100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Book Banning by Palin | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
I am sure the IT guys in Alaskan state government are pretty busy now. The press worldwide and many private citizens are hitting government sites like crazy looking for all kinds of information. I tried off and on for a couple days to get onto several of their government sites without success.  Ive noticed that too. It seems like someone is trying to control all information about her.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, D!ck Cheney said, "In the final analysis we will find that the Iraqis did have a robust program." So WTF are they? Got nothing on this, huh? Confirmed US Deaths: 4152 War in Iraq Costs: $552,077,857,154 How many deaths and cost (inflation adjusted) did we have against Hitler? Wasn't it a democrat that got us involved in that war? Did Hitler have any weapons of mass destruction? What is the death toll and ongoing cost of being in Korea? Who got us involved there? Any weapons of mass destruction found? What about Vietnam? Why do the Democrats always have us going to war in these countries so far away from the U.S. and at such a great financial and mortal cost to us? Do we really want another democrat when there are so many hot situations with Pakistan, Iran, Russia/Georgia, etc? BS Smokescreen... We invaded Iraq with fictional WMD's as justification. So did Bill Clinton, Operation Desert Fox, Killed about 600 to 2000 Iraqis, You can see on my Previous posts  What do you think about this bookbanning issue kerbear?  It looks like there may be something to some of this?
I am not exactly a Fan of book banning. but it is not exactly Banning it all together, More like banning from the library, But as long as you can still buy the books...  But why would someone want to take books out that are already in the library? Especially books that are considered classic by popular acclaim. Those books are the kinda books libraries are supposed to have.
This is not something new and she is not the only one who has pushed this. They have been trying to ban the Harry potter books for Ions, Personally I have all the movies and I love them, but when it comes down to it, I pick and choose what is My Book Lbrary and as long as they don't tell me that I am not allowed to read it...... _____________________________________________ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_debates_over_Harry_Potter But its obvious that Harry Potter books are going to be considered classics. Stephen King books are considered classics now. I just had an entire college course that was mostly discussion of Stephen King. So J.K. Rowling will be the same way. People used to want to ban Mark Twain from libraries as well. The public libraries are there to provide access to popular (and controversial) literature to people who otherwise cant afford to buy them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, D!ck Cheney said, "In the final analysis we will find that the Iraqis did have a robust program." So WTF are they? Got nothing on this, huh? Confirmed US Deaths: 4152 War in Iraq Costs: $552,077,857,154 How many deaths and cost (inflation adjusted) did we have against Hitler? Wasn't it a democrat that got us involved in that war? Did Hitler have any weapons of mass destruction? What is the death toll and ongoing cost of being in Korea? Who got us involved there? Any weapons of mass destruction found? What about Vietnam? Why do the Democrats always have us going to war in these countries so far away from the U.S. and at such a great financial and mortal cost to us? Do we really want another democrat when there are so many hot situations with Pakistan, Iran, Russia/Georgia, etc? BS Smokescreen... We invaded Iraq with fictional WMD's as justification. So did Bill Clinton, Operation Desert Fox, Killed about 600 to 2000 Iraqis, You can see on my Previous posts What do you think about this bookbanning issue kerbear? It looks like there may be something to some of this?
I am not exactly a Fan of book banning. but it is not exactly Banning it all together, More like banning from the library, But as long as you can still buy the books... But why would someone want to take books out that are already in the library? Especially books that are considered classic by popular acclaim. Those books are the kinda books libraries are supposed to have.
This is not something new and she is not the only one who has pushed this. They have been trying to ban the Harry potter books for Ions, Personally I have all the movies and I love them, but when it comes down to it, I pick and choose what is My Book Lbrary and as long as they don't tell me that I am not allowed to read it...... _____________________________________________ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_debates_over_Harry_Potter But its obvious that Harry Potter books are going to be considered classics. Stephen King books are considered classics now. I just had an entire college course that was mostly discussion of Stephen King. So J.K. Rowling will be the same way. People used to want to ban Mark Twain from libraries as well. The public libraries are there to provide access to popular (and controversial) literature to people who otherwise cant afford to buy them.
