1 2 5 6 7 9 11 12 13 49 50
Topic: Evolution Is it Compatible With THE BIBLE?
feralcatlady's photo
Tue 01/27/09 10:43 AM
Edited by feralcatlady on Tue 01/27/09 10:44 AM
Your so funny....take what works for you Krisma instead of reading the whole context...because no way you did....sorry love but I don't by it......I did not come from a chimp...and truly showing the skulls of human beings is just that Human Beings. And if we did evolve from chimps...why are they still here....sorry no go.



I also feel we are going to loose our lil pinky toe too....So within a species I have no qualms....But please I beg you show me that we evolutionized from something else...Within a species I have never had a problem with it...But has a dog ever been a cat, has a cow ever been a sheep. And please proof.


This is a fallacy that people who don’t understand the theory of evolution often espouse. Never ONCE is it stated that "we evolved from apes." We DIVERGED from chimpanzee and continued to evolve into our own species as did they. Why is this so hard for you to understand? huh

WASHINGTON, Wed., Aug. 31, 2005 - The first comprehensive comparison of the genetic blueprints of humans and chimpanzees shows our closest living relatives share perfect identity with 96 percent of our DNA sequence, an international research consortium reported today.


Krimsa's photo
Tue 01/27/09 10:48 AM
Edited by Krimsa on Tue 01/27/09 10:50 AM
I just told you we DIDN'T EVOLVE FROM Chimps. Yeah I don’t think those first few are exactly human. Why don’t you find me a human today with a cranium identical to that one. :tongue:

Krimsa's photo
Tue 01/27/09 10:54 AM
The four rivers of Eden.

Bringing all this together we find that the sources of all four rivers originate in the highland area which Alexander the Great knew as Armenia and we know today as eastern Turkey and western Iran.



Hmm. Interesting. The concept of a biblical paradise appears several thousand years EARLIER in Sumer. happy

the idea of a divine paradise comes from Dilmun, the land of immortals situated in southwestern Persia. It is the same Dilmun that, later, the Babylonians, the Semitic people who conquered the Sumerians, located their home of the immortals. There is a good indication that the Biblical paradise, which is described as a garden planted eastward in Eden, from whose waters flow the four world rivers including the Tigris and the Euphrates, may have been originally identical with Dilmun;

feralcatlady's photo
Tue 01/27/09 10:55 AM
Sorry K...but we didn't deverge from chimps either....please know first what you want to say....If you put this



WASHINGTON, Wed., Aug. 31, 2005 - The first comprehensive comparison of the genetic blueprints of humans and chimpanzees shows our closest living relatives share perfect identity with 96 percent of our DNA sequence, an international research consortium reported today.



What are you saying?

feralcatlady's photo
Tue 01/27/09 10:57 AM
Reference K.....so you could see that again historically it is accurate....you people crack me up.... DONE




The four rivers of Eden.

Bringing all this together we find that the sources of all four rivers originate in the highland area which Alexander the Great knew as Armenia and we know today as eastern Turkey and western Iran.



Hmm. Interesting. The concept of a biblical paradise appears several thousand years EARLIER in Sumer. happy

the idea of a divine paradise comes from Dilmun, the land of immortals situated in southwestern Persia. It is the same Dilmun that, later, the Babylonians, the Semitic people who conquered the Sumerians, located their home of the immortals. There is a good indication that the Biblical paradise, which is described as a garden planted eastward in Eden, from whose waters flow the four world rivers including the Tigris and the Euphrates, may have been originally identical with Dilmun;


Krimsa's photo
Tue 01/27/09 11:02 AM
Edited by Krimsa on Tue 01/27/09 11:02 AM

Sorry K...but we didn't deverge from chimps either....please know first what you want to say....If you put this



WASHINGTON, Wed., Aug. 31, 2005 - The first comprehensive comparison of the genetic blueprints of humans and chimpanzees shows our closest living relatives share perfect identity with 96 percent of our DNA sequence, an international research consortium reported today.



What are you saying?


What are you asking me? What dont you understand?

Krimsa's photo
Tue 01/27/09 11:03 AM

Reference K.....so you could see that again historically it is accurate....you people crack me up.... DONE




The four rivers of Eden.

Bringing all this together we find that the sources of all four rivers originate in the highland area which Alexander the Great knew as Armenia and we know today as eastern Turkey and western Iran.



