Topic: Take My Country Back
no photo
Mon 03/03/14 02:10 PM
Edited by alnewman on Mon 03/03/14 02:19 PM





how do we steal from you? I thought you were someone who was too enlightened to pay taxes?




Again, absolutely clueless. I don't pay income taxes but that isn't used for entitlements for the citizens. Income tax is to pay the interest on the national debt and was part of the Federal Reserve deal. Such a miniscule amount compared to what the government hauls in as taxes on an annual basis but it is increasing as the debt keeps climbing.

It is the cost for goods and services that I pay for that is being stolen.

Electric Utility taxes
Water/Sewage taxes
Communications taxes from phone and cable companies
Property taxes
Excise taxes
Sales taxes
Gasoline taxes
Import taxes

And so many more it is impossible to list them. Just these non-payroll takes consume 15 to 20 percent of a persons income, well beyond the fees required to run a just government. Didn't you ever wonder where all those other trillions of dollars come from? Most entitlement people don't, they are too busy with the me, me, me syndrom.

So yes, money is stolen from me by increasing my cost of living to support others, the entitlement class.




lol, so you are arguing that service and sales taxes are STOLEN from you to pay welfare?..lol

ok

well, those types of taxes are paid by people, regardless of income level, who receive service or purchase items,,lol




Yes everybody pays and why? To be able to pay entitlements to those too irresponsible to provide for themselves.

But no problem, I am working on eliminating a large majority of those taxes also.

I believe I will contract for trash pickup even though it's not that important except to get rid of all that toxic packaging. Every thing else is recycled.

no photo
Mon 03/03/14 02:15 PM


lol, yeah, because no danger came to them doesn't mean the weren't in danger

like I Said, having a child who just started school, and needs me available to get them to school, leaving about five hours that they are supervised by others, and not being in a position to work somewhere where my child was free to 'wait for me' and not having a crystal ball to know that the FATHER would decide not to provide any of his share of support for HIS child

I used a different option

I expect my kids not to suffer danger or starvation because I hit hard time for a couple of my FORTY SOME years on this earth,

I Expect to provide (through taxes) for others to be confident their kids wont either



Yep, to those that can't provide for their children, there is the Child Protective Services, because those children are in grave danger. But then in this Odumbo society, they are getting the best government can steal and are being taught very serious principles.

msharmony's photo
Mon 03/03/14 02:18 PM
that's quite alright,


I don't trust STRANGERS to take personal care of my child, and I have had experience working with CPS as well to know better than to put my child through it,,,

no photo
Mon 03/03/14 02:21 PM


I Expect to provide (through taxes) for others to be confident their kids wont either



And I expect to grow wings and fly. Wont that be a real hoot.

msharmony's photo
Mon 03/03/14 02:24 PM
doesn't matter, I already pay sales taxes, utility taxes and gasoline tax,, so Im paying in too :wink:

no photo
Mon 03/03/14 02:24 PM

yep,, an American who cares about American PEOPLE

and not jus American ideals,,,, how about that,,,?


Hey, I know a whole bunch of Americans that care about American people, they sneak across the border by the droves. But just imagine, most of them are looking to work at menial jobs to provide for their families.

But those United States of Americans are just too lazy and it is beneath them to work a menial job.

no photo
Mon 03/03/14 02:27 PM
@msharmony
You have all my sympathy for this thread, your persistence, your ideas. From Europe, it's good to read this, feels connected humanly. I just wonder how you bear all the hatred that pours from many responses you triggered... Take care

Dodo_David's photo
Mon 03/03/14 02:28 PM

ty dodo

and I appreciate that humans have diverse opinions and perceptions

I don't mean to lump EVERYONE together, but at the same time when one says they want to take something 'back', to me there is something they are wishing to return to

either they are wishing to return to having possession of something or they are wishing to return to a different point

my question is,, what point would that be? at what times were politicians 'different' than they are now?

recognizing that corruption has ALWAYS been a risk and a presence in politics and amongst politicians, who are, before anything else HUMAN,,,


what is the point or possession people presume to return to?


They want to return to a point at which the U.S. government was not being controlled by people who want to turn the USA into the United Socialist States of America.

msharmony's photo
Mon 03/03/14 02:31 PM


yep,, an American who cares about American PEOPLE

and not jus American ideals,,,, how about that,,,?


Hey, I know a whole bunch of Americans that care about American people, they sneak across the border by the droves. But just imagine, most of them are looking to work at menial jobs to provide for their families.

