Edited by
voileazur
on
Fri 04/10/09 03:39 PM
|
|
Now also this is not to say that you can't believe in whatever it is you want to...you can.....as for me...There is only one way......And through only one.....Jesus Christ whom God himself declared as his one and only. This is my original post......so where is this off the original OP Now someone came and asked something after me referring to my post...which I answered......so where exactly did you have a problem with it.. It would appear that your bearings are off. I didn't comment on your first post, nor did I comment on the rather lenghty and pontificating answer you gave to a question asked. I pointed the 'OFF TOPIC' and 'HIGHJACK' run when you couldn't stop yourself from driving YOUR 'OFF TOPIC' agenda into oblivion. That's highjacking the topic of a thread. If you wish to keep hammering an 'off topic' point with someone, simply invite them to do so through e-mail, or start a thread of your own in the christian café, and knock yourself out. This thread compares 346 similarities between Jesus and Krishna life stories. Besides the fact that you don't believe in the similarities, which you stated a heck of a while back, do you wish to add anything else which pertains to anyone of the hundreds of similarities??? You can tear up any of the similarities you wish with contracticting FACTS, if you have any to submit. And while you might really 'itch' to throw bible quotes around, they simply are of no use for this topic. That 'book' of yours came after Krishna, which is a central aspect of the questions raised through this thread. Just stay 'on topic'. Simple! As a hint to help you stay focused and 'on-topic': ... just read the similarities listed in the OP, and give us your very own thoughts as to what could explain such fortuitous coincidences in Jesus' life account??? You can't be serious.....listen again like I said if topic was about krisna alone then point taken...But it was not and you sir don't have the right nor are you appointed thread god to tell me how to post...How arrogant is that. I didn't hijack anything...if I don't believe that there is anyone but Christ like I said I am not going to addres the krisna part of this thread...why would I when I don't believe it. I also have no control of what others put as you do not either...and if someone asks a question directly to me, I am going to answer it end of story... And again obviously others are interested enough in my answers to ask question and if you don't like it...oh well again to bad. The only contradicting fact I have which I stated was that there is no other then Christ....God didn't say he had many god sons now did he and again I can only answer what I know to be truth... I am staying on topic....as the first of the entire OP is Jesus...so I guess talking about Jesus is right on topic I would say. I don't believe the similarities so I guess I will take it in the direction of satan now and false gods and prophets... This thread is not about the story of 'Jesus', the one and only god, as told and written in the 'bible' book. This thread raises questions about the source of that which was written about 'Jesus' in that book called the 'bible'. In clearly pointing out similarities in 'jesus's story, taken straight out of Krishna's life account, which the bible book itself can't disclaim since it didn't exist throughout Krishna's life, the host is hence suggesting that those so called 'wise ones' whom wrote the bible, were simply trying to appeal to the masses of the times with compelling and easy to understand stories. The 'wise ones' (wise ones simply because they knew the written and read 'word'), picked at 'Krishna's life account, figuring at the time, that no one would ever trace it back; - the masses had no access to education, no notion of reading and writing, and - neither the 'wise ones', nor their inspiration from YOUR god, had any idea that the google 'god' was going to emerge eventually: litteracy of the masses and masses of information :) ). The fact that you keep coming back with your personal, single religious, and 'Jesus' exclusive point of view is commonly referred to as 'highjacking' a conversation, topic or other legitimate exchange between civilized and open-minded people. In the event where the term 'highjacking' didn't communicate clearly the nature of your delinquent actions, let me propose 'FILIBUSTERING' as an alternative of your uncivilized act. You have stated your opinion and position, and you you have answered the questin asked of you some 13 posts ago. Since then, you have been deliberately 'OBSTRUCTING' any form of legitimate exchanges, on this legitimate topic, on this most appropriate 'GENERAL RELIGION CHAT' forum. REMINDER: The thread is about the similarities between 'Krishna' and 'Jesus' life accounts. The thread is not about 'Jesus': the one and only god, as YOUR religion claims. That would be a whole other topic which you are welcomed to propose in your 'christian exclusive forums'. If, as you say, you have no intention of dealing with the similarities between 'Krishna's and 'Jesus's life accounts (you have exercised your privilege to state that position, and we all took good note of it), please have the common decency of allowing those whom wish to debate on topic, to do so, ... FREE OF YOUR FILIBUSTERING. |
|
|
|
Edited by
voileazur
on
Thu 04/09/09 09:29 PM
|
|
Now also this is not to say that you can't believe in whatever it is you want to...you can.....as for me...There is only one way......And through only one.....Jesus Christ whom God himself declared as his one and only. This is my original post......so where is this off the original OP Now someone came and asked something after me referring to my post...which I answered......so where exactly did you have a problem with it.. It would appear that your bearings are off. I didn't comment on your first post, nor did I comment on the rather lenghty and pontificating answer you gave to a question asked. I pointed the 'OFF TOPIC' and 'HIGHJACK' run when you couldn't stop yourself from driving YOUR 'OFF TOPIC' agenda into oblivion. That's highjacking the topic of a thread. If you wish to keep hammering an 'off topic' point with someone, simply invite them to do so through e-mail, or start a thread of your own in the christian café, and knock yourself out. This thread compares 346 similarities between Jesus and Krishna life stories. Besides the fact that you don't believe in the similarities, which you stated a heck of a while back, do you wish to add anything else which pertains to anyone of the hundreds of similarities??? You can tear up any of the similarities you wish with contracticting FACTS, if you have any to submit. And while you might really 'itch' to throw bible quotes around, they simply are of no use for this topic. That 'book' of yours came after Krishna, which is a central aspect of the questions raised through this thread. Just stay 'on topic'. Simple! As a hint to help you stay focused and 'on-topic': ... just read the similarities listed in the OP, and give us your very own thoughts as to what could explain such fortuitous coincidences in Jesus' life account??? |
|
|
|
Edited by
voileazur
on
Thu 04/09/09 04:21 PM
|
|
Double posting. Sorry.
|
|
|
|
Well darling then look up madamx7315 and ask for yourself...and oh really.....well maybe of better understanding of how God works here. He is the mighty healer, through him anything is possible. It is said that when two or more gather in his name (prayer) that Mighty things happen...Tell the man at my church who the doctors gave months to live not once not twice but 14 different times when different cancers riddled his body. Tell that to me when the Lord healed my breast cancer.....go and ask the doctors that were not only dumbfounded but whose mouths were on the floor....And remember sweet Thomas I am a witness to these miracles so there are no fabrications there are none of what you speak of.
