100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: ONE BLIND MAN. | |
|---|---|
|
Edited by
Charles1962150
on
Tue 08/28/18 11:46 AM
|
|
It's amazing to me how this man blames everyone but himself for the bad press or Google search results. He constantly attacks others for what he brings on himself. It's always someone else fault.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-attacks-google-claims-prioritizes-fake-news-searches/story?id=57444232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's amazing to me how this man blames everyone but himself for the bad press or Google search results. He constantly attacks others for what he brings on himself. It's always someone else fault. http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-attacks-google-claims-prioritizes-fake-news-searches/story?id=57444232 the elders used to say dont dish it out if you cant take it. I guess Trump didnt have such elders. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narcissistic personality disorder — one of several types of personality disorders — is a mental condition in which people have an inflated sense of their own importance, a deep need for excessive attention and admiration, troubled relationships, and a lack of empathy for others.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signs and symptoms of narcissistic personality disorder
Grandiose sense of self-importance. ... Lives in a fantasy world that supports their delusions of grandeur. ... Needs constant praise and admiration. ... Sense of entitlement. ... Exploits others without guilt or shame. ... Frequently demeans, intimidates, bullies, or belittles others. Hmmm, if the shoe fits... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nuns were repainting their chapel, but they kept getting paint on their clothes, so they decided to remove them since they were alone.
They heard some one knocking at the door, and one of the nuns asked, "Who is it?" The man at the door answered, ''The blind man!' so the nuns decided to to let him in. The nuns opened the door, and the man said, ''Nice boobs! Where do you want the blinds?" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nuns were repainting their chapel, but they kept getting paint on their clothes, so they decided to remove them since they were alone. They heard some one knocking at the door, and one of the nuns asked, "Who is it?" The man at the door answered, ''The blind man!' so the nuns decided to to let him in. The nuns opened the door, and the man said, ''Nice boobs! Where do you want the blinds?" 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Charles1962150
on
Tue 08/28/18 02:05 PM
|
|
Signs and symptoms of narcissistic personality disorder Grandiose sense of self-importance. ... Lives in a fantasy world that supports their delusions of grandeur. ... Needs constant praise and admiration. ... Sense of entitlement. ... Exploits others without guilt or shame. ... Frequently demeans, intimidates, bullies, or belittles others. Hmmm, if the shoe fits... It's remarkable anyone pays attention to Trump at all since he is an authentic fake news provider and has been for many years with his association with the National Inquirer. The National Inquirer is essentially the originator of fake news in the modern era. Being fake is their purpose and they have cynically exploited speech freedom for profit as their business model. There is no one faker than Trump. Never has been nor can there ever be. Trump truly is the very best at being fake and Trump supporters fully approve. Me personally, I've never paid any attention to what the NI writes. But on the other hand, This "fake news" excuse is starting to get old. Major news outlets report what happens on a daily basis with Trump. In other words, what I'm trying to say is, Let's give the devil his due. Let's say at the beginning that Trump was right. The news we see every day was fake. Especially about him and his daily exploits. Once he said that he set the wheels in motion for him to be closely watched by the media. And since he attacks the media, now, the media is going to report everything stupid he does and on the crooked people associated with him. And they are going to report it accurately. Because they know they have too. This includes Google. Google has no reason to skew search results. If you type into a search, "Todays Trump news". That's what you are going to get. If you type in, "Bills passed by the Senate today". That's what you will get. Anyway, the things we hear and read about through our local news outlets, If it once was fake, it's not anymore. Now, the major news outlet's reputations are on the line. And they know it. So now, At least 98% of what you hear and read about Trump is probably true. Simply because of Tweety Trump and his mouth. But since Trump loves attention so much, bad attention is better than no attention. Trump is the definition of narcissistic. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it's the stupidity, willful ignorance, and/or complicity that kills me.