But those United States of Americans are just too lazy and it is beneath them to work a menial job.


not so menial when it can be sent back to a country where it is worth 13 times as much,,lol

Im sure americans would love a rate of pay 13 times higher, and nothing would be considered MENIAL at that rate,,,

laugh laugh

no photo
Mon 03/03/14 02:33 PM


its hard to become 'dependent' on something that lasts 3-5 years of lifetime

its like telling mothers not to let babies use a pacifier because as they grow they will STILL depend on it

its not gonna happen

and its not designed as a 'lift' , we have pulled off the myth of meritocracy allegedly responsible for 'lift'

its merely about helping people GET THROUGH,,,


Only 3 to 5 years? I know people on Welfare who will only work as much as they have to to stay on Welfare, and turn down better jobs because they'd lose their benefits; in some states, with all the benefits, (Section 8 Housing, FoodStamps, "Help" with utilities, Cash Payments) they make as much as a $50K to $70K by not moving up in payroll.
My daughter went to school with one girl who got pregnant at 13 just so that her mother would be able to buy a new car from the increased benefits.
Welfare=Slavery.


Yeah I used to have a neighbor that was a convicted murder (not too serious as he claimed it was only a Mexican so he only served 27 years, heck of a guy). He got $36,000 a year in benefits. Left him free to detail cars and sell drugs as a sideline.

But your grandma that paid Social Security all their lives gets $800 a month if they are lucky which makes them ineligible for all but maybe $20.00 a month in food stamps and their monthly Medicare payment is free.

This is what this system is all about.

msharmony's photo
Mon 03/03/14 02:35 PM
Edited by msharmony on Mon 03/03/14 02:41 PM


ty dodo

and I appreciate that humans have diverse opinions and perceptions

I don't mean to lump EVERYONE together, but at the same time when one says they want to take something 'back', to me there is something they are wishing to return to

either they are wishing to return to having possession of something or they are wishing to return to a different point

my question is,, what point would that be? at what times were politicians 'different' than they are now?

recognizing that corruption has ALWAYS been a risk and a presence in politics and amongst politicians, who are, before anything else HUMAN,,,


what is the point or possession people presume to return to?


They want to return to a point at which the U.S. government was not being controlled by people who want to turn the USA into the United Socialist States of America.


please explain how we are being turned socialist, when CORPORATIONS are holding so much stake in the politics

seems more like a Corporatocracy than anything CLOSE to a socialist state

what production or manufacturing do you own? I certainly don't own any , nor does anyone I know,,,,



from my perspective its the same as it always was, the rule of the elite,,

whether they were the slaveowners getting free labor from people who didn't have the rights or the worth to actually 'pay' into their system with anything but their work,,,and therefore were certainly not equally entitled to its privileges or protections

or whether they are the wealthy ceos, 'job producers' , etc,, who get CHEAP labor from people who don't have ENOUGH to actually 'pay' into their system with anything but work, and are therefore certainly not equally entitled to its privileges (or basic needs) or protections,,,

its always been those with money looking down on those without and telling them they are less deserving and less significant,,,

msharmony's photo
Mon 03/03/14 02:43 PM

@msharmony
You have all my sympathy for this thread, your persistence, your ideas. From Europe, it's good to read this, feels connected humanly. I just wonder how you bear all the hatred that pours from many responses you triggered... Take care


I appreciate it, I have worked with people from France, Spain, Switzerland and I admire their culture of caring for and being connected to their fellows(The ones I worked with anyhow, Im certain every country has those who feel unfairly burdened)


Dodo_David's photo
Mon 03/03/14 02:46 PM
please explain how we are being turned socialist, when CORPORATIONS are holding so much stake in the politics


As well as the labor unions.

msharmony's photo
Mon 03/03/14 02:53 PM

please explain how we are being turned socialist, when CORPORATIONS are holding so much stake in the politics


As well as the labor unions.


not sure how much of a stake they have, their membership has been declining for at least the last half century,,,,

no photo
Mon 03/03/14 03:02 PM



its hard to become 'dependent' on something that lasts 3-5 years of lifetime

its like telling mothers not to let babies use a pacifier because as they grow they will STILL depend on it

its not gonna happen

and its not designed as a 'lift' , we have pulled off the myth of meritocracy allegedly responsible for 'lift'

its merely about helping people GET THROUGH,,,


Only 3 to 5 years? I know people on Welfare who will only work as much as they have to to stay on Welfare, and turn down better jobs because they'd lose their benefits; in some states, with all the benefits, (Section 8 Housing, FoodStamps, "Help" with utilities, Cash Payments) they make as much as a $50K to $70K by not moving up in payroll.
My daughter went to school with one girl who got pregnant at 13 just so that her mother would be able to buy a new car from the increased benefits.
Welfare=Slavery.


