Topic: HELP BRING DOWN THE FOX NEWS MONSTER! | |
---|---|
I am not sure why but this thread made me think of this clip. It is only a few seconds long.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkzV5AIK8iM&NR=1 |
|
|
|
I am not sure why but this thread made me think of this clip. It is only a few seconds long. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkzV5AIK8iM&NR=1 |
|
|
|
love the hypocrisy in these threads
|
|
|
|
ya know...I see in these forums and in life things that are insane sometimes
people wants to laugh at Bush-isms (I think they are funny too) but don't anyone dare speak of Obama-isms because then the excuses come out of the wood work instead of just laughing at those too people whine about Fox news but yet they use blatantly biased sources on the other side that seem to be ok as long as it is what they want to hear people talk about the right wingers, republicans, conservatives...whatever doing this and that....when the other side does the exact same thing!!!! but that seems to be ok I see nothing but hypocritical things a lot lately and if it wasn't so sad it would be funny |
|
|
|
ya know...I see in these forums and in life things that are insane sometimes people wants to laugh at Bush-isms (I think they are funny too) but don't anyone dare speak of Obama-isms because then the excuses come out of the wood work instead of just laughing at those too people whine about Fox news but yet they use blatantly biased sources on the other side that seem to be ok as long as it is what they want to hear people talk about the right wingers, republicans, conservatives...whatever doing this and that....when the other side does the exact same thing!!!! but that seems to be ok I see nothing but hypocritical things a lot lately and if it wasn't so sad it would be funny That actually was the point I was trying to make with the movie clip ... and to add a little humor to the sad situation. |
|
|
|
Sorry most people think hosting the olympics is a great honor as well as an economic stimulas. I'm sorry, but some people check out their sources. I checked the "Weekly Standard's" blog site and no such article exists. Furthermore, 45 percent of Chicagoans oppose bringing the Olympics to Chicago (47 percent were in favor). Presumably opponents have reasons other than a deep-seated hatred of America for wanting to see the city fail in its bid? Or does the White House think Chicagoans who don't want the games are unpatriotic, too? It seems that, like Obamacare, the more people learned what hosting the Olympics really means -- higher taxes, heavy traffic, more corruption -- the less support there was. So, I was wrong to write this morning that Chicago lost. It didn't lose. Neither did America. Obama's cowboy diplomacy lost. And I cheered. One man. And for good reasons. The people of Chicago have suffered enough, they can't afford higher taxes and worse traffic. And as the Olympic committee member said, they were concerned with TSA. Besides, who wants to go to Chicago? Since they passed their new gun legislation, murders have gone up by 18%. |
|
|
|
ya know...I see in these forums and in life things that are insane sometimes people wants to laugh at Bush-isms (I think they are funny too) but don't anyone dare speak of Obama-isms because then the excuses come out of the wood work instead of just laughing at those too people whine about Fox news but yet they use blatantly biased sources on the other side that seem to be ok as long as it is what they want to hear people talk about the right wingers, republicans, conservatives...whatever doing this and that....when the other side does the exact same thing!!!! but that seems to be ok I see nothing but hypocritical things a lot lately and if it wasn't so sad it would be funny I'm still waiting for some one to answer my question about who decides what I can listen to and what qualifies them to be that superior That actually was the point I was trying to make with the movie clip ... and to add a little humor to the sad situation. |
|
|
|
Edited by
earthytaurus76
on
Mon 10/05/09 01:47 PM
|
|
Sorry I didnt hear what you said, I was watching
|
|
|
|
ya know...I see in these forums and in life things that are insane sometimes people wants to laugh at Bush-isms (I think they are funny too) but don't anyone dare speak of Obama-isms because then the excuses come out of the wood work instead of just laughing at those too people whine about Fox news but yet they use blatantly biased sources on the other side that seem to be ok as long as it is what they want to hear people talk about the right wingers, republicans, conservatives...whatever doing this and that....when the other side does the exact same thing!!!! but that seems to be ok I see nothing but hypocritical things a lot lately and if it wasn't so sad it would be funny That actually was the point I was trying to make with the movie clip ... and to add a little humor to the sad situation. I'm still waiting for some one to answer my question about who decides what I can listen to and what qualifies them to be that superior Liberal, in modern politics, actually means totalitarian or progressive. They aren't interested in freedom, they want to take away your freedoms with which they don't agree. What car you drive, what food you eat, what news you watch, what radio programs you listen to. They want to involve themselves into your every day to day activity, because they don't care about you personally, they just want power. |
|
|
|
Liberal, in modern politics, actually means totalitarian or progressive. They aren't interested in freedom, they want to take away your freedoms with which they don't agree. What car you drive, what food you eat, what news you watch, what radio programs you listen to. They want to involve themselves into your every day to day activity, because they don't care about you personally, they just want power. I've pretty much said that before myself. a lot of them seem to want freedom for all as long as it's what they believe in. My sister is (what I think)is a true liberal. she and I (I'm more conservative myself) both can see that others have the rights to things whether we agree with it or not, as long as it's legal. we both believe in the constitution and upholding that |
|
|
|
Liberal, in modern politics, actually means totalitarian or progressive. They aren't interested in freedom, they want to take away your freedoms with which they don't agree. What car you drive, what food you eat, what news you watch, what radio programs you listen to. They want to involve themselves into your every day to day activity, because they don't care about you personally, they just want power. I've pretty much said that before myself. a lot of them seem to want freedom for all as long as it's what they believe in. My sister is (what I think)is a true liberal. she and I (I'm more conservative myself) both can see that others have the rights to things whether we agree with it or not, as long as it's legal. we both believe in the constitution and upholding that Exactly! Conservatives are for preserving our existing liberties, Liberals feel that more liberties are needed. They agree on making the changes in our existing framework. The progressives seek "change" by "remaking America". It's really a scary proposition. Don't let anyone fool you, silencing dissent will always be on the table while progressives are in charge. |
|
|
|
no one fool me. I'm pretty stubborn in my view points and opinions. I'm conservative but liberal minded to want to protect people's rights under the constitution and law.
