1 2 3 4 6 Next
Topic: They lied about wmds
no photo
Mon 02/18/08 06:27 AM
By the way, direct links to first-hand congressional and British parliament transcripts as well as established newspapers are less credible sources than the 3rd party Bushisevil.com sites you use? lol

madisonman's photo
Mon 02/18/08 03:01 PM

By the way, direct links to first-hand congressional and British parliament transcripts as well as established newspapers are less credible sources than the 3rd party Bushisevil.com sites you use? lol
have you resorted to makeing things up now>? the Downing street memos are exactly that transcripts of minuts you realy should read themdrinker

madisonman's photo
Mon 02/18/08 03:02 PM


The Niger yellow cake has been proven to be a fraud. so there goes alot of your info. I wont say that governments were not attempting to gather information on Iraq especialy after Bush stated bellowing about it but as most of your post said, the sources proved to be unreliable. I will dig deeper at another time but now I have to pick my son up from his youth basketball leage


No kidding it was faulty intelligence, however it was the French and Germans who provided it and believed it to be true. The point isn't that it TURNED OUT TO BE FAULTY. Sources I provided unreliable? Direct links to the French and German intelligence believing Iraq had WMDs? You said prove that the Germans and French believed there to be WMD and I just did what you asked for. lol, you have poor comprehension skills.
I dont think you live in the real world if your talkingabout spooks you can expect alot of evidence planted to help form a concensus and it is rather amuseing that all the evidence that was ever used to convince the american public of wmds turned out to be "unreliable"

1 2 3 4 6 Next