Well, the Mark Twain books, you can blame that on Political Correctness.. Much modern scholarship of Huckleberry Finn has focused on its treatment of race. Many Twain scholars have argued that the book, by humanizing Jim and exposing the fallacies of the racist assumptions of slavery, is an attack on racism.[15] Others have argued that the book falls short on this score, especially in its depiction of Jim.[11] According to Professor Stephen Railton of the University of Virginia, Twain was unable to fully rise above the stereotypes of black people that white readers of his era expected and enjoyed. Twain therefore resorted to minstrel show-style comedy to provide humor at Jim's expense, and ended up confirming rather than challenging late-19th century racist stereotypes.[16] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adventures_of_Huckleberry_Finn |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From librarian.net here is a list of books Sarah Palin sought to ban when she was mayor. Sarah and Adolph would have gotten along famously I bet. A Clockwork Orange by Anthony Burgess A Wrinkle in Time by Madeleine L’Engle Annie on My Mind by Nancy Garden As I Lay Dying by William Faulkner Blubber by Judy Blume Brave New World by Aldous Huxley Bridge to Terabithia by Katherine Paterson Canterbury Tales by Chaucer Carrie by Stephen King Catch-22 by Joseph Heller Christine by Stephen King Confessions by Jean-Jacques Rousseau Cujo by Stephen King Curses, Hexes, and Spells by Daniel Cohen Daddy’s Roommate by Michael Willhoite Day No Pigs Would Die by Robert Peck Death of a Salesman by Arthur Miller Decameron by Boccaccio East of Eden by John Steinbeck Fallen Angels by Walter Myers Fanny Hill (Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure) by John Cleland Flowers For Algernon by Daniel Keyes Forever by Judy Blume Grendel by John Champlin Gardner Halloween ABC by Eve Merriam Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone by J.K. Rowling Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets by J.K. Rowling Harry Potter and the Prizoner of Azkaban by J.K. Rowling Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire by J.K. Rowling Have to Go by Robert Munsch Heather Has Two Mommies by Leslea Newman How to Eat Fried Worms by Thomas Rockwell Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings by Maya Angelou Impressions edited by Jack Booth In the Night Kitchen by Maurice Sendak It’s Okay if You Don’t Love Me by Norma Klein James and the Giant Peach by Roald Dahl Lady Chatterley’s Lover by D.H. Lawrence Leaves of Grass by Walt Whitman Little Red Riding Hood by Jacob and Wilhelm Grimm Lord of the Flies by William Golding Love is One of the Choices by Norma Klein Lysistrata by Aristophanes More Scary Stories in the Dark by Alvin Schwartz My Brother Sam Is Dead by James Lincoln Collier and Christopher Collier My House by Nikki Giovanni My Friend Flicka by Mary O’Hara Night Chills by Dean Koontz Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck On My Honor by Marion Dane Bauer One Day in The Life of Ivan Denisovich by Alexander Solzhenitsyn One Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest by Ken Kesey One Hundred Years of Solitude by Gabriel Garcia Marquez Ordinary People by Judith Guest Our Bodies, Ourselves by Boston Women’s Health Collective Prince of Tides by Pat Conroy Revolting Rhymes by Roald Dahl Scary Stories 3: More Tales to Chill Your Bones by Alvin Schwartz Scary Stories in the Dark by Alvin Schwartz Separate Peace by John Knowles Silas Marner by George Eliot Slaughterhouse-Five by Kurt Vonnegut, Jr. Tarzan of the Apes by Edgar Rice Burroughs The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain The Adventures of Tom Sawyer by Mark Twain The Bastard by John Jakes The Catcher in the Rye by J.D. Salinger The Chocolate War by Robert Cormier The Color Purple by Alice Walker The Devil’s Alternative by Frederick Forsyth The Figure in the Shadows by John Bellairs The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck The Great Gilly Hopkins by Katherine Paterson The Handmaid’s Tale by Margaret Atwood The Headless Cupid by Zilpha Snyder The Learning Tree by Gordon Parks The Living Bible by William C. Bower The Merchant of Venice by William Shakespeare The New Teenage Body Book by Kathy McCoy and Charles Wibbelsman The Pigman by Paul Zindel The Seduction of Peter S. by Lawrence Sanders The Shining by Stephen King The Witches by Roald Dahl The Witches of Worm by Zilpha Snyder Then Again, Maybe I Won’t by Judy Blume To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper Lee Twelfth Night by William Shakespeare Webster’s Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary by the Merriam-Webster Editorial Staff Witches, Pumpkins, and Grinning Ghosts: The Story of the Halloween Symbols by Edna Barth 
And you believe that Banning books. Would everyone now like to agree that we the people are in some serious ****!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, D!ck Cheney said, "In the final analysis we will find that the Iraqis did have a robust program." So WTF are they? Got nothing on this, huh? Confirmed US Deaths: 4152 War in Iraq Costs: $552,077,857,154 How many deaths and cost (inflation adjusted) did we have against Hitler? Wasn't it a democrat that got us involved in that war? Did Hitler have any weapons of mass destruction? What is the death toll and ongoing cost of being in Korea? Who got us involved there? Any weapons of mass destruction found? What about Vietnam? Why do the Democrats always have us going to war in these countries so far away from the U.S. and at such a great financial and mortal cost to us? Do we really want another democrat when there are so many hot situations with Pakistan, Iran, Russia/Georgia, etc? BS Smokescreen... We invaded Iraq with fictional WMD's as justification. So did Bill Clinton, Operation Desert Fox, Killed about 600 to 2000 Iraqis, You can see on my Previous posts What do you think about this bookbanning issue kerbear? It looks like there may be something to some of this?