Hmm. Interesting. The concept of a biblical paradise appears several thousand years EARLIER in Sumer. happy

the idea of a divine paradise comes from Dilmun, the land of immortals situated in southwestern Persia. It is the same Dilmun that, later, the Babylonians, the Semitic people who conquered the Sumerians, located their home of the immortals. There is a good indication that the Biblical paradise, which is described as a garden planted eastward in Eden, from whose waters flow the four world rivers including the Tigris and the Euphrates, may have been originally identical with Dilmun;




Yeah I guess your bible is plagiarized. happy

no photo
Tue 01/27/09 03:58 PM
Evolution is pollution. we were created.flowerforyou

feralcatlady's photo
Tue 01/27/09 04:02 PM
Edited by feralcatlady on Tue 01/27/09 04:10 PM


Sorry K...but we didn't deverge from chimps either....please know first what you want to say....If you put this



WASHINGTON, Wed., Aug. 31, 2005 - The first comprehensive comparison of the genetic blueprints of humans and chimpanzees shows our closest living relatives share perfect identity with 96 percent of our DNA sequence, an international research consortium reported today.



What are you saying?


What are you asking me? What dont you understand?



You say we don't evolve from chimps then post that we share perfect identity with 96 percent of our dna sequence so which is it...we do or we don't.....I don't think....hmmmmmmm no I know I have never changed the fact that I say we were created from God through Adam and Eve..... just saying

Inkracer's photo
Tue 01/27/09 04:07 PM



Sorry K...but we didn't deverge from chimps either....please know first what you want to say....If you put this



WASHINGTON, Wed., Aug. 31, 2005 - The first comprehensive comparison of the genetic blueprints of humans and chimpanzees shows our closest living relatives share perfect identity with 96 percent of our DNA sequence, an international research consortium reported today.



What are you saying?


What are you asking me? What dont you understand?



You say we don't evolve from chimps then post that we share perfect identity with 96 percent of our dna sequence so which is it...we do or we don't.....I don't think....hmmmmmmm know I know I have never changed the fact that I say we were created from God through Adam and Eve..... just saying


Science is always a work in progress, people come up with new theories, and test them. The fact that you're story hasn't changed(that you know of) doesn't make it the right one. . .

feralcatlady's photo
Tue 01/27/09 04:11 PM
This is true but where is it written or said God is a theory......thought so.

Inkracer's photo
Tue 01/27/09 04:16 PM

This is true but where is it written or said God is a theory......thought so.


You cannot prove the existence of god, therefore, like everything in the scientific field, the existence of god is a theory.

IMO, there is enough scientific evidence out there, that makes the existence of a god very, very unlikely.

Krimsa's photo
Tue 01/27/09 04:52 PM



Sorry K...but we didn't deverge from chimps either....please know first what you want to say....If you put this



WASHINGTON, Wed., Aug. 31, 2005 - The first comprehensive comparison of the genetic blueprints of humans and chimpanzees shows our closest living relatives share perfect identity with 96 percent of our DNA sequence, an international research consortium reported today.



What are you saying?


What are you asking me? What dont you understand?



You say we don't evolve from chimps then post that we share perfect identity with 96 percent of our dna sequence so which is it...we do or we don't.....I don't think....hmmmmmmm no I know I have never changed the fact that I say we were created from God through Adam and Eve..... just saying


The reason that our DNA is 96% matched with chimpanzee is because they are our closest living relative on the planet. Six million years ago, chimpanzees and humans diverged from a common ancestor and evolved into unique species. That’s why we are so closely linked. We are on the same "evolutionary fork" with them. There are many instances of this in the animal kingdom today like take African and Indian Elephants. They probably diverged also at one point. Cats and dogs probably did also. There is a link in between or even several links that went extinct. This took millions of years.

feralcatlady's photo
Tue 01/27/09 04:55 PM




Sorry K...but we didn't deverge from chimps either....please know first what you want to say....If you put this



WASHINGTON, Wed., Aug. 31, 2005 - The first comprehensive comparison of the genetic blueprints of humans and chimpanzees shows our closest living relatives share perfect identity with 96 percent of our DNA sequence, an international research consortium reported today.



What are you saying?


What are you asking me? What dont you understand?



You say we don't evolve from chimps then post that we share perfect identity with 96 percent of our dna sequence so which is it...we do or we don't.....I don't think....hmmmmmmm no I know I have never changed the fact that I say we were created from God through Adam and Eve..... just saying


The reason that our DNA is 96% matched with chimpanzee is because they are our closest living relative on the planet. Six million years ago, chimpanzees and humans diverged from a common ancestor and evolved into unique species. That’s why we are so closely linked. We are on the same "evolutionary fork" with them. There are many instances of this in the animal kingdom today like take African and Indian Elephants. They probably diverged also at one point. Cats and dogs probably did also. There is a link in between or even several links that went extinct. This took millions of years.


