100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
|
Topic:
The Skin Trade
Edited by
Krimsa
on
Fri 02/13/09 08:18 AM
|
|
This stuff works wonders. I slather it on all winter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I could understand women having many children in countries where medical resources and access to health care is not on the same level that we experience in industrialized nations. In that case, your children help you to support yourself and out of having 10, only 2 might live to adulthood. This even occurred in the United States historically.
I just dont understand this woman's reasoning behind having all of these babies when she cant support her origional, living children. It makes no sense and is counter intuitive. Im assuming these babies will require extra medical attention also if she carried all 8 to term. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Faith is Fantasy
|
|
If that were the case, I will convert to evangelism today. I have a sh1tty car.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah she cant feed the ones she had prior from what I hear. That is part of the controversy. I personally feel like people should stop having one child, let alone this lunacy. I guess Im an extremist in the other direction. 
You an extremist, never 
I personally don't care so long as that person can take care of their own. Meaning, guidance, nourishment, shelter, love, and the financial obligationm etc., all those good things, if you can provide and all that, have a million kids. But if you continue to have kids on my dime, that annoys the hell outta me. Well yes I speaking from the standpoint of it becoming an increasingly disastrous situation as it relates directly to the drain on natural resources. The world population is nearing 7 billion. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah she cant feed the ones she had prior from what I hear. That is part of the controversy. I personally feel like people should stop having one child, let alone this lunacy. I guess Im an extremist in the other direction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I just think it is none of my business, how many kids she has. if she were able to feed them all without my money I wouldn't care either 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Faith is Fantasy
|
|
I would agree with Funch. I am losing my patience with them.  If they have a legitimate concern, then they can hit "report post". Then once the moderators realize its just them being ridiculous, they can deal with it. He is not breaking any rules in posting this thread. Besides, since when does the term "faith" only apply to Catholics or Christians? 
"ljcc" always resorts to a tactic that I called "The Excommunicator" first attack the poster and start singing the olde "we Christians are being percecuted song" and rant to everyone how horrible the poster is in an attempt to rally all the christians together to scorn the poster and to boycott or "excommunicate" the offensive thread .... but unfortunely since there is now a seperate Christian Singles Forum, to float from that forum over to this forum to try and use that tactic is ..er..how can I put this so that it won't be offensive ...delusional Right. The "Excommunication" thing doesnt work for sh!t either. I had Spider do that to me at one point and he rallied all of the Christians on forum to stop responding to my posts. It worked for about 24 hours and he stopped responding to me, that was it. The rest of them only intensified their whining.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
I've found the answer
|
|
Deb it was a joke. Have I "experimented"? Yes. Do I consider myself Lesbian, no.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Any one into Wiccan?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ImGary said:
Krimsa John 4:2 States that Jesus baptized his disciples, it does not state that he did not perform any baptisms. You have taken this scripture out of context.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I apologize. I cant even remember who brought up this contradiction but they did and then feral and Eljay jumped in. Someone needs to just start a separate biblical contradiction thread. I agree it has no place and this one in particular is stupid. All that happened was either whoever wrote this was drunk at the wheel or someone inserted a contradictory verse later because they didnt read John 3. Krimsa this is YOUR post- SEVERAL pages after you claim that I interrupted the topic of this thread. You were obviously upset about the topic being changed-NOT. You apologize here and try to place blame on me after you went on and on about this tangent for several pages after I responded to your post on the first page. Grow up. I was apologizing to INKRACER because he was wondering why the topic had suddenly changed from evolution to Jesus. It was because you had taken my quote way back from the beginning of the thread and posted it while we were all discussing evolution. You even confessed to me by private message that it was a mistake and you didn’t realize the quote would go to the end of the thread. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I could post many partial quotes that you have posted here but I have wasted far too much time communicating with you already.
But what do you mean? To what are you referencing? Do you mean when I use these quotes? I am only sectioning your OWN WORDS in response so that way it is easier to read. I take one sentence or paragraph at a time and respond. You can do that also. Anyone can. As far as fibs, anyone who read the posts from tonight would agree that you are being a hypocrite in this regard.
Once again I don’t follow. I actually quoted where you had interrupted the discussion on evolution. And if someone saying that they don't like what it says in regards to them questioning why they are even speaking to you, makes you laugh, then you are more delusional than I had originally imagined.
This comment makes absolutely no sense so I can not respond |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Krimsa
on
Fri 02/13/09 01:34 AM
|
|
you have not contributed even one statement on topic this evening and you know it.
On this thread? Nope. Try looking throughout it. I was not going to let you get away with telling fibs tonight and you knew that. partial quotes, edited posts, picking apart words and twisting meanings even when you are on topic and the people who have been on this forum for awhile already know this for sure if I have figured it out in 3 days.
What partial quotes, edited posts, and picking apart words are you referring to? I have been quoting YOUR OWN WORDS. Can you not comprehend your own writing? If you feel I have misrepresented your position at any point this evening, it would be on you to correct that.
Man I don't like what that says about me.
It makes me laugh honestly. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well you can certainly see that I have been contributing on topic no less. What about gary? We are all waiting with baited breath.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Right. Anything you say. Still waiting on you to comment on topic? Any day now. Once you are done arguing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Krimsa
on
Fri 02/13/09 01:12 AM
|
|
Why do you think I used the term! It's an adjective used to reference women arguing. I know it was mean. I feel like a cat batting around a mouse right now. I should stop. This is cruel and evil of me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Krimsa
on
Fri 02/13/09 01:05 AM
|
|
NO I admitted only that I do not use slang terms.
Catty is not a slang term and you don’t even realize that. I knew your catty context of catty
Then tell me the reason why you had to look up the definition online and then decided that I could only have been referring to a Chinese unit of measurement?
and painted you into a corner with it by using it to prove that it is you that is being catty, not I.
All you have demonstrated is that you did not know the definition for the word catty. It is most often used in reference to two women arguing. That is why I knew you did not even know what it meant.
Since you refuse to read the thread, and offer any kind of comprehensive rebuttal from the point where the participants left off, we have no choice but to endure this crap. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I never said that was not a possible alternate definition. I am asking you how did you imagine the context to be that of a unit of weight in China when I asked you to stop being so catty in forum. That was the question. Please read what I write. You also admitted that you did not know the definition of the word.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Krimsa
on
Fri 02/13/09 12:29 AM
|
|
I guess the reading comprehension is a little steep. Okay I’ll wait for MS in the morning. Actually I forgot to tell you that "catty" really means when two girls argue and fight.
Catty really means-any of the various units of weight of China and Southeast Asia varying around 600 grams. As most intellectual people do not use slang terms, I never considered what context you were invoking with the use of the term "catty". Although any response subsequent to this post will definately fall under your slang definition of catty because you shall be arguing with yourself. And if it were in fact a unit of weight in China, how were you envisioning that context when I told you to stop being "catty" on forum? I will love to hear your response to that one. Catty is not a "slang term", sir. Someone who is unaware of the definition of "catty" would hardly qualify as an 'intellectual". At least I would be mortified if I were you. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Krimsa
on
Fri 02/13/09 12:09 AM
|
|
I guess the reading comprehension is a little steep. Okay I’ll wait for MS in the morning.
Actually I forgot to tell you that "catty" really means when two girls argue and fight.
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
