It would appear to me that a socialist democrat believes that everyone deserves a middle class lifestyle even if they are unable or unwilling to earn it for themselves. Therefore, it is the governments responsibility to provide the level of support necessary to achieve that goal.

I dont know which liberals youre referring to, but Im a liberal and an American. As an American, I acknowledge my fellow citizens have their right to disagree with my perspectives.

As a thinking person, I can indeed distinguish night from day, wrong from right, and good from bad....but:

'Thank god...for those blind useless liberals'???
'...a mushroom with its head in the sand...'???

what?

really? Is that what his teammates said?

Like I said, NFL doesnt deserve half the talent that they exploit, let alone Colin. He opened the door to a purpose bigger than entertainment and sports, and I hope NFL learns a valuable lesson about infringing on players ability to merely quietly kneel.

I wonder if DNA causes people to be argumentative and lack the ability to use logic, no matter what privilege they 'earn'.

is this somehow different than the republican party?

Are these the same polls that said Hillary would be our next president?

We will know when it happens. Kaepernick was ranked 29 out of the top 100 quarterbacks.

Which of the 70 qbs ranking below Kaepernick in 2016 were let go after ?


http://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/2016/passing.htm

Wow, "Promises made, promises kept", but you can't name any.

And if he was YOUR employee, you probably would have canned him already. Even if he was telling you what a good job he was doing for your company?


And I asked you to change my mind about him, and you simply imply I am unable to understand his greatness. Well, I can turn that around and say that you and the other brainwashed folks who support him are either too naive or stubborn to admit that he has done nothing but dupe you.

Meanwhile, we are not risking a plumbing business or a McDonald's franchise, but a COUNTRY on this do-nothing employee.

I seriously would have developed more respect for you if you had just answered "I have no response". Instead, you couldn't give me any evidence to change my mind, so I must have a strong point.

she did not win, but she did get more votes, which should highlight to both sides that its not so simple and clear cut, that he has neither overwhelming support NOR opposition at this point. and just like 2016, its truly a toss up of which way it is going or will end up.

In what is the most tangible victory thus far for Colin Kaepernick and his legal team, the arbitrator overseeing his collusion case has denied the NFL’s dismissal attempt.

The decision comes in the wake of a summary judgement hearing in which the NFL argued Kaepernick’s attorneys did not have the evidence to meet an appropriate standard proving a collusive effort to keep the former San Francisco 49ers quarterback out of the league.

Both sides filed arguments that included giving arbitrator Stephen Burbank the evidence each had produced in discovery. Those arguments led Burbank to determine the case should move forward, a clear loss for the NFL.

Burbank’s decision suggests there is enough merit in the arguments and evidence produced by Kaepernick’s legal team to warrant a trial on the facts of the case.


There are a lot of unanswered questions about the path of the collusion grievance. But the most important issues at hand have been resolved: Kaepernick’s case moves forward despite the NFL’s attempt to quash it; a trial of the facts will take place; and the arbitrator who made the judgement on both of those developments has given Kaepernick’s legal team an adrenalin shot of optimism in a long uphill battle.



http://www.yahoo.com/sports/colin-kaepernick-wins-summary-judgment-case-vs-nfl-keeping-grievance-case-alive-203456241.html

typical empty republican fear mongering babble!!

I guess that means that you cant come up with any RATIONAL argument to use to try to validate your viewpoints,huh?
[whodathunkit??]

Why does something over 42% of the country want him impeached? It seems to most that nearly half the country wants him gone. It seems to me, the "liberal" view is very popular. And it's growing steadily since 2016 when Hillary won the election by something over 3 million votes.

So far, as for me, Since Trump took office I've seen more bullying and hate out of conservatives than I have liberals. You see a lot of it right here on these forums. And Trump is at the forefront of that. Sowing hate and discontent. And his followers fall right into it.

Bias media? So far all I've seen reported by the big news groups is exactly what happened that day or week in Trumpland. So far everything that the media has said about Trump and his crooked buddies, have been exactly what happened. There is no real bias here. It's not biased when its true. Some just can't face it.

