100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Liberals prefer Women be Unarmed and Raped | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
A bit strange that no one can answer my questions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Jeanniebean
on
Thu 03/07/13 11:04 PM
|
|
Who exactly is saying they want women to be raped? It was the administrators on her college campus. “I was denied the one equalizing factor that I had,” she said. After she was raped, did they change their "no gun" policy? No, they didn't. Why wouldn't they? What was their argument? The argument had to have went like this: "We will not allow any guns on this campus, even though rape has become a problem. It is better that a few women are raped than anyone, even a rapist get killed." "So you have a licence to carry? Too bad. Rules are rules." (What other argument did they have?) None. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is one of those, "Are you still beating your wife?" statements Not really worthy of a response. Signed, A Liberal typical liberal stupidity... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A bit strange that no one can answer my questions. it's a dumb question, not worthy of an answer...typical liberal tactics, trying to evade the issue by clouding it with stupid questions... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Jeanniebean
on
Fri 03/08/13 12:29 PM
|
|
She wants a name? Here is one from Colorado.
In today's Pueblo Chieftain: Senator Angela Giron voted to pass three gun control laws out of her committee including a ban on carrying concealed weapons on college campuses. Dudley Brown said: "How she could vote against a rape victim who siad she needed a gun to defend herself on campus is beyond me." Pro-gun legislators have found a pro-gun democrat that they will fund to run against Senator Giron in next year's primary if she votes against her constituents. Other democrats claim she has a lot of support and that she should vote to pass these bills. She brushed over Brown's threat in a statement Thursday, saying she was focusing on serving Pueblo. Senator Giron apparently is the deciding vote on one of the proposed gun measures. She has been targeted in advertising, at rallies, and with thousands of emails and phone messages. |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
MetalShadow6
on
Fri 03/08/13 12:50 PM
|
|
A lady down the street from me was home along and used a gun to stop someone from breaking in her house while she was home. She held him at gunpoint in the ground till the police arrived.
I remember seeing a rape victim, Amanda Collins, said a gun would have protected her from being rape before the legislative branch of Colorado. Democratic state Sen. Evie Hudak states that stats said the gun would not have help but “You said that you were a martial arts student, I mean person, experienced in Tae Kwon Do, and yet because this individual was so large, was able to overcome you even with your skills, and chances are that if you had had a gun, then he would have been able to get that from you and possibly use it against you,” Hudak claimed that for every one woman who used a handgun to kill someone in self-defense, 83 were murdered by them. “Respectfully senator, you weren’t there,” Collins said before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Monday. “Had I been carrying concealed, he wouldn’t have known I had my weapon; and I was there. I know without a doubt in my mind at some point I would’ve been able to stop my attack by using my firearm.” Last I check, most martial arts require you to get close to a person. A gun is just as useful at 2 feet or 20 feet. Knowing hand to hand combat is good. However many of it is not too helpful unless to stay in practice everyday with a sparring partner. Guns are still the best equalizer when facing people more powerful then you. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common sense dictates. Take away a woman's option to protect herself, as she sees fit is, IMO, the same as giving an attacker the upper hand. I like a thing I read the other day. Gal says, "I carry already, I'm 5'2" and a bullet to the Brain would stop Rape in a Heartbeat. If I'm ever arrested for Carrying, I'd let a Jury decide my fate as I press the Constitutional Arguement that gives me the Right to Carry as I will also Argue that by the time the Police Arrive; I would already be a victim of some crime." Let's just hope she wouldn't have a jury full of liberals. Arrested for carrying? Is she carrying in a place where it's not legal? there you go asking questions again.  remember, "it won't work". you are just supposed to agree. asking dumb questions doesn't need an answer...the answer to about 90% of her questions are right above her, as in this case it was all explained in the thread she responded to...as i can see your not very good at reading either... is that a liberal thing? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I remember a story where a man was openly carrying a gun in a city in Pennsylvania and was arrested. When they took him to the station, he asks the chief to look up a law. The law said he could openly carry a gun in that city. They released him but the chief said the next day that they will arrest anyone openly carrying a gun.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common sense dictates. Take away a woman's option to protect herself, as she sees fit is, IMO, the same as giving an attacker the upper hand. I like a thing I read the other day. Gal says, "I carry already, I'm 5'2" and a bullet to the Brain would stop Rape in a Heartbeat. If I'm ever arrested for Carrying, I'd let a Jury decide my fate as I press the Constitutional Arguement that gives me the Right to Carry as I will also Argue that by the time the Police Arrive; I would already be a victim of some crime." Let's just hope she wouldn't have a jury full of liberals. Arrested for carrying? Is she carrying in a place where it's not legal? there you go asking questions again. remember, "it won't work". you are just supposed to agree. asking dumb questions doesn't need an answer...the answer to about 90% of her questions are right above her, as in this case it was all explained in the thread she responded to...as i can see your not very good at reading either... is that a liberal thing? I don't know you tell me, you seem to be the one with the super human powers of intuition, always trying to label people you know nothing about. does the thought of someone, anyone, having a belief system that does not directly line up with yours scare you this much? here's the thing, the student in this case did not have a gun on her, (fact) so assuming the rape would not have taken place had she had one is completely hypothetical. neither you nor I can answer that with absolute certainty. unless of course you are trying to suggest that all gun owners are impervious to crimes against them. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common sense dictates. Take away a woman's option to protect herself, as she sees fit is, IMO, the same as giving an attacker the upper hand. I like a thing I read the other day. Gal says, "I carry already, I'm 5'2" and a bullet to the Brain would stop Rape in a Heartbeat. If I'm ever arrested for Carrying, I'd let a Jury decide my fate as I press the Constitutional Arguement that gives me the Right to Carry as I will also Argue that by the time the Police Arrive; I would already be a victim of some crime." Let's just hope she wouldn't have a jury full of liberals. Arrested for carrying? Is she carrying in a place where it's not legal? there you go asking questions again. remember, "it won't work". you are just supposed to agree. asking dumb questions doesn't need an answer...the answer to about 90% of her questions are right above her, as in this case it was all explained in the thread she responded to...as i can see your not very good at reading either... is that a liberal thing? I don't know you tell me, you seem to be the one with the super human powers of intuition, always trying to label people you know nothing about. does the thought of someone, anyone, having a belief system that does not directly line up with yours scare you this much? here's the thing, the student in this case did not have a gun on her, (fact) so assuming the rape would not have taken place had she had one is completely hypothetical. neither you nor I can answer that with absolute certainty. unless of course you are trying to suggest that all gun owners are impervious to crimes against them. i have an idea... why don't you worry about you, and let me worry about people i know nothing about... her belief system has nothing to do with this, because all she did was ask the same dumb question 4 times, without saying what she believes or doesn't believe. so your whole point means nothing there... i see your in the same mindframe as the libs around... guns don't stop crimes, banning guns won't stop crimes... guns are a deterrent, nothing more... if a criminal/rapist knows their victim has a gun, they will think twice... so why don't you enlighten us on why your anti-gun? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A bit strange that no one can answer my questions. it's a dumb question, not worthy of an answer...typical liberal tactics, trying to evade the issue by clouding it with stupid questions... Imagine that. Telling me my question is dumb, because you could not give me an exact quote to answer the question. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A bit strange that no one can answer my questions. it's a dumb question, not worthy of an answer...typical liberal tactics, trying to evade the issue by clouding it with stupid questions... Imagine that. Telling me my question is dumb, because you could not give me an exact quote to answer the question. imagine that, i answered it the first time, and your still asking it... even JB answered it, and you still can't figure it out... liberals are liberals... have to treat them like little kids, because they don't know any better... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actually, you didn't provide the quote I asked for. Please feel free to try again, though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actually, you didn't provide the quote I asked for. Please feel free to try again, though. ehh, your on your own there... i won't keep answering the same question over and over to someone who won't understand... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common sense dictates. Take away a woman's option to protect herself, as she sees fit is, IMO, the same as giving an attacker the upper hand. I like a thing I read the other day. Gal says, "I carry already, I'm 5'2" and a bullet to the Brain would stop Rape in a Heartbeat. If I'm ever arrested for Carrying, I'd let a Jury decide my fate as I press the Constitutional Arguement that gives me the Right to Carry as I will also Argue that by the time the Police Arrive; I would already be a victim of some crime." Let's just hope she wouldn't have a jury full of liberals. Arrested for carrying? Is she carrying in a place where it's not legal? there you go asking questions again. remember, "it won't work". you are just supposed to agree. asking dumb questions doesn't need an answer...the answer to about 90% of her questions are right above her, as in this case it was all explained in the thread she responded to...as i can see your not very good at reading either... is that a liberal thing? I don't know you tell me, you seem to be the one with the super human powers of intuition, always trying to label people you know nothing about. does the thought of someone, anyone, having a belief system that does not directly line up with yours scare you this much? here's the thing, the student in this case did not have a gun on her, (fact) so assuming the rape would not have taken place had she had one is completely hypothetical. neither you nor I can answer that with absolute certainty. unless of course you are trying to suggest that all gun owners are impervious to crimes against them. i have an idea... why don't you worry about you, and let me worry about people i know nothing about... her belief system has nothing to do with this, because all she did was ask the same dumb question 4 times, without saying what she believes or doesn't believe. so your whole point means nothing there... i see your in the same mindframe as the libs around... guns don't stop crimes, banning guns won't stop crimes... guns are a deterrent, nothing more... if a criminal/rapist knows their victim has a gun, they will think twice... so why don't you enlighten us on why your anti-gun? I wasn’t talking about her beliefs; I was talking about your comment at the end of your response to me. “is this a liberal thing?” I am the one you know nothing about, yet this is not the first time you have assumed that you know me by calling me the dreaded “l” word. haha…I do enjoy the way in which, in your infinite wisdom, you use it to automatically dismiss any idea or person that doesn’t agree with you. your assumption that I am anti-gun just shows how closed minded you really are. not in the sixteen words (or so) I posted to her asking questions, nor in my response to you directly, did I say was pro or anti anything. I was wondering though, like she was, just who would make such a statement. still, as of this moment no one has produced a quote that backs up the op’s headline. why?...because it is an asinine blanket statement mean to get attention, and it has absolutely no factual base on which to stand. by the way, I do happen to own two guns. this fact, and the fact that I had three of them with me in 1989, while living in phoenix, did not prevent me from being car-jacked. you see, while I was inside paying, my friend,( who just spent the morning with me, target shooting in the desert.) was returning the nozzle to the gas pump when some guy walked up and put a gun to his ribs. I had two guns under my seat and the other tucked down between the seat and the console, and I was helpless. had I pulled my gun there may have been two dead people and possibly three, that day. now how’s that for someone you assume is anti gun? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common sense dictates. Take away a woman's option to protect herself, as she sees fit is, IMO, the same as giving an attacker the upper hand. I like a thing I read the other day. Gal says, "I carry already, I'm 5'2" and a bullet to the Brain would stop Rape in a Heartbeat. If I'm ever arrested for Carrying, I'd let a Jury decide my fate as I press the Constitutional Arguement that gives me the Right to Carry as I will also Argue that by the time the Police Arrive; I would already be a victim of some crime." Let's just hope she wouldn't have a jury full of liberals. Arrested for carrying? Is she carrying in a place where it's not legal? there you go asking questions again. remember, "it won't work". you are just supposed to agree. asking dumb questions doesn't need an answer...the answer to about 90% of her questions