Topic: Osama Bin Laden's hate? Why?
no photo
Fri 07/11/08 10:24 AM
I suppose Fanta is smarter than Steve Coll and knows much more than he does as well. He must have the inside men and resources to get such information.

no photo
Fri 07/11/08 10:26 AM
It was actually "Ghost Wars: The Secret History of the CIA, Afghanistan, and Bin Laden, from the Soviet Invasion to September 10, 2001" that won him the Pulitzer Prize.

s1owhand's photo
Fri 07/11/08 10:27 AM

A GREAT article on Massoud, the CIA in Afghanistan and their relationship with Massoud, and the search for bin Laden there: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=3853553

Steve Coll wrote a great book, much more lengthier than the lengthy story from the source above called Ghost Wars.

Steve Coll is a Pulitzer Prize-winning American journalist and writer.


bigsmile

GREAT HORNEY TOADS!
Yosemite Sam

Belushi's photo
Fri 07/11/08 10:30 AM

as for bin laden. sure are not 100 percent sure he was behind 9/11. but from my view, anyone who train es someone to blow them self up. is surely a crazy person.


Is that a Haskin Robbins Ice Cream parlour in Russian behind you?

no photo
Fri 07/11/08 10:32 AM

but, if you want to go straight to the horse's mouth
so to speak...here you go - broadcast on Al-Jazeera...
just after 911...

"As Reported by USATODAY.com on Sunday, October 7, 2001 - Updated 05:29 PM EDT
© Associated Press
Text of Osama bin Laden's taped remarks, aired on an Arab television station after the U.S. and British strikes
Sunday. The remarks, which refer to the Sept. 11 terror attacks on New York and Washington, appear to have
been made before Sunday's strikes. The text is translated from the Arabic. - USATODAY.com

I bear witness that there is no God but Allah and that Mohammad is his messenger.

There is America, hit by God in one of its softest spots. Its greatest buildings were destroyed, thank God for
that. There is America, full of fear from its north to its south, from its west to its east. Thank God for that.

What America is tasting now is something insignificant compared to what we have tasted for scores of years.
Our nation (the Islamic world) has been tasting this humiliation and this degradation for more than 80 years.
Its sons are killed, its blood is shed, its sanctuaries are attacked, and no one hears and no one heeds..."

etc. etc. etc.



Sometimes it is very hard to find the truth when you have a huge propaganda machine to prepare for unpopular wars . Remember that wars mean killings and to have the citizens support the killings , a mass media propaganda is required . I read in some very fair reports that many interviews and videoes were fake and although the media knew they were fake they showed them as realible .
A : How can a sick man with kidney problems and dialysis machines survive a brutal war ?.
B : How can he escape and Saddam be captured although Saddam had more power than he ?.
C : How did the French media report he was dead ?.
D : How come he was not captured or killed ?.
The answer might be very clear : if they say he is dead it means the war on terror is dead . But the Administration wants this war to be forever and to be used against any country they wish to bomb .
E : Does this make sense ?.
Yes , it does in fact .

Fanta46's photo
Fri 07/11/08 10:46 AM
Edited by Fanta46 on Fri 07/11/08 11:04 AM





Short Version:

Osama essentially got to the holy war on US idea when it was the US that Saudi Arabia came to during the first Gulf War. When Kuwait was invaded the Saudi royal family feared that Saddam might not stop for they were pushing closer and closer to the border of Saudi Arabia through Kuwait. Osama came to Saudi Arabia offering his assistance, for the right price and approval of the Saudi royal family, to assemble his own personal army and defend them from Iraq.

Saudi Arabia declined and went to the US instead. This extremely ticked him off, his ego trip, and he created vast problems following for both Saudi Arabia and the US.


power, greed, intolerance...etc...:wink:


Pretty much, Osama wasn't even the real hero of the Russian defeat in Afghanistan. The rich and highly educated Osama took all credit for the successes that were actually Ahmed Shah Massoud, the Northern Alliance leader who was tracking Osama in Afghanistan for us prior to 9/11. Mossoud HATED Osama with a passion for what he did to him and according to him Osama was a horrible field commander, as is evident by the very poor battlefield training of al Qaeda.


