I am not sure why but this thread made me think of this clip. It is only a few seconds long.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkzV5AIK8iM&NR=1

ya know...I see in these forums and in life things that are insane sometimes

people wants to laugh at Bush-isms (I think they are funny too) but don't anyone dare speak of Obama-isms because then the excuses come out of the wood work instead of just laughing at those too

people whine about Fox news but yet they use blatantly biased sources on the other side that seem to be ok as long as it is what they want to hear

people talk about the right wingers, republicans, conservatives...whatever doing this and that....when the other side does the exact same thing!!!! but that seems to be ok

I see nothing but hypocritical things a lot lately and if it wasn't so sad it would be funny

Sorry most people think hosting the olympics is a great honor as well as an economic stimulas.

Furthermore, 45 percent of Chicagoans oppose bringing the Olympics to Chicago (47 percent were in favor). Presumably opponents have reasons other than a deep-seated hatred of America for wanting to see the city fail in its bid? Or does the White House think Chicagoans who don't want the games are unpatriotic, too? It seems that, like Obamacare, the more people learned what hosting the Olympics really means -- higher taxes, heavy traffic, more corruption -- the less support there was. So, I was wrong to write this morning that Chicago lost. It didn't lose. Neither did America. Obama's cowboy diplomacy lost. And I cheered.

I'm still waiting for some one to answer my question about who decides what I can listen to and what qualifies them to be that superior

That actually was the point I was trying to make with the movie clip ... and to add a little humor to the sad situation.

I'm still waiting for some one to answer my question about who decides what I can listen to and what qualifies them to be that superior

Liberal, in modern politics, actually means totalitarian or progressive. They aren't interested in freedom, they want to take away your freedoms with which they don't agree. What car you drive, what food you eat, what news you watch, what radio programs you listen to. They want to involve themselves into your every day to day activity, because they don't care about you personally, they just want power.

I've pretty much said that before myself. a lot of them seem to want freedom for all as long as it's what they believe in.

My sister is (what I think)is a true liberal. she and I (I'm more conservative myself) both can see that others have the rights to things whether we agree with it or not, as long as it's legal.

we both believe in the constitution and upholding that

oH COME ON MAN didnt 8 years of Bush teach you anything? In 8 short years our country was taken to its knees and we used the republican formula, less taxes war and borrowing. We are now bankrupt and your try to blame the Dems? This is rich.

What is rich is that your comment would claim a knowledge of my education, ability to reason, politics, and my perspective of history.

psst...it's the I'm right and your wrong theory

Exactly! Conservatives are for preserving our existing liberties, Liberals feel that more liberties are needed. They agree on making the changes in our existing framework. The progressives seek "change" by "remaking America". It's really a scary proposition. Don't let anyone fool you, silencing dissent will always be on the table while progressives are in charge.

Umm who wrote the patriot act?

now let's see the other side as well to be fair...who is keeping it alive now? and who voted for it in the senate

http://educate-yourself.org/cn/patriotact20012006senatevote.shtml

true but he hasn't yet and he voted for it while a senator....things that make you go hmmmmmmm huh?