he's so obvious, so transparent, and so corrupt...he's showing us all, and defying us to believe our own eyes! you wouldn't allow your friends or family to be swindled by his kind. you wouldn't hire him to work for you. you couldn't wait to fire him if you had the chance, just so you wouldn't have to be around him. you wouldn't put up with his schemes, his cons, his bs, his constant whining, his constant bogus claims, his constant bragging, his constant demonstrable lies, his constant lack of sympathy, of empathy, of basic manners...you just wouldn't! why in the h3ll would you hire him to represesent you to the entire world? to represent YOUR interests? to be in charge of prosecuting crimes that he commits? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it's the stupidity, willful ignorance, and/or complicity that kills me. he's so obvious, so transparent, and so corrupt...he's showing us all, and defying us to believe our own eyes! you wouldn't allow your friends or family to be swindled by his kind. you wouldn't hire him to work for you. you couldn't wait to fire him if you had the chance, just so you wouldn't have to be around him. you wouldn't put up with his schemes, his cons, his bs, his constant whining, his constant bogus claims, his constant bragging, his constant demonstrable lies, his constant lack of sympathy, of empathy, of basic manners...you just wouldn't! why in the h3ll would you hire him to represesent you to the entire world? to represent YOUR interests? to be in charge of prosecuting crimes that he commits? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it's the stupidity, willful ignorance, and/or complicity that kills me. he's so obvious, so transparent, and so corrupt...he's showing us all, and defying us to believe our own eyes! you wouldn't allow your friends or family to be swindled by his kind. you wouldn't hire him to work for you. you couldn't wait to fire him if you had the chance, just so you wouldn't have to be around him. you wouldn't put up with his schemes, his cons, his bs, his constant whining, his constant bogus claims, his constant bragging, his constant demonstrable lies, his constant lack of sympathy, of empathy, of basic manners...you just wouldn't! why in the h3ll would you hire him to represesent you to the entire world? to represent YOUR interests? to be in charge of prosecuting crimes that he commits? Workin4it, I appreciate your answer, and really, I am trying to understand the opposing point of view. I truly am trying to see why I should change my opinion of this guy. WHAT has this guy accomplished? I am not going to list again all the promises he has made that he has not followed through with. The stuff he takes credit for can be proven to be not his doing, and the stuff he has failed at is all buried by him as "fake news. If you had an employee at your company that was getting such non-results in the position you gave to him, and he was blaming things like his tardiness and absenteeism on "the clocks are wrong" and "that calendar is incorrect", you would not put up it. If the employee used excuses for not getting a task done like "the last guy who had the job sucked", or "the other person who you were interviewing for this job is crooked", you would say "yes, and the last person is gone, and we did not hire that other person, so blaming them is not important, and I need you to do YOUR job and stop talking about them!" If your company had paid for marketing research that business decisions were being based on, and this employee was sharing it with your competitors, after the researchers said it should not be shared, you would be concerned, correct? And if your new employee was ticking off some of your best customers, loyal buyers who have kept your company in business all these years, people who always pay on time, give you good Yelp reviews, etc. If the employee pissed them off, you would probably say something to him, right? What if it came across that he said in the interview that he was trained in doing something that your company needed done, and then you found out that he lied about knowing how to do that? Would you keep him around? And when you ask him why he lied about it, he turns it around and says that HE didn't lie, you just don't know what you are talking about, he is DOING this better than anyone, and you just can't recognise it? What would you say to that employee? Like I say, I am just trying to figure out WHY I should think that this employee of mine (he IS after all, a public servant, elected to serve ALL the citizens of this country) is more than a big bag of farts? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narcissistic personality disorder — one of several types of personality disorders — is a mental condition in which people have an inflated sense of their own importance, a deep need for excessive attention and admiration, troubled relationships, and a lack of empathy for others. Exercising, individual liberty is, NOT, a mental nor social defect. Exercising, one's own importance is, NOT, a mental nor social defect Exercising, pride in one's ethnicity is, NOT, a mental nor social defect Exercising, defending the borders of a Sovereign nation is, NOT, a mental nor social defect A lack of empathy for others exercising same, IS a a mental & social defect. Disliking others because of their political choice; IS a a mental & social defect. Forcing, people to like one because of one's political choice, IS a mental defect. Calling on Constitutions, to riot AND BULLY the winner's supporters because your party lost an election, like D-Maxine Waters did, IS A HUGE MENTAL DEFECT! AND SOCIAL CANCER! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narcissistic personality disorder — one of several types of personality disorders — is a mental condition in which people have an inflated sense of their own importance, a deep need for excessive attention and admiration, troubled relationships, and a lack of empathy for others. Exercising, individual liberty is, NOT, a mental nor social defect. Exercising, one's own importance is, NOT, a mental nor social defect Exercising, pride in one's ethnicity is, NOT, a mental nor social defect Exercising, defending the borders of a Sovereign nation is, NOT, a mental nor social defect A lack of empathy for others exercising same, IS a a mental & social defect. Disliking others because of their political choice; IS a a mental & social defect. Forcing, people to like one because of one's political choice, IS a mental defect. Calling on Constitutions, to riot AND BULLY the winner's supporters because your party lost an election, like D-Maxine Waters did, IS A HUGE MENTAL DEFECT! AND SOCIAL CANCER! hhhmmmm... exactly WHICH side are you trying to prove right?? cuz,what you have just posted SURE sounds like it is validating the bejeezus out of your OPPONENTS arguments!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it's the stupidity, willful ignorance, and/or complicity that kills me. he's so obvious, so transparent, and so corrupt...he's showing us all, and defying us to believe our own eyes! you wouldn't allow your friends or family to be swindled by his kind. you wouldn't hire him to work for you. you couldn't wait to fire him if you had the chance, just so you wouldn't have to be around him. you wouldn't put up with his schemes, his cons, his bs, his constant whining, his constant bogus claims, his constant bragging, his constant demonstrable lies, his constant lack of sympathy, of empathy, of basic manners...you just wouldn't! why in the h3ll would you hire him to represesent you to the entire world? to represent YOUR interests? to be in charge of prosecuting crimes that he commits? Workin4it, I appreciate your answer, and really, I am trying to understand the opposing point of view. I truly am trying to see why I should change my opinion of this guy. WHAT has this guy accomplished? I am not going to list again all the promises he has made that he has not followed through with. The stuff he takes credit for can be proven to be not his doing, and the stuff he has failed at is all buried by him as "fake news. If you had an employee at your company that was getting such non-results in the position you gave to him, and he was blaming things like his tardiness and absenteeism on "the clocks are wrong" and "that calendar is incorrect", you would not put up it. If the employee used excuses for not getting a task done like "the last guy who had the job sucked", or "the other person who you were interviewing for this job is crooked", you would say "yes, and the last person is gone, and we did not hire that other person, so blaming them is not important, and I need you to do YOUR job and stop talking about them!" If your company had paid for marketing research that business decisions were being based on, and this employee was sharing it with your competitors, after the researchers said it should not be shared, you would be concerned, correct? And if your new employee was ticking off some of your best customers, loyal buyers who have kept your company in business all these years, people who always pay on time, give you good Yelp reviews, etc. If the employee pissed them off, you would probably say something to him, right? What if it came across that he said in the interview that he was trained in doing something that your company needed done, and then you found out that he lied about knowing how to do that? Would you keep him around? And when you ask him why he lied about it, he turns it around and says that HE didn't lie, you just don't know what you are talking about, he is DOING this better than anyone, and you just can't recognise it? What would you say to that employee? Like I say, I am just trying to figure out WHY I should think that this employee of mine (he IS after all, a public servant, elected to serve ALL the citizens of this country) is more than a big bag of farts? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it's the stupidity, willful ignorance, and/or complicity that kills me. he's so obvious, so transparent, and so corrupt...he's showing us all, and defying us to believe our own eyes! you wouldn't allow your friends or family to be swindled by his kind. you wouldn't hire him to work for you. you couldn't wait to fire him if you had the chance, just so you wouldn't have to be around him. you wouldn't put up with his schemes, his cons, his bs, his constant whining, his constant bogus claims, his constant bragging, his constant demonstrable lies, his constant lack of sympathy, of empathy, of basic manners...you just wouldn't! why in the h3ll would you hire him to represesent you to the entire world? to represent YOUR interests? to be in charge of prosecuting crimes that he commits? Workin4it, I appreciate your answer, and really, I am trying to understand the opposing point of view. I truly am trying to see why I should change my opinion of this guy. WHAT has this guy accomplished? I am not going to list