Community > Posts By > Kleisto

 
Kleisto's photo
Sun 03/24/13 05:46 PM


Yes and no...While it is true that all the taxes are gathered into a consolidated fund for disbursement according to the budget, I think it is much more than coincidence that in a "well-balanced" budget, the income tax collected corresponds closely to the interest payable on the national debt. Too much so for coincidence IMO.


Well, all that aside, it is clear that the income tax revenue is not being allocated 'exclusively' to the national debt. You know as well as I do the state would cease to function if that were the case.


You really think so? Or do you really think they even give two rats about anything beyond their own greed? You're wrong if you do, because they don't, they'd rather the state itself die, all they care about is power, nothing more or nothing less. I'll ask again, if all this money, income tax or otherwise goes to where they say it does, why is this country in such piss poor shape? They get so much damn money from taxes and license fees, etc etc, but they always need more, ever notice that? Ever ask yourself why?

Time to wake up from your slumber.......all is not what it appears to be.

Kleisto's photo
Sun 03/24/13 04:25 PM





Yes, don't pay tax and watch your country become mediaeval in no time. What a great idea.




Our 'income tax' goes exclusively towards paying the interest on the national debt.

If the country defaults on the national debt, then people should stop paying income tax.




Exclusively? Utter nonsense followed by poor logic.


Yes exclusively, it goes to the debt before being spent on anything else.....


Well, that is hardly 'exclusive'. You people do understand the meaning I take it?


Yes I do and when I said that I mean it goes to the debt, and then it's gone, it can't go anywhere else because it's spent before it can get there.

Kleisto's photo
Sun 03/24/13 03:57 PM
Edited by Kleisto on Sun 03/24/13 03:57 PM



Yes, don't pay tax and watch your country become mediaeval in no time. What a great idea.




Our 'income tax' goes exclusively towards paying the interest on the national debt.

If the country defaults on the national debt, then people should stop paying income tax.




Exclusively? Utter nonsense followed by poor logic.


Yes exclusively, it goes to the debt before being spent on anything else.....tell me something if this money goes to where they say, why is everything in such poor shape for? Where is that money going? And why aren't they being held accountable for the missing money, millions of it a year? If we are found to be defrauding them we have the book thrown at us, but they get pass, why? Why are they held to a different standard from everyone else? Why is there no accountability?

Face facts man, the system is rigged.

Kleisto's photo
Sun 03/24/13 03:48 PM
Edited by Kleisto on Sun 03/24/13 03:49 PM


and thus you consent to your own enslavement......when you give someone the right to tell you can do something, you give them the right to tell you you can't as well. Only way to be truly free is never to give someone such authority that is unwarranted. Do that and you agree to be a slave, no matter if you know it or not.


well , that's life

I learned at an early age I Cant do whatever I want, nor did I grow up to feel like I was 'enslaved' because of it

I live in a society, and the community matters every bit as much as my individual and immediate gratification,,,

someone tells us what is accepted and what is not,, always will and that's life too

we decide whats important to us and what things we can accept potential consequences for

that's life too

slavery doesn't mean any presence of consequence or boundaries,
that's actually the definition of chaos


It's only chaos if one is afraid to have to take actual responsibility for themselves instead of relying on laws to do it for them.

And please stop with the idea that in a free society, there is no consequences or no boundaries, that's totally twisting the argument to support you. Of course someone can't kill someone, rob from them, or in any other way do them harm, and there is a natural consequence and boundary there....no one is saying those restrictions shouldn't be in place. But those are the ONLY ones that need exist, when it comes to personal rights, none should.

Finally, if you believe life means others get to tell you what is acceptable based on their own personal bias, well frankly you deserve to be a slave, because you bring it on yourself by letting that stand. Again I will say to you......who is TRULY the ego centric people? The ones wanting to be free personally, or those that wanna control them?

Kleisto's photo
Sun 03/24/13 03:29 PM
Edited by Kleisto on Sun 03/24/13 03:30 PM
and thus you consent to your own enslavement......when you give someone the right to tell you can do something, you give them the right to tell you you can't as well. Only way to be truly free is never to give someone such authority that is unwarranted. Don't do that and you agree to be a slave, no matter if you know it or not.

