I lived up there ahile back, for about 3 years. On Sullivan St. down near Cope Middle School.

I'm thinking it's unrealistic for a person to hold off till marriage before having sex in todays society. In the past, with courting and brothels, this socialogical behavior was encouraged in women and acceptible to suiters. In todays society, it's dangerous to go to a prostitute when young men's girlfriends aren't engaging in sex. contraceptives, among other regulatory medicine, make sex an activity that women can participate in, with a sense of a security that it won't ruin their lives. This mentality is from a preprogressive era. 1800s

Sex and Sexuality are a shallow form of intimacy, but a form of intimacy none-the-less. To deprive yourself of this form of intimacy because this first girl chooses ignorance in the matter, is insane to me. At the same time, I wouldn't consider too much from this second chick, as far as forming a serious relationship. It seems to me you're suffering from one girl being too reluctant, and the other being too forecoming.

If only you could like, meld them together... :D

My advice is to get rid of the first, have fun with second one. Then look for someone more natural in matters of intimacy. perhaps the second one is, but that's not the impression I gathered.


EDIT: spelling

good insight, and an inspiring point of view.

applet

Well, there has to be a point of initiation to cause the balance to exist, that's what I'm focusing on.

This isn't as perplexing as 'the chicken and the egg' concept.

The problems in the importance of giving or taking love ISN'T important, or relative to, when two people love one another. The problem is when one person loves someone who does not love them.

One of the two possible problems is when you love, or express love to, someone who does not love you back, how do you validate it; The better question is, do you even care whether they love you back? If you do care, than your importance lyes in 'being loved.' If you don't care, than your importance is in 'giving love.' To that end, if you don't care, because your contempt in the notion of merely loving someone else, you won't experience 'being loved,' and I can only assume that's a tradgey. Not to mention you're a border line stalker.

The other problem is when you're not the expressor, but the recepter. If someone expresses their love to you, and you don't love them. Then the importance of give or take isn't concerning to you at all. in respect to that relationship, unless you are 'taking' their love for the sole purpose of benefiting, in which case.. you're manipulating them, shame on you!

These are the concerns, and my perception of importance (in regards to love), that exist at the points of initation. Beyond this point is the loving relationship, where, ideally, neither of these concerns are relavent. Realistically, if one of the partners is unsatisfied with the amount of love they receive from their spouse, than their importance already lyes in 'being loved.'

I don't want to seem contradicatory here, but it is 'better' to 'give love' than to recieve, because it's more important to 'receive.'

I see it as it relates to the difference between intentions and wants/needs. The better intention is to give, but you still have the wants and needs of receiving.

I'm not sure if this just seems like garbage rhetoric to yall or not.

Starting A Relationship:
insecurities

In A Relationship:
Anything that would cause me to lose trust in them.

doesn't like horses!

slate

damn there's a lot of sin slinging up in here

This comes down to the individuals definition (or perception, if you will) on importance, among other things.

I would argue that 'Courage' is the more important root factor here. Ideally, I would like to say to 'show' love is more important than receiving love.. but I know that isn't true, as there is the distinct possiblitiy it would lead to manipulation and tradegy, and you couldn't, as the expressor of love, be able to validate the benefits of loving the person you desire. That's If, you place your importance on your loving relationship soley on your ability to love.

Truely, it is more important to be loved, or feel it.

People don't have control over who they love, however, they do control how they express it.

To be loved is not only the most beneficial but it is also the least demanding. This offers a gauge, and thus an ability to validate. Even though it is not idealistic to think of self-centered notions when it comes to love. The reality of things are, if people did not pursue love to improve themselves or to experience it, they would not pursue it at all. The desire of love, whether to give it or take it, is rooted in a very personable, self-interest.

In the end, it takes a couragous lover to initate that level of companionship, from someone who loves them in return, but does not express it because they are unable to validate. Where as, in such a companionship, the issue of importance of give and take becomes trivial.

A couragous lover is also a fool, in this instance. A fool in love, if you will. It is a conflicting notion, that your best interests are to consider the importantance of being loved over giving love. That you have to await the rash loving fools that don't consider the depth of their commitment to euphoria.

Anyway, that's my scoop.

It's hardly a sexy factor really... The fact that you don't freak out around snakes displays some sort of attractiveness at face value, I guess... But there's a why factor in that though. Like, are you interested in snakes because you desire to be different than a stereotype, or do you relate with them (which could be disturbing to some people).. Those are the two concerning reasons that come to mind. On the plus side, snakes are exotic, exotic is sexy. Do you like snakes because they are exotic? Hence, you enjoy sexy things...

that is sooooo creepy, and well done

haha,

the infamous virus.doomsday_aol_7.0_zombie.win32k is no laughing matter.

I looked into the free tax filing from the IRS, it isn't very user friendly..

I need to sit down one day, find an SDK for this efiling ( if it's out there) and put it to a programming project. I would like to charge people 19 dollars for erroring on their taxes too.

actually, I'm not that greedy.. I would charge 3 at the most.

EDIT: spelling

I also want to note, ALL of my hotfix keys start with KB9*****, where * are digits... But then, I don't have SharePoint.. and I recently reinstalled and was updating through series of Service Packs.. which resulted in less individual hotfix updates.

So my comment about 'Not all hotfixs are recorded in the registry'.. may be misleading. Most, if not all, of the hotfixes you've downloaded, should be there.

Opps, I forgot to address this yesterday... I don't know what would cause that. I know that in your registries:

HKLM/Software/Microsoft/Windows NT/CurrentVersion/HotFix

There is a list of Security Updates that are listed for the updates that windows has installed and attempted to install (I believe).

You could check key 'KB890829' (the last update that you listed, that is) and see if it has the value 'Installed = 0x00000001' or 'Installed = 0x00000000', or if the key exists at all. Not all hotfixs are recorded in the registry though.

I would suggest XxAchillesxX's remedy, if you know you already have these files installed.

With that said..


Click Start > Run > type 'regedit' > hit enter ( or okay) > navigate to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE/Software/Microsoft/Windows NT/CurrentVersion/HotFix

Please DO NOT edit anything in here, I wouldn't even suggest changing the value to '0x00000001' (which computes as = TRUE)... this is only for information purposes.. go ahead and tell us if you found any of these key/values .. and if so, does it give the Installed value of 0x00000001 or 0x00000000?

sure are, except for the whole distance thing.

location is like a y factor for the whole dating stuff, or is that a z factor..... haha

I don't know if bringing up vampires and mice are the best way of winning ladies over.. haha

Mighty mouse was pretty good too.