Community > Politics, Current News & Events

Topic: he 935 Lies Of George W. Bush
madisonman Joined Sun 12/23/07 Posts: 4573	Mon 02/04/08 05:26 PM
Aw shucks, I forgot that according to you and your research buddies that Al-Q had nothing to do with 911. So you don't have the mental capacity to respond to my question as to Is Bush a genius ? So, let's go at it like this. IF IF IF IF IF(and that should satisfy you so you can answer) Al-Q was responsible for 911 is Georgie a genius for taking the fight with them to Iraq and at the same time getting rid of a horrible dictator? dude said he had to go get his kids man... I got em.thanks. will be back and forth between activities this topic wont have my undivided attention thats for sure

AllenAqua Joined Wed 01/09/08 Posts: 3895	Mon 02/04/08 05:31 PM
Aw shucks, I forgot that according to you and your research buddies that Al-Q had nothing to do with 911. So you don't have the mental capacity to respond to my question as to Is Bush a genius ? So, let's go at it like this. IF IF IF IF IF(and that should satisfy you so you can answer) Al-Q was responsible for 911 is Georgie a genius for taking the fight with them to Iraq and at the same time getting rid of a horrible dictator? No IRaq had nothing to do with 911 and prior to our illegal invasion there was no AL-Q in Iraq. geniouse is hardly the word I would use I think that there is a certain "genius" to it all...when you consider the backroom deals and the prime agenda of the good ol boys we're talking about here... Turkey, a democratic nation, does not want us (our bases) in their country now...The Saudis pay us lip service (to our faces) but really, they are buying America up at a record pace. To me it seems obvious that Bush & Cheney have alot to gain by making damn sure that we are in Iraq to stay...

Lindyy Joined Tue 01/01/08 Posts: 2699	Mon 02/04/08 05:52 PM
To all of my dearly beloved opponents of President George W. Bush, Christianity, God, Jesus, conservatives, those who insist that Al-Q had no connection with Sadaam Hussein, to those who insist there were never and are not now Al-Q in Iraq, to those who approve of Hussein's plastic shredder wherein his opponents were put thru it feet first to make sure they enjoyed the pleasure of this wonderful torture, to those who insist Hussein did not use deadly chemicals to rid Iraq of those whom he hated, to those who insist that Hussein never had anyone beheaded, raped, tortured, maimed, beheaded and drug through the streets and hung from a bridge, to those who dispute the massive graves of those who were mass murdered and tossed into those lovely burial plots,to those who hate the USA, to those who have no respect for those who were killed because of 9/11 and their families, to those who inadvertently and accidentally on purpose did not read the post by Wiley of all the documented TRUTH in this debate, to those who blatantly have acquired long and short term amnesia as to the fact that in 1998, Khadafy offered Bill Clinton Bin Laden on a silver plattet and Clinton refused, to those who have amnesia to the fact that Bill Clinton has been disbarred from practicing law in his home state of Arkansa, to those who have amnesia to the fact that the USS Cole was attacked by terrorists and 17 of our military were killed and Bill Clinton sat back and did NOTHING, to those who so conveniently forget that the Twin Towers was first car bombed under the Bill Clinton reign of presidency and he did nothing (seems he was a do-nothing president) about it,well to all my beloved enemies: Yea, yea yea, you are all right, we, your opponents in this debate, are wrong, - RIGHT, and I am Tinkerbell, Peter Pan finally let me out of my glass jar. Lindyy

wiley Joined Thu 12/13/07 Posts: 19738	Mon 02/04/08 06:08 PM
No IRaq had nothing to do with 911 and prior to our illegal invasion there was no AL-Q in Iraq. geniouse is hardly the word I would use For somebody who supposedly researched this, you say some remarkably stupid things.

madisonman Joined Sun 12/23/07 Posts: 4573	Mon 02/04/08 06:13 PM
No IRaq had nothing to do with 911 and prior to our illegal invasion there was no AL-Q in Iraq. geniouse is hardly the word I would use For somebody who supposedly researched this, you say some remarkably stupid things. so tell me then what links did Saddam have to 911 and why would saddam allow al-q into his country when saddam was a bathist opposed to fundamental islam? please provide any proof you have that is verifiable........for someone who thinks they know everything you sure have said an ignorant thing

wiley Joined Thu 12/13/07 Posts: 19738	Mon 02/04/08 06:14 PM
No IRaq had nothing to do with 911 and prior to our illegal invasion there was no AL-Q in Iraq. geniouse is hardly the word I would use For somebody who supposedly researched this, you say some remarkably stupid things. so tell me then what links did Saddam have to 911 and why would saddam allow al-q into his country when saddam was a bathist opposed to fundamental islam? please provide any proof you have that is verifiable........for someone who thinks they know everything you sure have said an ignorant thing Ansar Al Islam was in Iraq in December 2001. When did we invade again? Try some actual research for a change instead of op-ed pieces. You might learn something.