Again with the no real knowledge gang!!laugh laugh laugh

Try again!


Prove me wrong.


There's an old saying in the real world sailor that says never underestimate your enemy!
Of course you couldn't learn that unless you actually had to fight yourself!

Personally, Id have already tracked Osama down and killed him. Underestimating him is what GWB has done despite the first hand accounts of his bravery and military tacticial genius from knowledgeable westerners who actually fought with him. Some of these CIA, many private mercenaries, who hired out to fight against the Soviets!
You have no credibility at all. Either in military tactics or known knowledge about Osama's deeds! You should read some at least!
I'll just dismiss your arrogant lack of knowledge for what it is, immaturity!

Slowhand,

Please explain the first five on your list if you think its so accurate.

1. greed - makes no sense at all. The dude was born rich!
2. envy - Who is he envious about? His family is one of the most respected and powerful in all the ME! He is a Prince! This makes no sense either!
3. fear- The man, who didn't have too (see above) volunteered to go to Afghanistan and fight the Soviets. At one time even setting up a camp within sight of a major Soviet Base. His exploits as recorded by others, not him (including westerners, during battle prove he is not a coward!
4. money- I think we've covered this, but lets look at how much of his own money he spent fighting the Soviets! Again, makes no sense.
5. power- I hate repeating myself, but he could be leading a much better life sitting fat and sassy in Saudi Arabia as a potential air to the throne. After all he is a Prince!

Ok, that pretty much blows 50% of your list away!
I will stop there!:wink:

no photo
Fri 07/11/08 10:50 AM
Edited by Starsailor2851 on Fri 07/11/08 10:51 AM






Short Version:

Osama essentially got to the holy war on US idea when it was the US that Saudi Arabia came to during the first Gulf War. When Kuwait was invaded the Saudi royal family feared that Saddam might not stop for they were pushing closer and closer to the border of Saudi Arabia through Kuwait. Osama came to Saudi Arabia offering his assistance, for the right price and approval of the Saudi royal family, to assemble his own personal army and defend them from Iraq.

Saudi Arabia declined and went to the US instead. This extremely ticked him off, his ego trip, and he created vast problems following for both Saudi Arabia and the US.


power, greed, intolerance...etc...:wink:


Pretty much, Osama wasn't even the real hero of the Russian defeat in Afghanistan. The rich and highly educated Osama took all credit for the successes that were actually Ahmed Shah Massoud, the Northern Alliance leader who was tracking Osama in Afghanistan for us prior to 9/11. Mossoud HATED Osama with a passion for what he did to him and according to him Osama was a horrible field commander, as is evident by the very poor battlefield training of al Qaeda.


Again with the no real knowledge gang!!laugh laugh laugh

Try again!


Prove me wrong.


There's an old saying in the real world sailor that says never underestimate your enemy!
Of course you couldn't learn that unless you actually had to fight yourself!

Personally, Id have already tracked Osama down and killed him. Underestimating him is what GWB has done despite the first hand accounts of his bravery and military tactician genius fro knowledgeable westerners who actually fought with him. Some of these CIA, many private mercenaries who hired out to fight against the Soviets!
You have no credibility at all. Either in military tactics or known knowledge about Osama's deeds! You should read some at least!
I'll just dismiss your arrogant lack of knowledge for what it is, immaturity!


Steve Coll, a Pulitizer Prize winning author and journalist, is immature? He lacks knowledge and has no credibility either?

----

A GREAT article on Massoud, the CIA in Afghanistan and their relationship with Massoud, and the search for bin Laden there: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=3853553

Steve Coll wrote a great book, much more lengthier than the lengthy story from the source above called Ghost Wars.

Steve Coll is a Pulitzer Prize-winning American journalist and writer. Ghost Wars won him the prize in 2005.