And what about all those people whose prayers go unanswered? What about the countless people who are/were in your situation, or that guys situation, and pray, but nothing happens, or they die quicker than the time they were given? Why doesn't god help all those starving children around the world, if he helped you with cancer? Just because the doctors don't know what happened, doesn't mean that they can't find out, or that it was god. Like I said before....It's all God's timing not ours....He has a reason always for waiting until he feels the time is right or never at all. I know from again my own experiences that everyone has trials, including me.....if he doesn't answer is he testing my loyality and my faith....could be...But here is the big difference for me...I never doubt God I give him 100% of my life. Always when something is not answered it is later revealed why through some other circumstance. And sometimes it is not and it might take 1 year 5 years or 50 years....It's not up to us to decide...But the people that get angry at God for not doing what they think he should...What is that telling God? Why did Jesus heal the leaper, or the blind man, why did as you think Christ pick this one over that one...It is not for us to know, but to have the utmost Faith that He has his reasons.. Everyone on this planet is loved by God and it is arrogant to think that God owes anything to anyone. But I know with all my heart that what God does is what is truly best. Now again you can't take man made problems and think that just because you say GOD why are all those children suffering why are all these people homeless etc. There is God's way and we can't even phanthom what that is...and to think you should or could is just imo wrong... Why is it that everyone wants to blame God for everything? But how many wake each new day and say thank you God for all that you do in my life? 'OFF TOPIC' !!! Go to the christian forum, and start a 'miracles-for-feral' thread. |
|
|
|
Well darling then look up madamx7315 and ask for yourself...and oh really.....well maybe of better understanding of how God works here. He is the mighty healer, through him anything is possible. It is said that when two or more gather in his name (prayer) that Mighty things happen...Tell the man at my church who the doctors gave months to live not once not twice but 14 different times when different cancers riddled his body. Tell that to me when the Lord healed my breast cancer.....go and ask the doctors that were not only dumbfounded but whose mouths were on the floor....And remember sweet Thomas I am a witness to these miracles so there are no fabrications there are none of what you speak of. Its certainly not my position to criticize the beliefs of individuals. Thats an exercise in futility but what I dont fully understand is why Jesus (who there is absolutely no proof that he existed at all) is somehow placed on this pedestal as being the one true messiah put on this earth by god (yet he is god) and then all of these other different gods existed before him like Horus and Krishna and they have nearly the identical backgrounds and historical accounting of their lives? Why are they considered the "impostors" and not Jesus? I guess thats the million dollar question right there. Because regardless of what the truth may be, people have been programed from a young age to believe a certain way by people that have a vested interest in controlling the flow of information and what it contains. Believing that the bible has gone untainted and unchanged for over 2,000 years is an incredible leap of faith. Every time I hear of people blindly following words without question I get sick. Given everything that has happened, to do so and live like sheep is to spit in the face of every person that has truly lived as a Christian. Faith that remains unchallenged is blind faith indeed. If one still believes after opening their mind to other possibilities, they are truly spiritually strong. I again can only speak for myself....I have studied many many religions. Circumstances led me to search and the Lord Jesus Christ was the one that answered...I was not young and as with my parents and my kids for me, nothing was ever shoved down my throat. I searched and found for myself. And through this searching and finding the Lord who I cried out to show me he was real....Which the Lord did. Now I don't care if people will come and say oh you think your that special that God spoke to you...I don't care because the fact of the matter is He did and He does. And for me to deny him and the faith I have in the Lord of Lords is through the search and my faith is unwavering. I believe with all my heart, soul and mind, In God, Christ and the inate word of God the Bible...I do believe that God himself breathed life into the Bible and inspired every word from Genesis to Revelation. If people don't want this then ok.....but again for me....I will not deny the Lord his rightful place, and like in Acts I will go out into the world and make disciples of men. Again I say to all who enters this thread. I do not follow the Lord my God blindly nor do I walk a path that is wide, but one that is narrow for the Lord has shown me and that is all I need. I have seen with my own eyes the miracles that are "His" right here on this sight I have seen athiest turn to God, cold hard unrelenting men, who through prayer and the word of God have seen the light. I have seen one so stricken with cancer here on mingle that the doctors said there was no hope....Again through prayer not only was there hope but complete healing and she has not only given her life to Christ but now is very involved in missions and the church. I have seen to much to ever deny that "He" is not exactly who "He" proclaims to be. So call in Blind Faith or whatever you want....I see clear, I hear the Lord, so take a few minutes to ponder if perhaps the covering on your eyes is strong and the ears also, for it takes but a moment if it is truly of the heart for the Lord to take away the film of the eyes and the wax in the ears and stop and listen...truly listen. Nothing will ever make sense, not the Bible not any of it...if like you said there is no open minds...but keep the covering over your eyes and ears and you could read the word millions of times and not have a clue. I give all the Glory to You Lord God and I humbly anoint and praise you for all that you do in my life, as well as on Mingle..In Your Mighty Name Lord AMEN. I wouldn't have thought the story of jesus was a "teeny piece of scripture". The whole story of jesus was a plagiarism of several other religions that came thousands of years before. I'm not calling you a liar, but I don't believe your story of the cancer healing. Cancer doesn't work like that. I think you will find that all claims of miraculous healing are either lies or just out of control rumors. This has been shown time and time again. Again, this is PREPOSTEROUSLY 'OFF TOPIC' and gross 'PROSELYTIZING'. Get to topic, or save it!!! |
|
|
|
