Topic: Theists who believe in evolution.
metalwing's photo
Wed 09/07/11 06:28 AM
It is interesting that the theory of evolution has, itself, evolved and is continuing to do so. Originally, natural selection was the whole ball game. The weaker didn't breed and the stronger did to leave stronger offspring. Nitches were filled. Necks grew to reach higher branches, etc. The whole theory could be described as "survival of the fittest" as a form of "natural selection".

There are semantics involved now with the definition of natural selection. Some, like me, think that if you breed great danes to the point where they look like chihuahuas, natural selection was not involved so evolution was not involved. It is simply an experiment by man using biology as a tool.

Evolution is also changes that were NOT caused by "natural selection", the changes were just random. Radiation and other factors cause a constant change in genes that can pass traits on to the new generation also. Molecular biologists have stolen the show in recent times to show the constant changes that have occurred in the human genome due to this effect.

There are some posts here that negate inter species breeding as a form of evolution. However, with the recent ability to quickly analyze the genome of a species, some surprising points have been discovered. Modern humans are the result of interbreeding with other species long ago. Depending upon where your recent ancestors are from, you have a percentage of genes from other hominids that were not homo sapiens. These species would include Denisovans and Neanderthals.

As far as God is concerned. If you believe in God, what is wrong with believing that scientific evolution is his way of making it happen?

msharmony's photo
Wed 09/07/11 06:34 AM
ITs a catch 22 question,, because for those christians who dont believe in evolution as it concerns being from some animal/human hybrid there will be immediate rebuttal/dispute from science lovers who will insist it is proven that we are or that to not believe so is illogical, or crazy,, or whatever

I dont believe that apes and people EVOLVED from the same being, I Think they were both CREATED, by intelligent design...and came from the same 'PLACE',,but not from the same 'creature'

metalwing's photo
Wed 09/07/11 06:47 AM

ITs a catch 22 question,, because for those christians who dont believe in evolution as it concerns being from some animal/human hybrid there will be immediate rebuttal/dispute from science lovers who will insist it is proven that we are or that to not believe so is illogical, or crazy,, or whatever

I dont believe that apes and people EVOLVED from the same being, I Think they were both CREATED, by intelligent design...and came from the same 'PLACE',,but not from the same 'creature'


What place is that?

mykesorrel's photo
Wed 09/07/11 06:56 AM

It is interesting that the theory of evolution has, itself, evolved and is continuing to do so. Originally, natural selection was the whole ball game. The weaker didn't breed and the stronger did to leave stronger offspring. Nitches were filled. Necks grew to reach higher branches, etc. The whole theory could be described as "survival of the fittest" as a form of "natural selection".

There are semantics involved now with the definition of natural selection. Some, like me, think that if you breed great danes to the point where they look like chihuahuas, natural selection was not involved so evolution was not involved. It is simply an experiment by man using biology as a tool.

Evolution is also changes that were NOT caused by "natural selection", the changes were just random. Radiation and other factors cause a constant change in genes that can pass traits on to the new generation also. Molecular biologists have stolen the show in recent times to show the constant changes that have occurred in the human genome due to this effect.

There are some posts here that negate inter species breeding as a form of evolution. However, with the recent ability to quickly analyze the genome of a species, some surprising points have been discovered. Modern humans are the result of interbreeding with other species long ago. Depending upon where your recent ancestors are from, you have a percentage of genes from other hominids that were not homo sapiens. These species would include Denisovans and Neanderthals.

As far as God is concerned. If you believe in God, what is wrong with believing that scientific evolution is his way of making it happen?


Agreed, from a deistic stand point they have all right to say God/Supreme consciousness/whatever started the big bang and everything else came into place, that i will give moderate lead way.

msharmony's photo
Wed 09/07/11 07:22 AM


ITs a catch 22 question,, because for those christians who dont believe in evolution as it concerns being from some animal/human hybrid there will be immediate rebuttal/dispute from science lovers who will insist it is proven that we are or that to not believe so is illogical, or crazy,, or whatever

I dont believe that apes and people EVOLVED from the same being, I Think they were both CREATED, by intelligent design...and came from the same 'PLACE',,but not from the same 'creature'


What place is that?



