the internet. Details reported that day and in the week after the attacks—both the media reports and accounts given by Bush himself—have changed radically over the past 18 months. Culling hundreds of reports from newspapers, magazines, and the internet has only made finding the “truth” of what happened and when it happened more confusing. In the changed political climate after 9/11, few have dared raise challenging questions about Bush’s actions. A journalist who said Bush was “flying around the country like a scared child, seeking refuge in his mother’s bed after having a nightmare” and another who said Bush “skedaddled” were fired. [Washington Post, 9/29/01 (B)] We should have a concise record of where President Bush was throughout the day the US was attacked, but we do not.

no photo
Thu 08/04/11 06:25 PM
An Assassination Attempt?

Bush awoke a little before 6:00 a.m. on September 11, pulled on shorts and an old T-shirt and laced up his running shoes. [CBS, 11/1/02] At 6:30 a.m., Bush, a reporter friend, and his Secret Service crew took a four-mile jog in the half-light of dawn around a nearby golf course. [Washington Post, 1/27/02, Washington Post, 09/11/01]

At about the same time Bush was getting ready for his jog, a van carrying several Middle Eastern men pulled up to the Colony’s guard station. The men said they were a television news crew with a scheduled “poolside” interview with the president. They asked for a certain Secret Service agent by name. The message was relayed to a Secret Service agent inside the resort, who hadn’t heard of the agent mentioned or of plans for an interview. He told the men to contact the president’s public relations office in Washington, DC, and had the van turned away. [Longboat Observer, 9/26/01]

General Ahmed Shah Massoud.

The Secret Service may have foiled an assassination attempt. Two days earlier, Ahmed Shah Massoud, leader of Afghanistan’s Northern Alliance, had been murdered by a similar ruse. Two North African men, posing as journalists from “Arabic News International,” had been requesting an interview with Massoud since late August. Ahmad Jamsheed, Massoud’s secretary, said that by the night of September 8, “they were so worried and excitable, they were begging us.” An interview was arranged for the following day. As it began, a bomb hidden in the video camera exploded, killing the two journalists. Massoud was rushed by helicopter to a hospital in Tajikistan, but was pronounced dead on arrival (although his death was not acknowledged until September 15). [International Policy Institute for Counter-Terrorism, 10/30/01, Newsday, 10/26/01] The assassination is widely believed to have been timed to remove the Taliban’s most popular and respected opponent in anticipation of the backlash that would occur after the 9/11 attacks. [BBC, 9/10/01, BBC, 9/10/01 (B), Time, 8/4/02, St. Petersburg Times, 9/9/02] The Northern Alliance blamed al-Qaeda and the ISI, Pakistan’s secret service, for the attacks. [Radio Free Europe, 9/10/01, Newsday, 9/15/01, Reuters, 10/4/01]

s1owhand's photo
Thu 08/04/11 07:43 PM



Well apparently everyone likes to take the credit for 9-111.

The alleged mastermind of the 9/11 attacks has admitted his role in them, and 30 other plots in a hearing at Guantanamo Bay, the Pentagon says.

"I was responsible for the 9/11 operation, from A to Z," said Khalid Sheikh Mohammed in a partial transcript from a closed-door hearing.

He also claims he was tortured at Guantanamo Bay.

I don't know... It think these guys are just soldiers. I think they take orders from someone higher than Osama Bin Laden.


Al-Qaida was responsible. Everyone associated with the 911 attacks
was from Al-Qaida. Osama Bin Laden was the leader of Al-Qaida. There
was no one in the organization higher than Bin Laden and Bin Laden
did not take orders from anyone else apparently.


Okay let's assume that is true. Let's assume that there was no one at all working on the inside of our government. Let's assume these terrorists did this all completely on their own.

This means that what they said in that video about us being "stupid" and about the attack with planes being "so easy" is true. How incompetent are we that we did not heed the many warnings that just this kind of attack was going to happen. Then we just sit there for a whole hour between the first attack and the last plane and still we have not done anything to prevent this attack from continuing.

What else was going on that we were so pre-occupied that we let this happen? Was there really an attempt at an assassination and coup? If so who was behind the coup? Who would have taken over the country if Bush had been killed in that attempt?

Or are we as stupid and unprotected as Al-Qaeda said?


laugh

You don't have to be stupid to be hijacked. You don't have to be
an ignoramus to have a suicide bomber attack you...or multiple
bombers in a coordinated attack. We just were enjoying our freedom
and were not alert to the threats.

Yes. We were vulnerable to hijackers willing to crash themselves
and their planeload of fuel and hostages into buildings. We are
less vulnerable now.


no photo
Thu 08/04/11 09:15 PM
Something broke down in the chain of command. Nasa claims they were not informed of the hijacked planes until later. They should have had fighter planes there in seconds... this is New York, close to our capitol. Fighters should have been there!!

Where were they?

no photo
Thu 08/04/11 09:27 PM

Something broke down in the chain of command. Nasa claims they were not informed of the hijacked planes until later. They should have had fighter planes there in seconds... this is New York, close to our capitol. Fighters should have been there!!

Where were they?

why would you want fighters going up to commercial aircraft? the planes had citizens in them. you and kleisto have been talking a lot, but producing NOTHING. several people have provided links, have you taken the time to look at them? i know kleisto has NOT because he avoids the points to say he will not cast pearls before swine (when did he start believing things written in the bible). both you and kleisto have beliefs that have merit, but do you want people to convert to your belief before you produce your facts? do you only show evidence to people who already believe as you do? instead of this tit for tat game you play, show your cards and let everyone examine them and make up their own minds

1 2 15 16 17 19 21 22 23 49 50