Its certainly not my position to criticize the beliefs of individuals. Thats an exercise in futility but what I dont fully understand is why Jesus (who there is absolutely no proof that he existed at all) is somehow placed on this pedestal as being the one true messiah put on this earth by god (yet he is god) and then all of these other different gods existed before him like Horus and Krishna and they have nearly the identical backgrounds and historical accounting of their lives? Why are they considered the "impostors" and not Jesus? I guess thats the million dollar question right there. Because regardless of what the truth may be, people have been programed from a young age to believe a certain way by people that have a vested interest in controlling the flow of information and what it contains. Believing that the bible has gone untainted and unchanged for over 2,000 years is an incredible leap of faith. Every time I hear of people blindly following words without question I get sick. Given everything that has happened, to do so and live like sheep is to spit in the face of every person that has truly lived as a Christian. Faith that remains unchallenged is blind faith indeed. If one still believes after opening their mind to other possibilities, they are truly spiritually strong. I again can only speak for myself....I have studied many many religions. Circumstances led me to search and the Lord Jesus Christ was the one that answered...I was not young and as with my parents and my kids for me, nothing was ever shoved down my throat. I searched and found for myself. And through this searching and finding the Lord who I cried out to show me he was real....Which the Lord did. Now I don't care if people will come and say oh you think your that special that God spoke to you...I don't care because the fact of the matter is He did and He does. And for me to deny him and the faith I have in the Lord of Lords is through the search and my faith is unwavering. I believe with all my heart, soul and mind, In God, Christ and the inate word of God the Bible...I do believe that God himself breathed life into the Bible and inspired every word from Genesis to Revelation. If people don't want this then ok.....but again for me....I will not deny the Lord his rightful place, and like in Acts I will go out into the world and make disciples of men. Again I say to all who enters this thread. I do not follow the Lord my God blindly nor do I walk a path that is wide, but one that is narrow for the Lord has shown me and that is all I need. I have seen with my own eyes the miracles that are "His" right here on this sight I have seen athiest turn to God, cold hard unrelenting men, who through prayer and the word of God have seen the light. I have seen one so stricken with cancer here on mingle that the doctors said there was no hope....Again through prayer not only was there hope but complete healing and she has not only given her life to Christ but now is very involved in missions and the church. I have seen to much to ever deny that "He" is not exactly who "He" proclaims to be. So call in Blind Faith or whatever you want....I see clear, I hear the Lord, so take a few minutes to ponder if perhaps the covering on your eyes is strong and the ears also, for it takes but a moment if it is truly of the heart for the Lord to take away the film of the eyes and the wax in the ears and stop and listen...truly listen. Nothing will ever make sense, not the Bible not any of it...if like you said there is no open minds...but keep the covering over your eyes and ears and you could read the word millions of times and not have a clue. I give all the Glory to You Lord God and I humbly anoint and praise you for all that you do in my life, as well as on Mingle..In Your Mighty Name Lord AMEN. Yet more 'OFF TOPIC' - 'PROSELYTIZING' threadbashing. Speak to the 346 similarities. That's what this htread is about. |
|
|
|
Edited by
voileazur
on
Thu 04/09/09 04:20 PM
|
|
Ok interesting here.....you have a post on Jesus vs. Krisna Now I can't give you any other view then my own....so again call it a single view, single minded whatever...I can only post "MY" views. Did you not see where I also posted that anyone can believe anything they wish....So again same crap different day from you sir. If I have ever received any "so called evidence the the bible is not true" then ok but thus far I have not...Every contradiction that has been brought to me I showed where they took a teeny piece of scripture out of context....so therefore again sir I can only go by what I know to be truth. I can't give you answer as a drakonian, I am not one, I can't give you answers as an Athiest, because I am not one....get the picture. I cannot nor would not debate anything about Jesus, God, the Bible with anything other then what "I know" I can't answer as you Voil...because I am not you....If you have such an open mind will rooty tooty for you....I let others believe whatever gets them through the day....I have one single religion so therefore can only respond with answers that "I know to be truth for me" And I find it rather rude that you think in your ever open mind that we can answer any other way then that which we know....So to say to be that the threads are "ONLY MEANT for those whom wish to explore in 'good faith', a number of perfectly legitimate general religion 'questions', all worthy of being DEBATED IN GOOD FAITH. is lame And you can answer any way you choose as I am entitled by the rules to do the same.....so again I say to you be very very careful before you cast stones my friend. Now again I give all respect and kudos that you don't believe in the so called christian dogma......But am I not entitled to the same. And just FYI if this thread was krisna beliefs I never would of stepped in....But when Jesus....which is who and what I believe with all my heart, soul and mind is involved..then you can bet your sweet bippy I have every right to come in a voice my opinion and if you don't like it....oh well.....this is life sir....Bring up any thread with God, Christ and the Bible and I will here.. And again practice what you preach voil...because it's not you bashing the krisnas or the athiest or the drakodians but the Christian and if you do expect it to come back 10 fold. It's also not a matter of exploring but the knowledge for me myself and I what I believe in. If people are wishy washy and don't know what it is they believe oh well I can't help that...But to think that I am going to come into a thread and say "Oh yes they are one in the same, when my Lord clearly states that "HE" is the only one then you sadly mistaken. The following to me shows again the shallow single minded person that want himself to be right and damn what I so believe in....Well again not going to happen...and I find this disrespectful, of what I believe and furthermore you don't have that right. Voil said: To 'bash' the thread and state the obvious: '... I only believe in the bible because the bible is the only thing I believe in!!! ...' is redundant, disrespectful, and derails any chance of open minded debate. The purpose of my post was to point out that you were intentionally 'OFF TOPIC', 'threadbashing' and 'proselytizing'. I further suggested that your post was a model of 'bad faith'. That you were pretending to be 'on topic', but barged in with proselytizing blend of 'single-dogmatic-religious-party-lines'. Of course, you are welcomed to partake in this debate. It raises the opportunity to explore, compare, discuss, and debate 346 well researched and documented similarities between two giant religious-spiritual 'icons'. That is what THIS GENERAL RELIGION THEAD is about. Again, with this latest reply of yours, you highjacked the general religion forum, as well as this thread, with yet more 'party-line' proselytizing. Address the topic of the thread, or move on. Your proselytizing is an insult to people's intelligence, including your own. We understand what you believe. We understand that you only believe in one guy. And I trust most of us respect your right to believe exactly what you choose to believe. Now, here is the point. If this belief of yours forbids you to explore the 346 similarities between 'J' and 'K', which is the legitimate invitation of this thread, then have the honesty to go on to threads where you have permission to address the questions raised. These forums are civilized environment. It could easily be compared to a college, where a group of people have gathered in a lecture room, to discuss, at the invitiation of a host, the topic proposed above. If someone were to 'bash-in' with 'proselytizing' BS of any denomination or nature, which obliterated the topic of the exchange, they would be kindly invited to leave the room. That simple. Respect the 'on topic' and 'non-proselytizing' rules of this site. Debate the 346 similarities proposed by the host or move on. |