Fanta46's photo
Fri 07/11/08 10:53 AM

I suppose Fanta is smarter than Steve Coll and knows much more than he does as well. He must have the inside men and resources to get such information.


laugh laugh laugh laugh
This from sailor. Doctorer of facts and figures, King of the NeoCons who says hes a Democrat!
Boy Genius and master of momma and Daddies basement!

I have done more in one year of my life than you will in 20.
I have wrote many research papers on Afghanistan and the Soviet Invasion.
Hell, I was actually alive back then. Better yet, I was in the military when in all took place!
I cant vouch for Steve Coll, but I do know far more on the subject than you'll ever read in the Bushy Indoctrination manual little one!

laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh

no photo
Fri 07/11/08 10:55 AM

Short Version:

Osama essentially got to the holy war on US idea when it was the US that Saudi Arabia came to during the first Gulf War. When Kuwait was invaded the Saudi royal family feared that Saddam might not stop for they were pushing closer and closer to the border of Saudi Arabia through Kuwait. Osama came to Saudi Arabia offering his assistance, for the right price and approval of the Saudi royal family, to assemble his own personal army and defend them from Iraq.

Saudi Arabia declined and went to the US instead. This extremely ticked him off, his ego trip, and he created vast problems following for both Saudi Arabia and the US.


This is pretty much what I gathered sir, yet why would Saudia Arabia believe that Saddam Hussein's forces would want to invade or attack Saudia Arabia? Did he have a grudge with them also?

As far as I understand Saddam Hussein wanted to reclaim Kuwait for in history it was a part of Iraq. He believed that that part of the country belongs to the Iraqi people. So if this is to be true why would he want to attack Saudia Arabia?

Did the Saudia Arabian family monarchs truly believe Saddam would be a threat or did they listen to advisors from other countries to believe that they would be a threat?

Also and I am sorry to make this so long. Why did we even get involved in the affairs of the Middle East. Where we paid to save Kuwait or do we think we are obligated to make sure every country is a democracy? If this is to be true then why don't we have forces in much more dire areas of the world where slavery, religious wars, and difference of opinions happen.

Thank you for sharing your knowledge.

John

no photo
Fri 07/11/08 11:06 AM


I suppose Fanta is smarter than Steve Coll and knows much more than he does as well. He must have the inside men and resources to get such information.


laugh laugh laugh laugh
This from sailor. Doctorer of facts and figures, King of the NeoCons who says hes a Democrat!
Boy Genius and master of momma and Daddies basement!

I have done more in one year of my life than you will in 20.
I have wrote many research papers on Afghanistan and the Soviet Invasion.
Hell, I was actually alive back then. Better yet, I was in the military when in all took place!
I cant vouch for Steve Coll, but I do know far more on the subject than you'll ever read in the Bushy Indoctrination manual little one!

laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh


A resort to a solely based personal attack. How old are you again? I based all that I said off of studies as well, mostly though DIRECT from Steve Coll. The fact you launched a solely personal attack and belittlement without providing these vast research papers that say something different than the Pulitzer Prize winning Steve Coll on the subject says alot.

Fanta46's photo
Fri 07/11/08 11:07 AM
laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh
Thats funny smiles.

Fanta46's photo
Fri 07/11/08 11:08 AM
Edited by Fanta46 on Fri 07/11/08 11:10 AM



I suppose Fanta is smarter than Steve Coll and knows much more than he does as well. He must have the inside men and resources to get such information.


laugh laugh laugh laugh
This from sailor. Doctorer of facts and figures, King of the NeoCons who says hes a Democrat!
Boy Genius and master of momma and Daddies basement!

I have done more in one year of my life than you will in 20.
I have wrote many research papers on Afghanistan and the Soviet Invasion.
Hell, I was actually alive back then. Better yet, I was in the military when in all took place!
I cant vouch for Steve Coll, but I do know far more on the subject than you'll ever read in the Bushy Indoctrination manual little one!

laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh


A resort to a solely based personal attack. How old are you again? I based all that I said off of studies as well, mostly though DIRECT from Steve Coll. The fact you launched a solely personal attack and belittlement without providing these vast research papers that say something different than the Pulitzer Prize winning Steve Coll on the subject says alot.