For christians, it is God, Gods inteligence, and whatever 'place' he chose to create us from,,,

metalwing's photo
Wed 09/07/11 08:03 AM



ITs a catch 22 question,, because for those christians who dont believe in evolution as it concerns being from some animal/human hybrid there will be immediate rebuttal/dispute from science lovers who will insist it is proven that we are or that to not believe so is illogical, or crazy,, or whatever

I dont believe that apes and people EVOLVED from the same being, I Think they were both CREATED, by intelligent design...and came from the same 'PLACE',,but not from the same 'creature'


What place is that?



For christians, it is God, Gods inteligence, and whatever 'place' he chose to create us from,,,


That is pretty vague. I, personally, don't see any conflict between evolution and Christianity. Most of the people I have discussed it with don't either.

s1owhand's photo
Wed 09/07/11 08:11 AM
huh

yeah i don't get it either. there is just no conflict.
so god created evolution so what big deal. evolution
has been clearly and incontrovertibly demonstrated but
it is also a beautiful part of god's world.

the whole thread seems a little odd to me. the title is
"theists who believe in evolution" but the first question
is "why don't you believe in evolution?"

oh well...whatever....

no photo
Wed 09/07/11 08:45 AM
My point in the OP was if evolution by natural selection occurred and we're a common ancestor that evolved from a decedent of great apes, that would cancel out Adam and Eve,



That would depend on what you believe about Adam and Eve.

Some people think that they were a genetic experiment by an advanced race of beings from space designed to upgrade the human species...(who evolved but were not significantly advanced.)

So both evolution and Adam and Eve could have some truth.


no photo
Wed 09/07/11 09:29 AM
Looking at the universe, some have said that we are all made from "stardust."

The Bible says God made Adam from "dust."

Life emerges from apparent inanimate matter. But matter contains atoms and atoms contain information and lots of energy.




jrbogie's photo
Wed 09/07/11 12:05 PM



have scientists 'observed' human evolution? predicted and tested it?



indeed they have. we're immune to viruses that once killed us. out skin pigmentation is changing as we come in from the sun. some people are born without adnoids which we no longer need. the average person is taller today than just one century ago. i could go on.


That's not what I would consider "evolution" from one species to another.



ah, but it is a study in the evolutionary process. evolution is not only about species evolving into other species. it's very much about how species transform in to sub species in order to survive in various climates. polar bears have hollow hairs that a brown bear doesn't have for insulation, for instance.

no photo
Wed 09/07/11 01:44 PM




have scientists 'observed' human evolution? predicted and tested it?



indeed they have. we're immune to viruses that once killed us. out skin pigmentation is changing as we come in from the sun. some people are born without adnoids which we no longer need. the average person is taller today than just one century ago. i could go on.


That's not what I would consider "evolution" from one species to another.



ah, but it is a study in the evolutionary process. evolution is not only about species evolving into other species. it's very much about how species transform in to sub species in order to survive in various climates. polar bears have hollow hairs that a brown bear doesn't have for insulation, for instance.


Yes, that is indeed very interesting. I think those kinds of changes requires changes in DNA.

no photo
Wed 09/07/11 01:57 PM


Yes, that is indeed very interesting. I think those kinds of changes requires changes in DNA.


Yes, that requires changes in the DNA. But those changes are not mediated by mysterious beams of energy! With sexual reproduction, every offspring has a new set of genes that has never before existed in that particular combination. That's a change in the DNA sequence. In term of the relationship between DNA nad morphology, there is absolutely no evidence of any meaningful or relevant 'changes in DNA' other than the well known existence of changes in the sequence and/or number of base pairs. (Which includes large scale additions or subtractions of genes, including missing and extra chromosomes).


Not that you suggested otherwise, but I've been hearing this from other recently so I want to be clear: The fact that evolution requires 'changes in the DNA' does not mean that fringe theories of 'changes due to energy beams', or, as I recently read, 'changes due to vibrations' have any validity.

The changes we know of are chemical, and occur through chemical means (which includes the activities of viruses, cell division, gamete production, various enzymes, and more - but those all come down to chemical reactions).

no photo
Wed 09/07/11 02:36 PM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Wed 09/07/11 02:44 PM



Yes, that is indeed very interesting. I think those kinds of changes requires changes in DNA.


