1 2 32 33 34 36 38 39 40 49 50
Topic: questions that believers are afraid to answer
no photo
Sun 01/20/08 12:37 PM

this thread is about questions that the religious will just close their minds to and refuse to answer or just afraid to answer because it will question their suppose faith or question that they just can't answer rationally ..here's the first one

according to believers logic, God had to have created the universe because the universe couldn't have popped out of nothingness and create itself .....so therefore do the same logic apply to the creator

if the answer is no then could you explain why with a rational explanation




Faith in a given 'religon' generally cannot be explained rationally, scientifically, or with final proven conclusions. Most are centered on an omnipotent being or force whose knowledge, methods and power are far beyond the understanding of the faithful.

There are numerous questions that simply can no more be answered by the faithful about their god and his/her ways than an amoeba can expound on the works of Shakespeare. When one decides to investigate and select a belief many questions are put to those who went before them. However at some point a decision is made as to whether to continue 'on faith' acceptin that which could be understood and leaving the rest in the hands of faith.

Is it rational? Put to the test -probably not. Delusional? Maybe, but it works to provide a missing ingredient for many, giving them (us) a peace that life is not a random, chaotic string of events. Rather that, even if we don't understand it all, and would often -in our limited view- do some things different, there is a greater power at work. A power that we trust has a greater good in mind.

No, the faithful cannot answer all the questions. But in that inability too, there is peace. After all, if we could understand it all, we'd be on the same level as our god. Inversely, that would place him on our level!!!! Perish the thought!!!!

no photo
Sun 01/20/08 01:24 PM

Faith in a given 'religon' generally cannot be explained rationally, scientifically, or with final proven conclusions. Most are centered on an omnipotent being or force whose knowledge, methods and power are far beyond the understanding of the faithful.

There are numerous questions that simply can no more be answered by the faithful about their god and his/her ways than an amoeba can expound on the works of Shakespeare. When one decides to investigate and select a belief many questions are put to those who went before them. However at some point a decision is made as to whether to continue 'on faith' acceptin that which could be understood and leaving the rest in the hands of faith.

Is it rational? Put to the test -probably not. Delusional? Maybe, but it works to provide a missing ingredient for many, giving them (us) a peace that life is not a random, chaotic string of events. Rather that, even if we don't understand it all, and would often -in our limited view- do some things different, there is a greater power at work. A power that we trust has a greater good in mind.

No, the faithful cannot answer all the questions. But in that inability too, there is peace. After all, if we could understand it all, we'd be on the same level as our god. Inversely, that would place him on our level!!!! Perish the thought!!!!


to say the original question doesn't have a rational answer because it is beyond the comprehension of the believer is the same as if Children was having holiday wars and killing each other in the name of Santa ...

would one not ask the children why they would do such things for something unseen and incomprehensible and not try to make rational sense out of the whole matter...

would society keep encouraging this type of behavior among the children and just say it's beyond their comprehension and would people just say let the children continue to act in this matter or would they deem it as strange behavior

becca_lynn's photo
Sun 01/20/08 03:41 PM
God was here before the heavens and the earth. its called faith for a reason, you just have to believe.

toastedoranges's photo
Sun 01/20/08 03:44 PM

God was here before the heavens and the earth. its called faith for a reason, you just have to believe.


blind belief isn't providing the answers that this thread seeks

toastedoranges's photo
Sun 01/20/08 03:46 PM


yawn



Hi Dave.....how are ya? I took all the pills away from everyone.......cuz hey man when you do drugs when your not sick, is really sick.....giggle


whether or not it's sick and/or wrong in your opinion, my body is my own. if there's anything in this world i should be free to use or abuse at my discression, it's my own body

no photo
Sun 01/20/08 04:00 PM
hmmm, provocation supercedes genuine interest.
In the human experience there are unanswered questions in every endeavor. We're simply not smart enough to know everything. But that's ok.
Choice of belief systems is, in the end, a personal matter.
Regretting the attacks you've suffered for your choice, I hope it's in your path to find peace with your 'God'.
~fin~

"42"

no photo
Sun 01/20/08 04:00 PM
well, i believe and I am not afraid

iamgeorgiagirl's photo
Sun 01/20/08 11:35 PM
The war part, disagreements and arguements over religion is truly sad... :cry: but a part of life since time on earth in the flesh began pretty much. Everyone has their own opinions about everything. 10 people out of 100 in the same forum can't even agree usually. Most forums here wind up into name calling brawls... :cry: Too many try to force their opinions on to others or get mad

no photo
Sun 01/20/08 11:50 PM

this thread is about questions that the religious will just close their minds to and refuse to answer or just afraid to answer because it will question their suppose faith or question that they just can't answer rationally ..here's the first one

according to believers logic, God had to have created the universe because the universe couldn't have popped out of nothingness and create itself .....so therefore do the same logic apply to the creator

if the answer is no then could you explain why with a rational explanation


How did the eye evolve?
How did blood clotting evolve?

