Oops, forgot our female friends...uh...let's see what I have..humm.

Seriously? What's the weather have to do with this? Eh?

Let us get some "sin" started:

Gives you an extra one for the bush?

So who voted for these douchebags....let's not forget AM static and the hoardes who are swayed by the pulpit...that's why the shills tout Obama as a Muslim...to SCARE the sheeple. Look at the titles on this board made by the same lame shills.

It's a rovean mix that makes this all a disaster. LOW life people, Beck, Linbaugh, Coulter, Savage, Hannity, O'reilly, Bachmann, Boehner, Palin..etc...and all the arseholes over at the POX faked news station. The people you dips elected sound a lot like POX....and other RW extremists noise machines...and I haven't even scratched the surface of this Neocon agenda creeping back.

You guys can only scare people to get a vote. How lame is that?

I think that if god had not intended us to masturbate then he'd have made our arms much shorter.

What do you think of this issue?

Will you burn in hell for having sex with someone you love? (yourself).

Do any of you do it even though you know HE'S watching?

I am watching football...screw MSNBC until Olbermann comes back, he's intelligent and entertaining. Oh, I don't watch every night..I do catch Maddow a few times a week as well and these people do not lie...and when they make a mistake they apologize for it. Olbermann has even said when he went over the top...can anyone say that about anyone at POX?

This constant BS that MSNBC is radically left as POX is right might have footing IF POX were a real news outlet...they ain't. Proved it over and over. Give it up yo'...POX is a wholly owned subsidairy of the GOP and Big Corp...period.

I must assume we have a lot of shills here, there and everywhere.

Either that or they're simply that ignorant and racist...and above it all is that it was Big Corp who started the rhetoric. Funding morons to say stupid chit to attract stupid people and other disaffected GOPers.

POX is the epicentre and channeling device for Big Corp, to make people vote against their own best interests, even for the interest of corporate control and profit over this country....and inevidably they are voting to lose our democracy.

Thanks! Real American of yall.

It's different in the MSM. They have to appear nonpartial to maintain their jouranlistic integrities. Heh...meh...not including POX who were caught last year at an anti-HC T-baghead rally cueing the audience. Anyway, any corporation that has to maintain a public image has the right to suspend or fire people who do not follow their values.

I hope that Keith Olbermann learned his lesson.

Egads, just imagine if POX had ethics...LOL...therw would be a lot of dead air on there. I hope they replace him in his 3 day suspension with Cenk Uygur.

Hang in there Keith!

Uh, India is more Budda and Hindu...pffft. The rest is just more absurd myopeon speak.

Oh come on, POX knew that was BS...they lie all the time plus "an un-named top official" in India said something? Only POX is publishing this BS...then their parrots on this site follow suit.

Sure enough - I guess Backmann vetted the story with POX so they must have confirmed with.....each other.

"The president will be accompanied by 40 aircraft, 3,000 people, a fleet of cars and 34 warships, according to a string of blow-by-blow news updates. The Press Trust of India quoted an official in the state of Maharashtra pegging the cost at $200 million a day."

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/11/04/security-entourage-earning-epic-reputation-ahead-obama-india-visit/

Soooo, US presidents should not travel to do...uh...diplomacy?

It was that dipwad Congressperson Michelle Bachmann who aired the lie that this trip costs $200 million a day...egads, the internet was a cesspool before but now it's more tainting to reality with it leaking into our elected officials speak...does this not trouble anyone...yet?

She's also the one demanding an investigation into congress for "un-American activities".

Gee do I hafta drag out all these HC rally signs again? Really? Please no!

Let's put it this way...if you met a homophobic-Islam-hating-Beck-blowing-Mexican-hating-Obama-hating person who do you think they voted for? C'mon...it's simple.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bqxgTryyYoA&feature=fvw

Oh, I get it...lol...(now a spin on what was said) it's pretty much: Don't show or have passion, no lust for the woam you love...no desire to the woman you're inserting your penis into her only to bare children...for god right?

Dude, seriously? So IF you get married and have 3 kids that means that you will have shown your love for your wife only THREE times?

