Topic: Liberals prefer Women be Unarmed and Raped | |
---|---|
Conrad,
Your constitution was amendment a second time that is why they called it the second amendment. This means you can actually amend you constitution. However, if you wish to live in a society in which you fear others having guns and therefore need to be armed yourself then go for it. Just don't bleed on about massacres and the death rate (per 100 hundred thousand) that is way and above any other comparable country. PS: I have said nothing about being afraid of guns just the opportunity that unbalanced people have to get them. |
|
|
|
Can I also add that you must have one hell of a country when you are so scared of the people that you elect (I think that is what you call it) to those very positions.
|
|
|
|
No one can know who is or is not "stable or unstable" or should or should not be "allowed" to have a weapon. If you put that power into the hands of shrinks or counselors, then people who might need counseling will be afraid to even have an appointment for any reason. Forced mental evaluations will become the norm where people are abducted (arrested?) and forced to undergo a mental evaluation. A person's right to bear arms can easily be infringed on the word of some doctor. Also, the true psychopaths can fool any shrink. there is no need for forced mental evaluations, plenty of people have doctors, and those who commit crimes can undergo mandatory evaulation as a condition of bail or probation,,, it wont stop everyone, but it will stop those who are suffering trauma that has caused mental breaks , and are already under counseling along with registering, it will be valuable in revoking permits (like we do licenses with drunk drivers) from those who exhibit illegal and violent behaviors,, etc its not dumb at all, its a precaution,,, its dumb to do nothing except grieve after preventable deaths happen,,, Dictatorship of the Masses anyone? I thought that life was an inalienable right but it seems that is conditional to. So what right is unconditional? |
|
|
|
I would like to own multiple guns. One for Tom, one for Dick, and one for Harry. Tom said Dick is too Harry to have a gun...That didn't come out right, did it You think that one didn't come out right? Go read what you posted on the prude thread. Who said what? Considering the topic, I thought it was funny... Maybe I just need to get lai.....never mind!... |
|
|
|
I would like to own multiple guns. One for Tom, one for Dick, and one for Harry. Tom said Dick is too Harry to have a gun...That didn't come out right, did it Tom and Harry are pretty cool. Dick sometimes runs around half-cocked, loses his head and shoots prematurely. |
|
|
|
I would like to own multiple guns. One for Tom, one for Dick, and one for Harry. Tom said Dick is too Harry to have a gun...That didn't come out right, did it You think that one didn't come out right? Go read what you posted on the prude thread. Who said what? Considering the topic, I thought it was funny... Maybe I just need to get lai.....never mind!... You and me both. |
|
|
|
She and Liberals really believe this crap.
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Leigh2154
on
Fri 03/15/13 07:54 AM
|
|
She and Liberals really believe this crap. Crap is right...First thing that came to mind when I read this was the looting that takes place after disasters leave people and their possessions vulnerable.... |
|
|
|
How often do you hear about a Gunman going on a shooting spree at a gun show?
|
|
|
|
Conrad, Your constitution was amendment a second time that is why they called it the second amendment. This means you can actually amend you constitution. However, if you wish to live in a society in which you fear others having guns and therefore need to be armed yourself then go for it. Just don't bleed on about massacres and the death rate (per 100 hundred thousand) that is way and above any other comparable country. PS: I have said nothing about being afraid of guns just the opportunity that unbalanced people have to get them. You really need to do some serious reading! |
|
|
|
Edited by
Conrad_73
on
Fri 03/15/13 11:24 AM
|
|
No one can know who is or is not "stable or unstable" or should or should not be "allowed" to have a weapon. If you put that power into the hands of shrinks or counselors, then people who might need counseling will be afraid to even have an appointment for any reason. Forced mental evaluations will become the norm where people are abducted (arrested?) and forced to undergo a mental evaluation. A person's right to bear arms can easily be infringed on the word of some doctor. Also, the true psychopaths can fool any shrink. there is no need for forced mental evaluations, plenty of people have doctors, and those who commit crimes can undergo mandatory evaulation as a condition of bail or probation,,, it wont stop everyone, but it will stop those who are suffering trauma that has caused mental breaks , and are already under counseling along with registering, it will be valuable in revoking permits (like we do licenses with drunk drivers) from those who exhibit illegal and violent behaviors,, etc its not dumb at all, its a precaution,,, its dumb to do nothing except grieve after preventable deaths happen,,, Dictatorship of the Masses anyone? I thought that life was an inalienable right but it seems that is conditional to. So what right is unconditional? The Right To Selfdefense is what it's all about! Unless,of course,you plan to turn the Other Cheek! |
|
|
|
How often do you hear about a Gunman going on a shooting spree at a gun show? |
|
|
|
She and Liberals really believe this crap. |
|
|