1 2 3 4 6 Next
Topic: Osama Bin Laden's hate? Why?
Lindyy's photo
Fri 07/11/08 03:01 PM




huh Wheres Quickstepper?? huh She'll say something funny 4-surelaugh


What she has to say is definitely not funny.

But I will probably laugh at it anyway.
laugh me2laugh


.. or Lindyy will come in and say something about you being irreverent and refer it to some inane biblical quotation


YEP, I sure will:smile:

Lindyy
:heart:

Dragoness's photo
Fri 07/11/08 03:07 PM




I have asked all along, where the hell is bin laden? When Bush headed us towards Iraq, I wanted to know where is bin laden. When we declared "military action" against Iraq, I wanted to know where was bin laden. To this day I want to know where is bin laden. We should have been watching him on trial and we should have determined our justice for the 3000 lifes he took but again I will say, bin laden was not sitting on any oil soooooooooooo he is not of interest to us militarily.


I do not know how many times you have to be told to go to the border of Afghanistan and Pakistan, hike through the mountains, up and down, in and out of every cave, and you just may find him. No one else can!!laugh laugh laugh laugh






Why should I have to do it when it SHOULD HAVE BEEN A PRIORITY ON OUR ILLUSTRIOUS LEADERS MIND FROM GET. Are you going to tell me like some others on here have hinted at that SINCE BIN LADEN WAS "TOO HARD" TO GET WE JUST WENT TO IRAQ?? Because that would be the most horrendous thing I could ever hear come from an American.

no photo
Fri 07/11/08 03:16 PM

i respectfully disagree with the characterization that one people's terrorist is another's freedom fighter. this represents the two parties conflict on equal footing and this is
typically not the case but certainly not in current Islamic
fundamentalist conflagrations.

you cannot reasonably make this symmetric equivalence.
Kim Jong-Il and Saddam Hussein saw themselves as
freedom fighters as they terrorized millions. They
even had supporters!

but they were no ones freedom fighter. their cause was/is
cancerous to humanity and to freedom. you cannot equate
the bombing of a schoolbus to shooting someone who is
attempting to launch a rocket at you.

that is why (among other things) that we have something
known as killing in self defense as a valid legal defense.

we attacked bin laden and overthrew the Taliban
to disrupt his attempts to kill us and Afgan santuary
of terrorists.

we attacked hussein because he had demonstrated a willingness
and capability to kill civilians in order to try to intimidate
his enemies and he openly threatened the US and our allies
while defiantly refusing attempts to disarm him. there was
also a concern that he was continuing to pursue nuclear options...and because of the oil he had plenty of mad money.

your argument that bin laden lives because of his lack of
oil is naive. if bin laden were to peek out of hiding he would
be taken out. he is merely hidden better and less effective
hence less of a threat.

bin laden like hussein is a man who gleefully cheers the slaughter of
innocent civilians in the name of Islam and provides funds
and support to those who do the killing.


The US went to Iraq for the following :
1 : the oil : to steal Iraqi oil .
2 : to have permanent military bases .
3 : For Israel to dominate the whole region .
You must understand that the neo cons , the hawks ,do not work for the U.N or the security council but they work for their own agenda and specially ISRAEL .
Anyone who can not see that is ZERO politics .

no photo
Fri 07/11/08 03:31 PM


i respectfully disagree with the characterization that one people's terrorist is another's freedom fighter. this represents the two parties conflict on equal footing and this is
typically not the case but certainly not in current Islamic
fundamentalist conflagrations.

you cannot reasonably make this symmetric equivalence.
Kim Jong-Il and Saddam Hussein saw themselves as
freedom fighters as they terrorized millions. They
even had supporters!

but they were no ones freedom fighter. their cause was/is
cancerous to humanity and to freedom. you cannot equate
the bombing of a schoolbus to shooting someone who is
attempting to launch a rocket at you.

that is why (among other things) that we have something
known as killing in self defense as a valid legal defense.

we attacked bin laden and overthrew the Taliban
to disrupt his attempts to kill us and Afgan santuary
of terrorists.

we attacked hussein because he had demonstrated a willingness
and capability to kill civilians in order to try to intimidate
his enemies and he openly threatened the US and our allies
while defiantly refusing attempts to disarm him. there was
also a concern that he was continuing to pursue nuclear options...and because of the oil he had plenty of mad money.

your argument that bin laden lives because of his lack of
oil is naive. if bin laden were to peek out of hiding he would
be taken out. he is merely hidden better and less effective
hence less of a threat.

bin laden like hussein is a man who gleefully cheers the slaughter of
innocent civilians in the name of Islam and provides funds
and support to those who do the killing.