Yes, that requires changes in the DNA. But those changes are not mediated by mysterious beams of energy! With sexual reproduction, every offspring has a new set of genes that has never before existed in that particular combination. That's a change in the DNA sequence. In term of the relationship between DNA nad morphology, there is absolutely no evidence of any meaningful or relevant 'changes in DNA' other than the well known existence of changes in the sequence and/or number of base pairs. (Which includes large scale additions or subtractions of genes, including missing and extra chromosomes).


Not that you suggested otherwise, but I've been hearing this from other recently so I want to be clear: The fact that evolution requires 'changes in the DNA' does not mean that fringe theories of 'changes due to energy beams', or, as I recently read, 'changes due to vibrations' have any validity.

The changes we know of are chemical, and occur through chemical means (which includes the activities of viruses, cell division, gamete production, various enzymes, and more - but those all come down to chemical reactions).


I have actually read some stuff about how environment and stimuli can create or change DNA, a discovery by a scientist (a cellular biologist) about cells. I don't think this is something that academia has accepted or acknowledges but I suspect there are a lot of things that are not acknowledged by academia and main-stream science. I would certainly not rule anything out.

If life emerged from apparent inanimate material anything is possible. To state that this cannot happen because of some "mysterious beams of energy" is an opinion.

Everything is energy and many things are still mysterious. Until our scientists have answers for everything I will consider possibilities... including a field of "mysterious energy."

Things are only mysterious when we don't know everything about them.


no photo
Wed 09/07/11 04:08 PM




Yes, that is indeed very interesting. I think those kinds of changes requires changes in DNA.


Yes, that requires changes in the DNA. But those changes are not mediated by mysterious beams of energy! With sexual reproduction, every offspring has a new set of genes that has never before existed in that particular combination. That's a change in the DNA sequence. In term of the relationship between DNA nad morphology, there is absolutely no evidence of any meaningful or relevant 'changes in DNA' other than the well known existence of changes in the sequence and/or number of base pairs. (Which includes large scale additions or subtractions of genes, including missing and extra chromosomes).


Not that you suggested otherwise, but I've been hearing this from other recently so I want to be clear: The fact that evolution requires 'changes in the DNA' does not mean that fringe theories of 'changes due to energy beams', or, as I recently read, 'changes due to vibrations' have any validity.

The changes we know of are chemical, and occur through chemical means (which includes the activities of viruses, cell division, gamete production, various enzymes, and more - but those all come down to chemical reactions).


I have actually read some stuff about how environment and stimuli can create or change DNA


It is well known that environmental factors can change DNA, through chemical events, and sometimes through high energy particles that cause chemical events.

, a discovery by a scientist (a cellular biologist) about cells. I don't think this is something that academia has accepted or acknowledges


No, we already know that this (environmental influences lead to changes in DNA) is true.

You haven't really said anything here very specific that can be evaluated for its consistency with the evidence or with the beliefs of scientists.


but I suspect there are a lot of things that are not acknowledged by academia and main-stream science. I would certainly not rule anything out.


I rule out the idea that my toilet will eat me if I flush it. There are a lot of things we ought to rule, to be sane and sensible.

I agree that we shouldn't say "thats impossible" for something that simply lacks evidence - but I think we can say "thats stupid" or "thats crazy" when people taking evidence-free ideas very seriously.


If life emerged from apparent inanimate material anything is possible.


I don't think you meant that literally.


To state that this cannot happen because of some "mysterious beams of energy" is an opinion.


To state that which cannot happen?

Let's take another look; we were talking about polar bears having hollow hairs:

Yes, that requires changes in the DNA. But those changes are not mediated by mysterious beams of energy!


We actually understand what is happening well enough to know that those changes are not being guided by an energy beam. (Stray high energy particles do occasionally strike DNA and mess it up, but thats totally different.)

So I'm not saying that some particular process is completely impossible to ever occur, I'm saying that this line of thought (changes in DNA being guided by energy) has nothing to do with what is actually happening in polar bears.


jrbogie's photo
Wed 09/07/11 04:35 PM

If life emerged from apparent inanimate material anything is possible.

