I just wanted to say that when I first saw the name of the post. My first thought was it wasn't hidden well enough since someone found it. hahaha

your contradicting yourself... barry wanted to go to war in syria, but yet your ok with it... congress was the only thing that stooped it...and your still ok with barry...

your quote:

"actually, no I didn't,, I think the only thing that came close was hatred over the war,, but those had similar hatred about presidents in the past who went to war,,"

so it's ok to want to go to war, but not to actually do it...

I am concerned however with INSTITUTIONAL racism , if there is a cultural acceptance of certain stereotypes and attitudes that validate those in powers of oppression to continue to oppress,,

For American society, a dangerous polarization has set in. Signs of this polarization over the years include opposite reactions between blacks and whites to verdicts in the O.J. Simpson murder case, the "rape" charges against Duke University students, and trials resulting from the beating of Rodney King and the death of Trayvon Martin.

More dangerous than these highly publicized episodes over the years are innumerable organized and unprovoked physical attacks on whites by young black gangs in shopping malls, on beaches and in other public places all across the country today.

While some of these attacks make it into the media as isolated incidents, the nationwide pattern of organized black on white attacks by thugs remains invisible in the mainstream media, with the notable exception of Bill O'Reilly on the Fox News Channel.

Even when these attacks are accompanied by shouts of anti-white rhetoric and exultant laughter at the carnage, the racial makeup of the attackers and their victims is usually ignored by the media, and public officials often deny that race has anything to do with what happened.

These attacks have sent many people to the hospital, and some have died, but the attacks are often carried out in a festive atmosphere. What are called "troubled youths," in this and other contexts, are often in fact young people enjoying themselves greatly by creating big trouble for others.

Some of these many attacks are covered in detail in a book titled "White Girl Bleed A Lot" by Colin Flaherty. It was a phrase that I recognized immediately, from my own previous research.

That phrase was uttered by one of a group of black attackers who descended on a group of whites at a July 4th fireworks show in Milwaukee. But what happened there was not unique, either in itself or in the efforts of police and political authorities to play down what happened -- and to say that race had nothing to do with it.

When the Chicago Tribune was criticized for editing out the race of the attackers in a series of similar organized attacks in Chicago, it replied that race was irrelevant. Yet race is not considered irrelevant when indignantly editorializing on a disproportionate number of young black males arrested and imprisoned.

who said IM ok with war in Syria,,,?

when did OBama say he wanted to go to 'war with Syria'?

there is no contradiction of things that were not said

presidents who WENT TO WAR,,,what war did OBama begin,,,?

nonetheless, whether you remember it or not, barry wanted to go help the rebels, which means war, regards of what libs want to call it... the same people we are at war with now, and he's been giving them weapons for a while now, the al quida and the taliban...

nonetheless, whether you remember it or not, barry wanted to go help the rebels, which means war, regards of what libs want to call it... the same people we are at war with now, and he's been giving them weapons for a while now, the al quida and the taliban...

yeah, whatever, I wanted to rob a bank, I rethought it and it never happened,,, thinking about it and doing it are different ends of the spectrum

You are correct to say "if", because you keep referring to something that may not be as nearly as bad as you make it out to be.

Meanwhile, real acts of modern-day racism remain ignored because of who is committing the acts.

African-American economist Thomas Sowell writes the following.



Quote Source

Sowell has his own agenda so it isn't unbiased nor do all black folks have the same view of what the issues are for blacks in this country. They are still digging out from the damage done to their families and societies from slavery. Many have different views on how they can fix it. Some is constructive, some is off the wall bat shyte. One thing for sure, whites, who are most definitely ignorant of how to fix these problems reading the blacks who voice their opinions on these problems have very little constructive views to add to the conversation because they can't speak on what they don't know.

The problem with black on white crime for some people is "you do understand their frustration and anger". After observing the white prejudice I have seen against black folks, I personally know I would be in jail for a or a few very heinous crime/s if I were born black in this country. The issue I have is, were they instigated by some racists whites? Most likely yea, just from what I have seen. White racism is the norm in this country. It is taught from birth to whites and isn't identified as racism to the children. These whites go through their life perpetrating these racisms on whoever non white is lucky enough to have to deal with them. It sucks to be non white in this country.

I guess it would be a pretty hard sell to convince people that a black conservative who speaks out against Obama is racist ...Much easier to sell the idea that Thomas Sowell is a biased man pushing "his own" agenda...Making an excuse for black on white crime based on slavery is not only a stretch, it's irrational...The reason we have laws against crime is because criminal acts are inexcusable in a civilized society...Blacks have never had to "dig out" from the damage done by slavery... Whites did (and still do) that for them...Racism in America is not about race as much as it is about an excuse for dodging responsibility...Black liberals cry racism every time the president is criticized...When liberalism fails, liberals cry racism....When the Democratic party gets in trouble, liberals cry racism...Racism exists and will always exist...In spitie of that fact, we live in a nation that has a black (almost) president, a black Attorney General, and a government that is more than happy to legally discriminate against whites on a daily basis...Even so, you can't go one day without hearing liberals whining about what a racist country they live in...It's pitiful....

um wrong... thinking about robbing a bank is one think... when you plan it out and do everything but the acual robery is still illegal... barry went before congress to get their aproval, and it was denied... looks like someone wanted to rob a bank

Funny... I see racism against blacks, and racism against whites. Sexism against men, and sexism against women. The only policy that can be put forth is the requirement that one cannot favor a particular sex/or race, over the other (which is supposedly a law in place). Even this is tough to uphold, as they are mostly based on assumptions. Micromanaging these situations likely result in the reverse effect. A white man and black woman apply for the same job, and have the same credentials. Employer decides to flip a coin and the white man gets a job. Looks like racism, but it's not.

In fact most people i know would hire the black woman for fear of lawsuits. Wouldn't that be racism as well?

I don't think you know what you are talking about,, sorry...

can you show where the president made a request to go to war with Syria

or where there was anything illegal in sending something to congress for approval?

and ignorance, as you cant be sued so long as you hire someone who is qualified,,,and there is no EVIDENCE of discrimination against any groups in your hiring