Kleisto's photo
Sun 03/24/13 03:00 PM




when we start leaning more and more to the citizen being the center of the universe, damn the society or the culture,,,

than I can plan on adapting or moving to a more suitable culture for my desires

....as can everyone else,,,


IF they can afford it and if they don't have a record......it's not as simple as you make it out to be.......and that's not even counting the family side of moving. You make it sound so easy, but fact is it's not.

And to me citizen rights should be paramount. Just because you don't like what someone is doing doesn't give you or anyone else the right to tell them they can't so long as them doing so isn't infringing on your rights in so doing. You wanna talk about the citizen being the center of the universe? I think the idea that YOU can dictate another's behavior just cause you disapprove is more reflective of that than them just trying to live their lives how they choose to live them.

They aren't telling you how to live, but you are trying to tell them how.....so who is really ego centered here, the people that are just trying to live their life, or those trying to take power over others?



when people can agree what a 'right' is, I will agree

but for now, I am adapted to and accepting of the society where the people, by democratic republic, decide what boundaries and societal guidelines they will enforce , support, or discourage,,,


then you accept the open slavery of others based on the whim of people who are more worried about what others are doing than what they are, and in the end you may be accepting slavery of yourself too, whether you believe it or not matters little.

and second, if people have to agree what a right is......then no rights exist, and you don't know what the term really stands for.

Kleisto's photo
Sun 03/24/13 02:43 PM
lol gotcha. How often would you hear from them when you started to opt out?

Kleisto's photo
Sun 03/24/13 02:26 PM
Edited by Kleisto on Sun 03/24/13 02:36 PM


when we start leaning more and more to the citizen being the center of the universe, damn the society or the culture,,,

than I can plan on adapting or moving to a more suitable culture for my desires

....as can everyone else,,,


IF they can afford it and if they don't have a record......it's not as simple as you make it out to be.......and that's not even counting the family side of moving. You make it sound so easy, but fact is it's not.

And to me citizen rights should be paramount. Just because you don't like what someone is doing doesn't give you or anyone else the right to tell them they can't so long as them doing so isn't infringing on your rights in so doing. You wanna talk about the citizen being the center of the universe? I think the idea that YOU can dictate another's behavior just cause you disapprove is more reflective of that than them just trying to live their lives how they choose to live them.

They aren't telling you how to live, but you are trying to tell them how.....so who is really ego centered here, the people that are just trying to live their life, or those trying to take power over others?

Kleisto's photo
Sun 03/24/13 02:19 PM
tell more about your story Just, would be curious to hear just how you talked to them, I've always wanted to try something like what you speak of here.

Kleisto's photo
Sun 03/24/13 02:11 PM

Someone told me once, and I have no way to verify it,
but they said there is NO law saying one has to
pay income taxes.


That's quite true, Jeannie even refers to it here, the actual text describes as a voluntary tax......which by definition means we can opt out if we so choose. But yeah best I understand there is no definitive law that says you MUST pay, and if you try to ask them that you won't get an answer because they can't answer without incriminating themselves.

Kleisto's photo
Sat 03/23/13 11:25 PM






My point is people who scream that abortion is murder probably have not been faced with the reality of being responsible for an unwanted child or children and while they can make suggestions about "adoption" they don't really know what that involves.

It is easy to have an opinion when you are not face to face with the problem.

I don't see many anti-abortion proponents offering to adopt and raise these unwanted children.






I would bet there are quite a few anti abortion folks who do actually adopt and raise unwanted children


but that is beside the point,,,,not eveyone is able to take on children, yet I wouldnt think that should stop them from speaking up about children being abused or neglected

similarly, I think its irrelevant to not supporting abortion,,,,


why is that irrelevant? SOMEONE has to raise the kid, it doesn't just come able to raise itself! If someone can't handle it and no one else wants to, what good is that gonna do for anyone? The kid will lead a ****ed up life because of it, is that fair to it to be burdened with that because of the mistakes of the parent? If it can't be raised properly, it almost is better off not existing really from that perspective.

I don't think abortion should be used as an easy out for not being responsible for yourself that said, but......I think the topic of what happens to these unwanted kids is VERY relevant, it will shape the rest of their lives.



yes, society may have to pay to keep a child safe or alive,, oh the DREAD,,,,

frustrated frustrated


it cant be raised properly DEAD, and we dont know how properly it will be raised until someone is RAISING It,,,

and yes, what happesn to them is important to discuss,


but my not being able to 'step up' to raise someones child, is irrelevant to me stepping in to protect that child if they are facing death or harm,,,,




You missed my point! If no one is willing to raise the kid properly, is it fair to put the child through that suffering if it can be helped? That is what I was trying to say, nothing more.


we dont know if no one is willing to raise the child 'properly' until the child is here ,,,,,,,,



I'd say at times you know........but that's just me.

