Well that sounds nice but you cant fix a country when

1) You have a war on drugs

2) you have governments that don't understand the power of free markets

3) you have businesses that hire illegals that are only fined if they are caught

Even if you build the wall people will still come over.

I like what Canada does and this is why we don't have that problem, we have other problems like Deportees once they are deported are flying or boating to Mexico and the treks through the United States to then sneaks into Canada whether it through B.C/Washington, North Dakota to Manitoba or Vermont to Quebec.

Most of them end up in Toronto, Hamilton or Montreal and they are criminals.

the one thing Canada does right is Illegals cannot get HealthCare card, Drivers license or a temporary SIN card, you call it Social security card there and they cannot get welfare directly.

The problem with Mexico is you have a large portion of the population that is illiterate and uneducated and they have a disadvantage, The Mexican government is having a hard time with them and some of them are easy pickins for the drug cartels.

I compare it to African americans before Civil rights came it, how they were treated as second class citizens , and look how long it took before some of the blacks in America rose up and became prosperous, its going to take something like that to help the poor in Mexico and other places.

If the U.S. Canadian, Mexico, Colombian and other countries are interested in fixing the problem, eliminating the war on drugs is a good start.

But those countries need a system in place to help the underprivileged and welfare isn't the answer.

And American authorities have to use draconian measures against businesses that hire illegals and landlords who houses them.

No more welfare and generous supplementary programs to help them out, if you don't make it hard for them why would they stop coming?

Its 2018.
The United States is a world power and a nation of educated, 1st world people.
The fix for illegal aliens entering our country is not a wall or tighter borders.
The fix, the real fix, is to remove the reason why people would want to illegally enter.

Think about it for a minute.

Why do people try to come to the United States from Mexico illegally?
We don't have that issue at our Canadian border.

As a 1st world power we have the intelligence and the resources to help Mexico also become a 1st world power. What keeps Mexico from attaining that status?
Corruption.

There are entities in Mexico that want to end corruption. They want to end cartel power and remove the oppression from their country.
The United States has this war on drugs thing going but its the most ineffective war ever fought.
This is because there are limits to how it must be fought. There is corrupt people in power in Mexico that prevents doing what needs to be done.

We have the ability to work with the Mexican government to end the cartels and the oppression by corruption in Mexico but we don't.
To remove the illegal immigration problem the fix is to cause the people not to want to or need to leave their country in search of a better life.
Bring Mexico to 1st world status.
Then Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Panama, Columbia and right on down the continent.
Go in and permanently remove the oppression. Eliminate the cartels and warmongers. Establish national pride in the people for their own home country and they won't want to come to the United States for a better life.

Canada and USA help Mexico fix Mexico.
Canada, USA and Mexico help Guatemala fix Guatemala and so on.
It could be done. Yes, warmongers and cartels would die. Oppressive regimes would be toppled and a lot of people would have to be jailed or eliminated but it could be done.

Why are cartels still in power in Mexico?
Because it is more profitable to allow them power and influence.
The DEA needs drugs in the USA. They Want drugs in the USA.

Remove the reason why someone would want to escape their country and you significantly reduce the number of illegal immigrants seeking a better life. End 3rd world oppression and people won't have a reason to leave their country.
Few 1st world immigrants are illegal.

then I dont personally see why they need the clearance or ANY other person not in a clearance job needs clearance.

But then again, I dont know completely the precedent or the reasons people may retain those clearances and Im wondering why it would not just be a standard rule for ANYONE not in a clearance position, as opposed to just isolated or singled out individuals.

I wonder if its just another juicy tidbit our POTUS likes to dabble in to keep the masses rooting for him, because it makes sense that if this is the precedent, that clearances be revoked when someone leaves, it would already have happened and would be a non issue. I always have to wonder until I research because the POTUS has been known to throw things out as fact or issue even though he doesnt really know if they are.

trump is ALSO gaining A LOT MORE than his salary that he is 'donating' [and,claiming as a tax deduction!] on things like all of the MILLIONS of tax dollars that trump is making us spend to house him,and,and all of his hundreds of security personnel at his hotels,and resorts,like mara lago that he INSISTS on staying at.
[at FULL PRICE]

if trump is so 'altruistic' why doesn't he donate all of THOSE MILLIONS OF DOLLARS back,as well,instead of fleecing the government[and US] out of?

if trump is so 'altruistic',why do all of the bills and tax breaks ta he tries to pass always benefit HIM,HIS BUSINESSES,HIS FAMILY,and BILLIONAIRE CRONIES,while they leave US holding the bag,and paying for them?

I would pay $400,000 a year to be able to gain MILLIONS of dollars,too!!
[ESPECIALLY if I was going to be able to claim it on my taxes as a charitable contribution,and get it all back!!]

wouldn't you?

clinton might have gotten a B.J. in the oval office,but at least he didnt sell out his country,and put the false statements of putin/russia above ALL of the intelligence services of his own country.

there is A BIG difference in being a philanderer,and a traitor,but i can understand how a trump supporter would try to use it to excuse THEIR OWN misguided hero worship of someone who should be shunned for the good of all mankind because they are too chicken**t to own the evil that their hero worship is responsible for,cuz if they DIDNT,then they would have to accept the responsibility for the things that they have allowed to happen.

Politicians DO have more flexibility after they have been elected. That is simply fact. No mention of what he would do, so its not close to treason.