Take it from one of your leaders:

Do Evangelical Christians have good and frequent sex?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MOpMsuz_uK4&feature=related

Readers who believe this crap may also like:

No, they are specifically accurate in context...and you cannot worm out of your contradiction. I guess you're now in the "god (and you) are infallible" mode...or as I call it here down on Earth: denial.

":I was specifically addressing this paragraph that you wrote.
"Sex is pleasurable to the flesh, and the flesh only. And no we are not to have sex for the "pleasure". That's when it becomes lustful. Sex is for reproduction, and reproduction only."

I did read what you said carefully. Reproduction would possibly become none existent if it wasn't pleasurable and or if we were not to enjoy making love for reproduction. So God tells us it is ok to feel the pleasure of our married spouse in the act of reproduction"


You can't have it both ways Cowboy but something tells me you don't have it....or have never had it anyway.

“no more bailouts”

The bailouts were started under the Dippic and helped avoid a total collpase of our economy.

“no more taking over of auto companies”

GM recently announced profits that have helped pay back to US taxpayers so that now we only own 40% of them v the 61% we had. It is and will pay dividends to us.

“no more taking over of the student loan program”

The student loan program enabled more kids to attend college without paying higher rates and the cetralization of it helped cut admin costs. This is important since tuitions are rising.

“no more reading terrorists their miranda rights”

If you don’t honor the Bill of Rights then I suggest you get yer arse out of this country.

“no building of any mousque at ground zero”

It’s not a Mosque but a community center with several uses...including a Muslim prayer room. So what?

“no more lawsuits against Arizona”

The Arizona immigration law is un-Constitutional. Back to the drawing board.

“no more stimulus”

The stimulus monies created jobs and help unemployment stay under 10%…imagine it worse and us in a complete depression right now.

“no more debt”

In 2009 the debt was lowered by 8%. That’s a start.

“no more spending money we don't have”

Then make the superrich pay their share then. End the tax cuts for the 2% in this country that make 45% of the salaries. Screw them.

“no more goverment run healthcare”

So, how are YOU going to cover 45 million Americans who have no HC insurance? Let them die? How are YOU going to stop the runaway Big HC and Big Pharma who have ripped us off for years.

“no more telling us what we can eat”

Who is saying that?

“no more telling us what we can drink”

Who is saying that?

“no more foodstamps”

So, “let them eat cake” then eh?

“no more poverty”

I guess that will end when you starve the poor to death.

“no more unemployment”

We’ve had good job growth in the private sector. It’s getting better but may take a while to recover. Any person of minimal eonomics knowledge will tell you that employment is the last thing to recover after a severe recession.

“no more appologies for this great country “

Who’s asking for us to apologize?

“and lastly...NO MORE LIBERALISM !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!”

It’s not a “left” or “right” thing, it’s about the correct thing. Your T-baggery talking points are NOT plans. T-bagheads have no plans to answer to complex issues so it's only about politics and their hatred for all that don't look or sound like them.

In a nutshell...lol.

A 1995 report...but goody for the racists here that they can attack a black man and a Muslim at the same time. It's the BONUS edition of "Who Should We Hate This Week?". Certainly not defending Farrakhan since he's just like the racists here on Mingle but all they want here is to point at others while covering up their own racist ways.


~~~~

"A leading example of a black separatist group is the Nation of Islam led by Louis Farrakhan. In 1997, and in less explicit ways since then, Farrakhan made clear that he had renounced none of the anti-white, anti-Semitic, anti-Catholic and anti-gay views of the previous Nation leader, Elijah Mohammed. Those beliefs include the view that Yacub, a renegade black "scientist," created whites 6,600 years ago as an inherently evil and ungodly people — "blue-eyed devils." Farrakhan has described Catholics and Jews, who he said practice a "gutter religion," as preying on blacks. He regrets the "tone" of a former principal subordinate who called for slaughtering white South Africans, but agreed with the message. He called for racial separatism and inveighed against interracial relationships.

If a white group espoused similar beliefs with the colors reversed, few would have trouble describing it as racist and anti-Semitic. Although the racism of a group like the Nation may be relatively easy to understand, if we seek to expose white hate groups, we cannot be in the business of explaining away the black ones."

SPLC

http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-files/ideology/black-separatist

Oh, so you changed your mind then?