Two very simple questions that obliterate the theory of evolution.
Not assuming or saying that you believe in it, but here you are raising questions on subjects no human being has the intelligence to understand-

"how can their be a Being that has all ways been???"
its the whole chicken & the egg story.

Imagine trying to explain the human circulatory system to an ANT.
Imagine trying to explain the human lymphatic system to your DOG.

We dont even know our OWN BRAINS properly. Yet we ask questions like this.

All this is, is an excuse.
Every anti-creation is just a pitiful attempt to find a REASON why they dont need to abide under Him.


toastedoranges's photo
Mon 01/21/08 12:00 AM
evolution and natural selection work hand and hand.

the first eye was brought about far before the dinosaurs, in the ocean. a creature developed them to better get prey, and after that it became a standard. apparently you don't watch the discovery channel, they had a whole bit on stuff like that. developement of sight, feeling, ability to moderate body temperature, the advent of the 3 chambered heart

blood clotting, while i do not know that, it is a necessity for survival.

your words disprove nothing, they only show that once again religious folk throw up questions that THEY do not have answers for as if they are unanswerable

no photo
Mon 01/21/08 12:18 AM
Edited by Untamed on Mon 01/21/08 12:21 AM

evolution and natural selection work hand and hand.

the first eye was brought about far before the dinosaurs, in the ocean. a creature developed them to better get prey, and after that it became a standard. apparently you don't watch the discovery channel, they had a whole bit on stuff like that. developement of sight, feeling, ability to moderate body temperature, the advent of the 3 chambered heart

blood clotting, while i do not know that, it is a necessity for survival.

your words disprove nothing, they only show that once again religious folk throw up questions that THEY do not have answers for as if they are unanswerable


You explanation of the evolution of the eye is completely flawed.

According to the fundamental principle of evolution; mutations, we came from simple to more complex.

Now, if you have NO blood clotting system and you cut yourself; you bleed to death.
So if we "evolved" to get more and more complex; tell me how did the lifeforms evolve to create the ability of blood clotting?
if in order to DO this, you need to experience it right?
no experience = no call to evolve into a superior species right?

but if you dont have a blood clot system and you get cut, you bleed to death.
Remind me, can you evolve into a stronger, fitter lifeform if you are dead?

The eye
"The eye is a extremely complex organ. It has the complicated system whereby light is directed to the back of the eye on to cells which are sensitive to it; it also has that even more intricate arrangement whereby the information then travels to the visual part of the brain so that we actually see someting.
...
All the specialized and complex cells that make up our eyes are supposed to have evolved because of advantageous mutations in some more simple cells that were before. But what use is a hole in the front of the eye to allow light to pass through, if there are no cells at the back of the eye to recieve light?
what use is a lens forming an image if there is no nervous system to interpret that image?
How could a visual nervous system have evolved before there was an eye to give it infomation?"
- taken from Bone of contention; Is evolution true? (by Sylvia Baker)
(my emphasis)
Im sorry toastedoranges, but you havent even got a missing link to stand on.

the theory of evolution requires FAR MORE FAITH than any religion.
THAT is JUST how unlikely it is.

no photo
Mon 01/21/08 05:32 AM

Slowly picks herself back up after falling out of her chair (shock induced loss of equilibrium, you know), feisty wench is now a bit bruised and too flabbergasted for further comment. Mission accomplished funches? You definitely shut me up with that one!


yes feisty wench...that's what happens when the given knowledge becomes realized rationalized understood and finally comprehended and one open their mind to accept the enlightnement and not close their mind to the irrationality of faith

Differentkindofwench's photo
Mon 01/21/08 06:38 AM
Edited by Differentkindofwench on Mon 01/21/08 06:58 AM
Applause, funches. I will even curtsy for that masterful spin of another's comments to suit your purpose: and yes, I'll even agree you do have a valid point.

Untamed, without the evolution (growth) of thought that naturally and normally occurs from childhood to adult life, you would not have the thought processes you have to even participate in a forum. Then again, I am a heathen, so what could I possibly know?