Old enough to be your Daddy!!laugh laugh laugh

Of course if I was you'd be much wiser and less arrogant and nasty!!

Fanta46's photo
Fri 07/11/08 11:11 AM
How old are you? 14?

no photo
Fri 07/11/08 11:12 AM




I suppose Fanta is smarter than Steve Coll and knows much more than he does as well. He must have the inside men and resources to get such information.


laugh laugh laugh laugh
This from sailor. Doctorer of facts and figures, King of the NeoCons who says hes a Democrat!
Boy Genius and master of momma and Daddies basement!

I have done more in one year of my life than you will in 20.
I have wrote many research papers on Afghanistan and the Soviet Invasion.
Hell, I was actually alive back then. Better yet, I was in the military when in all took place!
I cant vouch for Steve Coll, but I do know far more on the subject than you'll ever read in the Bushy Indoctrination manual little one!

laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh


A resort to a solely based personal attack. How old are you again? I based all that I said off of studies as well, mostly though DIRECT from Steve Coll. The fact you launched a solely personal attack and belittlement without providing these vast research papers that say something different than the Pulitzer Prize winning Steve Coll on the subject says alot.


Old enough to be your Daddy!!laugh laugh laugh

Of course if I was you'd be much wiser!!


Nice job of the duck and cover. Steve Coll said it right, you got caught with your pants down, so you decided to use childish face icons, belittle and personally attack someone far younger than you, and totally ignore the subject, which Coll has you seriously bested in. And, I based everything I said directly off of it.

baroosie's photo
Fri 07/11/08 11:15 AM
A 6'6" Saudi, hiding in that region of the world and he hasn't been "discovered" yet?! Come on! He must be hiding with the Easter Bunny!

Seriously, I think he loathes the "coercion" between the American and his own Saudi "regimes" and their lifestyle as well.

Fanta46's photo
Fri 07/11/08 11:22 AM
Edited by Fanta46 on Fri 07/11/08 11:23 AM





I suppose Fanta is smarter than Steve Coll and knows much more than he does as well. He must have the inside men and resources to get such information.


laugh laugh laugh laugh
This from sailor. Doctorer of facts and figures, King of the NeoCons who says hes a Democrat!
Boy Genius and master of momma and Daddies basement!

I have done more in one year of my life than you will in 20.
I have wrote many research papers on Afghanistan and the Soviet Invasion.
Hell, I was actually alive back then. Better yet, I was in the military when in all took place!
I cant vouch for Steve Coll, but I do know far more on the subject than you'll ever read in the Bushy Indoctrination manual little one!

laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh


A resort to a solely based personal attack. How old are you again? I based all that I said off of studies as well, mostly though DIRECT from Steve Coll. The fact you launched a solely personal attack and belittlement without providing these vast research papers that say something different than the Pulitzer Prize winning Steve Coll on the subject says alot.


Old enough to be your Daddy!!laugh laugh laugh

Of course if I was you'd be much wiser!!


Nice job of the duck and cover. Steve Coll said it right, you got caught with your pants down, so you decided to use childish face icons, belittle and personally attack someone far younger than you, and totally ignore the subject, which Coll has you seriously bested in. And, I based everything I said directly off of it.


Of course you did!
People just like you won him a Pulitzer, not because he knows what he's writing about!
If Id have used him as a reference Id have been laughed at and failed!
Instead I made A's.

Fanta46's photo
Fri 07/11/08 11:24 AM

A 6'6" Saudi, hiding in that region of the world and he hasn't been "discovered" yet?! Come on! He must be hiding with the Easter Bunny!

Seriously, I think he loathes the "coercion" between the American and his own Saudi "regimes" and their lifestyle as well.