I am not exactly a Fan of book banning. but it is not exactly Banning it all together, More like banning from the library, But as long as you can still buy the books... But why would someone want to take books out that are already in the library? Especially books that are considered classic by popular acclaim. Those books are the kinda books libraries are supposed to have.
This is not something new and she is not the only one who has pushed this. They have been trying to ban the Harry potter books for Ions, Personally I have all the movies and I love them, but when it comes down to it, I pick and choose what is My Book Lbrary and as long as they don't tell me that I am not allowed to read it...... _____________________________________________ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_debates_over_Harry_Potter But its obvious that Harry Potter books are going to be considered classics. Stephen King books are considered classics now. I just had an entire college course that was mostly discussion of Stephen King. So J.K. Rowling will be the same way. People used to want to ban Mark Twain from libraries as well. The public libraries are there to provide access to popular (and controversial) literature to people who otherwise cant afford to buy them.
Well, the Mark Twain books, you can blame that on Political Correctness.. Much modern scholarship of Huckleberry Finn has focused on its treatment of race. Many Twain scholars have argued that the book, by humanizing Jim and exposing the fallacies of the racist assumptions of slavery, is an attack on racism.[15] Others have argued that the book falls short on this score, especially in its depiction of Jim.[11] According to Professor Stephen Railton of the University of Virginia, Twain was unable to fully rise above the stereotypes of black people that white readers of his era expected and enjoyed. Twain therefore resorted to minstrel show-style comedy to provide humor at Jim's expense, and ended up confirming rather than challenging late-19th century racist stereotypes.[16] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adventures_of_Huckleberry_Finn  Yeah I know. Stephen King uses racial slurs in his books as well. Which makes you wonder why someone would want to ban Harry Potter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
so, maybe she inquired about book banning?
Im a RN, I inquire about what exactly kinda drugs I could kill someone with! does this make me an effin murderer??? nope, knowledges is power. Its amazing how y'all take one thing and just run with it. after reading some of these posts...I really as a woman never ever want to be accused of thinking TOO much again. Its obvious men do it too. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
MirrorMirror
on
Sun 09/07/08 02:30 PM
|
|
so, maybe she inquired about book banning? Im a RN, I inquire about what exactly kinda drugs I could kill someone with! does this make me an effin murderer??? nope, knowledges is power. Its amazing how y'all take one thing and just run with it. after reading some of these posts...I really as a woman never ever want to be accused of thinking TOO much again. Its obvious men do it too.  Im not sure what you mean by all of that. I still think McCain will win but this is a bizarre story and it seems to have a seed of truth to it. This is an important issue that is open to debate. This is the kind of stuff people are supposed to be discussing in an election instead of teen pregnancies and silly stuff like that.Theres nothing wrong with this discussion. It has nothing to do with her being a female but it does indicate what her outlook on our fundamental freedom of speech is.  And her outlook toward intellectualism.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, D!ck Cheney said, "In the final analysis we will find that the Iraqis did have a robust program." So WTF are they? Got nothing on this, huh? Confirmed US Deaths: 4152 War in Iraq Costs: $552,077,857,154 How many deaths and cost (inflation adjusted) did we have against Hitler? Wasn't it a democrat that got us involved in that war? Did Hitler have any weapons of mass destruction? What is the death toll and ongoing cost of being in Korea? Who got us involved there? Any weapons of mass destruction found? What about Vietnam? Why do the Democrats always have us going to war in these countries so far away from the U.S. and at such a great financial and mortal cost to us? Do we really want another democrat when there are so many hot situations with Pakistan, Iran, Russia/Georgia, etc? BS Smokescreen... We invaded Iraq with fictional WMD's as justification. So did Bill Clinton, Operation Desert Fox, Killed about 600 to 2000 Iraqis, You can see on my Previous posts What do you think about this bookbanning issue kerbear? It looks like there may be something to some of this?