|
|
|
Edited by
voileazur
on
Thu 04/09/09 03:20 PM
|
|
My christian friend has told me that because i am a non-believer, and because someone i have recently fallen for is christian, that we will not work out for the long term. He's even gone as far to say that because i am a non-believer, i am essentially unmarry-able by anyone at all who is a true christian. what do you guys think...? Unbeknownst to your 'counselor' friend, he is not referring to a 'true christian' in his little moralistic sermon. He is referring to fanatics, fundamentalists, and obsessively dogmatic people, whom confuse their religion with some sort of barbaric 'army' which 'never LETS IN the ennemy (infidel)'. It is sad to note that the friend whom advised you, unfortunately seems to belong to that kind of paranoïd army. If so, he can't help you much, nor anyone else for that matter. But maybe, if he is your friend, YOU could help set him straight. As for the 'christian' person you have fallen for, if he IS NOT A FANATIC, but rather a person whom is centered and solid in his faith and beliefs, there is no reason for him to judge you in your own beliefs. There is no reason that 'religion', as an army you might belong to, be a 'condition' of a loving and trusting relationship. Should it turn out to be a condition for that person, I trust you will have your answer: that person would turn out to be more committed to his fears than to life, trust and love. That would make him, the unlovable one! Simple life test! |
|
|
|
Edited by
voileazur
on
Tue 04/07/09 11:39 AM
|
|
Its certainly not my position to criticize the beliefs of individuals. Thats an exercise in futility but what I dont fully understand is why Jesus (who there is absolutely no proof that he existed at all) is somehow placed on this pedestal as being the one true messiah put on this earth by god (yet he is god) and then all of these other different gods existed before him like Horus and Krishna and they have nearly the identical backgrounds and historical accounting of their lives? Why are they considered the "impostors" and not Jesus? I guess thats the million dollar question right there. Futility is right 'Alverdine'!!! And to elevate one's god and beliefs by pushing and dishonoring everyone else's god and beleifs, is equally fultile and disingeneous. The host's topic raises the possibility of unifying people while respecting differences in beliefs. If we were allowed to debate the host's question without the 'fundamentalists' dogmatic chorus line, we might have a chance to get to this fundamental and elevating concept. IMHO, that is exactly the intent of this thread: to explore and debate questions which celebrate unity of the HUMAN FAMILY, regardless of beliefs, rather than proselytizing the corrosive, divisive and destructive dogma which only segragates it. If I am wrong about the host's intent, I apologize, and invite him to bring me back to order. |
|
|
|
It doesn't really matter what the origins of the Biblical stories are. The stories themselves are untenable. It makes no sense to claim to have a supposedly blameless God who's so jealous that he hates anyone who refuses to worship him. He's already flawed with the worst of human pitfalls, jealousy and hate. Whether the story was original or plagiarized is irrelevant. It's a flawed story either way. YES Abra!!! I happen to agree with you on this particular view of the biblical stories, and all the attached dogma. The point is however, neither you nor I would even think of 'bashing' the christian threads, and chant our 'ANTI-DOGMA' rethoric!!! You and I, and many others here respect the people's right to different beliefs. The line is drawn however, when one deludes oneself in believing that he is charged with a mission of imposing his beliefs above all others!!! That is 'BAD FAITH' in every sense of the expression. |
|
|
|
Edited by
voileazur
on
Tue 04/07/09 10:06 AM
|
|
Which of course is way ok....post away...Like I have told so many in the past....I put out information what people do with it is up to them.... Now first if your talking Orthodox Jew.....this is what they believe. Belief in Deity There exists only one personal God Almighty--creator, all-powerful, ever-present, and all-knowing--formless, incorporeal spirit. Incarnations None, as only God is worshipped. Moses was the greatest of all prophets. Origin of Universe and Life They hold to the book of Genesis literally, that God created the universe/life from nothing, in less than 7 days, less than 10,000 years ago; Adam and Eve were the first humans. But, some hold that a “day” in the Bible is not defined as 24 hours, and some believe that scientific discoveries don’t contradict but attest to God’s awesome power. After Death Traditional Judaism believes in the World to Come, the coming of the messianic age heralded by the messiah, and a resurrection of the dead, but beliefs vary on the details. Some believe souls of the righteous go to heaven, or are reincarnated, while the wicked suffer from a hell of their own making or remain dead. Some believe God will resurrect the righteous to live on earth after the Messiah comes to purify the world. Judaism generally focuses on strictly following God's commandments rather than on details of afterlife or rewards after death. Why Evil? No original sin. Most believe God created Satan as evil inclination, a tendency that lies within everyone. People also have awareness of and inclination toward goodness. Thus, God provides free will as a test of obedience and faith. Salvation Salvation is achieved through faith and continual prayer to God, strict adherence to divine commandments (Jewish Law), including dietary restrictions, to give to the poor, "love your neighbor as yourself," bring God’s message to humanity by example (a responsibility of God’s "chosen people"). Confessions and repentances are expressed through Yom Kippur when one fasts, asks forgiveness from others and from themselves, and commits to do good deeds in the future. Undeserved Suffering Sometimes it is believed that suffering is caused by a weakness in one’s devotion to God. Generally, it is believed that God gave humans free will to feel pleasure and pain, and His purpose in allowing deep suffering of the innocent must be good even if mysterious. God suffers along with the sufferer. Some Jews (e.g. the Hasidim) believe that suffering is punishment for past-life sins. Knowing why God allows suffering is not as important as knowing that God will punish the perpetrators. Contemporary Issues Judaism holds that human life begins upon first breath, and Jewish law requires abortion if necessary to save the mother’s life prior to birth. Most believe that potential human life should never be terminated casually, but abortion is generally regarded as a personal decision, especially within the first 40 days of pregnancy. Now this above is very very true.....with one exception...Even in the time of Jesus, why he was even cruxified is because the sadasees and pharasees lived in Old Testament and traditions. The biggest mistake in doing so was denying Christ. When God and Christ were in heaven.....God had two choices destroy the world again which he promised Noah he would not do hence the rainbow or send his only son to live fully as a man and planned before all the Jesus did...Also note in Old Testament the prophecy of all that Jesus did was foretold long before he did. So God