He's probably in Iran!

no photo
Fri 07/11/08 11:28 AM
Edited by Starsailor2851 on Fri 07/11/08 11:30 AM


Short Version:

Osama essentially got to the holy war on US idea when it was the US that Saudi Arabia came to during the first Gulf War. When Kuwait was invaded the Saudi royal family feared that Saddam might not stop for they were pushing closer and closer to the border of Saudi Arabia through Kuwait. Osama came to Saudi Arabia offering his assistance, for the right price and approval of the Saudi royal family, to assemble his own personal army and defend them from Iraq.

Saudi Arabia declined and went to the US instead. This extremely ticked him off, his ego trip, and he created vast problems following for both Saudi Arabia and the US.


This is pretty much what I gathered sir, yet why would Saudia Arabia believe that Saddam Hussein's forces would want to invade or attack Saudia Arabia? Did he have a grudge with them also?

As far as I understand Saddam Hussein wanted to reclaim Kuwait for in history it was a part of Iraq. He believed that that part of the country belongs to the Iraqi people. So if this is to be true why would he want to attack Saudia Arabia?

Did the Saudia Arabian family monarchs truly believe Saddam would be a threat or did they listen to advisors from other countries to believe that they would be a threat?

Also and I am sorry to make this so long. Why did we even get involved in the affairs of the Middle East. Where we paid to save Kuwait or do we think we are obligated to make sure every country is a democracy? If this is to be true then why don't we have forces in much more dire areas of the world where slavery, religious wars, and difference of opinions happen.

Thank you for sharing your knowledge.

John


Yes, Saudi Arabia did see Saddam and Iraq as a threat. I could go on at length, but I do remembering reading in various books about the scuds that Iraq did fire at Saudi Arabia. A few actually killed American troops in Iraq, but most of them were to hurt Saudi Arabia. I did a search on google and finally found the evidence to support the scuds hitting Saudi Arabia. Wasn't easy.

From the book, on Google's Book Site, called Desert Storm: Forgotten War.

"During the war Iraq launched 88 SCUD missiles (46 against Saudi Arabia....)" - Desert Storm: A Forgotten War By Alberto Bin, Richard Hill, Archer Jones, page 101. http://books.google.com/books?id=KgD1VyCgGAYC&pg=PA101&lpg=PA101&dq=46+scuds+
from+Iraq+entered+Saudi+Arabia&source=web&ots=q
MuLd7QkUP&sig=HceWNE59JUlrOCMY0DRBwa1Tgvo&hl=en
&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=9&ct=result#PPA101,M1

Link is soooo long I had to assist in editting it or it screwed up the thread. Might be spaces when you copy and paste it so take them out or post it in line by line.

They have that cited, in the footnote on page 101, you see where they got that information from.


There is also personal and diplomacy, as well as historical issues between Iraq and Saudi Arabia that are complex. I'm going to end with the Scud thing, but there is alot behind animosity, I actually read awhile back that Saudi Arabia was aiding Iran in the Iran-Iraq War, and that is another reason for being a bit angry, plus the relationship they had with the US. Bahrain and Qatar were actually hit by a very few Scuds from Iraq as well, likely due to US relations as well.

no photo
Fri 07/11/08 11:31 AM


A 6'6" Saudi, hiding in that region of the world and he hasn't been "discovered" yet?! Come on! He must be hiding with the Easter Bunny!

Seriously, I think he loathes the "coercion" between the American and his own Saudi "regimes" and their lifestyle as well.


He's probably in Iran!

Iran sent the troops and fought the Taliban and Al qaeda in Afghanistan .
So this explains much on this idea .

no photo
Fri 07/11/08 11:31 AM


A 6'6" Saudi, hiding in that region of the world and he hasn't been "discovered" yet?! Come on! He must be hiding with the Easter Bunny!

Seriously, I think he loathes the "coercion" between the American and his own Saudi "regimes" and their lifestyle as well.


He's probably in Iran!

Iran sent the troops and fought the Taliban and Al qaeda in Afghanistan .
So this explains much on this idea .