I am not exactly a Fan of book banning. but it is not exactly Banning it all together, More like banning from the library, But as long as you can still buy the books... But why would someone want to take books out that are already in the library? Especially books that are considered classic by popular acclaim. Those books are the kinda books libraries are supposed to have.
This is not something new and she is not the only one who has pushed this. They have been trying to ban the Harry potter books for Ions, Personally I have all the movies and I love them, but when it comes down to it, I pick and choose what is My Book Lbrary and as long as they don't tell me that I am not allowed to read it...... _____________________________________________ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_debates_over_Harry_Potter But its obvious that Harry Potter books are going to be considered classics. Stephen King books are considered classics now. I just had an entire college course that was mostly discussion of Stephen King. So J.K. Rowling will be the same way. People used to want to ban Mark Twain from libraries as well. The public libraries are there to provide access to popular (and controversial) literature to people who otherwise cant afford to buy them.
Well, the Mark Twain books, you can blame that on Political Correctness.. Much modern scholarship of Huckleberry Finn has focused on its treatment of race. Many Twain scholars have argued that the book, by humanizing Jim and exposing the fallacies of the racist assumptions of slavery, is an attack on racism.[15] Others have argued that the book falls short on this score, especially in its depiction of Jim.[11] According to Professor Stephen Railton of the University of Virginia, Twain was unable to fully rise above the stereotypes of black people that white readers of his era expected and enjoyed. Twain therefore resorted to minstrel show-style comedy to provide humor at Jim's expense, and ended up confirming rather than challenging late-19th century racist stereotypes.[16] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adventures_of_Huckleberry_Finn Yeah I know. Stephen King uses racial slurs in his books as well. Which makes you wonder why someone would want to ban Harry Potter.
People always wanted to ban Harry potter because it promotes witchcraft. If you look at a lot of those books, it has the word Witch in them... You can Blame Religious organizations on that... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, D!ck Cheney said, "In the final analysis we will find that the Iraqis did have a robust program." So WTF are they? Got nothing on this, huh? Confirmed US Deaths: 4152 War in Iraq Costs: $552,077,857,154 How many deaths and cost (inflation adjusted) did we have against Hitler? Wasn't it a democrat that got us involved in that war? Did Hitler have any weapons of mass destruction? What is the death toll and ongoing cost of being in Korea? Who got us involved there? Any weapons of mass destruction found? What about Vietnam? Why do the Democrats always have us going to war in these countries so far away from the U.S. and at such a great financial and mortal cost to us? Do we really want another democrat when there are so many hot situations with Pakistan, Iran, Russia/Georgia, etc? BS Smokescreen... We invaded Iraq with fictional WMD's as justification. So did Bill Clinton, Operation Desert Fox, Killed about 600 to 2000 Iraqis, You can see on my Previous posts What do you think about this bookbanning issue kerbear? It looks like there may be something to some of this?
I am not exactly a Fan of book banning. but it is not exactly Banning it all together, More like banning from the library, But as long as you can still buy the books... But why would someone want to take books out that are already in the library? Especially books that are considered classic by popular acclaim. Those books are the kinda books libraries are supposed to have.
This is not something new and she is not the only one who has pushed this. They have been trying to ban the Harry potter books for Ions, Personally I have all the movies and I love them, but when it comes down to it, I pick and choose what is My Book Lbrary and as long as they don't tell me that I am not allowed to read it...... _____________________________________________ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_debates_over_Harry_Potter But its obvious that Harry Potter books are going to be considered classics. Stephen King books are considered classics now. I just had an entire college course that was mostly discussion of Stephen King. So J.K. Rowling will be the same way. People used to want to ban Mark Twain from libraries as well. The public libraries are there to provide access to popular (and controversial) literature to people who otherwise cant afford to buy them.
