100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Liberals prefer Women be Unarmed and Raped | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
Maybe you should look at rates per one hundred thousand and compare the US with any other country . You do have an extremely high rate of gun deaths through criminal activity, let alone through suicide, accident and lawful deaths. I say again, I am glad I live in a country where we are not so afraid of our government they we need to be armed just in case. PS: I understand it was the second amendment to your constitution, it was changed once and can be again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Surmar
on
Thu 03/14/13 12:33 AM
|
|
I can only shoot one gun at a time,, why on earth would I require the 'right' to own an arsenal,,,,? owning a gun for protection or guns for hunting are one thing,, owning an arsenal is a different extreme --------------------------------------------------------------------- I Own a .38 for Personal Protection when I'm out of the House, I have a Saiga 12 (Low Recoil Stock, 20Rd Drum Loaded With Turket Shot) For Home Defense if Someone Breaks into my House; I have an AR-15 for Property Defense, along with a 30-06 for Hunting and a few other guns (Some are just fun to shoot) for this or that. Each Gun has its Stregnth & Weakness and there is no All Purpose Gun for Everything; the Reason to have Multiple Guns is to have the Right Gun for One's Need. People would Freak Out if I Carried a Saiga 12 or an AR-15 in Public, so I carry a .38; and it's easier to Conceal. The Aveg Home Invasion involves Multiple Person (Usually 3) so the 6 Shooter is out and a .223 will travel through walls and may hit someone I don't want to Shoot, so I have a Saiga Shotgun. The AR-15 is a Good Weapon to Defend One's Own Property (Outside the House) if there is Trouble. Understand why one would own Multiple Guns? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm 5'2", around a 100Lbs, the Average Man could simply do whatever he wanted with me; my .38 is the only thing I have to make me an Equal to a Rapist, or anyother man that wishs to do me harm when I'm in Public. I ALWAYS CARRY my Gun when I'm out; and not to leave anything to chance, with a Toy Gun (That looks like my .38 but for the Orange plastic) I practice with my Husband on what to do if the Unthinkable happens - Attacked from behind, grabbed from the side, different forms of assaults so that I would have a basic plan pre-programmed if I need it; and practice with my Husband tends to be Fun, Fun, Fun. No one who trys to Disarm me is my Friend, though I'm forgiving of the Well Meaning Ignorent who had bought into lies; I'd rather have the Perp pee on himself when he's looking down the business end of my gun. my mother is similarly petite, and has a gun < A GUN Im not for banning guns, and Im not ANTI gun, I am for REGLUATING guns do I want petite women such as yourself to not be able to defend themself with a gun,, NO do I want mentally ill persons like james holmes to acquire an ARSENAL of weapons ,, NO people pretend like the issue is simple and black and white(not you specifically), but there IS common sense middle ground between the two extremes of gun banning and complete freedom of weapon ownership,,,,, And if you Regulate a Women to Not have a Gun, and she is Killed without the Means to Defend Herself; Then What? Before we start to Pass New Laws, how about we Enforce the Laws that are Already on the Books; Criminals don't buy their Weapons by Legal Means. who supports regulations that prevent women from having 'a gun'? yes, we need to enforce the laws and allow them to evolve with the technology,,, and people who dont do things legally , are therefore called 'criminals',, goes without saying that they dont follow the laws... Do you recall the Appalation Law School Shooting? Two Students hearing Shots as they were going to Class, retreaved their guns from their Car; they detained the Would Be Mass Shooter after he Killed Two. How about the San Antonio Theater Shooting? The Shooter was Killed after he Killed One and Wounded Two Others by an Off Duty Police Officer. The Threat of Arms Being Anywhere & Everywhere Keeps Evil At Bay. George Washington. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe you should look at rates per one hundred thousand and compare the US with any other country . You do have an extremely high rate of gun deaths through criminal activity, let alone through suicide, accident and lawful deaths. I say again, I am glad I live in a country where we are not so afraid of our government they we need to be armed just in case. PS: I understand it was the second amendment to your constitution, it was changed once and can be again. Besides,one needs their Eyes closed Wide Shut not to know what ANY Government is capable of doing! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rep. Jim Moran (D) Can’t Answer Why He’s Not Pro-Choice For Woman To Own Guns For Self-Defense March 13, 2013 Congressman Jim Moran (D-Va. 8th Dist.) invited his constituents to join him for a “conversation about gun violence.” However, when one woman stood up to ask the pro-choice legislator why he refuses to give women the choice to protect themselves, Moran refused to answer her question. Because the woman upset his gun-control narrative, he rudely shut her down. The woman who revealed Moran’s arrogance and hypocrisy was Celia Bigelow, the former campus action director for American Majority Action. To appreciate how important Bigelow’s question was, and how appalling it was that an elected official refused even to acknowledge her, a little context is useful. When Bigelow asked the question, she had in mind the story of Amanda Collins, who was raped when she was a student at the University of Nevada-Reno in 2007. Collins’ attacker, James Biela, was a serial rapist who went on to rape two more women and to murder a third. At the time of her attack, Collins possessed a concealed-carry license. Unfortunately for Collins, while she had the license, she didn’t have a weapon: the University of Nevada-Reno’s “gun free” policy left Collins defenseless. As she later said, the college bureaucracy “legislated [her] into being a victim.” (Collins’ entire story is heart-wrenching, but it’s worth listening to at length. You can find it here.) Find out what gun-rights question left Rep. Moran speechless [NEXT PAGE] You may also want to read: Rape Survivor Pleads With Co. State Senate For Concealed Carry – Democrat Taunts and Questions Her Obama Supporter Says They Would Rather Die Than Defend Themselves With Gun Pages: 1 2 3 http://www.mrconservative.com/2013/03/6258-dem-rep-cant-answer-why-woman-cant-choose-guns-for-defense/ absolute SLIMEBALLS,and they have the Nerve calling themselves concerned Leaders of the People! Hope there is a special place in Hell for this type of Trash! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No one can know who is or is not "stable or unstable" or should or should not be "allowed" to have a weapon. If you put that power into the hands of shrinks or counselors, then people who might need counseling will be afraid to even have an appointment for any reason. Forced mental evaluations will become the norm where people are abducted (arrested?) and forced to undergo a mental evaluation. A person's right to bear arms can easily be infringed on the word of some doctor. Also, the true psychopaths can fool any shrink. there is no need for forced mental evaluations, plenty of people have doctors, and those who commit crimes can undergo mandatory evaulation as a condition of bail or probation,,, it wont stop everyone, but it will stop those who are suffering trauma that has caused mental breaks , and are already under counseling along with registering, it will be valuable in revoking permits (like we do licenses with drunk drivers) from those who exhibit illegal and violent behaviors,, etc its not dumb at all, its a precaution,,, its dumb to do nothing except grieve after preventable deaths happen,,, Dictatorship of the Masses anyone? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm 5'2", around a 100Lbs, the Average Man could simply do whatever he wanted with me; my .38 is the only thing I have to make me an Equal to a Rapist, or anyother man that wishs to do me harm when I'm in Public. I ALWAYS CARRY my Gun when I'm out; and not to leave anything to chance, with a Toy Gun (That looks like my .38 but for the Orange plastic) I practice with my Husband on what to do if the Unthinkable happens - Attacked from behind, grabbed from the side, different forms of assaults so that I would have a basic plan pre-programmed if I need it; and practice with my Husband tends to be Fun, Fun, Fun. No one who trys to Disarm me is my Friend, though I'm forgiving of the Well Meaning Ignorent who had bought into lies; I'd rather have the Perp pee on himself when he's looking down the business end of my gun. my mother is similarly petite, and has a gun < A GUN Im not for banning guns, and Im not ANTI gun, I am for REGLUATING guns do I want petite women such as yourself to not be able to defend themself with a gun,, NO do I want mentally ill persons like james holmes to acquire an ARSENAL of weapons ,, NO people pretend like the issue is simple and black and white(not you specifically), but there IS common sense middle ground between the two extremes of gun banning and complete freedom of weapon ownership,,,,, Their Rhetoric proves it! Too bad they are able to hoodwink so many people! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and people who dont do things legally , are therefore called 'criminals',, goes without saying that they dont follow the laws... If I'm in a High Crime Area where the Law Says that I can't Carry a Gun, like the Inner-City of Chicago, which should I risk; being the Victim of a Violent Crime, or be Arrested for Carrying a Gun? What advice would you give your Dauhter? Though I Dress Down when I'm in the Inner-City and make myself look like one of the Crowd; I always have my Gun with me though the Law Says that I can't have it, just in case I need it. If I have the Right to Defend Myself, then I have the Right to Have the Means to do That. I had already discussed with my Lawyer, as a Hypathetical, what it would take to Get Out of Jail and get my Gun Back, under the 2nd, 4th & 5th Amendments to the Constitution. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No one can know who is or is not "stable or unstable" or should or should not be "allowed" to have a weapon. If you put that power into the hands of shrinks or counselors, then people who might need counseling will be afraid to even have an appointment for any reason. Forced mental evaluations will become the norm where people are abducted (arrested?) and forced to undergo a mental evaluation. A person's right to bear arms can easily be infringed on the word of some doctor. Also, the true psychopaths can fool any shrink. there is no need for forced mental evaluations, plenty of people have doctors, and those who commit crimes can undergo mandatory evaulation as a condition of bail or probation,,, it wont stop everyone, but it will stop those who are suffering trauma that has caused mental breaks , and are already under counseling along with registering, it will be valuable in revoking permits (like we do licenses with drunk drivers) from those who exhibit illegal and violent behaviors,, etc its not dumb at all, its a precaution,,, its dumb to do nothing except grieve after preventable deaths happen,,, Dictatorship of the Masses anyone? you still believe anything is absolute, including 'rights and freedoms' . ? chaos anyone? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm 5'2", around a 100Lbs, the Average Man could simply do whatever he wanted with me; my .38 is the only thing I have to make me an Equal to a Rapist, or anyother man that wishs to do me harm when I'm in Public. I ALWAYS CARRY my Gun when I'm out; and not to leave anything to chance, with a Toy Gun (That looks like my .38 but for the Orange plastic) I practice with my Husband on what to do if the Unthinkable happens - Attacked from behind, grabbed from the side, different forms of assaults so that I would have a basic plan pre-programmed if I need it; and practice with my Husband tends to be Fun, Fun, Fun. No one who trys to Disarm me is my Friend, though I'm forgiving of the Well Meaning Ignorent who had bought into lies; I'd rather have the Perp pee on himself when he's looking down the business end of my gun. my mother is similarly petite, and has a gun < A GUN Im not for banning guns, and Im not ANTI gun, I am for REGLUATING guns do I want petite women such as yourself to not be able to defend themself with a gun,, NO do I want mentally ill persons like james holmes to acquire an ARSENAL of weapons ,, NO people pretend like the issue is simple and black and white(not you specifically), but there IS common sense middle ground between the two extremes of gun banning and complete freedom of weapon ownership,,,,, Their Rhetoric proves it! Too bad they are able to hoodwink so many people! when my children are around there is middle ground, between insane bigots who presume a 'threat' and have guns to do their dirty work, and 'law abiding' citizens who feel legitimately threatened |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm 5'2", around a 100Lbs, the Average Man could simply do whatever he wanted with me; my .38 is the only thing I have to make me an Equal to a Rapist, or anyother man that wishs to do me harm when I'm in Public. I ALWAYS CARRY my Gun when I'm out; and not to leave anything to chance, with a Toy Gun (That looks like my .38 but for the Orange plastic) I practice with my Husband on what to do if the Unthinkable happens - Attacked from behind, grabbed from the side, different forms of assaults so that I would have a basic plan pre-programmed if I need it; and practice with my Husband tends to be Fun, Fun, Fun. No one who trys to Disarm me is my Friend, though I'm forgiving of the Well Meaning Ignorent who had bought into lies; I'd rather have the Perp pee on himself when he's looking down the business end of my gun. my mother is similarly petite, and has a gun < A GUN Im not for banning guns, and Im not ANTI gun, I am for REGLUATING guns do I want petite women such as yourself to not be able to defend themself with a gun,, NO do I want mentally ill persons like james holmes to acquire an ARSENAL of weapons ,, NO people pretend like the issue is simple and black and white(not you specifically), but there IS common sense middle ground between the two extremes of gun banning and complete freedom of weapon ownership,,,,, Their Rhetoric proves it! Too bad they are able to hoodwink so many people! when my children are around there is middle ground, between insane bigots who presume a 'threat' and have guns to do their dirty work, and 'law abiding' citizens who feel legitimately threatened Rights,NOT Privileges! Seems these days most Liberals have trouble to understand the difference between the two! One more time,Rights are NOT negotiable,and the 2nd Amendment clearly protects a Right,NOT a Privilege! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm 5'2", around a 100Lbs, the Average Man could simply do whatever he wanted with me; my .38 is the only thing I have to make me an Equal to a Rapist, or anyother man that wishs to do me harm when I'm in Public. I ALWAYS CARRY my Gun when I'm out; and not to leave anything to chance, with a Toy Gun (That looks like my .38 but for the Orange plastic) I practice with my Husband on what to do if the Unthinkable happens - Attacked from behind, grabbed from the side, different forms of assaults so that I would have a basic plan pre-programmed if I need it; and practice with my Husband tends to be Fun, Fun, Fun. No one who trys to Disarm me is my Friend, though I'm forgiving of the Well Meaning Ignorent who had bought into lies; I'd rather have the Perp pee on himself when he's looking down the business end of my gun. my mother is similarly petite, and has a gun < A GUN Im not for banning guns, and Im not ANTI gun, I