madisonman Joined Sun 12/23/07 Posts: 4573	Mon 02/04/08 06:19 PM
To all of my dearly beloved opponents of sanity, to all the snake handling, bible thumping, god fearing abstinance sex promoteing, flat earthers, I truly think you live in Bizzaro world and am ashamed to call you americans. though you dwell is some parralel universe call you americans I must. But somehow you lost your way as to what being an american is. you see americans dont torture or violate the geneva conventions, we dont invade other countries because we once supported a dictator and now after years of ignoreing his attrocities trump these attrocities out when they are conveniant. americans do not force there wacko religions on anyone nor do we mix polotics with religion as our founding fathers intended. americans dont rob from the poor to feed the rich, americans are the good guys. So someone please point me the direction back to my country for I truly think I HAVE FALLEN INTO SOME weird parallel universe were everything is backwards

wiley Joined Thu 12/13/07 Posts: 19738	Mon 02/04/08 06:27 PM Edited by wiley on Mon 02/04/08 06:29 PM
I'm sure you can find your way back with some more "research."

madisonman Joined Sun 12/23/07 Posts: 4573	Mon 02/04/08 06:30 PM Edited by madisonman on Mon 02/04/08 06:31 PM
No IRaq had nothing to do with 911 and prior to our illegal invasion there was no AL-Q in Iraq. geniouse is hardly the word I would use For somebody who supposedly researched this, you say some remarkably stupid things. so tell me then what links did Saddam have to 911 and why would saddam allow al-q into his country when saddam was a bathist opposed to fundamental islam? please provide any proof you have that is verifiable........for someone who thinks they know everything you sure have said an ignorant thing Ansar Al Islam was in Iraq in December 2001. When did we invade again? Try some actual research for a change instead of op-ed pieces. You might learn something. yes he was there to help destabalize Iraq he was not there at saddams request and if he was cought by the bathist regime he would probly have been executed. try getting the whole story and again what links did saddam haveto 911? cough cough

wiley Joined Thu 12/13/07 Posts: 19738	Mon 02/04/08 06:32 PM Edited by wiley on Mon 02/04/08 06:36 PM
No IRaq had nothing to do with 911 and prior to our illegal invasion there was no AL-Q in Iraq. geniouse is hardly the word I would use For somebody who supposedly researched this, you say some remarkably stupid things. so tell me then what links did Saddam have to 911 and why would saddam allow al-q into his country when saddam was a bathist opposed to fundamental islam? please provide any proof you have that is verifiable........for someone who thinks they know everything you sure have said an ignorant thing Ansar Al Islam was in Iraq in December 2001. When did we invade again? Try some actual research for a change instead of op-ed pieces. You might learn something. yes he was there to help destabalize Iraq he was not there at saddams request and if he was cought by the bathist regime he would probly have been executed. try getting the whole story and again what links did saddam haveto 911? cough cough I didn't say anything about links to 9-11. Nice try though. You said there were no AQ in Iraq prior to the invasion. I called BS. Have a nice day. And BTW, who is 'he'? I was talking about the group Ansar Al Islam. I have no idea what you're blathering about now...

madisonman Joined Sun 12/23/07 Posts: 4573	Mon 02/04/08 06:35 PM
No IRaq had nothing to do with 911 and prior to our illegal invasion there was no AL-Q in Iraq. geniouse is hardly the word I would use For somebody who supposedly researched this, you say some remarkably stupid things. so tell me then what links did Saddam have to 911 and why would saddam allow al-q into his country when saddam was a bathist opposed to fundamental islam? please provide any proof you have that is verifiable........for someone who thinks they know everything you sure have said an ignorant thing Ansar Al Islam was in Iraq in December 2001. When did we invade again? Try some actual research for a change instead of op-ed pieces. You might learn something. yes he was there to help destabalize Iraq he was not there at saddams request and if he was cought by the bathist regime he would probly have been executed. try getting the whole story and again what links did saddam haveto 911? cough cough I didn't say anything about links to 9-11. Nice try though. You said there were no AQ in Iraq prior to the invasion. I called BS. Have a nice day. yea the word was he had snuck in the country but of course he was not there to support the bathist regime that was diametricly opposed to what AQ stands for so the point is mute for the purpose of our debate.......hate to see you cut and run