I am calling 'president' donald trump 'treasonous' because he is attempting to protect a foreign power who has technically commited an act of war against his own country,instead of doing his job and making sure that they are held accountable for it,and making sure that it doesn't happen again.

it is HIS JOB to take the side of the united states,and defend this country against ALL ENEMIES,BOTH FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC!!

so,technically,i believe that what he has done/is doing DOES qualify as 'treason',cuz if a SOLDIER did what he is doing,then they would DEFINITELY be charged with treason under the Uniform Code of Military Justice,and,technically,he IS a member of he military,since he is the 'commander-in-chief' of it,so THAT is the code of rules that he must follow,not JUST the constitution!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


"UCMJ Article 104: Aiding the Enemy "

" A service member of the United States armed forces who supplies aid to an enemy of the state in the form of arms, ammunition, supplies, money or intelligence; or any service member who knowingly protects or communicates with the enemy may be charged under Article 104 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

Article 104 is considered an act of treason by the United States government. And like all acts of treason, the penalties are severe. "
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

there it is in black&white...
[if you don't believe me,look it up yourself!!]

article 104 0f the uniform code of military justice,which as commander-in-chief,'president' trump falls under it rule...

and he is knowingly protecting Vladimir putin/russia,so....

I believe that what Donald trump has done qualifies as TREASON,no matter how badly his supporters try to deny it!!

too bad that he was elected 'president',and is 'commander-in-chief of the entire U.S. military,or else he would just be an ordinary citizen and wouldn't be subject to be tried under the rules of the UCMJ.

but,he is,so...

technically,he IS a traitor!

umm, so OBama put a defense into the Ukraine to protect it from Russia because he was an ALLY to Russia and he was letting Ukraine get attacked?

How is it those three statements don't seem like they can all be true simultaneously?

A drowning person will reach for anything or anyone to stay alive.

Trumpanzees felt safe when they could say, "He was joking.." or "He said that, but didn't really mean that.."

Now Donn'y out of the closet. He's rubbing the planet's face into the fact that he is, and proud to be, a Russian "asset" The Trumpanzees are in shock, drowning, and totally in denial.

I don't know if they're accomplices "after the fact", but a small part of me wonders if the label of "treasonous" can be laid on them. Since Guyana, I've never been surprised at the lengths cult members will go to, to defend their master.

The Trumpanzees are drowning, and they know it.

is this not the same type of judgment often complained about when people called Anti Obama folks racist?

Not approving of Trump as POTUS can come from plenty of reasons BESIDES racism.

LMAO!!!!
this sure sounds like anther case of "i cant rationally defend trump on this matter,so I will just bring up Hillary,or Obama,because that is the only way I know how to argue!!" to me if I have EVER seen one!!

trump supporters are sure one-trick-ponies,arent they?

Actually it proves it perfectly. Any trump supporters giving ANY credit to Obama or vice versa?

no.

I find hypocrisy in the area of politics (constituents AND candidates) is as American as apple pie.

but at least Obama didn't undermine the intelligence community by undercutting their investigations the whole way or calling them 'fake news'.

This is not a reflection on the south in whole.. at all

but

I have been to the south many times, and many times as soon as I say a few words some don't like me.. why.. because the northern accent. They don't know the first thing about me.. but they don't like what they hear.

Not all of them.. at all... but it does happen

How come that people in the North of the USA think so differently from people in the South of the USA?
It really seems like two different worlds.

The South seems to hang onto traditional values, is more conservative,... while the North seems to look at things from a global point of view, rather than from a religious point of view.

I mean, take bathroom bills for example. Bathroom bills were only a discussion topic in the Southern states like North and South Carolina, Missouri, Massachussets. But not in Northern states like New-York for example?

How come that there is such a huge discrepancy between the North and the South regarding way of life, way of thinking,... ?

Also religion, why is the North of the USA less vocal about religious preferences, religious values, religious morals,..?

Does the fact that there is such a huge discrepancy between North and South, influence people in their decisions about where they want to live?

Also, is it unheard of for someone to be democrat but befriend someone who is republican, in the USA?

Is the North of the US safer to live in for LGBT people than the South of the US?

Can someone be a conservative living in the South and still support gay people, lesbian people and trans people or are those two mutually exclusive?

Would love to hear some explanations regarding these questions as it is difficult to understand for someone who is not American.
Please be respectful and don’t attack others when explaining. I would like to understand the reasons why, no condemning or things like that, rather looking for as much objectivity as possible.

Thanks.
Elissa

I saw that too. He a;so refused to bow.

And then people wonder why no one can stand the pu$$y grabber in chief.

Sad, Bigly.



And he isn't "presidential" in any way..

Just a POS that's barely human.

I find it funny when Democrats are blasting President Trump for meeting with Russia after the recent arrests...…..

Back in 2010 Obama met with the President Medvedev less then 72 hours before the 10 Soviet Spies were arrested and Obama knew about the arrests of the Russian Spies the "Illegals" before the meeting yet the Democrats praised him for the meeting. You don't see any of them criticizing him for the meeting like they are doing with Trump and those people actually infiltrated his administration!

Hell, just a month or two before their arrest we signed the new START treaty with Russia and those "Illegals" infiltrated the DOD and Fort Meade and the Obama Administration going back as far as 2008 so they could have had a direct impact on the new treaty and we didn't do anything about it after it was signed and we should have. Hell they even knew about the investigation while they were working on the treaty.

None of this is mentioned. Go figure. The hypocrisy on the left is unbelievable!