did just that he sent his only son to die on the cross so that we (Gentiles) and all that come have everlasting life. Jesus is still God's son and hence the miracles through his father and all that he did in his 3 years of ministry...But a man 100%. He had to be a man and live as a man in order to make in the end the greatest sacrafice for his Father....When God looked away from His Son in those final moments it was not because he didn't love Christ, it was because God loved us so much and could not look on His Son as he took on the Sin of the world. Christ had no limitations whatever he set out to do or show was done....He could heal the blind, make the lame walk and just with a brush of the sleeve of his clothing....through His Father God. It is not ever a contradiction if you put all into the context in which it was done. God doesn't do contradictions only people do. John 13:31 Jesus Predicts Peter's Denial When he was gone, Jesus said, "Now is the Son of Man glorified and God is glorified in him. Acts 2:22 "Men of Israel, listen to this: Jesus of Nazareth was a man accredited by God to you by miracles, wonders and signs, which God did among you through him, as you yourselves know. Acts 4:10 then know this, you and all the people of Israel: It is by the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, whom you crucified but whom God raised from the dead, that this man stands before you healed. Romans 5:15 But the gift is not like the trespass. For if the many died by the trespass of the one man, how much more did God's grace and the gift that came by the grace of the one man, Jesus Christ, overflow to the many! Timothy 2:5 For there is one God and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus, 'Single view', 'single minded', 'fundamentalist and dogmatic' 'christians' hold one single, exclusive and compulsive belief: ... the INERRANCY OF THE BIBLE...!!! In the reality of such believers, the 'bible' is held to be ERROR FREE, regardless of any evidence to the contrary. Thus, in the mind of a fundamentalist dogmatic 'bible inerrancy' believer, the Gospel of John can only be absolutely accurate when it presents Jesus Christ as a supernatural being, the Son of God, who was present at the creation of the universe, is the savior of humanity, and who came to earth so that believers "might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly." (John 10:10 KJV). Here is the case of 'bad faith' IMO: This is the 'general religion chat' forum. It invites those whom wish to discuss religion from a general perspective, rather than the single religion exclusive and dogmatic angle. It is meant for those whom wish to explore in 'good faith', a number of perfectly legitimate general religion 'questions', all worthy of being DEBATED IN GOOD FAITH. '...In good faith...' is simple in this case. Before participating in a thread such as this one, one should ask oneself: '... I'm I allowed, do I wish, or I am interested in EXPLORING THIS QUESTION as proposed by the host/OP??? ...' If one's religious dogma does not allow one to question certain aspects of the so-called 'received truth' (the inerrant part) of the dogma in which one believes, in good faith, one should refrain from participating in any given thread which raises such questions about one's religious 'inerrant' dogma. Anything else can only result in 'threadbashing', with the intent of imposing and proselytizing one's exclusive religious or moral point of view, which derails and destroys any possibility of debating the OP. I personnally do not believe in the christian dogma. Given that position of mine, I know better than to 'invade' and 'threadbash' the 'christian' café's discussions. I respect the liberty and interest of those whom wish to exchange bible quotes, and discuss principles which they believe and share. Is it too much to suggest that single religion, and 'bible inerrancy' believers could afford others the same courtesy, and stay clear of open minded, general religion chat 'debates', which simply seek to explore legitimate general religious questions??? We all know that a bible inerrancy fundamentalist has no intention to explore, or raise questions about the source or influence of the story of 'Jesus'. To act as though you are debating a question which you do not allow yourself toquestion in the first place, is squarely dishonest IMO. To 'bash' the thread and state the obvious: '... I only believe in the bible because the bible is the only thing I believe in!!! ...' is redundant, disrespectful, and derails any chance of open minded debate. |
|
|
|
Edited by
voileazur
on
Sat 03/28/09 01:11 PM
|
|
everyone is entitled to their opinions. I understand what morningsong is saying and if someone doesn't agree with her opinion....that i their right. but she is entitled to state her feelings and beliefs like everyone else is as long as it goes with the rules Of course Yellowrose, Morningsong is entitled to her opinion (guessing that is what your above post is about). And I, for one, have an opinion about what IMO are misguided, deceitful and moralizing statements which I get to read on these forums. Opinions meeting some agreement, or counter opinions is what these forums are all about. It is redundant IMHO, to keep pointing out this simple evidence. As for the 'deal' I am proposing to Morningsong, it's an invitation based on the fact that IMHO, I don't think deceit helps hers, or for that matter, anyone else's mission. In the end, Morningsong will either agree with my logic or not, and accept or decline my invitation. That simple. |
|
|
|
Edited by
voileazur
on
Sat 03/28/09 12:43 PM
|
|
OK.....One more time.... CHRISTIANITY is NOT about RELIGION !!!!!! But RELATIONSHIP !!! R-E-L-A-T-I-O-N-S-H-I-P ....BACK WITH GOD ALMIGHTY!!! MADE AVAILABLE THRU CHRIST JESUS. The ONE WHO IS The BRIDGE ..... THE ONE WHO CLOSES THE GAP.... BETWEEN MAN AND GOD.... AND BRINGS MAN BACK INTO FELLOWSHIP AND RIGHT STANDING AND RELATIONSHIP WITH GOD ALMIGHTY ONCE MORE.... JUST LIKE IT WAS IN THE BEGINNING!!!!!!!!!! MAN MADE RELIGION!!!!!!! NOT GOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DON'T BLAME GOD FOR WHAT MAN DID NOW!!! GOD WANTS A RELATIONSHIP BACK WITH HIS CREATION.... NOT NOT NOT SOME MAN MADE RELIGION!!! !!!!!!...R---E---L---A---T---I---O---N---S---H---I---P...!!!!!! Dear Morningsong, I humbly ask you, please, do not bring this sophisitic and confused statement up again. It truly doesn't help your mission. Take some time to look up the definition of christianity, and then a bit more time to look up te definition of religion. Think about it for a moment, and I am confident you will never again bring up such misguided and deceitful concept to describe that which you claim is the very centre of your life. You claim: '... Christianity is about RELATIONSHIP !!! R-E-L-A-T-I-O-N-S-H-I-P ....BACK WITH GOD ALMIGHTY!!! MADE AVAILABLE THRU CHRIST JESUS...' The ONE WHO IS The BRIDGE ..... THE ONE WHO CLOSES THE GAP.... BETWEEN MAN AND GOD.... AND BRINGS MAN BACK INTO FELLOWSHIP AND RIGHT STANDING AND RELATIONSHIP WITH GOD ALMIGHTY ONCE MORE.... JUST LIKE IT WAS IN THE BEGINNING!!!!!!!!!! ...' ... THAT PERSONAL CLAIM, is nothing other than 'ARTICLE 1' OF YOUR VERY OWN AND PERSONAL RELIGION RELIGION RELIGION RELIGION (as you would write yourself)!!! Your 'ARTICLE 1' IS EXACTLY WHAT A RELIGION IS!!! If you can't find an adequate definition of 'religion' or 'christianity' in your reference manuals, I'll be happy to post a few from different sources just for you Morningsong. But please Morningsong, let's agree that you will make every attempt to refrain in the future, from making such misguided and deceitful statements as offered in your above post. Clearly not 'christ like' to be deceitful. DEAL!?!?!? |
|
|
|
Topic:
Hypothetical question...