wiley Joined Thu 12/13/07 Posts: 19738	Mon 02/04/08 06:37 PM
No IRaq had nothing to do with 911 and prior to our illegal invasion there was no AL-Q in Iraq. geniouse is hardly the word I would use For somebody who supposedly researched this, you say some remarkably stupid things. so tell me then what links did Saddam have to 911 and why would saddam allow al-q into his country when saddam was a bathist opposed to fundamental islam? please provide any proof you have that is verifiable........for someone who thinks they know everything you sure have said an ignorant thing Ansar Al Islam was in Iraq in December 2001. When did we invade again? Try some actual research for a change instead of op-ed pieces. You might learn something. yes he was there to help destabalize Iraq he was not there at saddams request and if he was cought by the bathist regime he would probly have been executed. try getting the whole story and again what links did saddam haveto 911? cough cough I didn't say anything about links to 9-11. Nice try though. You said there were no AQ in Iraq prior to the invasion. I called BS. Have a nice day. yea the word was he had snuck in the country but of course he was not there to support the bathist regime that was diametricly opposed to what AQ stands for so the point is mute for the purpose of our debate.......hate to see you cut and run Again with 'he'. You do know AQ is made up of more than one group, right?

wiley Joined Thu 12/13/07 Posts: 19738	Mon 02/04/08 06:38 PM
No wonder you can't do real research. You can't even stay on topic.

madisonman Joined Sun 12/23/07 Posts: 4573	Mon 02/04/08 06:40 PM
No IRaq had nothing to do with 911 and prior to our illegal invasion there was no AL-Q in Iraq. geniouse is hardly the word I would use For somebody who supposedly researched this, you say some remarkably stupid things. so tell me then what links did Saddam have to 911 and why would saddam allow al-q into his country when saddam was a bathist opposed to fundamental islam? please provide any proof you have that is verifiable........for someone who thinks they know everything you sure have said an ignorant thing Ansar Al Islam was in Iraq in December 2001. When did we invade again? Try some actual research for a change instead of op-ed pieces. You might learn something. yes he was there to help destabalize Iraq he was not there at saddams request and if he was cought by the bathist regime he would probly have been executed. try getting the whole story and again what links did saddam haveto 911? cough cough I didn't say anything about links to 9-11. Nice try though. You said there were no AQ in Iraq prior to the invasion. I called BS. Have a nice day. yea the word was he had snuck in the country but of course he was not there to support the bathist regime that was diametricly opposed to what AQ stands for so the point is mute for the purpose of our debate.......hate to see you cut and run Again with 'he'. You do know AQ is made up of more than one group, right? again you kno the cia ORIGINALY FUNDED aq RIGHT? you know that saddam was a bathist right? AQ is a Islamic fundamentalist organization right? so Saddam being a bathist would never relinquish his control to them for any reasone. In fact that is why america supported saddam through the worst of his attrocities and then when it was expediant we dragged them out of history and claimed indignation. what hypocrytes we are in the eyes of the world.

wiley Joined Thu 12/13/07 Posts: 19738	Mon 02/04/08 06:44 PM
No IRaq had nothing to do with 911 and prior to our illegal invasion there was no AL-Q in Iraq. geniouse is hardly the word I would use For somebody who supposedly researched this, you say some remarkably stupid things. so tell me then what links did Saddam have to 911 and why would saddam allow al-q into his country when saddam was a bathist opposed to fundamental islam? please provide any proof you have that is verifiable........for someone who thinks they know everything you sure have said an ignorant thing Ansar Al Islam was in Iraq in December 2001. When did we invade again? Try some actual research for a change instead of op-ed pieces. You might learn something. yes he was there to help destabalize Iraq he was not there at saddams request and if he was cought by the bathist regime he would probly have been executed. try getting the whole story and again what links did saddam haveto 911? cough cough I didn't say anything about links to 9-11. Nice try though. You said there were no AQ in Iraq prior to the invasion. I called BS. Have a nice day. yea the word was he had snuck in the country but of course he was not there to support the bathist regime that was diametricly opposed to what AQ stands for so the point is mute for the purpose of our debate.......hate to see you cut and run Again with 'he'. You do know AQ is made up of more than one group, right? again you kno the cia ORIGINALY FUNDED aq RIGHT? Wrong again. Big surprise there.