Kleisto's photo
Sat 03/23/13 10:30 PM




My point is people who scream that abortion is murder probably have not been faced with the reality of being responsible for an unwanted child or children and while they can make suggestions about "adoption" they don't really know what that involves.

It is easy to have an opinion when you are not face to face with the problem.

I don't see many anti-abortion proponents offering to adopt and raise these unwanted children.






I would bet there are quite a few anti abortion folks who do actually adopt and raise unwanted children


but that is beside the point,,,,not eveyone is able to take on children, yet I wouldnt think that should stop them from speaking up about children being abused or neglected

similarly, I think its irrelevant to not supporting abortion,,,,


why is that irrelevant? SOMEONE has to raise the kid, it doesn't just come able to raise itself! If someone can't handle it and no one else wants to, what good is that gonna do for anyone? The kid will lead a ****ed up life because of it, is that fair to it to be burdened with that because of the mistakes of the parent? If it can't be raised properly, it almost is better off not existing really from that perspective.

I don't think abortion should be used as an easy out for not being responsible for yourself that said, but......I think the topic of what happens to these unwanted kids is VERY relevant, it will shape the rest of their lives.



yes, society may have to pay to keep a child safe or alive,, oh the DREAD,,,,

frustrated frustrated


it cant be raised properly DEAD, and we dont know how properly it will be raised until someone is RAISING It,,,

and yes, what happesn to them is important to discuss,


but my not being able to 'step up' to raise someones child, is irrelevant to me stepping in to protect that child if they are facing death or harm,,,,




You missed my point! If no one is willing to raise the kid properly, is it fair to put the child through that suffering if it can be helped? That is what I was trying to say, nothing more.

Kleisto's photo
Sat 03/23/13 08:37 PM




BRUNSWICK, Ga. (AP) — Police arrested two teenagers Friday who are suspected in the shooting death of a 13-month-old baby in a stroller and wounding the baby’s mother during an attempted robbery.

Seventeen-year-old De’Marquis Elkins is charged as an adult with first-degree murder.

“He asked me for money and I said I didn’t have it,” she said. “When you have a baby, you spend all your money on babies. They’re expensive. And he kept asking and I just said ‘I don’t have it.’ And he said, ‘Do you want me to kill your baby?’ And I said, ‘No, don’t kill my baby!’”

He fired at her head and the bullet grazed her left ear – she has a small scab and bruising there. He fired again and shot her in the left leg above the knee. “I didn’t know I was hurt.”

“The boy proceeded to go around to the stroller and he shot my baby in the face,” she said. “And then he just shoved me when I started screaming and he ran down London Street.


Would Universal Background Checks, or Any Other Bill being Debated Stop This Monster? NO, Because Criminals Will Still Get Guns; Gun Laws Only Disarm Law Abiding Citizens.



criminals breaking laws is no reason to abandon any attempt at creating or enforcing laws...



Her point was, no matter WHAT the law is, someone will break it if they want to, it's naive to think that because of a law someone will suddenly change.


yes, some people are determined to do what they want regardless of laws

but others are absolutely encouraged and discouraged by the laws as well,,


Bottom line though is, these gun laws will not really help anyone, if anything it will RAISE crime since law abiding people will have a harder time getting a gun. If we care about keeping ourselves safe, let those at most risk carry. Nuff said.

Kleisto's photo
Sat 03/23/13 08:35 PM


My point is people who scream that abortion is murder probably have not been faced with the reality of being responsible for an unwanted child or children and while they can make suggestions about "adoption" they don't really know what that involves.

It is easy to have an opinion when you are not face to face with the problem.

I don't see many anti-abortion proponents offering to adopt and raise these unwanted children.






I would bet there are quite a few anti abortion folks who do actually adopt and raise unwanted children


but that is beside the point,,,,not eveyone is able to take on children, yet I wouldnt think that should stop them from speaking up about children being abused or neglected

similarly, I think its irrelevant to not supporting abortion,,,,


why is that irrelevant? SOMEONE has to raise the kid, it doesn't just come able to raise itself! If someone can't handle it and no one else wants to, what good is that gonna do for anyone? The kid will lead a ****ed up life because of it, is that fair to it to be burdened with that because of the mistakes of the parent? If it can't be raised properly, it almost is better off not existing really from that perspective.