This link is from 2016. It proves out that most of the voting public is going left. Which also proves out why Clinton got over 3 million more votes than Trump did. It's because at the time American was leaning left. And leaning more left right now than they ever were. America voted left in 2016. Midterms are coming. I think that's the way it will go again. But that remains to be seen. So far Democrats took 36 seats, as of Feb. 11, 2018. Someone claimed it was 50 seats. Politifact proved it out to be 36.

http://www.politifact.com/florida/statements/2018/feb/15/corey-lewandowski/have-democrats-gained-50-seats-formerly-held-repub/

http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/01/why-america-is-moving-left/419112/

dont forget Charles:

as it pertains to intelligence

stupid: having or showing a great lack of intelligence or common sense.


just noting it doesn't mention income level, career choice, or spousal attractiveness....

So, are you saying that anyone who doesn't like the way things are, should leave?

Does that include the people who you LIKE, who don't like the way things are, or just whoever you DON'T like?

That's the way it works, when you try to appeal to a principle, as you did here with your "if you can't stand the heat" quote.

By that standard, you must REALLY despise Donald Trump, since he complains constantly about anyone who fails to praise him.

Workin4it,

I appreciate your answer, and really, I am trying to understand the opposing point of view. I truly am trying to see why I should change my opinion of this guy.

WHAT has this guy accomplished? I am not going to list again all the promises he has made that he has not followed through with. The stuff he takes credit for can be proven to be not his doing, and the stuff he has failed at is all buried by him as "fake news.

If you had an employee at your company that was getting such non-results in the position you gave to him, and he was blaming things like his tardiness and absenteeism on "the clocks are wrong" and "that calendar is incorrect", you would not put up it.

If the employee used excuses for not getting a task done like "the last guy who had the job sucked", or "the other person who you were interviewing for this job is crooked", you would say "yes, and the last person is gone, and we did not hire that other person, so blaming them is not important, and I need you to do YOUR job and stop talking about them!"

If your company had paid for marketing research that business decisions were being based on, and this employee was sharing it with your competitors, after the researchers said it should not be shared, you would be concerned, correct?

And if your new employee was ticking off some of your best customers, loyal buyers who have kept your company in business all these years, people who always pay on time, give you good Yelp reviews, etc. If the employee pissed them off, you would probably say something to him, right?

What if it came across that he said in the interview that he was trained in doing something that your company needed done, and then you found out that he lied about knowing how to do that? Would you keep him around? And when you ask him why he lied about it, he turns it around and says that HE didn't lie, you just don't know what you are talking about, he is DOING this better than anyone, and you just can't recognise it? What would you say to that employee?

Like I say, I am just trying to figure out WHY I should think that this employee of mine (he IS after all, a public servant, elected to serve ALL the citizens of this country) is more than a big bag of farts?

it's the stupidity, willful ignorance, and/or complicity that kills me.
he's so obvious, so transparent, and so corrupt...he's showing us all, and defying us to believe our own eyes!


you wouldn't allow your friends or family to be swindled by his kind. you wouldn't hire him to work for you. you couldn't wait to fire him if you had the chance, just so you wouldn't have to be around him.
you wouldn't put up with his schemes, his cons, his bs, his constant whining, his constant bogus claims, his constant bragging, his constant demonstrable lies, his constant lack of sympathy, of empathy, of basic manners...you just wouldn't!


why in the h3ll would you hire him to represesent you to the entire world?
to represent YOUR interests? to be in charge of prosecuting crimes that he commits?

to imitate Hilary and Obama haters

,,,, just wait til it all comes to light, its coming, so much is gonna be exposed .... lol

well,i guess YOUR IMAGINATION must just be a little better than mine!!

[but,that's PROBABLY only because I deal in FACTS,and not IMAGINARY FANTASIES!!]

is this what you say when an alleged arsonist moves into your neighborhood?
your grandchildren's neghborhood?
an allged thief?
an alleged gangster?
an alleged woman beater?
an alleged sexual predator ?
an alleged child molester?