Judy,

You need to try these on, because people want to see your stance on the IS shoes..

Dan, we appreciate the effort, but they need to be U.S. Citizens and registered to vote!

Hope you don't run low on viagra..

Interesting accusations.. what sources can you provide?

Is this where we go to pass the bar exam?

As I mentioned elsewhere.. you're gonna need a good press secretary, right? You don't want to be making any misspeechifications when you start defining what is is, right?

You mean that you and Dan represent a unified front on the issue of dynamic topic threads?

Is the position of spin..err..press secretary.. still open?

You know.. once again, this is a brilliant and common technique by liberals to put a republican in a dim light shortly before an election.

It's a great accusation, too.. Nobody likes book burning.. especially liberals.. Democrats are worried about loosing support for their candidates, so paint her like she's a radical right-wing ultra-religeous zealot and before anybody can prove the alligations are true or false, the election is nearly over and it's too late to change a lot of people's minds.

For anyone who wants to make an intelligent decision.. Find the source of these alligations.. and the evidence that supports it.. from whatever source that you, personally, feel that you can rely on.. whether that's the Internet, the news or friggin Jay Leno..

Judy, you need to leak some nude photos.. that's always good for a campaign..

BTW - If you need a good intern, I'll be waiting for you under the oval desk..

Maybe it means they listen to the Black Crows too much..

Just waiting for the right native american from kentucky to come along...lol..

She's for my personal protection. Nobody's nose or fingertips are safe in my house anymore.

Reasons for invading Iraq as defined by George W. Bush (9/12/02)

1. To hunt down terrorists and remove any support for terrorism

2. Saddam Hussein ignored U.N. Resolutions that he initially agreed to.

3. To protect human rights

4. Iraq failed to disclose the disposition of all of it's biological weapons stockpiles

5. There were several indications that Iraq had programs in place to develop WMD's.

6. Iraq left unchecked was becoming a growing threat to the United States.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/09/20020912-1.html

It's not fish.. it's a mammal..

She's talking bacon.. but eating peanuts..

Anybody hungry for some Mahi Mahi?

How many deaths and cost (inflation adjusted) did we have against Hitler? Wasn't it a democrat that got us involved in that war? Did Hitler have any weapons of mass destruction?

What is the death toll and ongoing cost of being in Korea? Who got us involved there? Any weapons of mass destruction found?

What about Vietnam? Why do the Democrats always have us going to war in these countries so far away from the U.S. and at such a great financial and mortal cost to us? Do we really want another democrat when there are so many hot situations with Pakistan, Iran, Russia/Georgia, etc?

Who'd a thunk it... British Columbia full of fishermen..lol..

Fishing is a little too boring for me. I'd much rather do something more exciting, like watch the grass grow...lol..

“If you read the Anchorage Daily News article, towards the bottom, you find that Palin requested the resignations not only of the librarian, but of several other township officials. Why? Because they were political appointees who openly supported her political opponent. Palin requested the resignations a few days BEFORE she assumed office, apparently for political reasons, as would be routine in ALL such situations, including in the very small town of Washington, DC. [Didn’t some no-name politician fire all of the US Attorneys?] Frankly, it’s far more remarkable (and shows a great deal of tolerance) for Palin to have KEPT Emmons in office. And you’d think people would consider the source when Emmons claims Palin wanted to ban books.”

http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/06/the-bogus-sarah-palin-banned-books-list/

Well, this is probably a subject for another topic, but I think that your education has been successful at convincing you that evolution is fact. The truth is that the is a lot of circumstantial evidence, and yes, it would explain a lot of things, if it is indeed true, but we don't have anything, in fact, that proves the THEORY of evolution. Notice I'm not saying it's not true, I'm just saying it's speculative. But, it was once taught as a fact that the sun was pulled across the sky by a chariot.

I just don't think new generations should be taught to think that it's a solved mystery when it isn't. Maybe one of these kids in school will one day provide us with some real facts about it.

As far as what to teach, it's just like anything else. You teach each of the highly regarded theories about the subject.

Well, I resent that evolution is taught in school as if it's fact, and yet there is no definitive factual evidence that evolution is anything other than a theory. Creationism can be taught as a theory as well, it doesn't need to be presented as fact, but if you are going to talk about "where we came from", which is relevant subject matter for a school (IMO), then you need to present all sides of the issue, even that some people believe that we where put here by aliens. The idea here is to provoke the minds of our youth and to give them information so they can make up their own minds.

I wouldn't say that about the abortion issue. There are plenty of ways that the President directly and indirectly affects the outcome of abortion laws and their interpretation. But that being said, I'm much more concerned about the potential president's view on foreign policy, the military and social programs than I am about his views on abortion or gay rights or gun control.

I meant to say more moderate..lol

On the war.. well, he's more moderate than me. I think we should be building a permanent base in Iraq and quit talking about ever "pulling out". That's just not realistic. I think it's in our (America's) best interest to have a long-term strong military presence in the Middle-East until people there stop being so anti-American, and that's going to take several generations.

On abortion, McCain is more moderate than Bush, although he is still very much pro-life. Me, I prefer to take the baby's point of view and say no to abortions of any kind. The only exception should be if the likelyhood of both mother and child dying is nearly a certainty.

He wants to leave the issue of Gay marriage up to the states.

Wants to leave the issue of teaching creationism up to individual school districts.

He is pro-nuclear for energy

He is pro-stem cell research

I'm getting too damn picky as I get older.

Is it possible to find a woman who has a passion other than just finding a man and/or raising kids? I mean, there is nothing wrong with those things, but what ever happened to having life beyond those things?

But that's just a random thought. I'm also looking for a woman who is alive and interesting, attractive to me, confident, still possesses an ability to trust others and is not either too shy to talk and say what she wants or so outgoing and chaotic that she doesn't really know how to be a part of a relationship..

Of course, she has to really dig me. I think I have a lot to offer, but I'm not Tom Cruise (I'm about 8" taller) or Donald Trump (I think is decorating is just plain tacky..lol)

Throw on top of that the fact that I would like to still consider the possibility of having more kids and I think I've pretty well knocked out about 95% of the available women.

That's ok, though.. I'm enjoying life and I can be perfectly content by myself. Finding a woman I can love would make it that much better, though..