|
|
Jeannie....Although I shared the article on "son of man--son of God" , (because it gave scripture to back up what was said ) , I did not take time to check out the rest of the website. Actually, The Best and surest way .... to find answers to questions regarding scriptures.... is not to go to the many websites out there... but to Always go straight to the Source itself.... The Word of God. Where is that Morningsong?!?!?! Where does one go to find the SOURCE ITSELF OF THE WORD OF GOD?!?!?!?! I ask because I have been tricked before you know!!! People have raised hopes in people telling them the word of god was in this old book of fables. How deceitful!!! But hey, if you have found THE SOURCE ITSELF, let us know!!! That will be NEWS for everyone on the face of this earth! |
|
|
|
Edited by
voileazur
on
Wed 03/25/09 12:35 PM
|
|
thats the song http://www.jacksonville.com/news/metro/2009-03-24/story/st_johns_parents_file_suit_over_school_song I truly don't find this worthy of a lawsuit, they complained, school complied and they want damages because they learned a song. I say every parent should sue all schools, as the itsy bitsy spider promotes violence, afterall the rain wiped the spider out. Wait did that kill the spider, did it harm the spider, hmmm, maybe my child will suffer in latter years because of this song, ah ok, let's sue for it's all 'their' fault. As for the radio, yes we have some control over what's played, contact radio station or turn off radio. Franshade, You are missing THE POINT!!! 'Itsy Bitsy Spider' doesn't contravene the first amendment of the Constitution of the USA. The song you posted most squarely and obviously goes smack against the First amendment of the Nation's Constitution. Teachers in the public school system are our the nations's ambassadors in front of our kids, to educate the on the 'rule of law' for which we are all responsible. A teacher proposing such lyrics as you posted, to students, cannot possibly be naive enough to think it is just a song in the same line as 'itsy bitsy'. More likely, we are talking about religious zealots whom keep 'testing' the constitutional wisdom of the land; '... seperation of church and state...', regardless of the very clear public school system legislation warning against it. These 'teachers' are promoting their own religious opinion and perspective on the matter of US Constitution, when their first obligation is to respect the Constitutional law of the land, and their first 'duty' is to teach, and promote it as it stands. If they have disgreements with the law of the land, then they should approach members of congress and follow appropriate demacratic channels. This is what demacracy is for everyone. The last a teacher should do is putting his or her own personal views above the law of the land when acting as a teacher. In that sense, the lawsuit is perfectly justified, considering that 'religious zealots' do not seem to understand any other language. Without a legal gesture, and the deterrent that must come with it, zealots would disregarding the law, and keep having a blast simply keep 'testing' the system as THEY see fit. The question isn't whether or not the lawsuit is justified. It is more than justified. It could be said that there is no other means for parents whom are tired of 'calling' teachers and schools back to order. Without serious and clear deterrents, zealots will keep hypocrytically 'testing' the system. The real question IMHO, which will remain unanswered, is ... ... 'what will it take for religious zealots and fundamentalists to wake up and start respecting the wise and very real laws of the land, as opposed to their personal and often delusional dogma???...' Teaching is huge matter of trust and responsibility. When that trust is broken, as it often is, people have the obligation to take the means at their disposal to have what is right prevail. Oh sweet Louise. I am the last person to promote nor excuse any sort of religious force feeding fanaticism whatsoever, but that clearly is not the case here. Religion was not introduced, nor was religion being forced onto any student. Now dont get me wrong what you or I call "God" is entirely up to us, whether we worship or we don't again up to us, but this is suit beyond ridiculous, want to make a statement fine, want others to know how you feel great, but to clog up the already backed up court sytem while seeking monetary compensation for 'damages' (in this instance) is beyond ridiculous to me. As a parent if you feel your child shouldn't be exposed to a song you find inappropriate contact and handle it with the school, who removed the song and respected their wishes. But what do I know 'Franshade', From the lyrics you posted: 'You place your hand on the bible', hardly meets the abstract nature of the 'god' from your statement: '...what you and I call 'god'...', and certainly doesn't cover 'not believing in god', which is a fundamental 'right' afforded all US citizens whom choose the alternate side of the believing coin. Believe or not believe is equally promoted and guarenteed as a fundamental right under the US Constitution. Besides the fact that the statements : 'there's no seperation' and 'we're one nation under him' ... are two blatant lies, and while tolerated as such, are totally contrary to US constitutional law. As for your closing comment, '... As a parent if you feel your child ...' , ... it isn't up to parents to constantly remind 'religious zealots', and conniving school administrations, of their duties and responsibilities to teach, and refrain from proselytizing when entrusted with our chidren's education. As for the 'punitive damage', which seems to be the cornerpiece of your argument, I suggest that without a monetary deterrent, 'religious zealots' will not pay US laws any attention. Even with strong punitive deterrent, a lot of them place themselves and 'THEIR PERSONAL GOD' above the law of the land. |
|
|
|
Edited by
voileazur
on
Wed 03/25/09 11:42 AM
|
|
thats the song http://www.jacksonville.com/news/metro/2009-03-24/story/st_johns_parents_file_suit_over_school_song I truly don't find this worthy of a lawsuit, they complained, school complied and they want damages because they learned a song. I say every parent should sue all schools, as the itsy bitsy spider promotes violence, afterall the rain wiped the spider out. Wait did that kill the spider, did it harm the spider, hmmm, maybe my child will suffer in latter years because of this song, ah ok, let's sue for it's all 'their' fault. As for the radio, yes we have some control over what's played, contact radio station or turn off radio. Franshade, You are missing THE POINT!!! 'Itsy Bitsy Spider' doesn't contravene the first amendment of the Constitution of the USA. The song you posted most squarely and obviously goes smack against the First amendment of the Nation's Constitution. Teachers in the public school system are our the nations's ambassadors in front of our kids, to educate the on the 'rule of law' for which we are all responsible. A teacher proposing such lyrics as you posted, to students, cannot possibly be naive enough to think it is just a song in the same line as 'itsy bitsy'. More likely, we are talking about religious zealots whom keep 'testing' the constitutional wisdom of the land; '... seperation of church and state...', regardless of the very clear public school system legislation warning against it. These 'teachers' are promoting their own religious opinion and perspective on the matter of US Constitution, when their first obligation is to respect the Constitutional law of the land, and their first 'duty' is to teach, and promote it as it stands. If they have disgreements with the law of the land, then they should approach members of congress and follow appropriate demacratic channels. This is what demacracy is for everyone. The last a teacher should do is putting his or her own personal views above the law of the land when acting as a teacher. In that sense, the lawsuit is perfectly justified, considering that 'religious zealots' do not seem to understand any other language. Without a legal gesture, and the deterrent that must come with it, zealots would disregarding the law, and keep having a blast simply keep 'testing' the system as THEY see fit. The question isn't whether or not the lawsuit is justified. It is more than justified. It could be said that there is no other means for parents whom are tired of 'calling' teachers and schools back to order. Without serious and clear deterrents, zealots will keep hypocrytically 'testing' the system. The real question IMHO, which will remain unanswered, is ... ... 'what will it take for religious zealots and fundamentalists to wake up and start respecting the wise and very real laws of the land, as opposed to their personal and often delusional dogma???...' Teaching is huge matter of trust and responsibility. When that trust is broken, as it often is, people have the obligation to take the means at their disposal to have what is right prevail. |
|
|
|
Topic:
Hypothetical question...
