\



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fss3C0EDiA4



warelephant check this out man



Karl Logan and Eric Adams with Eric's son's band here in auburn at one of our bars

The Number Of The Beast By Iron Maiden

A slut = slut.

no anyone who takes a comedy seriously =a moron.

If you don't like sluts then yes....

Strong independant female = sexy

We are more independent, this is a fact. Men have had to realize these changes too. It is a difficult change but one that is not going to go away so we all need to deal with it.

...spoken like a proud card carrying member of the chauvinist labor party....(((((and we haven't been))))) there done that for enough centuries to suit you yet eah, well hun how many more would you like us to go before we complain and want the right to be an equal species....the world is suppose to change as we know it Dec. 2012....I myself would like to be treated like a equally valuable being before that...too much to ask, well go back to your rape and pillage routine it seems to be doing the world such good....JOHN STOSELL where are you...gimme a break !!!!!! and fall back down a rabbit hole or somthin.....ppphhhh.....


~wicked~

It's America, you're entitled to your opinion. Personally, I love the show and admire the women on it.

A lot of 21-century working women now view men as fun emotional rollercoasters, as a hobby rather than a vocation. To have singleness represented in such a glamorous way was a relief – in more traditional accounts, a single woman of that age is officially on the shelf.... The seventysomething novelist Fay Weldon, who found the series “impossible not to enjoy”, is reluctant to lend messages to the show, but suggests that one might be: “Find ways to enjoy yourself, but give up the hunt for men. It’s just debasing.”

Oh, are you calling me names now??? I don't think JSH will alllow that. (note the sarcasm since you don't have a clue) I already know who and what you are and your claimed "educational background" and such.

And how in the world could you ask "Are you threatening me"? Without doubt one of the stupidest remarks yet. How can anyone with even half a brain think that someone telling them to go sit on the train tracks when a train is coming and find the "presedence" they so longingly search for to rule thier life and you think that this has the remote possiblity of some sort of personal threat!!??

Let me state this in plain, clear consice English that MAYBE you can understand. that comment was NOT any sort of "threat" by ANY means. It' was basically stating htis.. "IF you are that stupid (look up definition in Websters) to need something (prsedence) or someone to tell you to get off the train tracks when a train is coming, then please, feel free to sit there. And I'll even deliver the books while you search for your presedence that states whether or not a person should or should not get off the tracks when a train is coming.

Now is that easier for you to understand? It's kind of like 2+2=4 . It does not get any easier than that.

As for the rest, what you can't read?? Just look it up, there are references all over the place..including direct ones by others right here in the thread, like Fanta's post.

And if you need more proof of my point, all you have to do is go sit on some train tracks with a train coming. My point will be clearly evident shortly thereafter.