Hell yeah he HAD to. We had the chance to caputre or kill the most wated criminal and murderer in the world. One of the evilest men in the history of our world. He had to sign off on it or he would have had hell to pay with the voters.

No, the hell he would have had to pay would not have been with the voters.

The puppet has a master. The master owns him, owns the world, puts presidents and dictators in office, starts wars etc. If you want to know who runs the world, follow the money dear....

99.9% of the world's population is fine with Osama Bin Laden
being eliminated as the world's worst terrorist.



OBL RIP.

And to where would that money trail lead? Names? A guy with a monocle and white cat on his lap?

Inquiring minds want to know...


-Kerry O.

There is a list of the wealthiest people in the world. They all have names....

There is also a lot of wealth, gold and money that has disappeared off the face of any records.... there are non entity entities. Like "The Crown."

There are people who are literally above the law. They make the law, they start the wars.

Do your research if you are interested.

Your quoting Michael Moore........... That guy is to busy shoveling cheeseburgers to say anything important.

Yes I do. Look up Pablo Escobar. Seal Team 6(the same team that killed Osama Bin Laden) both trained the foreign military and also took part in several raids killing many cartel members including Escobar. THey were sent in by Bill Clinton for that specific job. He wanted Escobar dead because when he was arrested he was given special treatment by that Government including being put in prison in a luxury complex and was able to run his criminal empire including committing murders there under the eyes of the Government's Guards.

So that was done in Mexico, not America.

It looks like Clinton is just taking sides in a drug war.

It also paints seal team six as a group of assassins.

They are not 'heroes' in my eyes.

He's faith believed in killin all Americans

obvioulsy support obl more than u do our own troops

our soliders took an oath to protect the constituion and this land forein and domestic

People suggest that you try living in a place where you do not have
the freedom to express your offensive views because in the US your
offensive views are protected by the very Seals and Govt whose efforts
(on behalf of your freedom) you denigrate.

They feel that you take your freedom for granted. They have a point.

You want your freedom of speech. You like being able to vote for
your leaders and have a court system which gives you a chance for
just resolution of grievances. You appreciate not having bombs go
off due to terrorist attacks at your grocery store and office bldgs
you visit. But you do not seem to appreciate that protection of these
rights and privileges requires that we root out terrorist cells which
are trying to attack us and who have declared war on us and who have
succeeded already at killing thousands of your innocent fellow
citizens.

Your failure to appreciate this and your attack on the policies
which ensure your own freedoms strike many here as masochistic.
So it is natural that they suggest that you consider moving to
different countries where they do not have the policies to protect
you which we have in the US. Go to those places where you do not
have the protections which you apparently don't want or need and
rid the US Govt and the Seals from the responsibility of protecting
someone who does not appreciate their policies and efforts.

That is what is meant by these comments suggesting you move.

Of course I want freedom of speech.

That would be defeating the whole purpose of anyone fighting and dying to preserve it.... it would be very disrespectful to the troops.

Freedom of speech does not mean the freedom to speak out as long as you say what everyone thinks you should say or as long as you don't criticize the government.

When it gets to the point that we can't criticize the government, then our freedom is gone.

The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it.
Albert Einstein


S.E.A.L. Teams and other Special Mission Units are the ones that do something about it.

Yeah, I'm aware of the legality of the 'corporation sole' entity. Big deal.

If you were to think your dread of people who exist 'above the law' through to its logical conclusion, you'd see that IF they are as the evil James Bond villains you claim them to be, then ONLY the James Bond "Licence to Kill" methods you so abhor would work against them.

That's the trouble with your brand of elephant hunting-- you have to carry the decoys.


-Kerry O.

Oh I'm sure their methods work against them all the time.

Some people live by the sword, and they will die by the sword.

I know a person who was in the marines and was given the opportunity to become a member of a secret group whose purpose was simply to assassinate "bad" people. So I am well aware that this stuff goes on all the time. (I advised him against it.)

The problem I have with it is if the government becomes "the bad guys" then what? Do they just start killing anyone who gets in their way?

Another problem I have with it is if you are going to do it, it is really bad taste to brag about it to the entire world.

Ossama Bin Laden Quotes?
(i question everything coming from the spider )

-It all started because of USA blind support of Israel -Fact
-The ultimate goal of Osama Bin Laden was to bankrupt America -Fact
-America was warned repeatedly years before 911 -Fact

It irks me to think, that SOB might win even though he's dead?

Okay, time for the long pants. Let's say you're the President and you have multiple intelligence reports that cross-confirm each other that an Osama-bin-laden-like character is very close to finishing a nuke made from plutonium they stole/bought.

Do you:

a) alert Interpol that a really bad man in the no-man's land of Afghanistan is about to do something really terrible

b) have the United Nations vote to sanction him and his organization

c) wait until he nukes an American city and attempt to have him tried for war crimes, or

d) decapitate the snake by sending in Seal Team 6 to terminate them with extreme prejudice?


-Kerry O.

they did not have enough evidence that Osama Bin Laden was responsible for 9-11. This they have admitted. Osama was 'convicted' in the press and with propaganda.

I personally don't know if he had anything to do with it, or who he was working for. I don't believe Al-Qaeda was or is a very sophisticated organization and I don't believe they could have pulled it off without inside help seeing as how our fighter pilots were suspiciously diverted elsewhere and could not prevent it.

sample: http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/911stand.html

I am really not responsible for other people getting offended by my attitude or by my objections to the public assassination.

I was informed in another thread that seal team 6 has done other assassinations of drug cartel leaders in old Mexico. It looks like that is what they do.

Also, I am not alone in the opinion that 9-11 may have been an inside job. I am not responsible for people who 'find it ludicrous that I don't agree with them.

WHAT IF Osama was NOT responsible for 9-11? Wouldn't people want to know who was?

It looks like to me they just want to think they got the right guy so they can feel good about everything.

Whatever helps them sleep at night.

i want that job and i get to pick too.

it says in the bible to kill people who worship molech.how do you think that will hold up in court? when can i start?

and anyone that doesnt like whats going on today can move with me.i want to start a GOD run atlantis. it will be like a vacation spot to get away from the fools when you need it.



i watched pbs about 12 years ago the was a guy who almost took out Noriega. our gov. told him to come back and dont do anything. they went in 2 years later and killed Noriega.the drugs never stopped flowing. because it took them 2 years to set up another kingpin before they could take out Noriega.did anyone else see this or have it?


are our troops getting hooked on drugs like they did in vietnam?

did any hear about our troops (over 100)getting electrocuted while taking showers over there?

and the soldiers water supply being contaminated over there and they bring it home to there family?

it seems our gov might be working with the terrorists? lol

1)He's a Marine.

2) He was never invited. As a sister to a Marine and a former girlfriend of a Marine, I know that Marines DON'T TALK to ANYONE about secrets within the military or government that they are privy to. That is why Marines are highly trusted and considered a special force without having special forces (like Navy SEALS or Army Rangers, etc...)

3) He's A Marine.

4) If he WAS invited, by telling you he became an "at-risk". You "advising him against it" had nothing to do about him not doing it. His telling you, (if he DID tell you) got him out of it because if he blabbed about a secret society so quickly to a civilian, then he was a security risk for bigger secrets.

5) He's a MARINE.

6) He didn't tell you diddly. What he did tell you was probably a lie to keep you at bay from what he was REALLY doing.

7) HE'S AN EFFIN' MARINE.