|
|
elijay, my words need no interpreter but what the hearer of each access them as, and if your profound insight, see contradiction, then this damn well should be pointed out, if you are choosing to to be responsible for how they are to be defined??? put your money where your mouth is, and speak out the contradiction??? if you speak for me, i shall speak for you??? that fair??? that equal??? i do not say what you mean to another, as this would be but childish on my part, and most even audacious, and if you deem so fit to do, then so be it, but if i speak for you, giving you back the equal you have given me, then my sting will have a more insideous effect, and sting from the inside out. do we have a clear understanding, as equals, as to our positions??? do not do unto me, what you do not wish to come back to yourself??? that pretty fair??? what more does a professed christian and scholar as yourself practice anyhow??? as indeed, this be the very essence of what was written, that you heard not one word of. peace Just getting the chance to catch up here - sorry it took so long. In the OP's original hypothesis - we are to "assume" that He lives a life free from "all sin", and yet never follows a religion (okay - I'll buy that one for the moment) and has never heard of Jesus. Well - since it is a sin to reject the Holy Spirit's testamony about Jesus - the ONLY unforgivable sin by the way - it is quite contrary to think that using the bible as our standard to determine what sin even is (Else where does the term Heaven come from as the presumed destination) than we are confronted with presumtions that are contradicting the boundries of the original premise. Since the bible says that ALL have sinned, te original premise is already defeated - but since it is an HYPOTHESIS (that is - assumed to be TRUE) it would naturally follow that given biblical parameters - it is hardly unlikely that he would be rejecting Jesus - given that he has NEVER sinned - so we can safely conclude that he HAS accepted Jesus, else he stands in self-contradiction and HAS sinned by rejecting Him. Since heaven is an eternity spent with Jesus and God - it is a fooloish assumption to assume that the original individual in the original hypothesis incapable of knowing who Jesus was. One doesn't need to be a scholar to see this David. All one needs do is read the text. A child can reason this out. WOW 'Eljay'!!! Given your 'theatrical' background, and given the incredibly staged nature of this latest post, I suspect it could only be an attempt on your part to offer us a masterful parody, short of his signature punch-line, of our most beloved and missed PHILOSOPHER-KING 'George Carlin'. If not an inspired 'theatrical parody', than I would be left with absolute confusion and disbelief in the statements that you have been posting of late. Please confirm my 'theatrical parody' suspicion! Please '... TELL ME IT IS SO!!!'. |
|
|
|
Topic:
Faith!
Edited by
voileazur
on
Sun 03/15/09 07:35 AM
|
|
AdventureBegins.....here are some scriptures on the very subject of your thread here: ................... Mark 11:22-26 (King James Version) 22And Jesus answering saith unto them, Have FAITH IN GOD. 23For verily I say unto you, That WHOSOEVER shall SAY unto this mountain, Be thou REMOVED, and be thou CAST into the sea; and shall NOT DOUBT in his HEART, but shall BELIEVE that those things which he SAITH shall come to pass; he SHALL HAVE whatsoever he SAITH. 24Therefore I say unto you, What things soever ye DESIRE, when ye PRAY, BELIEVE that ye RECIEVE them, and ye SHALL HAVE THEM . 25And when ye stand praying, FORGIVE , if ye have ought against any: that your Father also which is in heaven may forgive you your trespasses. 26But if ye do not forgive, neither will your Father which is in heaven forgive your trespasses. 'Morningsong', IMO, you and the scriptures you are quoting are 'off topic'. You're missing 'AdventureBegins' point something fierce. Read the OP again, slowly, and see if you can come back with an 'on topic' reply next time around. A hint: '... divisive and exclusive supposedly omnipotent 'gods' would end-up competing, only to grant confusion, tyranny, and ultimate chaos of infinite proportion. That would include the god of chaos you pray to 'morningsong'. However 'good' you feel YOUR 'god' difference might be, it is only DIVISIVE in the end. Give that a bit of thought before replying Morningsong. Sincerely. |
|
|
|
Edited by
voileazur
on
Sun 03/15/09 07:13 AM
|
|
Theshortelktonman..in your photo, you appear to be quite an intelligent young man, with a very caring sensitive heart. Just Be YOU ...Allow the special person you already are... to just shine thru!!! Be Blessed Now,Theshortelktonman. MorningSong, 'Theshortelktonman' IS blessed now!!! He IS shining through, and fully expressed! So much so, that Eljay and you are now picking in him for not sharing in with your fables on the one hand, and Eljay's misleading 'pseudo-intello-scientifico' perversions on the other hand. Be still for a moment 'morningsong'. Sit back and empty your heart and soul of all those noisy prejudices which cloud you from the spirit. You too shall sense and be blessed by the light shining through 'Theshortelktonman' ! Open-up 'Morningsong'. Let go of your pagan ways, and plug-in directly to the source. You're almost there 'morningsong'! Let go! Let go! |
|
|
|
Edited by
voileazur
on
Thu 03/12/09 05:28 PM
|
|
YOU request proof! And you claim fact without it. Even gos as far as claiming it's scientific theory. Yet you put the same demands on Christainity and Creatonism. You're a hypocrit Voile. Else just not too bright. Well before making personal attacks 'Eljay', and declaring ME a 'hypocrite', or '... just not too bright...', it would be important for you to first address the point I am making. In the case above, you are completely missing the point I am making, ... which might evoke the 'not too bright' epithet to which you are referring, or maybe you are conciously avoiding the point, ... which might evoke yet the 'hypocrite' epithet you have also coined. Anyhow, personal attacks simply don't work 'Eljay'. Attacking, or offering counter arguments of caustic genre to ideas, observations, beliefs, or convictions that we do not agree upon is to be expected, ... but let's stay away from personal attacks. Especially when those personal attacks are based on misunderstood or misinterpreted claims. They end-up backfiring on the attacker, and I don't enjoy seeing that happen to you 'Eljay'. What I determine the point is that you are making is attempting to guess what and how I think. For instance - you claim that I say all Catholics are not Christains, so rather than you misrepresenting what I think - I told you - so that in the future you could get it right. Let's see how you do with that. You've failed miserably up until this point. If you don't understand what I'm saying - just ask and I'll clarify it for you. Dear Eljay, You are showing serious signs of '... intellectual bankcrupty...' The degree of twisting, misinterpretations, ignoring other people's simple points, and spinning a web of lies and deceit, is clearly pointing to someone 'spendng more intellectually than one is worth'. And that my friend is the point you are missing, ignoring, by-passing, or simply incapable