Its a sign of bad leadership when a country is so polarized that each faction would love a chance to take a swing at the other. I realy suspect it wll get worse b4 it gets better. on one side you have the pro life pro war side and the other a pro choice anti war side. Could we be any more divided ? what candidate do you think is a moderate and could unite? certainly not a hundred years of war Mccain.

Wow Jimmy, you almost had me at your post until the last statement about McCain. I thought it was great, and agreed with it until you said that. Instead of saying something negative about one person, why can't you be more balanced on the good and bad of both candidates?

You were going to actually agree with madisonman? I think I hear horseman of the apocolypse

Well, Jimmy was right on balanced when he was saying we had pro-life, pro-war Vs Pro-choice anti-war. After he dissed McCain, he pulled a typical Carter on us...

...so all I have to say is....

Jimmy Carter.

LOL

Lol... Poor Jimmy Carter. Nicest man in the world. Worst president of my time.

true.

if Carter stood up for the Shah of Iran in 79, and quenched the shia revolt lead by Khomeini , then Saddam would not have rose to power in Iraq.

he was emboldened by the Shia in Iran making overtures toward Iraq, and sunnis don't like sharing power. They are working with the US military even now, and no longer against US efforts, to protect their age old grip on power and are keeping the unrest down as best they can, even though they will wrestle away control some day.

HHMMMMM...........


But the point is true about Carter.

One of the most inept and indecisve men to ever tread the carpet of the oval office.

He probably should not have been there, but his credentials and connections to the ruling class lent him the support he needed to get the nod.

Conspiratorial? Nope. just true.


nobama 2008

madman knows i think..he just dont want to admit it.

Here Here, jimmy got better when he was out of office not bothering anyone

12 pages discussing an internet hoax designed to smear the first female Republican to run for VP.

The Democrats are terrified. Not only did they find out that not all women are vapid liberals, but they are forced to see an accomplished mother of five succeed without their help. It must be galling.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/palin/bannedbooks.asp

I'm sure this has already been posted, right? It's a totally false story

Perhaps EVERYONE should be checking out snopes more often before posting anything about either party.

Yeah Yeah Coulda, woulda,shoulda

Yeah, it was pretty much debunked in the first page or two but the conversation around it lingered and changed focus.

ohhhhhh, just dug up a different pile of dirt?

The usual stuff. Liberals are sleezy devils, conservatives are self righteous war mongers. Or the like. Every once in a while someone throws in a valid point. Hard to find though.

Personally I believe that Jimmy Carter was one of the best presidents the United States had, next to FDR... Sadams rise to power was thanks to the US that feared loosing total control of the region after the religious uprising in Iran, that disposed the King, another US supported dictator...but thats a different story for a different time...

yeah but then you have to go all the way back to the Potsdam conference where America and the Soviets agreed to share Iran. But we forced em out, which really pissed off Russia (Iran IS their border). so we revived the Peacock throne

and there is a lot more to it than just "George Bush sucks"

Bottom line is she wanted books removed . . . .

She did not want those books on the shelves of the library.

I am sure if the librarian had been less altruistic, and more of a follower then the books would be gone . . . and no one the wiser.

The only hoax is this list, not the fact that she broached the subject.