madisonman Joined Sun 12/23/07 Posts: 4573	Mon 02/04/08 06:45 PM
No IRaq had nothing to do with 911 and prior to our illegal invasion there was no AL-Q in Iraq. geniouse is hardly the word I would use For somebody who supposedly researched this, you say some remarkably stupid things. so tell me then what links did Saddam have to 911 and why would saddam allow al-q into his country when saddam was a bathist opposed to fundamental islam? please provide any proof you have that is verifiable........for someone who thinks they know everything you sure have said an ignorant thing Ansar Al Islam was in Iraq in December 2001. When did we invade again? Try some actual research for a change instead of op-ed pieces. You might learn something. yes he was there to help destabalize Iraq he was not there at saddams request and if he was cought by the bathist regime he would probly have been executed. try getting the whole story and again what links did saddam haveto 911? cough cough I didn't say anything about links to 9-11. Nice try though. You said there were no AQ in Iraq prior to the invasion. I called BS. Have a nice day. yea the word was he had snuck in the country but of course he was not there to support the bathist regime that was diametricly opposed to what AQ stands for so the point is mute for the purpose of our debate.......hate to see you cut and run Again with 'he'. You do know AQ is made up of more than one group, right? again you kno the cia ORIGINALY FUNDED aq RIGHT? Wrong again. Big surprise there. I wait your proof

wiley Joined Thu 12/13/07 Posts: 19738	Mon 02/04/08 06:48 PM
No IRaq had nothing to do with 911 and prior to our illegal invasion there was no AL-Q in Iraq. geniouse is hardly the word I would use For somebody who supposedly researched this, you say some remarkably stupid things. so tell me then what links did Saddam have to 911 and why would saddam allow al-q into his country when saddam was a bathist opposed to fundamental islam? please provide any proof you have that is verifiable........for someone who thinks they know everything you sure have said an ignorant thing Ansar Al Islam was in Iraq in December 2001. When did we invade again? Try some actual research for a change instead of op-ed pieces. You might learn something. yes he was there to help destabalize Iraq he was not there at saddams request and if he was cought by the bathist regime he would probly have been executed. try getting the whole story and again what links did saddam haveto 911? cough cough I didn't say anything about links to 9-11. Nice try though. You said there were no AQ in Iraq prior to the invasion. I called BS. Have a nice day. yea the word was he had snuck in the country but of course he was not there to support the bathist regime that was diametricly opposed to what AQ stands for so the point is mute for the purpose of our debate.......hate to see you cut and run Again with 'he'. You do know AQ is made up of more than one group, right? again you kno the cia ORIGINALY FUNDED aq RIGHT? Wrong again. Big surprise there. I wait your proof Sure you do... Ever heard of the Afghan Resistance?

madisonman Joined Sun 12/23/07 Posts: 4573	Mon 02/04/08 06:51 PM Edited by madisonman on Mon 02/04/08 06:52 PM
No IRaq had nothing to do with 911 and prior to our illegal invasion there was no AL-Q in Iraq. geniouse is hardly the word I would use For somebody who supposedly researched this, you say some remarkably stupid things. so tell me then what links did Saddam have to 911 and why would saddam allow al-q into his country when saddam was a bathist opposed to fundamental islam? please provide any proof you have that is verifiable........for someone who thinks they know everything you sure have said an ignorant thing Ansar Al Islam was in Iraq in December 2001. When did we invade again? Try some actual research for a change instead of op-ed pieces. You might learn something. yes he was there to help destabalize Iraq he was not there at saddams request and if he was cought by the bathist regime he would probly have been executed. try getting the whole story and again what links did saddam haveto 911? cough cough I didn't say anything about links to 9-11. Nice try though. You said there were no AQ in Iraq prior to the invasion. I called BS. Have a nice day. yea the word was he had snuck in the country but of course he was not there to support the bathist regime that was diametricly opposed to what AQ stands for so the point is mute for the purpose of our debate.......hate to see you cut and run Again with 'he'. You do know AQ is made up of more than one group, right? again you kno the cia ORIGINALY FUNDED aq RIGHT? Wrong again. Big surprise there. I wait your proof Sure you do... Ever heard of the Afghan Resistance? good lord go watch Joe wilsons war and get a basic education on who channeled the money to fund them and yes thats is were they got there start so what is your point?

MirrorMirror Joined Fri 10/26/07 Posts: 89680	Mon 02/04/08 06:51 PM
I RESPECT EVERYBODYS OPINION, AND IM NOT REALLY A PARTISAN, BUT I THINK PRESIDENT BUSH HAS DONE A POOR JOB IN MOST RESPECTS.

wiley Joined Thu 12/13/07 Posts: 19738	Mon 02/04/08 06:54 PM
good lord go watch Joe wilsons war and get a basic edication on who channeled the money to fund them and yes thats is were they got there start so what is your point? Wow. So some members of what is now the Taliban were involved in the Afghan resistance which was funded by the US means the US funded AQ? Lemme guess. Joe Wilson's war, a propaganda piece by an ex-Clintoneista, is some of your "research." I'll pass. Might as well get some "research" from Sandy Berger.