how does your daughter know the reason the girl got pregnant,, ? sounds like an irresponsible child,,,which isn't specific to impoverished parents,,


, and I heard of some people who robbed a bank, but that's really not a reason to shut the banks down

and I heard that having some people perform mass shootings is no reason to regulate guns

looking at the 'charts' and information provided in this thread . less than 1 in 5 people are receiving the kind of 'welfare' people complain about (some don't consider social security or medicare in their welfare , government handout philosophy) for more than 5 years

and federal guidelines set a limit of 3-5 years PER LIFETIME,

your story and experience is like that anomaly of a bank robbery and not the rule, its a CRIME and not the standard and not a reason to lump everyone in the same fraudulent boat of the minority we hear stories about,,,




This is just pure rabble, gasping at straws. If you do the crime, then do the time, same could be said for entitlements. There is no justification except the distribution of other people's money.

And Federal Guidelines, about the same as the constitution, pieces of paper that the government feels free to trample on at will.

msharmony's photo
Mon 03/03/14 03:06 PM
I agree, do the crime, do the time

commit fraud, welfare fraud, voter fraud, embezzlement, forgery

these are CRIMES And should be prosecuted

what they have to do with the legitimate purpose of welfare, or voting, or working with money, or signing documents


is yet to be determined,,,

Smartazzjohn's photo
Mon 03/03/14 03:07 PM
When did welfare programs become an OPTION instead of working?

Welfare programs are supposed to be for those who CAN'T HELP THEMSELVES, it wasn't created for those who DON'T WANT TO HELP THEMSELVES.

I don't know ANYONE who wants to see CHILDREN or THOSE WHO CAN'T HELP THEMSELVES starve or go homeless. If able bodied PARASITES did their FAIR SHARE and even paid MINIMAL income tax then there would be more money to help those who REALLY DO NEED HELP!!!!

Who's really hurting the THRULY NEEDY by reducing the funds available for programs to help them? Those who use welfare as an OPTION instead of working because working is an INCONVENIENCE or those who want to keep more of the money they EARN?

It's the dependency CULTURE that needs to addressed by Americans who care about a future that will help ALL AMERICANS lift THEMSELVES out of POVERTY. Society doesn't OWE anyone anything for the CHOICES THEY MAKE!!!


msharmony's photo
Mon 03/03/14 03:16 PM
welfare has ALWAYS been an 'option',

welfare:the health, happiness, and fortunes of a person or group


wives depended upon the 'welfare'(fortunes) of their childrens fathers/husbands in the balance of running a home together

business owners and ceos and the elite depended upon the WELFARE (health) of their laborers in the balance of running a successful enterprise to make them profits



working(for money) isn't like breathing , it doesn't just happen, people compete for jobs based upon skills, job availability, geography and competition

and when COMPETITION for jobs increased, (ID say around the time minorities and women gained equal status for those opportunities) ,

and when people became more spread out geographically and as the job market changed to bottom line economics(outsourcing, automation) instead of family and community focused businesses and industries


and when employers started weening out employees by their credit ratings or their employment status,,


the 'option' to work became one that took more time and effort

and that time passes with people still having NEEDS that they cant put off,, like food and shelter for their kids

I agree , those who think that temporary assistance is for long term dependence are a problem, but I also think those who assume anyone needing temporary assistance should be ridiculed and defined by the EXCEPTIONS who abuse it are part of the problem too

because they would rather discard a lot of needy people by their limited view of what 'needy' is,,,,

willing2's photo
Mon 03/03/14 03:23 PM
Taxpayers pay those who choose not to help themselves.

Those sponges could show a bit of appreciation with at least a little oral.:wink: smokin

no photo
Mon 03/03/14 03:24 PM


again, missing the point

to clean houses, one needs transportation and advertising of SOME SORT,, that costs money

to LEGALLY clean house in Nevada one needs licensing, THAT COSTS MONEY

while one is building up the CLEANING clientele, ones children must EAT and be SAFE (at least its a requirement I have for mine)

the freedom of time and resources is quite different when there is another little life involved, and all of it takes TIME to truly acquire money that can sustain

and in the meantime,, babies needs don't put themselves on hold until the money comes in,,,





Now we're back to the circle jerk, same tired excuses as a couple of pages ago.