am for REGLUATING guns do I want petite women such as yourself to not be able to defend themself with a gun,, NO do I want mentally ill persons like james holmes to acquire an ARSENAL of weapons ,, NO people pretend like the issue is simple and black and white(not you specifically), but there IS common sense middle ground between the two extremes of gun banning and complete freedom of weapon ownership,,,,, Their Rhetoric proves it! Too bad they are able to hoodwink so many people! when my children are around there is middle ground, between insane bigots who presume a 'threat' and have guns to do their dirty work, and 'law abiding' citizens who feel legitimately threatened Rights,NOT Privileges! Seems these days most Liberals have trouble to understand the difference between the two! One more time,Rights are NOT negotiable,and the 2nd Amendment clearly protects a Right,NOT a Privilege! Where's that dead horse stashed today Con?...In horsey hospital getting stitched up would be my guess!   
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm 5'2", around a 100Lbs, the Average Man could simply do whatever he wanted with me; my .38 is the only thing I have to make me an Equal to a Rapist, or anyother man that wishs to do me harm when I'm in Public. I ALWAYS CARRY my Gun when I'm out; and not to leave anything to chance, with a Toy Gun (That looks like my .38 but for the Orange plastic) I practice with my Husband on what to do if the Unthinkable happens - Attacked from behind, grabbed from the side, different forms of assaults so that I would have a basic plan pre-programmed if I need it; and practice with my Husband tends to be Fun, Fun, Fun. No one who trys to Disarm me is my Friend, though I'm forgiving of the Well Meaning Ignorent who had bought into lies; I'd rather have the Perp pee on himself when he's looking down the business end of my gun. my mother is similarly petite, and has a gun < A GUN Im not for banning guns, and Im not ANTI gun, I am for REGLUATING guns do I want petite women such as yourself to not be able to defend themself with a gun,, NO do I want mentally ill persons like james holmes to acquire an ARSENAL of weapons ,, NO people pretend like the issue is simple and black and white(not you specifically), but there IS common sense middle ground between the two extremes of gun banning and complete freedom of weapon ownership,,,,, Their Rhetoric proves it! Too bad they are able to hoodwink so many people! when my children are around there is middle ground, between insane bigots who presume a 'threat' and have guns to do their dirty work, and 'law abiding' citizens who feel legitimately threatened Rights,NOT Privileges! Seems these days most Liberals have trouble to understand the difference between the two! One more time,Rights are NOT negotiable,and the 2nd Amendment clearly protects a Right,NOT a Privilege! Where's that dead horse stashed today Con?...In horsey hospital getting stitched up would be my guess!  This is all I have to say http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rz1V_piTsrc 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
its dumb to do nothing except grieve after preventable deaths happen. Why do people think they can solve every problem with more legislation and more laws that take away our rights? We are not experiencing more deaths because of guns. These incidents are just getting more press. Far more people die on the highway in cars than of guns from some crazy person. These incidents just make good news and sell more papers. Car accidents happen all the time. They barely make the local news. Nobody knows who is or is not stable enough to have a gun. Laws trying to figure that out will only infringe on people's rights. These over paid politicians are just trying to justify their jobs. We have a right to bear arms. Period. No legislation can take away our rights legally without being guilty of TREASON. there are professionals who study mental health and can absolutely observe whether someone is a harm to themself or others,,,, we have the right to a well 'REGULATED' militia in which militia members can bare arms,,,, militia are trained and , believed to be sane,,,, I can only shoot one gun at a time,, why on earth would I require the 'right' to own an arsenal,,,,? owning a gun for protection or guns for hunting are one thing,, owning an arsenal is a different extreme I Own a .38 for Personal Protection when I'm out of the House, I have a Saiga 12 (Low Recoil Stock, 20Rd Drum Loaded With Turket Shot) For Home Defense if Someone Breaks into my House; I have an AR-15 for Property Defense, along with a 30-06 for Hunting and a few other guns (Some are just fun to shoot) for this or that. Each Gun has its Stregnth & Weakness and there is no All Purpose Gun for Everything; the Reason to have Multiple Guns is to have the Right Gun for One's Need. People would Freak Out if I Carried a Saiga 12 or an AR-15 in Public, so I carry a .38; and it's easier to Conceal. The Aveg Home Invasion involves Multiple Person (Usually 3) so the 6 Shooter is out and a .223 will travel through walls and may hit someone I don't want to Shoot, so I have a Saiga Shotgun. The AR-15 is a Good Weapon to Defend One's Own Property (Outside the House) if there is Trouble. Understand why one would own Multiple Guns? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I would like to own multiple guns.