of 'getting'!!! Your comments and observations lately are tainted with a degree of pompous 'self-importance' that is ridding your posts of any and all credibility. To come back with : '... What I determine the point is that you are making is attempting to guess what and how I think...' ... besides the fact that the formulation itself is most confused, is the clearest indication that you haven't a clue about the point being made. I truly couldn't be less interested in '... what and how you think...' !!! I simply read some posts on these forums, and address as respectfully as can be, some points of agreement, or points of incoherence, confusion and inconsistency as I see them. My 'pro' or 'con' 2 cents worth against yours!!! No more! No less! Inside that 2 cents worth of ours, you do not have what it takes to lay or imply most of the 'claims' (very different than a personal opinion) that you make. i.e.: let's say that : '... to you personally, that you have no doubt that the bible is the word of (YOUR) god, and therefore represents the foundation of your own personal faith...' That experience of faith (dealing with that which IS NOT!!!) makes whatever you elevate your mind to believe 'as true', to be true FOR YOU, BUT NOT TRUE IN THE MATERIAL AND FACT-BASED WORLD. The bible 'is the word of god' FOR YOU, as a personal belief, but it isn't true in fact. In fact, the bible is a book period. To imply anything else is being guilty of 'intellectual bankcrupty'. And this - my "intellectually bankrupt" friend - is how you see reality, which does not make your world any more real than mine. As you are merely deluding yourself if you think you can demonstrate how the bible is not the word of God outside of your subjective observation. But that is a side-show as to th posts we've been exchanging, because while you keep bring up the bible - I have not refreenced it once in any of my posts on this thread other than to you and Abra - because you keep bringing it up in reference to what I'm posting. 'evolution is a religion', might be elevated as true to you, as a matter of personal belief TO YOU, but in fact, and in the real world, this claim is nothing other than a delusion. It has no foundation whatsoever. To imply anyting else as you do, is being guilty of 'intellectual bankcrupty'. (your words) '... While there may be numerous Catholics who are christains - claiming to be a Catholic does not make one a christain. Ditto for Protestantism!!!...' Again, elevate your mind to believe whatever you wish, but in fact, a catholic claiming he is a catholic, IS A CHRISTIAN. Again, your own personal standards, viewpoint, moral judgment, based on your interpretation of the book on this matter, change nothing with the fact that catholics whom claim to be catholics, ARE CHRISTIANS!!! Again, to imply anyting else as you do, is being guilty of 'intellectual bankcrupty'. We could go on endlessly picking statements and claims of yours which are oblivious to the 'FAITH - FACT' distinction, creating confusion, deceit, mischaracterizations, etc. It wouldn't change the fact that they are all given by the syndrome of 'intellectual bankrupty', or insisting unintentionally in giving oneself a 'larger than can be supported' degree of self-importance. That is the point you have been missing for the longest time. However YOU might value your faith, beliefs and convictions, which is your HUMAN privilege, the universe ISN'T a faith based orgamism, and couldn't care less. And this is your reality. Merely claiming that your semantical understanding of how to quatfy the definition of words - does not make you right, and me wrong. It just comes down to you thinking a Catholic is a Christain because he says he's a Catholic - and I think a Christain involves something more than that, as I get my definition of christainity from the bible. I really don't know where you get yours from, as when I askyou to either demonstrate how my definition is wrong and yours is right - all i get from you is rhetoric. Eljay, you have this very frustrating habit of twisting and confusing everything of late. Please, slow down on the reading, and raise the bar on the understanding factor. It would come across as evidence to anyone that I couldn't care less what a christian is or is not!!! My definition of what is or is not a christian is profoundly impertinent. Why you should trip over that is beyound me. I have no authority in declaring who is or isn't a christian (by the way pay attention to your spelling of the word). You're the one going around suggesting that you are a christian, and you claim to be a christian because of the book that you read, and the interpretation of the 'good' chrisitian you get out of it. You got that part Eljay?!?! Now, follow me here! I speak to catholics, and they tell me THEY are christians because of THEIR understanding of the SAME book THEY read. Still with me Eljay??? You on the side claiming that you're a christian based on your interpretation of the book, and catholics claiming they are christians based on their understanding and interpretation of the same book. Who do you think YOU are to claim that YOU get to decide, based on YOUR interpreation of the book, who is and who is not a 'good little' christian?!?!?! NO SEMANTICS! NO PERSONAL DEFINITION OF WORDS! NOT WHAT I THINK! NO NEED TO DEMONSTRATE A SINGLE THING! It's what YOU claim! And what you claim, is way above your legitimate right to claim it. You're a christian because you say so, based on whatever interpretation you make of your book, and catholics whom claim to be christians, based on whatever interpretation they make of the book, are good little christians just as much as you Eljay. Should you still have an understanding issue with this point, I would suggest, as JB pointed out earlier, don't bring it back to this forum, but rather, take it up with the pope, or the individual 1,3 billion CHRISTIAN CATHOLICS out there. I asked you to explain to me how Evolution is a science, and your response is that I'm intellectually bankrupt for not knowing this clear fact. Meanwhile - you don't demonstrate how this is true - it just is because - well - of your intellectual superiority. I mean - let's not cloud this issue by stating any facts. Just the mere mention of them is enough. Hate to brake it to you Eljay, but this is the same order of delusion you are applying to 'evolution'. As you need to take it up with the Pope and the 1,3 billion catholic christians out there, you need to take this personal dogmatic fundamentalist batlle of the 'origins of the species' to the scientific 'body'. 'Write-up' your case, based on your exahustive research, and present it to the scientific community. If what you claim has any validity whatsoever, we will all wake-up in the post darwinian, ELJAYIAN reality of the origin of the species. How's that!!! Fair enough?!?!? But until then Eljay, until you make your point where it matters, stop waging fundamentalist-creationism 'lost battles' on religious forums of datng sites. Not credible. That's the thing with you Fundies - no explination is required. There you go with your personal interpretations again!!! Look-up fundamentalism. It will clarify it all up for you. And if you don't find the pertinent definition, I'll help you track it down. |
|
|