again all the promises he has made that he has not followed through with. The stuff he takes credit for can be proven to be not his doing, and the stuff he has failed at is all buried by him as "fake news. If you had an employee at your company that was getting such non-results in the position you gave to him, and he was blaming things like his tardiness and absenteeism on "the clocks are wrong" and "that calendar is incorrect", you would not put up it. If the employee used excuses for not getting a task done like "the last guy who had the job sucked", or "the other person who you were interviewing for this job is crooked", you would say "yes, and the last person is gone, and we did not hire that other person, so blaming them is not important, and I need you to do YOUR job and stop talking about them!" If your company had paid for marketing research that business decisions were being based on, and this employee was sharing it with your competitors, after the researchers said it should not be shared, you would be concerned, correct? And if your new employee was ticking off some of your best customers, loyal buyers who have kept your company in business all these years, people who always pay on time, give you good Yelp reviews, etc. If the employee pissed them off, you would probably say something to him, right? What if it came across that he said in the interview that he was trained in doing something that your company needed done, and then you found out that he lied about knowing how to do that? Would you keep him around? And when you ask him why he lied about it, he turns it around and says that HE didn't lie, you just don't know what you are talking about, he is DOING this better than anyone, and you just can't recognise it? What would you say to that employee? Like I say, I am just trying to figure out WHY I should think that this employee of mine (he IS after all, a public servant, elected to serve ALL the citizens of this country) is more than a big bag of farts? still having trouble acknowledging vote counts and legitimate polling, huh?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it's the stupidity, willful ignorance, and/or complicity that kills me. he's so obvious, so transparent, and so corrupt...he's showing us all, and defying us to believe our own eyes! you wouldn't allow your friends or family to be swindled by his kind. you wouldn't hire him to work for you. you couldn't wait to fire him if you had the chance, just so you wouldn't have to be around him. you wouldn't put up with his schemes, his cons, his bs, his constant whining, his constant bogus claims, his constant bragging, his constant demonstrable lies, his constant lack of sympathy, of empathy, of basic manners...you just wouldn't! why in the h3ll would you hire him to represesent you to the entire world? to represent YOUR interests? to be in charge of prosecuting crimes that he commits? Workin4it, I appreciate your answer, and really, I am trying to understand the opposing point of view. I truly am trying to see why I should change my opinion of this guy. WHAT has this guy accomplished? I am not going to list again all the promises he has made that he has not followed through with. The stuff he takes credit for can be proven to be not his doing, and the stuff he has failed at is all buried by him as "fake news. If you had an employee at your company that was getting such non-results in the position you gave to him, and he was blaming things like his tardiness and absenteeism on "the clocks are wrong" and "that calendar is incorrect", you would not put up it. If the employee used excuses for not getting a task done like "the last guy who had the job sucked", or "the other person who you were interviewing for this job is crooked", you would say "yes, and the last person is gone, and we did not hire that other person, so blaming them is not important, and I need you to do YOUR job and stop talking about them!" If your company had paid for marketing research that business decisions were being based on, and this employee was sharing it with your competitors, after the researchers said it should not be shared, you would be concerned, correct? And if your new employee was ticking off some of your best customers, loyal buyers who have kept your company in business all these years, people who always pay on time, give you good Yelp reviews, etc. If the employee pissed them off, you would probably say something to him, right? What if it came across that he said in the interview that he was trained in doing something that your company needed done, and then you found out that he lied about knowing how to do that? Would you keep him around? And when you ask him why he lied about it, he turns it around and says that HE didn't lie, you just don't know what you are talking about, he is DOING this better than anyone, and you just can't recognise it? What would you say to that employee? Like I say, I am just trying to figure out WHY I should think that this employee of mine (he IS after all, a public servant, elected to serve ALL the citizens of this country) is more than a big bag of farts? over half the country, this week? Based on what source, besides Trump? Are you sure? http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_trump_job_approval-6179.html |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it's the stupidity, willful ignorance, and/or complicity that kills me. he's so obvious, so transparent, and so corrupt...he's showing us all, and