Well, the Mark Twain books, you can blame that on Political Correctness.. Much modern scholarship of Huckleberry Finn has focused on its treatment of race. Many Twain scholars have argued that the book, by humanizing Jim and exposing the fallacies of the racist assumptions of slavery, is an attack on racism.[15] Others have argued that the book falls short on this score, especially in its depiction of Jim.[11] According to Professor Stephen Railton of the University of Virginia, Twain was unable to fully rise above the stereotypes of black people that white readers of his era expected and enjoyed. Twain therefore resorted to minstrel show-style comedy to provide humor at Jim's expense, and ended up confirming rather than challenging late-19th century racist stereotypes.[16] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adventures_of_Huckleberry_Finn Yeah I know. Stephen King uses racial slurs in his books as well. Which makes you wonder why someone would want to ban Harry Potter.
People always wanted to ban Harry potter because it promotes witchcraft. If you look at a lot of those books, it has the word Witch in them... You can Blame Religious organizations on that...  Surely you dont agree with that do you (about Potter books promoting witchcraft)?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, D!ck Cheney said, "In the final analysis we will find that the Iraqis did have a robust program." So WTF are they? Got nothing on this, huh? Confirmed US Deaths: 4152 War in Iraq Costs: $552,077,857,154 How many deaths and cost (inflation adjusted) did we have against Hitler? Wasn't it a democrat that got us involved in that war? Did Hitler have any weapons of mass destruction? What is the death toll and ongoing cost of being in Korea? Who got us involved there? Any weapons of mass destruction found? What about Vietnam? Why do the Democrats always have us going to war in these countries so far away from the U.S. and at such a great financial and mortal cost to us? Do we really want another democrat when there are so many hot situations with Pakistan, Iran, Russia/Georgia, etc? BS Smokescreen... We invaded Iraq with fictional WMD's as justification. So did Bill Clinton, Operation Desert Fox, Killed about 600 to 2000 Iraqis, You can see on my Previous posts What do you think about this bookbanning issue kerbear? It looks like there may be something to some of this?
I am not exactly a Fan of book banning. but it is not exactly Banning it all together, More like banning from the library, But as long as you can still buy the books... But why would someone want to take books out that are already in the library? Especially books that are considered classic by popular acclaim. Those books are the kinda books libraries are supposed to have.
This is not something new and she is not the only one who has pushed this. They have been trying to ban the Harry potter books for Ions, Personally I have all the movies and I love them, but when it comes down to it, I pick and choose what is My Book Lbrary and as long as they don't tell me that I am not allowed to read it...... _____________________________________________ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_debates_over_Harry_Potter But its obvious that Harry Potter books are going to be considered classics. Stephen King books are considered classics now. I just had an entire college course that was mostly discussion of Stephen King. So J.K. Rowling will be the same way. People used to want to ban Mark Twain from libraries as well. The public libraries are there to provide access to popular (and controversial) literature to people who otherwise cant afford to buy them.
Well, the Mark Twain books, you can blame that on Political Correctness.. Much modern scholarship of Huckleberry Finn has focused on its treatment of race. Many Twain scholars have argued that the book, by humanizing Jim and exposing the fallacies of the racist assumptions of slavery, is an attack on racism.[15] Others have argued that the book falls short on this score, especially in its depiction of Jim.[11] According to Professor Stephen Railton of the University of Virginia, Twain was unable to fully rise above the stereotypes of black people that white readers of his era expected and enjoyed. Twain therefore resorted to minstrel show-style comedy to provide humor at Jim's expense, and ended up confirming rather than challenging late-19th century racist stereotypes.[16] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adventures_of_Huckleberry_Finn Yeah I know. Stephen King uses racial slurs in his books as well. Which makes you wonder why someone would want to ban Harry Potter.
People always wanted to ban Harry potter because it promotes witchcraft. If you look at a lot of those books, it has the word Witch in them... You can Blame Religious organizations on that... Surely you dont agree with that do you (about Potter books promoting witchcraft)?
