Who was "bagging" on those who happen to NEED it for a condition? Not
me. Nor was anyone else in here, so far I as recall.

But since you brought it up...

There are already FDA-approved drugs on the market for the treatment of
glaucoma and for alleviating pain and nausea associated with
cancer/chemotherapy.

Again, I will state, smoke it if you want to, but at least admit you
smoke it because you like being high; don't try to glorify its
"benefits" by stating all the wonderful uses it has when, in reality,
all you really care about is your right to get fkd up. ("You" in the
generic sense, of course).

Easy peasy lemon squeezy! I wasn't even referring to anything you said.
I'm just responding to the topic. Now, take a deep breath.

Alcoholics have the Right to get f'd up. It's legal. People who smoke
the herb don't have that same right. Still illegal.
That was is response to you.

Lmao

"Easy peasy lemon squeezy! I wasn't even referring to anything you said.
I'm just responding to the topic. Now, take a deep breath."

Why should I take a deep breath? Hmmm...well, at least if I need to,
I'll be able to, since my bronchial tubes are clear and free from pot
smoke.

Oh, you were responding to the TOPIC. I see. Which was, of course,
"Bagging on those who advocate pot use for medicinal purposes." How
silly of me; it says it right there in the subject line of the first
post, too, doesn't it?


****

And alcoholics do not have a "right" to get fkd up...it's illegal to be
intoxicated ...at least in public, anyway. Not that a whole lot is done
about that, most of the time.

But I digress...if ever there was ever a brilliant argument for the
advocacy of pot smoking, there's one.

"It's not FAIR that alcoholics get to get fkd up, cause accidents that
result in property damage, bodily injury or death, not only potentially
to myself, but to totally innocent human beings, and cause physical
illnesses and psychiatric disorders, *I* want to smoke pot and get fkd
up, cause accients that in property damge, bodily injury and death, not
only potentially to myself, but to totally innocent human beings, and
cause physical illnesses and psychiatric disorders, too! It's not FAIR;
it just NOT FAIR!!!"

LMFAO.

Nobody's talking about smoking and driving, except you. We're talking
about if it makes you stupid or not. Just read what michael wrote at
the very beginning of this thread. He's proven it doesn't have any
lasting negative effects on a person's life. Unless someone else makes
an issue out of it.

well if that is th way you feel about pot...

go take a damitol,

it's called a CHILL PILL...

starting to wonder how many of yer brain cells got killed when you
smoked...

are you always on a soap box?

or only about pot?

Oh, and people are BORN with psychiatric disorders. They're not caused
by the herb!

no Kevo...my comment was not at you

I never insulted you. I was sticking up for you, buddy

Oh, sorry, man.

My bad.

yeah well i can right my name in the snow.


not directed at anyone but it has gone from a debate to a silly pissin
contest. just my two cents

YES WEED, GRASS, HERB, MAKES PPL STUPID ! WHO CARES ? IF IT MAKES PPL
CALM !

You write as if you're trying to convince yourself.

--Roc

Mon 02/19/07 01:59 PM
Nobody's talking about smoking and driving, except you.

So? Your point?

We're talking about if it makes you stupid or not.

And I said, no, it doesn't make you stupid; some people are plenty
stupid enough without smoking it. I went on to state that, although it
doesn't MAKE someone stupid, I think it's a stupid thing to do, because
of its risks to one's health -- among other things. For EXAMPLE, driving
while impaired..that's pretty stupid. I didn't realize a person's
comments had to be limited to responding to what other people were
saying and that they didn't have a right to add on to the conversation
by posting other thoughts on a topic. My bad.

Just read what michael wrote at the very beginning of this thread. He's
proven it doesn't have any lasting negative effects on a person's life.

Oh, I see. Because it hasn't (theoretically) had any lasting negative
effects on HIS life means, of course, it wouldn't have any lasting
negative effects on anyone else's. To hell with what extensive
scientific and medical research says to the contrary; MICHAEL has spoken
and it is MICHAEL whom we should listen to.

Unless someone else makes an issue out of it.

Far as I can tell, you're as guilty as "making an issue" out of it as I
am. I'm simply enjoying the debate, myself. See, that's what a debate
entails, discussion and disagreement, and, also, agreement. But it
involves it all. It doesn't involve people getting all in a tizzy
because someone happens to disagree with them. Don't worry sweetie; I'm
not going to take your pot away from you. Calm down; quit being so
paranoid. Everything will be all right. I promise.

writing your name while you are,

pissin' in snow not recommended for the female gender

I AGREE WITH LION