are right above her, as in this case it was all explained in the thread she responded to...as i can see your not very good at reading either... is that a liberal thing? I don't know you tell me, you seem to be the one with the super human powers of intuition, always trying to label people you know nothing about. does the thought of someone, anyone, having a belief system that does not directly line up with yours scare you this much? here's the thing, the student in this case did not have a gun on her, (fact) so assuming the rape would not have taken place had she had one is completely hypothetical. neither you nor I can answer that with absolute certainty. unless of course you are trying to suggest that all gun owners are impervious to crimes against them. i have an idea... why don't you worry about you, and let me worry about people i know nothing about... her belief system has nothing to do with this, because all she did was ask the same dumb question 4 times, without saying what she believes or doesn't believe. so your whole point means nothing there... i see your in the same mindframe as the libs around... guns don't stop crimes, banning guns won't stop crimes... guns are a deterrent, nothing more... if a criminal/rapist knows their victim has a gun, they will think twice... so why don't you enlighten us on why your anti-gun? I wasn’t talking about her beliefs; I was talking about your comment at the end of your response to me. “is this a liberal thing?” I am the one you know nothing about, yet this is not the first time you have assumed that you know me by calling me the dreaded “l” word. haha…I do enjoy the way in which, in your infinite wisdom, you use it to automatically dismiss any idea or person that doesn’t agree with you. your assumption that I am anti-gun just shows how closed minded you really are. not in the sixteen words (or so) I posted to her asking questions, nor in my response to you directly, did I say was pro or anti anything. I was wondering though, like she was, just who would make such a statement. still, as of this moment no one has produced a quote that backs up the op’s headline. why?...because it is an asinine blanket statement mean to get attention, and it has absolutely no factual base on which to stand. by the way, I do happen to own two guns. this fact, and the fact that I had three of them with me in 1989, while living in phoenix, did not prevent me from being car-jacked. you see, while I was inside paying, my friend,( who just spent the morning with me, target shooting in the desert.) was returning the nozzle to the gas pump when some guy walked up and put a gun to his ribs. I had two guns under my seat and the other tucked down between the seat and the console, and I was helpless. had I pulled my gun there may have been two dead people and possibly three, that day. now how’s that for someone you assume is anti gun? oh, i see... you just posted on here to attack me...go for it, attack away... anything else i'm doing on here you want to get off your chest? now is the time, before they delete it... and you can't read either, like i told your fellow libber, it's been answered more than once, i won't treat you like babies because you just want to argue... reread the thread, if your able to, and tell me what i wrote the first time it was asked... if your not able to, then lets just drop the whole thing, i really don't want to argue with someone that doesn't have any sense.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actually, you didn't provide the quote I asked for. Please feel free to try again, though. ehh, your on your own there... i won't keep answering the same question over and over to someone who won't understand... No, I understand that you cannot provide a specific quote of someone saying they prefer women be raped. I can see that quite clearly from your responses. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stop making the posts personal. Everyone knows the rules of the forums. Keep it on the topic.
1) Do not attack/slam/insult others. You can discuss the message or topic, but not the messenger - NO EXCEPTIONS. If you are attacked by another user, use the Report Post link within that post. If you reciprocate instead, YOU will also be subject to the same consequences as the attacker. Defending yourself, defending a friend, etc. are NOT excuses. Violations of this rule are taken very seriously and may result in being banned without warning! Get it back to the topic. Kim |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you haven't watched this video,watch it....because...............
"THIS MAY BE THE BEST ARGUMENT FOR THE SECOND AMENDMENT".... http://www.ijreview.com/2013/01/32514-this-may-be-the-best-argument-for-the-second-amendment/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you haven't watched this video,watch it....because............... "THIS MAY BE THE BEST ARGUMENT FOR THE SECOND AMENDMENT".... http://www.ijreview.com/2013/01/32514-this-may-be-the-best-argument-for-the-second-amendment/ how sad... |
|
|
|
|