Personally I am a big fan of harry potter and I don't think promotes witchcraft, but it is going to be up to the parents to choose what their kids read. I have never agree with Religious organizations telling me what I should read or Drink. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
so, maybe she inquired about book banning? Im a RN, I inquire about what exactly kinda drugs I could kill someone with! does this make me an effin murderer??? nope, knowledges is power. Its amazing how y'all take one thing and just run with it. after reading some of these posts...I really as a woman never ever want to be accused of thinking TOO much again. Its obvious men do it too. Im not sure what you mean by all of that. I still think McCain will win but this is a bizarre story and it seems to have a seed of truth to it. This is an important issue that is open to debate. This is the kind of stuff people are supposed to be discussing in an election instead of teen pregnancies and silly stuff like that.Theres nothing wrong with this discussion. It has nothing to do with her being a female but it does indicate what her outlook on our fundamental freedom of speech is. And her outlook toward intellectualism.
I agree mirror it is an important discussion. and i for one would not ever ban/burn a book. not even pornography, lol. I could research it, and havent....but GUT instinct would tell me that Palin did not try to ban all the books on that list. and if the list is a figment of somebody's imagination..then I would question if she just inquired about having A book banned just to see what it would take. I will admit at this point...I am curious on what it takes to get a book banned from a library or even all libraries. just for curiosities sake. |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
voileazur
on
Sun 09/07/08 04:23 PM
|
|
Sarah Palin is intelligent, personable, and most effective and engaging as she demonstrated in her acceptance speach tuesday night last.
She is a self declared 'bible believing' fundamentalist christian, and 'political reformer'. As such, and in keeping with their beliefs, they see 'evil' in numerous places, including BOOKS on public library shelves. It shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone that a bible believing fundamentalist christian WILL PUT RELIGION AHEAD OF STATE!!! Sarah Palin is intelligent, personable, and most effective and engaging as a human being. She is also very clear in the positions and convictions she will be championing if elected Vice-president, a stone throw away from President. If you are a bible believing religious fundamentalist, NRA card carrying member, ennemy of free choice, and a die-hard conservative, vote for the McCain-Palin ticket. If on the other hand you are 'moderate' anything (republican, democrat or independent), the choice is just as clear the other way: STAY WELL AWAY FROM THE McCain-Palin ticket!!! No need for personal attacks, or inaccurate associations, Sarah Palin's positions couldn't be more explicit, and THE CHOICE COULDN'T BE CLEARER!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well said.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sarah Palin is intelligent, personable, and most effective and engaging as she demonstrated in her acceptance speach tuesday night last. She is a self declared 'bible believing' fundamentalist christian, and 'political reformer'. As such, and in keeping with their beliefs, they see 'evil' in numerous places, including BOOKS on public library shelves. It shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone that a bible believing fundamentalist christian WILL PUT RELIGION AHEAD OF STATE!!! Sarah Palin is intelligent, personable, and most effective and engaging as a human being. She is also very clear in the positions and convictions she will be championing if elected Vice-president, a stone throw away from President. If you are a bible believing religious fundamentalist, NRA card carrying member, ennemy of free choice, and a die-hard conservative, vote for the McCain-Palin ticket. If on the other hand you are 'moderate' anything (republican, democrat or independent), the choice is just as clear the other way: STAY WELL AWAY FROM THE McCain-Palin ticket!!! No need for personal attacks, or inaccurate associations, Sarah Palin's positions couldn't be more explicit, and THE CHOICE COULDN'T BE CLEARER!!! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, D!ck Cheney said, "In the final analysis we will find that the Iraqis did have a robust program." So WTF are they? Got nothing on this, huh? Confirmed US Deaths: 4152 War in Iraq Costs: $552,077,857,154 How many deaths and cost (inflation adjusted) did we have against Hitler? Wasn't it a democrat that got us involved in that war? Did Hitler have any weapons of mass destruction? What is the death toll and ongoing cost of being in Korea? Who got us involved there? Any weapons of mass destruction found? What about Vietnam? Why do the Democrats always have us going to war in these countries so far away from the U.S. and at such a great financial and mortal cost to us? Do we really want another democrat when there are so many hot situations with Pakistan, Iran, Russia/Georgia, etc? BS Smokescreen... We invaded Iraq with fictional WMD's as justification. So did Bill Clinton, Operation Desert Fox, Killed about 600 to 2000 Iraqis, You can see on my Previous posts What do you think about this bookbanning issue kerbear? It looks like there may be something to some of this?
