Community > General Religion Chat

Topic: Where in the Genesis is Jesus - part 3
Sin_and_Sorrow Joined Sun 01/01/12 Posts: 5757	Wed 01/18/12 05:46 AM
so if you can not find it in the bible...then it never existed as a law ...Um, God didn't write the Bible. ..and if the contents are 'true'.. He only would have 'written' the context for ten lines; i.e., the Commandments; and that was on stone, not litmus paper. when watching a movie you have to play like the characters are real ...the same thing here.....in the movie "Religion" the character called God did write/inspire the bible Oh..Wait.. we're talking about a movie? o.o a book ..Wow, you just totally confused me. @.@ ..thought you said movie? ..but your talking about the book version.. of a movie? ..or by book do you mean the Bible? o.o

funches Joined Sat 12/01/07 Posts: 12948	Wed 01/18/12 06:07 AM
so if you can not find it in the bible...then it never existed as a law ...Um, God didn't write the Bible. ..and if the contents are 'true'.. He only would have 'written' the context for ten lines; i.e., the Commandments; and that was on stone, not litmus paper. when watching a movie you have to play like the characters are real ...the same thing here.....in the movie "Religion" the character called God did write/inspire the bible Oh..Wait.. we're talking about a movie? o.o a book ..Wow, you just totally confused me. @.@ ..thought you said movie? ..but your talking about the book version.. of a movie? ..or by book do you mean the Bible? o.o in your post you claim that God didn't write the bible and then in the very same post you claim that if the contents are "true" he would have only written ten lines so if seems that you are the one contradicting and confusing yourself or perhaps you are agnostic and don't know it but anyway my point is to debate the bible fairly you have to be willing to play along with the delusions of the believers

Sin_and_Sorrow Joined Sun 01/01/12 Posts: 5757	Wed 01/18/12 06:18 AM
in your post you claim that God didn't write the bible and then in the very same post you claim that if the contents are "true" he would have only written ten lines so if seems that you are the one contradicting and confusing yourself or perhaps you are agnostic and don't know it but anyway my point is to debate the bible fairly you have to be willing to play along with the delusions of the believers That's not contradicting myself. God didn't write the bible. However, if the contents of the Bible are actually 'true'. He would only have been responsible for the Ten Commandments.. ..which I stated was written in stone. How's that contradicting? He didn't write it on Litmus Paper. It would etched it stone, as the story goes. As for my beliefs... I'm certainly not religious, or 'delusional' as you put it. I'm not atheist either. So, not really sure what I am. Agnostic is, what, spiritual or something right? The Bible's just a fictional book in my mind. Decent, but too many hypocritical entries for my blood.

funches Joined Sat 12/01/07 Posts: 12948	Wed 01/18/12 06:41 AM
in your post you claim that God didn't write the bible and then in the very same post you claim that if the contents are "true" he would have only written ten lines so if seems that you are the one contradicting and confusing yourself or perhaps you are agnostic and don't know it but anyway my point is to debate the bible fairly you have to be willing to play along with the delusions of the believers That's not contradicting myself. God didn't write the bible. However, if the contents of the Bible are actually 'true'. He would only have been responsible for the Ten Commandments.. ..which I stated was written in stone. How's that contradicting? He didn't write it on Litmus Paper. It would etched it stone, as the story goes. As for my beliefs... I'm certainly not religious, or 'delusional' as you put it. I'm not atheist either. So, not really sure what I am. Agnostic is, what, spiritual or something right? The Bible's just a fictional book in my mind. Decent, but too many hypocritical entries for my blood. but your post do not reflect that you are not religious I am limited by what you yourself posted just like I am limited to what is posted in the bible first you claim that God "didn't write" the bible and then you claim that if the contents are "true" this is you playing both sides of the coin...which agnostics generally do

funches Joined Sat 12/01/07 Posts: 12948	Wed 01/18/12 06:48 AM
How's that contradicting? He didn't write it on Litmus Paper. It would etched it stone, as the story goes. placing it on litmus paper and opting to using lightning bolts to etch in stone was still constitute as writing copies of then commandment etched in stone would be a daunting task to deliver to everyone which is why they propbably opt to place it in paperback format

Sin_and_Sorrow Joined Sun 01/01/12 Posts: 5757	Wed 01/18/12 06:50 AM
in your post you claim that God didn't write the bible and then in the very same post you claim that if the contents are "true" he would have only written ten lines so if seems that you are the one contradicting and confusing yourself or perhaps you are agnostic and don't know it but anyway my point is to debate the bible fairly you have to be willing to play along with the delusions of the believers That's not contradicting myself. God didn't write the bible. However, if the contents of the Bible are actually 'true'. He would only have been responsible for the Ten Commandments.. ..which I stated was written in stone. How's that contradicting? He didn't write it on Litmus Paper. It would etched it stone, as the story goes. As for my beliefs... I'm certainly not religious, or 'delusional' as you put it. I'm not atheist either. So, not really sure what I am. Agnostic is, what, spiritual or something right? The Bible's just a fictional book in my mind. Decent, but too many hypocritical entries for my blood. but your post do not reflect that you are not religious I am limited by what you yourself posted just like I am limited to what is posted in the bible first you claim that God "didn't write" the bible and then you claim that if the contents are "true" this is you playing both sides of the coin...which agnostics generally do I claimed it? So, you're telling me that God did write the Bible? And the word "IF" specifies an either-or situation. Not contradictory though..

funches Joined Sat 12/01/07 Posts: 12948	Wed 01/18/12 07:01 AM
I claimed it? So, you're telling me that God did write the Bible? And the word "IF" specifies an either-or situation. Not contradictory though.. what I'm saying is if you want to debate the bible...don't act like a parrot and constantly keep repeating that God didn't write the thing....you have to play along with the delusion as if he did for example god didn't write the bible yes he did no he didn't did to did not a serious debater would move beyond that kid stuff and debate what's in the bible not who wrote it

Sin_and_Sorrow Joined Sun 01/01/12 Posts: 5757	Wed 01/18/12 07:05 AM
what I'm saying is if you want to debate the bible...don't act like a parrot and constantly keep repeating that God didn't write the thing....you have to play along with the delusion as if he did for example god didn't write the bible yes he did no he didn't did to did not a serious debater would move beyond that kid stuff and debate what's in the bible not who wrote it Now I know where you're coming from.