The US went to Iraq for the following :
1 : the oil : to steal Iraqi oil .
2 : to have permanent military bases .
3 : For Israel to dominate the whole region .


When none of the 3 happen, then what are you going to use for the normal talking points? Not one of the three have occurred yet.

no photo
Fri 07/11/08 03:41 PM



i respectfully disagree with the characterization that one people's terrorist is another's freedom fighter. this represents the two parties conflict on equal footing and this is
typically not the case but certainly not in current Islamic
fundamentalist conflagrations.

you cannot reasonably make this symmetric equivalence.
Kim Jong-Il and Saddam Hussein saw themselves as
freedom fighters as they terrorized millions. They
even had supporters!

but they were no ones freedom fighter. their cause was/is
cancerous to humanity and to freedom. you cannot equate
the bombing of a schoolbus to shooting someone who is
attempting to launch a rocket at you.

that is why (among other things) that we have something
known as killing in self defense as a valid legal defense.

we attacked bin laden and overthrew the Taliban
to disrupt his attempts to kill us and Afgan santuary
of terrorists.

we attacked hussein because he had demonstrated a willingness
and capability to kill civilians in order to try to intimidate
his enemies and he openly threatened the US and our allies
while defiantly refusing attempts to disarm him. there was
also a concern that he was continuing to pursue nuclear options...and because of the oil he had plenty of mad money.

your argument that bin laden lives because of his lack of
oil is naive. if bin laden were to peek out of hiding he would
be taken out. he is merely hidden better and less effective
hence less of a threat.

bin laden like hussein is a man who gleefully cheers the slaughter of
innocent civilians in the name of Islam and provides funds
and support to those who do the killing.


The US went to Iraq for the following :
1 : the oil : to steal Iraqi oil .
2 : to have permanent military bases .
3 : For Israel to dominate the whole region .


When none of the 3 happen, then what are you going to use for the normal talking points? Not one of the three have occurred yet.


The three points are already there and only a ROBOT can not see them. Those who hate the truth hate humans due to hatred and racism . We can all see reality .

no photo
Fri 07/11/08 03:48 PM




i respectfully disagree with the characterization that one people's terrorist is another's freedom fighter. this represents the two parties conflict on equal footing and this is
typically not the case but certainly not in current Islamic
fundamentalist conflagrations.

you cannot reasonably make this symmetric equivalence.
Kim Jong-Il and Saddam Hussein saw themselves as
freedom fighters as they terrorized millions. They
even had supporters!

but they were no ones freedom fighter. their cause was/is
cancerous to humanity and to freedom. you cannot equate
the bombing of a schoolbus to shooting someone who is
attempting to launch a rocket at you.

that is why (among other things) that we have something
known as killing in self defense as a valid legal defense.

we attacked bin laden and overthrew the Taliban
to disrupt his attempts to kill us and Afgan santuary
of terrorists.

we attacked hussein because he had demonstrated a willingness
and capability to kill civilians in order to try to intimidate
his enemies and he openly threatened the US and our allies
while defiantly refusing attempts to disarm him. there was
also a concern that he was continuing to pursue nuclear options...and because of the oil he had plenty of mad money.

your argument that bin laden lives because of his lack of
oil is naive. if bin laden were to peek out of hiding he would
be taken out. he is merely hidden better and less effective
hence less of a threat.

bin laden like hussein is a man who gleefully cheers the slaughter of
innocent civilians in the name of Islam and provides funds
and support to those who do the killing.


The US went to Iraq for the following :
1 : the oil : to steal Iraqi oil .
2 : to have permanent military bases .
3 : For Israel to dominate the whole region .


When none of the 3 happen, then what are you going to use for the normal talking points? Not one of the three have occurred yet.


The three points are already there and only a ROBOT can not see them. Those who hate the truth hate humans due to hatred and racism . We can all see reality .


Where is the oil that we stole? why is Exxon's and Chevron's stock on a slide if they stole all the oil? Israel currently is dominating Egypt, United Arab Emirates, Turkey, and on and on? And, permanent bases, why would we need those when we already have plenty in other countries of the Middle East?

So, I am a robot, I hate humans, and I'm a racist too? lol

All one needs to look at is WHO are performing the personal attacks and unsubstantiated claims and rhetoric. It surely isn't I.

s1owhand's photo
Fri 07/11/08 04:14 PM
Edited by s1owhand on Fri 07/11/08 04:15 PM
rofl

no photo
Fri 07/11/08 07:23 PM
With a mass media and Administration propaganda , the people are left in the dark . They can not even see what is right and what is wrong like walls or trees . Even children know right and wrong .shocked shocked .

1 2 3 4 6 Next