One for Tom, one for Dick, and one for Harry.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Leigh2154
on
Thu 03/14/13 06:47 PM
|
|
I would like to own multiple guns. One for Tom, one for Dick, and one for Harry.  Tom said Dick is too Harry to have a gun...That didn't come out right, did it
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I would like to own multiple guns. One for Tom, one for Dick, and one for Harry. Tom said Dick is too Harry to have a gun...That didn't come out right, did it You think that one didn't come out right? Go read what you posted on the prude thread. Who said what? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm 5'2", around a 100Lbs, the Average Man could simply do whatever he wanted with me; my .38 is the only thing I have to make me an Equal to a Rapist, or anyother man that wishs to do me harm when I'm in Public. I ALWAYS CARRY my Gun when I'm out; and not to leave anything to chance, with a Toy Gun (That looks like my .38 but for the Orange plastic) I practice with my Husband on what to do if the Unthinkable happens - Attacked from behind, grabbed from the side, different forms of assaults so that I would have a basic plan pre-programmed if I need it; and practice with my Husband tends to be Fun, Fun, Fun. No one who trys to Disarm me is my Friend, though I'm forgiving of the Well Meaning Ignorent who had bought into lies; I'd rather have the Perp pee on himself when he's looking down the business end of my gun. my mother is similarly petite, and has a gun < A GUN Im not for banning guns, and Im not ANTI gun, I am for REGLUATING guns do I want petite women such as yourself to not be able to defend themself with a gun,, NO do I want mentally ill persons like james holmes to acquire an ARSENAL of weapons ,, NO people pretend like the issue is simple and black and white(not you specifically), but there IS common sense middle ground between the two extremes of gun banning and complete freedom of weapon ownership,,,,, Their Rhetoric proves it! Too bad they are able to hoodwink so many people! when my children are around there is middle ground, between insane bigots who presume a 'threat' and have guns to do their dirty work, and 'law abiding' citizens who feel legitimately threatened Rights,NOT Privileges! Seems these days most Liberals have trouble to understand the difference between the two! One more time,Rights are NOT negotiable,and the 2nd Amendment clearly protects a Right,NOT a Privilege! I dont want to deprive anyone of a right, I just dont want to see boundariless behavior in the name of 'rights',,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
its dumb to do nothing except grieve after preventable deaths happen. Why do people think they can solve every problem with more legislation and more laws that take away our rights? We are not experiencing more deaths because of guns. These incidents are just getting more press. Far more people die on the highway in cars than of guns from some crazy person. These incidents just make good news and sell more papers. Car accidents happen all the time. They barely make the local news. Nobody knows who is or is not stable enough to have a gun. Laws trying to figure that out will only infringe on people's rights. These over paid politicians are just trying to justify their jobs. We have a right to bear arms. Period. No legislation can take away our rights legally without being guilty of TREASON. there are professionals who study mental health and can absolutely observe whether someone is a harm to themself or others,,,, we have the right to a well 'REGULATED' militia in which militia members can bare arms,,,, militia are trained and , believed to be sane,,,, I can only shoot one gun at a time,, why on earth would I require the 'right' to own an arsenal,,,,? owning a gun for protection or guns for hunting are one thing,, owning an arsenal is a different extreme I Own a .38 for Personal Protection when I'm out of the House, I have a Saiga 12 (Low Recoil Stock, 20Rd Drum Loaded With Turket Shot) For Home Defense if Someone Breaks into my House; I have an AR-15 for Property Defense, along with a 30-06 for Hunting and a few other guns (Some are just fun to shoot) for this or that. Each Gun has its Stregnth & Weakness and there is no All Purpose Gun for Everything; the Reason to have Multiple Guns is to have the Right Gun for One's Need. People would Freak Out if I Carried a Saiga 12 or an AR-15 in Public, so I carry a .38; and it's easier to Conceal. The Aveg Home Invasion involves Multiple Person (Usually 3) so the 6 Shooter is out and a .223 will travel through walls and may hit someone I don't want to Shoot, so I have a Saiga Shotgun. The AR-15 is a Good Weapon to Defend One's Own Property (Outside the House) if there is Trouble. Understand why one would own Multiple Guns? no, do the bullets work differently based upon the gun? hunting, home protection, and everyday strolling I count three needs,,,, three guns?,,,I dont consider that an arsenal,,,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Surmar
on
Thu 03/14/13 11:32 PM
|
|
its dumb to do nothing except grieve after preventable deaths happen. Why do people think they can solve every problem with more legislation and more laws that take away our rights? We are not experiencing more deaths because of guns. These incidents are just getting more press. Far more people die on the highway in cars than of guns from some crazy person. These incidents just make good news and sell more papers. Car accidents happen all the time. They barely make the local news. Nobody knows who is or is not stable enough to have a gun. Laws trying to figure that out will only infringe on people's rights. These over paid politicians are just trying to justify their jobs. We have a right to bear arms. Period. No legislation can take away our rights legally without being guilty of TREASON. there are professionals who study mental health and can absolutely observe whether someone is a harm to themself or others,,,, we have the right to a well 'REGULATED' militia in which militia members can bare arms,,,, militia are trained and , believed to be sane,,,, I can only shoot one gun at a time,, why on earth would I require the 'right' to own an arsenal,,,,? owning a gun for protection or guns for hunting are one thing,, owning an arsenal is a different extreme I Own a .38 for Personal Protection when I'm out of the House, I have a Saiga 12 (Low Recoil Stock, 20Rd Drum Loaded With Turket Shot) For Home Defense if Someone Breaks into my House; I have an AR-15 for Property Defense, along with a 30-06 for Hunting and a few other guns (Some are just fun to shoot) for this or that. Each Gun has its Stregnth & Weakness and there is no All Purpose Gun for Everything; the Reason to have Multiple Guns is to have the Right Gun for One's Need. People would Freak Out if I Carried a Saiga 12 or an AR-15 in Public, so I carry a .38; and it's easier to Conceal. The Aveg Home Invasion involves Multiple Person (Usually 3) so the 6 Shooter is out and a .223 will travel through walls and may hit someone I don't want to Shoot, so I have a Saiga Shotgun. The AR-15 is a Good Weapon to Defend One's Own Property (Outside the House) if there is Trouble. Understand why one would own Multiple Guns? no, do the bullets work differently based upon the gun? hunting, home protection, and everyday strolling I count three needs,,,, three guns?,,,I dont consider that an arsenal,,,,, That would be 4 Guns. 1) .38 2) Saiga 12 Semi-Auto Shotgun w/20rd Drum & Low Recoil Stock. 3) AR-15 4) 30-06 for Hunting. Plus several other Guns for various other uses; like Pure Fun. A .38 is a good Gun for a One on One or a Two on One on the Open Streets as you pull it out from Concealment to Defend Yourself. In the Confined Space of One's Home, as a Home Invasion Usually Involves More Than One (3 - 4 on Avg) a Shotgun is the Better Choice (Semi-Auto with Low Recoil Stock for a Small Woman like myself)as the Barrings wouldn't Penetrat the Walls like a Rifle. If the Perp is Still Breaking Down the Door, or Crawling Thrugh the Window, or He & His Buddies are Acting in a Threating Manner Outside; A Good Semi-Auto Rifle with 30Rd Mag(Like the AR or AK)is the Rifle You'd Want. Every Gun has its Good Points and Drawbacks, the Trick is to use each Gun as Efectively as Possible. |
|
|
|
|