I don't think abortion should be used as an easy out for not being responsible for yourself that said, but......I think the topic of what happens to these unwanted kids is VERY relevant, it will shape the rest of their lives.

Kleisto's photo
Sat 03/23/13 08:22 PM


BRUNSWICK, Ga. (AP) — Police arrested two teenagers Friday who are suspected in the shooting death of a 13-month-old baby in a stroller and wounding the baby’s mother during an attempted robbery.

Seventeen-year-old De’Marquis Elkins is charged as an adult with first-degree murder.

“He asked me for money and I said I didn’t have it,” she said. “When you have a baby, you spend all your money on babies. They’re expensive. And he kept asking and I just said ‘I don’t have it.’ And he said, ‘Do you want me to kill your baby?’ And I said, ‘No, don’t kill my baby!’”

He fired at her head and the bullet grazed her left ear – she has a small scab and bruising there. He fired again and shot her in the left leg above the knee. “I didn’t know I was hurt.”

“The boy proceeded to go around to the stroller and he shot my baby in the face,” she said. “And then he just shoved me when I started screaming and he ran down London Street.


Would Universal Background Checks, or Any Other Bill being Debated Stop This Monster? NO, Because Criminals Will Still Get Guns; Gun Laws Only Disarm Law Abiding Citizens.



criminals breaking laws is no reason to abandon any attempt at creating or enforcing laws...



Her point was, no matter WHAT the law is, someone will break it if they want to, it's naive to think that because of a law someone will suddenly change.

Kleisto's photo
Sat 03/23/13 08:11 PM


why should they be getting a cut of ANY of the income we make though? even 9 percent or a flat tax is too much. They didn't do a damn thing to earn that money, what right do they have to take it?


That's right. They deserve exactly NONE.

Check out how much it costs per hour to fly Air force 1.
Find out how much money the Obama's spend for their trips.

Its a crime.


Not to mention spending income tax money on ****ing STAR TREK parodies like a different post here alludes to. It's ridiculous and theft.

Kleisto's photo
Sat 03/23/13 07:50 PM
why should they be getting a cut of ANY of the income we make though? even 9 percent or a flat tax is too much. They didn't do a damn thing to earn that money, what right do they have to take it?

Kleisto's photo
Sat 03/23/13 07:21 PM





So in other words......because two people are in a relationship YOU don't agree with.....they have to hide it from the public entirely? How very loving of you.....for not being a Christian, you sure are acting like a lot of them do on this.....

Many countries, they better hide or they wind up hung.
And that don't mean as like a horse.


This is true, either way though, either hung or just forced away from society in general, neither one is good.


If two people have a relationship that I don't agree with, fine. just keep it away from me. I don't care or want to see it. They don't want to see my relationships nor I theirs. For some reason, they want the public to see and approve theirs? Not. Good grief, how hard is that to understand?


How hard is it to understand that it's not fair to treat them as second class citizens just cause of who they choose to be with? That it's ok for you to go out with your wife or gf on a date, but they can't? And by the way, they are not forcing you to hide your relationship, so don't even try that argument, you are the only one forcing anything here, not them.

Kleisto's photo
Sat 03/23/13 06:19 PM



So in other words......because two people are in a relationship YOU don't agree with.....they have to hide it from the public entirely? How very loving of you.....for not being a Christian, you sure are acting like a lot of them do on this.....

Many countries, they better hide or they wind up hung.
And that don't mean as like a horse.


This is true, either way though, either hung or just forced away from society in general, neither one is good.

Kleisto's photo
Sat 03/23/13 05:40 PM



well, one thing people don't seem to understand is that there is no such thing as total freedom... some laws just need to be there, for the good of the people... i don't care if anyone is gay or not, i just don't see the need for all the "advertising" gay people do...


i would like for someone to tell me what the gays cannot get out of common law marriage that others get by being married...


Advertising? Do you mean like straight people do by showing/telling people they're straight?


yea, the NORMAL thing...


So in other words......because two people are in a relationship YOU don't agree with.....they have to hide it from the public entirely? How very loving of you.....for not being a Christian, you sure are acting like a lot of them do on this.....