Things are only mysterious when we don't know everything about them.






Once you can accept the universe as being something expanding into an infinite nothing which is something, wearing stripes with plaid is easy.


Albert Einstein

msharmony's photo
Wed 09/07/11 05:06 PM




ITs a catch 22 question,, because for those christians who dont believe in evolution as it concerns being from some animal/human hybrid there will be immediate rebuttal/dispute from science lovers who will insist it is proven that we are or that to not believe so is illogical, or crazy,, or whatever

I dont believe that apes and people EVOLVED from the same being, I Think they were both CREATED, by intelligent design...and came from the same 'PLACE',,but not from the same 'creature'


What place is that?



For christians, it is God, Gods inteligence, and whatever 'place' he chose to create us from,,,


That is pretty vague. I, personally, don't see any conflict between evolution and Christianity. Most of the people I have discussed it with don't either.



I dont have a problem with MOST of it either, the idea that living things were created with ability to adapt and evolve or not adapt and die off...


I have a problem with the idea that humans and apes are somehow related beyond the initial belief that we were both created by the creator,,,

no photo
Wed 09/07/11 06:10 PM





ITs a catch 22 question,, because for those christians who dont believe in evolution as it concerns being from some animal/human hybrid there will be immediate rebuttal/dispute from science lovers who will insist it is proven that we are or that to not believe so is illogical, or crazy,, or whatever

I dont believe that apes and people EVOLVED from the same being, I Think they were both CREATED, by intelligent design...and came from the same 'PLACE',,but not from the same 'creature'


What place is that?



For christians, it is God, Gods inteligence, and whatever 'place' he chose to create us from,,,


That is pretty vague. I, personally, don't see any conflict between evolution and Christianity. Most of the people I have discussed it with don't either.



I dont have a problem with MOST of it either, the idea that living things were created with ability to adapt and evolve or not adapt and die off...


I have a problem with the idea that humans and apes are somehow related beyond the initial belief that we were both created by the creator,,,



So what if we are "related" to apes....? so what if we evolved from the same point at some point? Why is that a problem for you? I mean, why do you have a problem with that?


msharmony's photo
Wed 09/07/11 06:59 PM






ITs a catch 22 question,, because for those christians who dont believe in evolution as it concerns being from some animal/human hybrid there will be immediate rebuttal/dispute from science lovers who will insist it is proven that we are or that to not believe so is illogical, or crazy,, or whatever

I dont believe that apes and people EVOLVED from the same being, I Think they were both CREATED, by intelligent design...and came from the same 'PLACE',,but not from the same 'creature'


What place is that?



For christians, it is God, Gods inteligence, and whatever 'place' he chose to create us from,,,


That is pretty vague. I, personally, don't see any conflict between evolution and Christianity. Most of the people I have discussed it with don't either.



I dont have a problem with MOST of it either, the idea that living things were created with ability to adapt and evolve or not adapt and die off...


I have a problem with the idea that humans and apes are somehow related beyond the initial belief that we were both created by the creator,,,



So what if we are "related" to apes....? so what if we evolved from the same point at some point? Why is that a problem for you? I mean, why do you have a problem with that?




I dont have a problem with it, it was wrongly worded in response to how the question was worded

I just dont believe it,, no problem for me at all...lol

no photo
Wed 09/07/11 08:00 PM
Notice.....In Genesis, God created all the birds of

the air,all the animals, and

everything else...BEFORE God made man in His Image.....


THEN God gave man DOMINION over All the animals , etc....


Point is..scriptures did not say God created man AND ape in His

Image...but only man in His Own Image.


:heart::heart::heart:

no photo
Wed 09/07/11 09:47 PM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Wed 09/07/11 09:48 PM

Notice.....In Genesis, God created all the birds of

the air,all the animals, and

everything else...BEFORE God made man in His Image.....


THEN God gave man DOMINION over All the animals , etc....


Point is..scriptures did not say God created man AND ape in His

Image...but only man in His Own Image.


:heart::heart::heart:


laugh laugh laugh

I would hope not. Think of going to heaven to meet God and he looked like a great ape.

Meet God: He's so handsome!