defying us to believe our own eyes! you wouldn't allow your friends or family to be swindled by his kind. you wouldn't hire him to work for you. you couldn't wait to fire him if you had the chance, just so you wouldn't have to be around him. you wouldn't put up with his schemes, his cons, his bs, his constant whining, his constant bogus claims, his constant bragging, his constant demonstrable lies, his constant lack of sympathy, of empathy, of basic manners...you just wouldn't! why in the h3ll would you hire him to represesent you to the entire world? to represent YOUR interests? to be in charge of prosecuting crimes that he commits? Workin4it, I appreciate your answer, and really, I am trying to understand the opposing point of view. I truly am trying to see why I should change my opinion of this guy. WHAT has this guy accomplished? I am not going to list again all the promises he has made that he has not followed through with. The stuff he takes credit for can be proven to be not his doing, and the stuff he has failed at is all buried by him as "fake news. If you had an employee at your company that was getting such non-results in the position you gave to him, and he was blaming things like his tardiness and absenteeism on "the clocks are wrong" and "that calendar is incorrect", you would not put up it. If the employee used excuses for not getting a task done like "the last guy who had the job sucked", or "the other person who you were interviewing for this job is crooked", you would say "yes, and the last person is gone, and we did not hire that other person, so blaming them is not important, and I need you to do YOUR job and stop talking about them!" If your company had paid for marketing research that business decisions were being based on, and this employee was sharing it with your competitors, after the researchers said it should not be shared, you would be concerned, correct? And if your new employee was ticking off some of your best customers, loyal buyers who have kept your company in business all these years, people who always pay on time, give you good Yelp reviews, etc. If the employee pissed them off, you would probably say something to him, right? What if it came across that he said in the interview that he was trained in doing something that your company needed done, and then you found out that he lied about knowing how to do that? Would you keep him around? And when you ask him why he lied about it, he turns it around and says that HE didn't lie, you just don't know what you are talking about, he is DOING this better than anyone, and you just can't recognise it? What would you say to that employee? Like I say, I am just trying to figure out WHY I should think that this employee of mine (he IS after all, a public servant, elected to serve ALL the citizens of this country) is more than a big bag of farts? still having trouble acknowledging vote counts and legitimate polling, huh? I think we are too common to see his exquisite robe .... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This man has gotten more of his promise accomplished than any other president. Not exactly true. http://www.cheatsheet.com/culture/who-broke-more-campaign-promises-donald-trump-or-barack-obama.html/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trump has to stay in office because democrats and CNN have made following his every word a career.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
petenh
on
Fri 08/31/18 05:17 AM
|
|
Promises made promises kept. That's how I see it. And so does over half the country. This man has gotten more of his promise accomplished than any other president in my memory. And hes doing this while being unfairly attacked every day by a bunch of sniveling whiners.so when you say your truly trying to understand him, I find that hard to believe after reading any of your posts and I don't think you have the ability to understand someone like him. Wow, "Promises made, promises kept", but you can't name any. And if he was YOUR employee, you probably would have canned him already. Even if he was telling you what a good job he was doing for your company? And I asked you to change my mind about him, and you simply imply I am unable to understand his greatness. Well, I can turn that around and say that you and the other brainwashed folks who support him are either too naive or stubborn to admit that he has done nothing but dupe you. Meanwhile, we are not risking a plumbing business or a McDonald's franchise, but a COUNTRY on this do-nothing employee. I seriously would have developed more respect for you if you had just answered "I have no response". Instead, you couldn't give me any evidence to change my mind, so I must have a strong point. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trump has to stay in office because democrats and CNN have made following his every word a career. The Japanese in World War II were also convinced their Emperor was a living god, and were committed to support him to the very end, even if it meant sacrificing themselves on the steps of the royal palace as the last ring of defense. Think, if that happens in America, and the Trump supporters kill themselves on the steps of the Capitol, it might raise the collective IQ of the country by 10 points. Wow, the audience for shows like "Keeping up with the bimbos", "Honey Boo Boo" and all those other 'reality' TV shows will disappear! No more WWE or NASCAR either! It truly MIGHT make America great again! |
|
|
|
|
