So what?

It is a major media article, not a conspiracy theory.

It was meant to show you the mix-up concerning two airplanes that were supposed to have been destroyed.

Are we expected to believe that someone painted these numbers on some old planes?

Where is the close and personal investigation of these planes? When were they built? What is the The ICAO identification number of these planes and why isn't this mentioned or investigated in this article?

You posted it on page 5!....Now it all makes sense!... You don't even know what you are pulling and posting!...You don't even read your own posts!!!

Here...Maybe this will help....It's your post!

POSTED BY BESTINSHOW ON PAGE 5 OF THIS THREAD and reposted per his request....

light data recorder expert Dennis Cimino, commercial pilot with more than 2000 hours, reveals government's claims about a flight data recorder found at the Pentagon from Flight 77 are totally fraudulent, with zeros instead of the plane's identification number and flight number! The recorder did not come from an airliner but was apparently created at a workbench and was also missing data that an actual flight would have, such as mandatory barometric adjustments and even any record of the cockpit door opening. The talk was given June 17, 2012 at the Vancouver 911 Hearing. Please visit pilotsfor911truth.org... for more information.

The questions in my mind about these flight numbers being reinstated are this:

Are these brand new just built planes with new ICAO identification numbers?

Or are these some old planes being given these numbers? If so, why would old planes need "new numbers?"

The article does not address any of those questions. Very poor reporting.

snippet from the article:



Consider for what? Are these brand new planes with new ICAO identification numbers?



What a bunch of sentimental and distracting rhetoric and garbage.

Instead, they should be demanding answers and asking questions about these planes.

Where are the real investigators?





More emotional poppy cock.

Investigate the actual planes!

If they are newly built planes with new numbers on them, I want to know. If not, I am going to think that these are the planes that did not get used for the attack on the World trade center.

When Mr Conrad pointed out that the flight recorder from the pentagon was recovered it was news to me being the cockpit conversations and hijacking would be on it and I was surprised I hadn't heard about it so I goggled it.

Really it would make interesting news print to have all those details don't ya think? Again one is left wondering why the information was not released to media or public.

Don't you think it would be "BIG" news?

Again I was not aware it was even recovered until Mr. Conrad was so kind as to point it out yet information on it was never released?

Maybe I will be surprised again and the conversations were released on some slow news day but I doubt it since I did google it AFTER Mr Conrad pointed it out.

I don't believe any cock pit recorders were recovered.

And if they were, why has the contents not been revealed to the public?

The only conclusion I can draw is because the contents of said recorder will not support the lies we have been fed.

May I suggest more research on credible sites?...

I would suggest that the entire conversations in the cabin would have been recorded and it would have made a fine news hour to hear those conversations from take off to crash all recorded for historical record.

were are they?

You do know that content has been revealed to immediate family members of the victims, right?

If you do some research, you can answer your own questions .....

hile the media plays up the significance of the government show trial of the seemingly deranged “20th hijacker” Zacharias Moussaoui, not one 9-11 victim’s lawsuit has been allowed to be heard in a trial by jury. Why have the 9-11 victims’ families not been given the same right to have their cases heard in an open trial?

Ellen Mariani, who lost her husband Neil on United Air Lines (UAL) Flight 175, filed the first 9-11 wrongful death lawsuit against UAL on Dec. 20, 2001. Mariani was interviewed on national television in May 2002 by Bill O’Reilly of Fox News, who repeatedly questioned her about why she had chosen to pursue litigation instead of accepting the government fund.

“I want justice,” Mariani said. “I want accountability. Who is responsible? I want the truth.”

Today, Mariani, like the other 9-11 plaintiffs, is under a gag order which prevents her from speaking about her ongoing lawsuit. Likewise, thousands of employees of federal agencies like the Federal Aviation Administration have received gag orders in the mail keeping them from telling what they know about the events of 9-11.

After more than four years, however, Mariani’s determined pursuit for the truth about 9-11 through the court system has failed to yield any answers or discovery about who is responsible for 9-11. Today, she is no closer to obtaining what she has stated she wanted from the beginning—a trial by jury.
http://www.mathaba.net/news/?x=534550

Play time is over for now I have important matters to attend to.

So I would like for a real investigative reporter to insist on seeing and learning about the ICAO numbers on the planes that were "mistakenly" or "inadvertently" reinstated as flight numbers 93 and 175, which had only been "retired" (not listed as destroyed) since the terror attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

"We discovered that flight numbers 93 and 175 were inadvertently reinstated in our future schedule. We regret the error, apologize and are taking immediate steps to remove the numbers from our system," United says in a post on its Facebook page.

A special identification number (not just a flight number) is assigned to every registered airplane. The number is sometimes called the ICAO (International Civil Aviation Organization) number, or can be labeled the Mode S number. The reason it is called the ICAO identification is because unlike the registration (N number) it is unique for the world, not just a single country.

About the ICAO numbers:

http://macsblog.com/2011/06/your-not-so-secret-id-number/

So where is the reporting concerning the ICAO numbers of these two planes?

Are these new planes? If so, when were they built and what is their ICAO numbers, and why were they given plane numbers 93 and 175?

An error? Really? How does an error like that happen?

and lastly:

WHERE ARE ALL THE REAL INVESTIGATIVE REPORTERS?

Another lie of course.

And the immediate family members are not talking anyway...

Except maybe only one. They probably paid her a bunch.

I'm sure family members (most of them) have been paid a great deal of money to keep quiet and if that does not work, they were threatened. Many witnesses who were testifying to the bombs on 9-11 have "mysteriously" died.

You can hear about them on youtube.

Take our bribe and keep quiet or risk "having an accident." Or risk your family "having an accident."

They rule by fear, intimidation, threats etc.

But first, they will use bribery and offer you a stack of cash.

Which is counterfeit fiat money, worthless paper from their own printing press.

2,977 x 4 (average size of family) = 11,908 people who are still "not talking" ...Amazing, nothing short of a miracle I tell ya....

There are some who are not only talking, but suing the government.

And "talking" and "talking publicly" are two different things.

First, there are tons of people talking about what they know on the Internet and on Youtube etc.

Second, the major media does not talk or report anything they are not instructed to talk about, and they are told what NOT to talk about.

Nothing short of a miracle...Almost 12,000 (or maybe more) keeping their mouth shut all this time....Stunning, amazing!!!...the stuff movies are made of.....

People are easily bribed and frightened.

That's what corporate terrorism is for.

No Jean, they are not...That is a misconception....

There is one thing that everybody can agree with and that is...911 was not done by a handful of Islamic
fanatics.”