Interview with Al Sharpton.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NyBudknJ0Aw

What good reason would he have to call jews satanic???

wrong link,,,,

Link works.
It's an interview with Al.

all I get is a cartoon picture and a bunch of (annoying) oinking

Yep. That's Al.

His comments about jews are extremely clear and parrot the same
antisemitic false themes of media domination, banking domination,
world control conspiracies that are found in such antisemitic
jew hating publications such as Der Sturmer, the Dearborn
Independent and KKK publications. It is the same kind of
crap that is written in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion which
is an infamous completely false forged document directed at
creating and perpetuating hatred of jews for no reason.

His own words are quoted and substantiated with correct attribution
on the ADL website. Many of them as recent as a few months ago.

The theory of jewish involvement in the slave trade for example is
historically false as well and is basically aimed at more jew
bashing. He is the worst kind of antisemite and unworthy of any
of your admiration.

Of course his conspiracy theories spill out in every direction towards
white people and the government as well. This is why Obama and
everybody else denounces him so vigorously. He is a one man band
of hatred and bigotry with a megaphone.

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/anti-semitism/ford.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Protocols_of_the_Elders_of_Zion

http://www.kkk.bz/why2.html

http://www.adl.org/main_Nation_of_Islam/jew_hatred_as_history.htm



Farrakhan usually just says "jew" not "irreligious jew".
A jew by definition is someone who follows judaism as
their religion. He might as well say "irreligious christian"
or "irreligious muslim". If they are irreligious then they
are not jewish or christian or muslim.

So until he says that it has nothing to do with judaism he
is still a bigot.

I read widely and certainly get a balanced perspective but
the man is an antisemitic bigot any way you look at him.

its subjective, I see him as an anti satanic bigot (sort of like Christ was,,but I wont go there)

Are you saying, as did Fairycan, that Jews are Satanic?

its subjective, I see him as an anti satanic bigot (sort of like Christ was,,but I wont go there)

Im saying that people of all SELF DESCRIBED religious labels have those amongst them who are satanic, and that would include REVERED religions like Judaism,,,,

So, Fairycan and his "SELF DESCRIBED" Nation of Islam could be viewed as Satanic in nature.
Interesting and provoking.

A 1995 report...but goody for the racists here that they can attack a black man and a Muslim at the same time. It's the BONUS edition of "Who Should We Hate This Week?". Certainly not defending Farrakhan since he's just like the racists here on Mingle but all they want here is to point at others while covering up their own racist ways.


~~~~

"A leading example of a black separatist group is the Nation of Islam led by Louis Farrakhan. In 1997, and in less explicit ways since then, Farrakhan made clear that he had renounced none of the anti-white, anti-Semitic, anti-Catholic and anti-gay views of the previous Nation leader, Elijah Mohammed. Those beliefs include the view that Yacub, a renegade black "scientist," created whites 6,600 years ago as an inherently evil and ungodly people — "blue-eyed devils." Farrakhan has described Catholics and Jews, who he said practice a "gutter religion," as preying on blacks. He regrets the "tone" of a former principal subordinate who called for slaughtering white South Africans, but agreed with the message. He called for racial separatism and inveighed against interracial relationships.

If a white group espoused similar beliefs with the colors reversed, few would have trouble describing it as racist and anti-Semitic. Although the racism of a group like the Nation may be relatively easy to understand, if we seek to expose white hate groups, we cannot be in the business of explaining away the black ones."

SPLC

http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-files/ideology/black-separatist

its subjective, I see him as an anti satanic bigot (sort of like Christ was,,but I wont go there)

? ? ?... you already did.

it is not subjective. being white or black is objective.
being antisemitic is objective. he is antisemitic by his own
words and actions. measurably. not a matter of opinion in this
case....

jews like muslims are also equally against injustice and
immorality. jesus was a jew after all. he believed and followed
judaism and was a good jew. the vast majority of jews are just
like jesus in that respect.

it is not christlike for people like Farrakhan to parrot
antisemitic texts like the protocols. it is un-christian
and wrong.

interpretation of words (particularly in print) is indeed subjective,,, Jesus himself rebuked some of the actions of 'his people' and revelations refers to the synagogue of satan

but that doesnt make the bible or Jesus ANTI SEMITIC,,,there is such a thing as correction without hatred or bigotry involved,,,

we are not talking about the meaning of Farrakhans words.
his meaning is plain. rebuke of some individuals is not
a condemnation of everyone in the religion.

i agree that the bible and jesus are not antisemitic but this
is not what Farrakhan preaches.

"synagogue of satan" is not meant to be a condemnation of jews but
rather a gathering of persons of like mind and spirit who are in opposition to the will of God whereas jews are dedicated to the will of god