I am not exactly a Fan of book banning. but it is not exactly Banning it all together, More like banning from the library, But as long as you can still buy the books... What does "i am not exactly a fan of book banning" mean? It's ok if a book is just banned from a library? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
voileazur
on
Sun 09/07/08 05:57 PM
|
|
Sarah Palin is intelligent, personable, and most effective and engaging as she demonstrated in her acceptance speach tuesday night last. She is a self declared 'bible believing' fundamentalist christian, and 'political reformer'. As such, and in keeping with their beliefs, they see 'evil' in numerous places, including BOOKS on public library shelves. It shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone that a bible believing fundamentalist christian WILL PUT RELIGION AHEAD OF STATE!!! Sarah Palin is intelligent, personable, and most effective and engaging as a human being. She is also very clear in the positions and convictions she will be championing if elected Vice-president, a stone throw away from President. If you are a bible believing religious fundamentalist, NRA card carrying member, ennemy of free choice, and a die-hard conservative, vote for the McCain-Palin ticket. If on the other hand you are 'moderate' anything (republican, democrat or independent), the choice is just as clear the other way: STAY WELL AWAY FROM THE McCain-Palin ticket!!! No need for personal attacks, or inaccurate associations, Sarah Palin's positions couldn't be more explicit, and THE CHOICE COULDN'T BE CLEARER!!!
I'm afraid it is YOUR 'off topic' gizzmo that is ... ... OFF TOPIC!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Could it be she doesn't feel that public monies should be spent on having these books rather than the books thenselves?
Hell I've read a lot of those books on the list. I think I am still a regestered Rep. but I generally disagree with those who ban books. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sarah Palin is intelligent, personable, and most effective and engaging as she demonstrated in her acceptance speach tuesday night last. She is a self declared 'bible believing' fundamentalist christian, and 'political reformer'. As such, and in keeping with their beliefs, they see 'evil' in numerous places, including BOOKS on public library shelves. It shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone that a bible believing fundamentalist christian WILL PUT RELIGION AHEAD OF STATE!!! Sarah Palin is intelligent, personable, and most effective and engaging as a human being. She is also very clear in the positions and convictions she will be championing if elected Vice-president, a stone throw away from President. If you are a bible believing religious fundamentalist, NRA card carrying member, ennemy of free choice, and a die-hard conservative, vote for the McCain-Palin ticket. If on the other hand you are 'moderate' anything (republican, democrat or independent), the choice is just as clear the other way: STAY WELL AWAY FROM THE McCain-Palin ticket!!! No need for personal attacks, or inaccurate associations, Sarah Palin's positions couldn't be more explicit, and THE CHOICE COULDN'T BE CLEARER!!! You are in Canada, you don't have a say |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is not like they are going to be Illegal, you are not going to goto Jail for having them.... They are just not in the public Library....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sarah Palin is intelligent, personable, and most effective and engaging as she demonstrated in her acceptance speach tuesday night last. She is a self declared 'bible believing' fundamentalist christian, and 'political reformer'. As such, and in keeping with their beliefs, they see 'evil' in numerous places, including BOOKS on public library shelves. It shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone that a bible believing fundamentalist christian WILL PUT RELIGION AHEAD OF STATE!!! Sarah Palin is intelligent, personable, and most effective and engaging as a human being. She is also very clear in the positions and convictions she will be championing if elected Vice-president, a stone throw away from President. If you are a bible believing religious fundamentalist, NRA card carrying member, ennemy of free choice, and a die-hard conservative, vote for the McCain-Palin ticket. If on the other hand you are 'moderate' anything (republican, democrat or independent), the choice is just as clear the other way: STAY WELL AWAY FROM THE McCain-Palin ticket!!! No need for personal attacks, or inaccurate associations, Sarah Palin's positions couldn't be more explicit, and THE CHOICE COULDN'T BE CLEARER!!! You are in Canada, you don't have a say You're on the WORLD WIDE WEB, and so am I. I HAVE ALL THE THE SAY, ... I SAY!!! Have you a 'say' on that!!! |
|
|
|
|
