100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Where was God? | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
And the one after jesus does not represent anything? If someone coming behind him of importance does not represent anything, then his coming means nothing. How can he be of importance and not represent anything? On the contrary, if he is of importance then he is obviousely representing something of significant. That person is the holy ghost, which is indeed symbolic of the arrival of truth which is the holy, and he will come as a thief in the night which is what ghost means, he will arrive when you least expect him, a man. Hardly someone who does not "represent" nothing, he will represent the truth. Truth long denied and distorted by the minions of evil and the archdeciever, also a man.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And the one after jesus does not represent anything? If someone coming behind him of importance does not represent anything, then his coming means nothing. How can he be of importance and not represent anything? On the contrary, if he is of importance then he is obviousely representing something of significant. That person is the holy ghost, which is indeed symbolic of the arrival of truth which is the holy, and he will come as a thief in the night which is what ghost means, he will arrive when you least expect him, a man. Hardly someone who does not "represent" nothing, he will represent the truth. Truth long denied and distorted by the minions of evil and the archdeciever, also a man. He does not represent something as in he is not figuratively speaking. Jesus said literally someone will come after him. And in many passages before that, he talks about sending a comforter. But it is literally a being that will come after Jesus, again he is not saying anything figuratively or parable or anything of that such. We know this because he said it many times again about someone after him, him sending a comforter and so on. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Ras427
on
Sun 12/30/12 08:28 PM
|
|
And the one after jesus does not represent anything? If someone coming behind him of importance does not represent anything, then his coming means nothing. How can he be of importance and not represent anything? On the contrary, if he is of importance then he is obviousely representing something of significant. That person is the holy ghost, which is indeed symbolic of the arrival of truth which is the holy, and he will come as a thief in the night which is what ghost means, he will arrive when you least expect him, a man. Hardly someone who does not "represent" nothing, he will represent the truth. Truth long denied and distorted by the minions of evil and the archdeciever, also a man. He does not represent something as in he is not figuratively speaking. Jesus said literally someone will come after him. And in many passages before that, he talks about sending a comforter. But it is literally a being that will come after Jesus, again he is not saying anything figuratively or parable or anything of that such. We know this because he said it many times again about someone after him, him sending a comforter and so on. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And the one after jesus does not represent anything? If someone coming behind him of importance does not represent anything, then his coming means nothing. How can he be of importance and not represent anything? On the contrary, if he is of importance then he is obviousely representing something of significant. That person is the holy ghost, which is indeed symbolic of the arrival of truth which is the holy, and he will come as a thief in the night which is what ghost means, he will arrive when you least expect him, a man. Hardly someone who does not "represent" nothing, he will represent the truth. Truth long denied and distorted by the minions of evil and the archdeciever, also a man. He does not represent something as in he is not figuratively speaking. Jesus said literally someone will come after him. And in many passages before that, he talks about sending a comforter. But it is literally a being that will come after Jesus, again he is not saying anything figuratively or parable or anything of that such. We know this because he said it many times again about someone after him, him sending a comforter and so on. How would that make him have greater significance then Jesus? Jesus did what no other being ever could. He died for your sins and was the ultimate sacrifice for any and all sins. Nothing could be greater then that. No one can come to the Father but through Jesus Christ, again nothing could be more significant then that. So please do elaborate. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And the one after jesus does not represent anything? If someone coming behind him of importance does not represent anything, then his coming means nothing. How can he be of importance and not represent anything? On the contrary, if he is of importance then he is obviousely representing something of significant. That person is the holy ghost, which is indeed symbolic of the arrival of truth which is the holy, and he will come as a thief in the night which is what ghost means, he will arrive when you least expect him, a man. Hardly someone who does not "represent" nothing, he will represent the truth. Truth long denied and distorted by the minions of evil and the archdeciever, also a man. He does not represent something as in he is not figuratively speaking. Jesus said literally someone will come after him. And in many passages before that, he talks about sending a comforter. But it is literally a being that will come after Jesus, again he is not saying anything figuratively or parable or anything of that such. We know this because he said it many times again about someone after him, him sending a comforter and so on. How would that make him have greater significance then Jesus? Jesus did what no other being ever could. He died for your sins and was the ultimate sacrifice for any and all sins. Nothing could be greater then that. No one can come to the Father but through Jesus Christ, again nothing could be more significant then that. So please do elaborate. The last prophecy fulfillment is no more important then the first. Everyone of them has their significance in one way or other, all equally important or they would never have happened. So again, please elaborate on why/how it's greater then Jesus. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The final prophecy has not happened yet, how can it be equel in significence? They are only significant in there completion, thereby making the final prophecy the most important in that according to scripture the arrival of the spirit of truth (holy ghost) who will come undetected (ghost) and bring the truth (holy) and expose the devil.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