Differentkindofwench's photo
Mon 01/21/08 06:42 AM
Whoops, sorry for my participation in thread jacking.

no photo
Mon 01/21/08 07:36 AM

God was here before the heavens and the earth. its called faith for a reason, you just have to believe.


or it may have been that God was created during the creation of the heavens and earth ...and the point is that anyone can give you their own version of a thought and that is why proof is needed to prove it exist beyond a thought...and that's why it's called faith ...it's like believing in a rumor with the hopes that the rumor is true

no photo
Mon 01/21/08 07:52 AM

hmmm, provocation supercedes genuine interest.

sounds like faith


In the human experience there are unanswered questions in every endeavor.

that's why you try to actually find out and not dabble in belief


We're simply not smart enough to know everything. But that's ok.

that you feel that you are not smart enough only proves you are not smart enough to speak on the comprehension powers of others


Choice of belief systems is, in the end, a personal matter.

tell that to those that was in the inquisition or caught up in someone's else holy war ...a belief system is only a personal matter if you keep that belief to yourself and once you try and turn that belief into action is when it becomes everyone's matter


feralcatlady's photo
Mon 01/21/08 08:20 AM


HEY FUNCHES THIS IS GOD....I AM REAL...AND YOU BETTER GET YOUR ACT TOGETHER SOON MISTER.......BECAUSE AS IT STANDS RIGHT NOW....YOUR BATTING 0 FOR 0....AND IN SPEAKING WITH DEBBIE, FOR SOME ODD REASON SHE LIKES YA.....AND WANTS YA TO GO TO HEAVEN....LOOKING OVER THE BOOK OF LIFE.....HURRY


hey God needs people who can think for theirselves to tend the Christian Flock ..so I'll be there to visit and tend your guys when it's nothing on the sci-fi channel to watch


As much as I would like that.....I don't see it in the realm of possibilities.

no photo
Mon 01/21/08 08:20 AM

well, i believe and I am not afraid


"to believe is to doubt" ...funches 3:16

toastedoranges's photo
Mon 01/21/08 08:28 AM
You explanation of the evolution of the eye is completely flawed.

According to the fundamental principle of evolution; mutations, we came from simple to more complex.

Now, if you have NO blood clotting system and you cut yourself; you bleed to death.
So if we "evolved" to get more and more complex; tell me how did the lifeforms evolve to create the ability of blood clotting?
if in order to DO this, you need to experience it right?
no experience = no call to evolve into a superior species right?

but if you dont have a blood clot system and you get cut, you bleed to death.
Remind me, can you evolve into a stronger, fitter lifeform if you are dead?

The eye
"The eye is a extremely complex organ. It has the complicated system whereby light is directed to the back of the eye on to cells which are sensitive to it; it also has that even more intricate arrangement whereby the information then travels to the visual part of the brain so that we actually see someting.
...
All the specialized and complex cells that make up our eyes are supposed to have evolved because of advantageous mutations in some more simple cells that were before. But what use is a hole in the front of the eye to allow light to pass through, if there are no cells at the back of the eye to recieve light?
what use is a lens forming an image if there is no nervous system to interpret that image?
How could a visual nervous system have evolved before there was an eye to give it infomation?"
- taken from Bone of contention; Is evolution true? (by Sylvia Baker)
(my emphasis)
Im sorry toastedoranges, but you havent even got a missing link to stand on.

the theory of evolution requires FAR MORE FAITH than any religion.
THAT is JUST how unlikely it is.


man, you're quite rabid.

have you not learned of darwin and the finch? how the bird could change from generation to generation depending on the seeds that were deposited?

"mutations" occur because they're needed. because without them the species would die out.

it really doesn't take faith to see what is clearly in front of your eyes.

here ya go

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/library/01/1/l_011_01.html

no photo
Mon 01/21/08 08:31 AM



HEY FUNCHES THIS IS GOD....I AM REAL...AND YOU BETTER GET YOUR ACT TOGETHER SOON MISTER.......BECAUSE AS IT STANDS RIGHT NOW....YOUR BATTING 0 FOR 0....AND IN SPEAKING WITH DEBBIE, FOR SOME ODD REASON SHE LIKES YA.....AND WANTS YA TO GO TO HEAVEN....LOOKING OVER THE BOOK OF LIFE.....HURRY


hey God needs people who can think for theirselves to tend the Christian Flock ..so I'll be there to visit and tend you guys when it's nothing on the sci-fi channel to watch


As much as I would like that.....I don't see it in the realm of possibilities.


you gotta have faith

1 2 32 33 34 36 38 39 40 49 50