Im reminded of how people said Rodney king kept 'moving', as if that is not to be expected when being kicked repeatedly,,lol

just saying all that to say, yeah, his pattern may be interesting but not necessarily telling since this event involved heightened adrenaline and a target that wasn't necessarily sitting in a solid position moving in a straight line,,,

if the deceased was lined up more to the right of the officer instead of directly in front of, the hits to the left would not be unexpected,,,,,

I realize it would not tell the whole story. But it would help. Anyone with an ounce of training is trained to shoot center mass. If he consistently pulls high and to the left it would help collaborate the story of him surrendering. If his grouping is center mass, than it paints a slightly different picture. The bullets struck the inner aspect of Brown's right arm, making a possible alignment to the officer's right unlikely. However, using the officer's grouping as a lone piece of evidence is foolish.

Here is a photo of a person charging at another:

that's true, that person will be PAID a large SUM of money and is trained rigorously for 'charging' at someone with a football

quite different than the pay off for charging at someone shooting bullets where no such training is available (that I know of)..lol,,,,

You mean to tell me that if you're PAID a large SUM of money, it outweighs someone charging because their life depends on it? Regardless of the spin you try and put on it, that is the position of the body when charging, no matter the reason. Have you ever been shot at? My guess is no. So your whole opinion is a guess at best.

I have had a gun pointed at me,, yes,,,,and what I did was FREEZE and FACE the person

not try to hope I am superman and CHARGE in the direction of the person with the gun and bullets,,,,

Good example. If Brown has the above position while being shot the bullets would cause the same type of wounds shown on the autopsy report. The thumb wound would be elongated and the same bullet may have hit the arm. The top of the head is in the line of fire, etc.

really?

lets see






wouldn't one expect, if there arm was outstretched like the charging athlete, that the bullets would not have had ENTRY marks on the inner arms unless the shooter was located on the inner RIGHT arm, unless the shooter was to the left of him?

if the shooter is in front of someone positioned in such a manner , wouldn't the ENTRY points be in his chest or hand? and why would the FINAL shots, the kill shots, be to the head if it was indeed protruded out in front of the body in such a manner,,

what are the odds that so many bullets would ENTER the inside of the arm before any hit the top of the head? how would there be an entry through the eye with the head in such a position?

however , each of those spots would be easier to hit if the hands were on their way to this position



,,just curious,, for the forensic experts on the panel,,,lol

Nope. The angle on the thumb injury is wrong. And unless they occurred after the thumb laceration the upper arm is blocked so now way to wound there.
If the arm were out more then upper arm wounds possible but angle still wrong for thumb. If held higher the thumb still not possible while other injuries would be to back of arm.

Try it with a laser pointer. Set up pointer about 10-15 feet away aim for a wound area and move hand around while surrenduring to attempt same wound.

wrong situation,besides,not everyone's Arms are at the same height!
Red Herring!

Your post is total BS. The wounds are consistent with the charging position... especially the thumb wound, which would be inconsistent with the hand being raised in surrender. Give it up.

lol

its not about the 'situation' its about the parts of the arms and hand that would be exposed for direct ENTRY if someone was moving them from their sides UP to a surrender position,,,,,,,while being shot at

no, your logic is ridiculous

if I am 'charging', my inner arms are TUCKED into my side to build momentum, like this with head down





try to get an entry wound inside that tucked upper arm with it tucked, or the eye with the head allegedly down in a charging position,,,lol


anyway,, it will be up to the ACTUAL FORENSIC experts to determine all the ways the different wounds could have happened,,,,


hopefully acknowledging that the arm would not have been some stationary object that remained in only one position throughout,,

as they did in the press conference when explaining the wounds and stating that the arm is 'very mobile' and that wounds could be consistent with 'raising to give up'

the examiner there also stated the point about how someone charging with head forward would collapse immediately after being shot in the head

Im figuring , both sides will have experts verifying that their version is 'consistent' with the wounds, mostly BECAUSE the arm is so mobile and could have had so many different positions during the death

That's what YOU did.......you can't know what HE did.
Having a gun pulled on you is not the question I asked. I said have you ever been SHOT at? Adrenaline kicks in overdrive when it happens, no time for thinking, just reaction. Your opinion, my opinion and everyone else's here is speculation. But something nags at me about this case. Why did his friend chose to lie about the incident? Covering something you think?

I don't know, adrenaline kicks in ,, and people lie ,,right?

one never knows for sure,, what did he 'lie' about,, the initial confrontation?

or at least he changed his story,, no telling which one was the lie,, police can persuade people with records ya know,,,

the suggestion was made that my opinion is only a guess, because I had never had a gun shot at me

I will tell you , even having a gun POINTED At you can get the adremaline rushing too,,,,,and the FATAL Danger of being actually shot at, would cause most to either surrender or HIDE,, not to close the distance by trying to charge at BULLETS,,,,

lol....the two are not the same. Both are scary as hell though. Never did answer the question why his friend lied if there was nothing to hide?

I did answer it

why would a person allegedly 'charge' at bullets?

adrenaline? lol


also, which version was the lie?,, the first or the second?, and how much of the second story could have been gently SUGGESTED by cops with something they could hold over his head (Warrants),,,?

It's really no surprise at all that a person who punched a cop in the fact might also charge at the cop.

That simple truth combined with the aggressive nature shown in the store video seems to escape those who want the truth to be something like the "first reports".