funches
on
Mon 12/31/12 06:55 AM
|
|
ok so far in this thread we have believers claiming that it's ok to put people to sleep and take their organs and body parts, without their permission or knowledge
we have believers claiming that it's ok for Fathers to impregnant their daughters we have believers claiming that it's ok for daughter to be impregnanted by their Fathers as long as the daughters agree we have believers claiming that it's ok for someone to kill a group of people because it's not Murder...it's a Judgement so is this the type of morality one gets from God? so if you want to know "Where was God?" during the massacre ...he was most likely there also the message from "Huckabee" in the video was pure deception ...exactly who's God was Huckabee referring to? ...."Fox News" is clearly not a News Organization that promote the worship of Allah in the public schools imagine christan kids coming home after school and want to start practicing Islam or want to start reading The Satanic Bible ...parents would start a Holy War trying to get God out of the public schools if you allow one God in the school you have to allow all Gods that are approved by the government into the schools but why did Huckabee blame the public schools and not the church, especially since the shooter did attend church .....and that is why Huckabees's Message in the video was pure deception |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ok so far in this thread we have believers claiming that it's ok to put people to sleep and take their organs and body parts, without their permission or knowledge we have believers claiming that it's ok for Fathers to impregnant their daughters we have believers claiming that it's ok for daughter to be impregnanted by their Fathers as long as the daughters agree we have believers claiming that it's ok for someone to kill a group of people because it's not Murder...it's a Judgement so is this the type of morality one gets from God? so if you want to know "Where was God?" during the massacre ...he was most likely there also the message from "Huckabee" in the video was pure deception ...exactly who's God was Huckabee referring to? ...."Fox News" is clearly not a News Organization that promote the worship of Allah in the public schools imagine christan kids coming home after school and want to start practicing Islam or want to start reading The Satanic Bible ...parents would start a Holy War trying to get God out of the public schools if you allow one God in the school you have to allow all Gods that are approved by the government into the schools but why did Huckabee blame the public schools and not the church, especially since the shooter did attend church .....and that is why Huckabees's Message in the video was pure deception we have believers claiming that it's ok for Fathers to impregnant their daughters we have believers claiming that it's ok for daughter to be impregnanted by their Fathers as long as the daughters agree we have believers claiming that it's ok for someone to kill a group of people because it's not Murder...it's a Judgement 1 - No it's not ok fathers to impregnate their daughters. We are only children of God spiritually, not physically. This physical body PURELY pertains to this world as it is now. We will not always have this flesh, this flesh is merely temporary we are not. 2 - Same as bullet 1. 3 - No it is not ok for someone to kill a group of people. Murder is murder. It isn't even ok or right for a judge to sentence someone to death thus then carrying it out. Murder is murder, doesn't matter who you are or what you call it. God is the only one that has the right to judge anyone for their deeds. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 - No it's not ok fathers to impregnate their daughters. We are only children of God spiritually, not physically. This physical body PURELY pertains to this world as it is now. We will not always have this flesh, this flesh is merely temporary we are not. ok..allow me to rephrase...believers claim that it's ok for spiritual Fathers to impregnant their spiritual daughters with a physical baby .....spiritual imbreeding, spiritual child abuse...a lack of morals 3 - No it is not ok for someone to kill a group of people. Murder is murder. It isn't even ok or right for a judge to sentence someone to death thus then carrying it out. Murder is murder, doesn't matter who you are or what you call it. God is the only one that has the right to judge anyone for their deeds. if you claim that it's ok for God to murder....then you condone murder ....a lack of morals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 - No it's not ok fathers to impregnate their daughters. We are only children of God spiritually, not physically. This physical body PURELY pertains to this world as it is now. We will not always have this flesh, this flesh is merely temporary we are not. ok..allow me to rephrase...believers claim that it's ok for spiritual Fathers to impregnant their spiritual daughters with a physical baby .....spiritual imbreeding, spiritual child abuse...a lack of morals 3 - No it is not ok for someone to kill a group of people. Murder is murder. It isn't even ok or right for a judge to sentence someone to death thus then carrying it out. Murder is murder, doesn't matter who you are or what you call it. God is the only one that has the right to judge anyone for their deeds. if you claim that it's ok for God to murder....then you condone murder ....a lack of morals God does not murder, he righteously judges. Murder - The unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another God's judgement is lawful. So again, it couldn't possibly be murder. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 - No it's not ok fathers to impregnate their daughters. We are only children of God spiritually, not physically. This physical body PURELY pertains to this world as it is now. We will not always have this flesh, this flesh is merely temporary we are not. ok..allow me to rephrase...believers claim that it's ok for spiritual Fathers to impregnant their spiritual daughters with a physical baby .....spiritual imbreeding, spiritual child abuse...a lack of morals 3 - No it is not ok for someone to kill a group of people. Murder is murder. It isn't even ok or right for a judge to sentence someone to death thus then carrying it out. Murder is murder, doesn't matter who you are or what you call it. God is the only one that has the right to judge anyone for their deeds. if you claim that it's ok for God to murder....then you condone murder ....a lack of morals God does not murder, he righteously judges. Murder - The unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another God's judgement is lawful. So again, it couldn't possibly be murder. as I stated earlier..you learn from God that Murder is Judgement...that would explain why God didn't stop the shooter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Murder - The unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another so you approve of E.T. the Extraterrestrial killing humans E.T. stop murdering humans and phone home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 - No it's not ok fathers to impregnate their daughters. We are only children of God spiritually, not physically. This physical body PURELY pertains to this world as it is now. We will not always have this flesh, this flesh is merely temporary we are not. ok..allow me to rephrase...believers claim that it's ok for spiritual Fathers to impregnant their spiritual daughters with a physical baby .....spiritual imbreeding, spiritual child abuse...a lack of morals 3 - No it is not ok for someone to kill a group of people. Murder is murder. It isn't even ok or right for a judge to sentence someone to death thus then carrying it out. Murder is murder, doesn't matter who you are or what you call it. God is the only one that has the right to judge anyone for their deeds. if you claim that it's ok for God to murder....then you condone murder ....a lack of morals God does not murder, he righteously judges. Murder - The unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another God's judgement is lawful. So again, it couldn't possibly be murder. as I stated earlier..you learn from God that Murder is Judgement...that would explain why God didn't stop the shooter No funches lol, murder is not judgement. If it is a lawful taking the life of another, it couldn't even possibly be "murder", because again murder is the unlawful taking the life of another. You're a real funny man Funches, gotta love it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Murder - The unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another so you approve of E.T. the Extraterrestrial killing humans E.T. stop murdering humans and phone home I've seen the movie E.T. but I don't remember him killing anyone.. hmmm. Because God is not an E.T. He is not a terrestrial. Terrestrial - An inhabitant of the earth God is not an inhabitant of the Earth. Heaven is God's home. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 - No it's not ok fathers to impregnate their daughters. We are only children of God spiritually, not physically. This physical body PURELY pertains to this world as it is now. We will not always have this flesh, this flesh is merely temporary we are not. ok..allow me to rephrase...believers claim that it's ok for spiritual Fathers to impregnant their spiritual daughters with a physical baby .....spiritual imbreeding, spiritual child abuse...a lack of morals 3 - No it is not ok for someone to kill a group of people. Murder is murder. It isn't even ok or right for a judge to sentence someone to death thus then carrying it out. Murder is murder, doesn't matter who you are or what you call it. God is the only one that has the right to judge anyone for their deeds. if you claim that it's ok for God to murder....then you condone murder ....a lack of morals God does not murder, he righteously judges. Murder - The unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another God's judgement is lawful. So again, it couldn't possibly be murder. as I stated earlier..you learn from God that Murder is Judgement...that would explain why God didn't stop the shooter No funches lol, murder is not judgement. If it is a lawful taking the life of another, it couldn't even possibly be "murder", because again murder is the unlawful taking the life of another. You're a real funny man Funches, gotta love it. well if you wish to get legal about it....then you approve of intentional manslaughter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Murder - The unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another so you approve of E.T. the Extraterrestrial killing humans E.T. stop murdering humans and phone home I've seen the movie E.T. but I don't remember him killing anyone.. hmmm. Because God is not an E.T. He is not a terrestrial. Terrestrial - An inhabitant of the earth God is not an inhabitant of the Earth. Heaven is God's home. didn't you also see the movie 'Aliens" ..according to you it's ok for Aliens to kill humans ... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 - No it's not ok fathers to impregnate their daughters. We are only children of God spiritually, not physically. This physical body PURELY pertains to this world as it is now. We will not always have this flesh, this flesh is merely temporary we are not. ok..allow me to rephrase...believers claim that it's ok for spiritual Fathers to impregnant their spiritual daughters with a physical baby .....spiritual imbreeding, spiritual child abuse...a lack of morals 3 - No it is not ok for someone to kill a group of people. Murder is murder. It isn't even ok or right for a judge to sentence someone to death thus then carrying it out. Murder is murder, doesn't matter who you are or what you call it. God is the only one that has the right to judge anyone for their deeds. if you claim that it's ok for God to murder....then you condone murder ....a lack of morals God does not murder, he righteously judges. Murder - The unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another God's judgement is lawful. So again, it couldn't possibly be murder. as I stated earlier..you learn from God that Murder is Judgement...that would explain why God didn't stop the shooter No funches lol, murder is not judgement. If it is a lawful taking the life of another, it couldn't even possibly be "murder", because again murder is the unlawful taking the life of another. You're a real funny man Funches, gotta love it. well if you wish to get legal about it....then you approve of intentional manslaughter What are you talking about now funches? Man slaughter? No Funches. Manslaughter would be aligned with murder. And again, that is unlawful taking the life of another. And God could not do this, for he is law, he is "God" the one with authority over us. God has told us the consequence for our disobedience, so it's not like a big surprise. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Murder - The unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another so you approve of E.T. the Extraterrestrial killing humans E.T. stop murdering humans and phone home I've seen the movie E.T. but I don't remember him killing anyone.. hmmm. Because God is not an E.T. He is not a terrestrial. Terrestrial - An inhabitant of the earth God is not an inhabitant of the Earth. Heaven is God's home. didn't you also see the movie 'Aliens" ..according to you it's ok for Aliens to kill humans ... Have no idea what you're talking about, sounds like you watch to much science-fiction movies. God is not an alien either. An alien is something to a foreign land/area. This is not a foreign place for God. God created this world, thus again it is not foreign to him. So what's your point? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 - No it's not ok fathers to impregnate their daughters. We are only children of God spiritually, not physically. This physical body PURELY pertains to this world as it is now. We will not always have this flesh, this flesh is merely temporary we are not. ok..allow me to rephrase...believers claim that it's ok for spiritual Fathers to impregnant their spiritual daughters with a physical baby .....spiritual imbreeding, spiritual child abuse...a lack of morals 3 - No it is not ok for someone to kill a group of people. Murder is murder. It isn't even ok or right for a judge to sentence someone to death thus then carrying it out. Murder is murder, doesn't matter who you are or what you call it. God is the only one that has the right to judge anyone for their deeds. if you claim that it's ok for God to murder....then you condone murder ....a lack of morals God does not murder, he righteously judges. Murder - The unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another God's judgement is lawful. So again, it couldn't possibly be murder. as I stated earlier..you learn from God that Murder is Judgement...that would explain why God didn't stop the shooter No funches lol, murder is not judgement. If it is a lawful taking the life of another, it couldn't even possibly be "murder", because again murder is the unlawful taking the life of another. You're a real funny man Funches, gotta love it. well if you wish to get legal about it....then you approve of intentional manslaughter What are you talking about now funches? Man slaughter? No Funches. Manslaughter would be aligned with murder. And again, that is unlawful taking the life of another. And God could not do this, for he is law, he is "God" the one with authority over us. God has told us the consequence for our disobedience, so it's not like a big surprise. "Render unto Ceasar" is why God is not the law..and this is why your attmept to find loopholes for your God to intentionally murder others is immoral.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 - No it's not ok fathers to impregnate their daughters. We are only children of God spiritually, not physically. This physical body PURELY pertains to this world as it is now. We will not always have this flesh, this flesh is merely temporary we are not. ok..allow me to rephrase...believers claim that it's ok for spiritual Fathers to impregnant their spiritual daughters with a physical baby .....spiritual imbreeding, spiritual child abuse...a lack of morals 3 - No it is not ok for someone to kill a group of people. Murder is murder. It isn't even ok or right for a judge to sentence someone to death thus then carrying it out. Murder is murder, doesn't matter who you are or what you call it. God is the only one that has the right to judge anyone for their deeds. if you claim that it's ok for God to murder....then you condone murder ....a lack of morals God does not murder, he righteously judges. Murder - The unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another God's judgement is lawful. So again, it couldn't possibly be murder. as I stated earlier..you learn from God that Murder is Judgement...that would explain why God didn't stop the shooter No funches lol, murder is not judgement. If it is a lawful taking the life of another, it couldn't even possibly be "murder", because again murder is the unlawful taking the life of another. You're a real funny man Funches, gotta love it. well if you wish to get legal about it....then you approve of intentional manslaughter What are you talking about now funches? Man slaughter? No Funches. Manslaughter would be aligned with murder. And again, that is unlawful taking the life of another. And God could not do this, for he is law, he is "God" the one with authority over us. God has told us the consequence for our disobedience, so it's not like a big surprise. "Render unto Ceasar" is why God is not the law..and this is why your attmept to find loopholes for your God to intentionally murder others is immoral.... Please don't paraphrase things that are said Funches. Mark 12:17 17 And Jesus answering said unto them, Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's. And they marvelled at him. |
|
|
|
|