not many seem to want to answer my question though I know the answer but I just want someone on the other side to give their answer so maybe I could see their thinking on it |
|
|
|
I am not sure why but this thread made me think of this clip. It is only a few seconds long. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkzV5AIK8iM&NR=1 What is rich is that your comment would claim a knowledge of my education, ability to reason, politics, and my perspective of history. |
|
|
|
I am not sure why but this thread made me think of this clip. It is only a few seconds long. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkzV5AIK8iM&NR=1 What is rich is that your comment would claim a knowledge of my education, ability to reason, politics, and my perspective of history. psst...it's the I'm right and your wrong theory |
|
|
|
I am not sure why but this thread made me think of this clip. It is only a few seconds long. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkzV5AIK8iM&NR=1 What is rich is that your comment would claim a knowledge of my education, ability to reason, politics, and my perspective of history. psst...it's the I'm right and your wrong theory Yeah, I know. But you would think someone would want to know your position before screaming they are against it! |
|
|
|
Liberal, in modern politics, actually means totalitarian or progressive. They aren't interested in freedom, they want to take away your freedoms with which they don't agree. What car you drive, what food you eat, what news you watch, what radio programs you listen to. They want to involve themselves into your every day to day activity, because they don't care about you personally, they just want power. I've pretty much said that before myself. a lot of them seem to want freedom for all as long as it's what they believe in. My sister is (what I think)is a true liberal. she and I (I'm more conservative myself) both can see that others have the rights to things whether we agree with it or not, as long as it's legal. we both believe in the constitution and upholding that Exactly! Conservatives are for preserving our existing liberties, Liberals feel that more liberties are needed. They agree on making the changes in our existing framework. The progressives seek "change" by "remaking America". It's really a scary proposition. Don't let anyone fool you, silencing dissent will always be on the table while progressives are in charge. |
|
|
|
Edited by
yellowrose10
on
Mon 10/05/09 07:06 PM
|
|
Liberal, in modern politics, actually means totalitarian or progressive. They aren't interested in freedom, they want to take away your freedoms with which they don't agree. What car you drive, what food you eat, what news you watch, what radio programs you listen to. They want to involve themselves into your every day to day activity, because they don't care about you personally, they just want power. I've pretty much said that before myself. a lot of them seem to want freedom for all as long as it's what they believe in. My sister is (what I think)is a true liberal. she and I (I'm more conservative myself) both can see that others have the rights to things whether we agree with it or not, as long as it's legal. we both believe in the constitution and upholding that Exactly! Conservatives are for preserving our existing liberties, Liberals feel that more liberties are needed. They agree on making the changes in our existing framework. The progressives seek "change" by "remaking America". It's really a scary proposition. Don't let anyone fool you, silencing dissent will always be on the table while progressives are in charge. now let's see the other side as well to be fair...who is keeping it alive now? and who voted for it in the senate http://educate-yourself.org/cn/patriotact20012006senatevote.shtml |
|
|
|
Liberal, in modern politics, actually means totalitarian or progressive. They aren't interested in freedom, they want to take away your freedoms with which they don't agree. What car you drive, what food you eat, what news you watch, what radio programs you listen to. They want to involve themselves into your every day to day activity, because they don't care about you personally, they just want power. I've pretty much said that before myself. a lot of them seem to want freedom for all as long as it's what they believe in. My sister is (what I think)is a true liberal. she and I (I'm more conservative myself) both can see that others have the rights to things whether we agree with it or not, as long as it's legal. we both believe in the constitution and upholding that Exactly! Conservatives are for preserving our existing liberties, Liberals feel that more liberties are needed. They agree on making the changes in our existing framework. The progressives seek "change" by "remaking America". It's really a scary proposition. Don't let anyone fool you, silencing dissent will always be on the table while progressives are in charge. now let's see the other side as well to be fair...who is keeping it alive now? and who voted for it in the senate http://educate-yourself.org/cn/patriotact20012006senatevote.shtml |
|
|
|
true but he hasn't yet and he voted for it while a senator....things that make you go hmmmmmmm huh?
|
|
|
|
true but he hasn't yet and he voted for it while a senator....things that make you go hmmmmmmm huh? |
|
|