I think not doll....because if that were the case then you could show me in the last 200 years where their is proof of this...Because if it is always happening like you claim then there should be something....I would even give you 300 years......Not happening....

Krimsa's photo
Tue 01/27/09 05:03 PM





Sorry K...but we didn't deverge from chimps either....please know first what you want to say....If you put this



WASHINGTON, Wed., Aug. 31, 2005 - The first comprehensive comparison of the genetic blueprints of humans and chimpanzees shows our closest living relatives share perfect identity with 96 percent of our DNA sequence, an international research consortium reported today.



What are you saying?


What are you asking me? What dont you understand?



You say we don't evolve from chimps then post that we share perfect identity with 96 percent of our dna sequence so which is it...we do or we don't.....I don't think....hmmmmmmm no I know I have never changed the fact that I say we were created from God through Adam and Eve..... just saying


The reason that our DNA is 96% matched with chimpanzee is because they are our closest living relative on the planet. Six million years ago, chimpanzees and humans diverged from a common ancestor and evolved into unique species. That’s why we are so closely linked. We are on the same "evolutionary fork" with them. There are many instances of this in the animal kingdom today like take African and Indian Elephants. They probably diverged also at one point. Cats and dogs probably did also. There is a link in between or even several links that went extinct. This took millions of years.


I think not doll....because if that were the case then you could show me in the last 200 years where their is proof of this...Because if it is always happening like you claim then there should be something....I would even give you 300 years......Not happening....


Well why only 300 years when I just said it required millions? Actually, they have recorded physical changes occurring in humans in a shorter time period. But in 300 years it would be minor of course.

Abracadabra's photo
Tue 01/27/09 06:58 PM


This is true but where is it written or said God is a theory......thought so.


You cannot prove the existence of god, therefore, like everything in the scientific field, the existence of god is a theory.

IMO, there is enough scientific evidence out there, that makes the existence of a god very, very unlikely.


The Bible has proven itself to be false so that picture of God isn't even in the running.

If there is a spiritual nature to our essence the only picture left is pantheism and science is actually in perfect harmony with pantheism.

Feral wants to believe that she is something other than God. I have no clue what that would be or how she thinks she could exist seperate from God.

If there is an underlying spirit to our essence then that spirit is what we are.

In order for the Biblical view of God to be correct human souls would need to exist in their own right seperate from God. But that would require that humans are gods in their own right.

Of course according to the bible Jesus agreed with that, but Christians reject Jesus' view. They have no respect for anything he ever said.

So no matter how you slice it the Biblical picture of God can't possibly be true and it denies itself without even any need to compare it with scientific evidence.

So comparing the Biblical stories with reality is a waste of time. We already know they don't match and even if they did the Bible has already proven itself to be false on its own anyway, so it's just a waste of time.

Besides, who would want that story to be true? huh

Who would want to believe that they are responsible for God having to have his son nailed to a pole? noway

Any sane person should reject that story at the slightest opportunity. Fortunately the Bible give endless reasons why it has to be false, so there's no reason to even remotely think it could be true, much less feel a need to believe it.






Krimsa's photo
Tue 01/27/09 07:07 PM
The bible is incompatible with reality. Its a work of fiction intended to teach something or other. At least the NT is. The old is pretty much a lot of killing and mayhem.

Nubby's photo
Fri 01/30/09 08:55 AM

No, he created them complete what would evolution have to do with that....They were the first two.


I believe they were.

Nubby's photo
Fri 01/30/09 10:49 AM
Edited by Nubby on Fri 01/30/09 11:06 AM
I dont believe God used evolution to create the first two human beings, but I say it is possible. Some Christians hold this view. Augustine said it years ago that the six days of Genesis are open to a wide range of interpretation. People like John Polkinghorn, former president of Queens college, Cambridge, and good freind of Stephen Hawking, I know John Polkinghorn loves the Lord. So you have good people on both sides of the wall. I believe theology makes most sense in the creation account of the first two human beings without macro evolution of the the first two human beings.

no photo
Fri 01/30/09 11:07 AM
I am not going to try to tell you your religion is incompatible that is for you to decide, but I will say evolution is a fact, so if it is not compatible then indeed Krimsa is right and your religion is not compatible with reality.

1 2 5 6 7 9 11 12 13 49 50