That he did, but most of the world did in fact think he still had them. Kind of irrelevant now tho, we're there & as we've both said, pulling out right now isn't an option;^]

Most of their talk has been concerning time phase withdrawel complimented with employing UN peace keepers. It's already been covered months ago & is considered well known enough that it isn't disscussed as much anymore;^

do you have a link to that cause I sure never heard about it...I wonder if the UN has...

after a massive propoganda campaign the world and most of america believed saddam Had wmds..............turns out it was exactly thata massive propoganda campaign based on out right lies and deceptions, what dribble it is to say well we are there now lets deal with it............isay deal with it by putting Bush and his whole gang on trial for war crimes and crimes against humanity and then we may get some respect in the world or get some alies we dont have to buy off.

lol drink up buddy, but look up the definition of lie before you do.

Text of the Downing Street Memo - a document containing meeting minutes transcribed during the British Prime Minister's meeting on July 23, 2002

The Foreign Secretary said he would discuss this with Colin Powell this week. It seemed clear that Bush had made up his mind to take military action, even if the timing was not yet decided. But the case was thin. Saddam was not threatening his neighbours, and his WMD capability was less than that of Libya, North Korea or Iran. We should work up a plan for an ultimatum to Saddam to allow back in the UN weapons inspectors. This would also help with the legal justification for the use of force.

http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/?q=node/1

We were there earlier, and like I said before, it doesn't say anything that your warped agenda would hope. Not once does it say they know Saddam has no WMD and are going in anyways.

basicly that iswhat it says you can factor that in with all the former CIA folks who had gone public saying the administration didnt wisht to hear anything that implied saddam was not working or didnt have wmds. I can start cuttin gand pasteing them for you if you like. the war is a based on lies and you were fooled to no end and now you live in denial. what a great feat of propoganda this is, stalin or goebells would be jelouse

i say deal with it by putting Bush and his whole gang on trial for war crimes and crimes against humanity and then we may get some respect in the world or get some alies we dont have to buy off.

u guys have been going at it for hours, wow

lol this is a restart from the discussion many hours ago.

All I said was prove he lied, a definition madisonman doesn't seem to comprehend and can't prove.

IT'S VERY IMPORTANT THAT WE WERE LIED TO, IT IS VERY IMPORTANT THAT WE WERE DUPED, IT IS VERY IMPORTANT THAT THE PERPETRATOR OF 9/11 IS STILL WALKING FREE!!!!

A war crime was committed that cost us thousands of lives, Iraqis thousands of lives. This is a great crime.

We should be ashamed to even defend the instigator of this war. He is a bane to this country.

What has this war accomplished apart from death and destruction? We got Saddam who DID NOT DO 9/11, no reason to celebrate there. We have managed to single handedly kill more innocents then bin laden did us. We have stuck our foot in a long time standing religious war that has waged there, will not end because of us either until someone concedes and that is not going to happen. We are losing our young people daily and will not get bin laden out of Iraq. WE WILL NOT GET BIN LADEN OUT OF IRAQ!!!!! IF THAT DOESN'T BOTHER YOU, YOU ARE NOT IN YOUR RIGHT MIND!!!!

Who lied? CIA, DIA, FBI, MI6, the French, Germans, the Canadians, other British Intelligence Services, the Spanish, and many more all believed that Iraq had WMD. Even the UN believed that Iraq may have WMD as they believed he was definately hiding something and would never allow full access. Just prior to the invasion the UN Inspectors were finally show missiles that we prohibited that could reach a range further than they had in 1991.

So, I suppose the 'moron' Bush and cronies duped everyone into the lie? lol come on madisonman, think.

I agree, Bush and his team needs to be put on trial...If someone came into the U.S. and did what we did in Irag how would we feel? As far as I know were the only one to ever use a nuclear bomb. So how do we get to choose who can have them and who cant

It was real easy for me. Before the Iraq war ever started I was 100% sure there was no nuclear threat there. You know what great intelligence I had access too? Ralph Nader. He gave a speech in my state where he simply stated that previously when Saddam had nuclear abilities a little country called Israel sent planes in and destroyed the nuclear threat. Nader assured us in the speech that this little country had a pretty good spy network in the area and somehow he felt that if they did not feel threatened then there was no threat. Simple as that! Ralph Nader with 10 minutes of reasoning was able to out think all of the conservative war mongers itching to go to Iraq and willing to use bad to non existent information to lie us into war.