Topic: Appearance age versus chronological age | |
---|---|
I was born in 1952, I have been told I look much younger than my age and am much healthier than my age group. What I am asking for in this are opinions of what my appearence age is and then whether it is valid for me to wish to date women 5 years younger than that consensus age? LOL. Please be honest but gentle. ROFL.
|
|
|
|
We all look our age.
If you cannot see it, try a different angle. I would also guess that 5 years makes little difference when you pass about 50. |
|
|
|
That is true enough, especially when you consider differnt looks and different days. That leaves me dating may age. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
An age range of 5 yrs difference is pretty standard, at your age I suppose it will depend on how fit you still are.
As for your appearance... only got 1 photo to go by. Based on that I'd say you look your age. |
|
|
|
Iβm 50 but donβt look it either. If people say I look good for my age I say Thank You .
|
|
|
|
I look good for 102!
|
|
|
|
I look my age .. so I date or try to date minus five ... unless she looks younger than her age ....
|
|
|
|
I look my age, and if she has a pulse, I'll date her.
|
|
|
|
i dont look my age and i can even date half a -12
|
|
|
|
I agree with soufie, everyone looks their age.
My preference is to date those who are at the same life stage as myself. |
|
|
|
yeah , I long suspected that when told you look younger than your age and really are good looking , the person delivering that compliment had a hidden agenda .... now, thats what I am trying to figure out ....
|
|
|
|
I'll only date those who won't expect too much of a bribe!
|
|
|