100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Oh The Horror! (Discuss anything horror related) | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Torgo70
on
Thu 03/03/11 02:34 PM
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
red_lace
on
Fri 03/04/11 06:10 AM
|
|
SESSION 9
A MUST SEE movie!  I just finished watching Session 9 again and I just have to say, that this is one truly creepy film, and by far, one of the best in its genre! Anyone who is a true horror fan, who loves psychological masterpieces that actually makes one think and use their imaginations instead of relying heavily on CGI spoon feeding, you have to see this film. I recommend watching this in the dark. Haha. If you're brave enough, watch it in the dark alone. This film will creep you out. There are no pretty young models, no trendy MTV-influenced rap/metal soundtrack, no breasts, no giggle-inducing decapitation effects. If you want those, by all means go watch something else as there are plenty other films that offer that. If you want to be drawn INTO a film, a place of fear, and think as well, Session 9 is like a therapy session of nightmares. :) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Torgo70
on
Fri 03/04/11 06:15 AM
|
|
Session 9 is one of my favorite horror films from the 2000's. The director Brad Anderson was at one time attached to direct The Crazies remake.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Session 9 is one of my favorite horror films from the 2000's. The director Brad Anderson was at one time attached to direct The Crazies remake. It's mine too! What did you think was the creepiest moment in the film? Mine was when Hank went back for the coins! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Session 9 is one of my favorite horror films from the 2000's. The director Brad Anderson was at one time attached to direct The Crazies remake. It's mine too! What did you think was the creepiest moment in the film? Mine was when Hank went back for the coins! Listening to the sessions is a another good one. And the fact we still don't quite know what really happened. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Session 9 is one of my favorite horror films from the 2000's. The director Brad Anderson was at one time attached to direct The Crazies remake. It's mine too! What did you think was the creepiest moment in the film? Mine was when Hank went back for the coins! Listening to the sessions is a another good one. And the fact we still don't quite know what really happened. The thing that I liked about this movie is that the suspense and creepiness factor is almost palpable. You know there is something evil, but you don't know if it's external or internal. What are your thoughts about this? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Session 9 is one of my favorite horror films from the 2000's. The director Brad Anderson was at one time attached to direct The Crazies remake. It's mine too! What did you think was the creepiest moment in the film? Mine was when Hank went back for the coins! Listening to the sessions is a another good one. And the fact we still don't quite know what really happened. The thing that I liked about this movie is that the suspense and creepiness factor is almost palpable. You know there is something evil, but you don't know if it's external or internal. What are your thoughts about this? That's what I mean about no knowing what really happened- were the session tapes with someone is was just crazy, or was there some kind of evil spirit. Was the patient making the things happen, or was she just possessed and it got passed on? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Session 9 is one of my favorite horror films from the 2000's. The director Brad Anderson was at one time attached to direct The Crazies remake. It's mine too! What did you think was the creepiest moment in the film? Mine was when Hank went back for the coins! Listening to the sessions is a another good one. And the fact we still don't quite know what really happened. The thing that I liked about this movie is that the suspense and creepiness factor is almost palpable. You know there is something evil, but you don't know if it's external or internal. What are your thoughts about this? That's what I mean about no knowing what really happened- were the session tapes with someone is was just crazy, or was there some kind of evil spirit. Was the patient making the things happen, or was she just possessed and it got passed on? Exactly! It's clear there's evil at work. However, as disturbing as the backstory is, it doesn't tie in well enough with present events to tell us for certain where this evil originates. Is it something dormant in the asylum, awakening with the team's intrusion? Or is it a potential for harm within all of us? In the last part of the session tapes, you hear Simon talk and answer the doctor when he was questioned upon where he resides. The answer he gave, gave me the impression that he was a malevolent entity after all that may have invaded Gordon's susceptible mind. What do you think? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Session 9 is one of my favorite horror films from the 2000's. The director Brad Anderson was at one time attached to direct The Crazies remake. It's mine too! What did you think was the creepiest moment in the film? Mine was when Hank went back for the coins! Listening to the sessions is a another good one. And the fact we still don't quite know what really happened. The thing that I liked about this movie is that the suspense and creepiness factor is almost palpable. You know there is something evil, but you don't know if it's external or internal. What are your thoughts about this? That's what I mean about no knowing what really happened- were the session tapes with someone is was just crazy, or was there some kind of evil spirit. Was the patient making the things happen, or was she just possessed and it got passed on? Exactly! It's clear there's evil at work. However, as disturbing as the backstory is, it doesn't tie in well enough with present events to tell us for certain where this evil originates. Is it something dormant in the asylum, awakening with the team's intrusion? Or is it a potential for harm within all of us? In the last part of the session tapes, you hear Simon talk and answer the doctor when he was questioned upon where he resides. The answer he gave, gave me the impression that he was a malevolent entity after all that may have invaded Gordon's susceptible mind. What do you think? That's what I'm thinking too, it was some kind of entity. Do you think the entity was released because the tapes were played? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Session 9 is one of my favorite horror films from the 2000's. The director Brad Anderson was at one time attached to direct The Crazies remake. It's mine too! What did you think was the creepiest moment in the film? Mine was when Hank went back for the coins! Listening to the sessions is a another good one. And the fact we still don't quite know what really happened. The thing that I liked about this movie is that the suspense and creepiness factor is almost palpable. You know there is something evil, but you don't know if it's external or internal. What are your thoughts about this? That's what I mean about no knowing what really happened- were the session tapes with someone is was just crazy, or was there some kind of evil spirit. Was the patient making the things happen, or was she just possessed and it got passed on? Exactly! It's clear there's evil at work. However, as disturbing as the backstory is, it doesn't tie in well enough with present events to tell us for certain where this evil originates. Is it something dormant in the asylum, awakening with the team's intrusion? Or is it a potential for harm within all of us? In the last part of the session tapes, you hear Simon talk and answer the doctor when he was questioned upon where he resides. The answer he gave, gave me the impression that he was a malevolent entity after all that may have invaded Gordon's susceptible mind. What do you think? That's what I'm thinking too, it was some kind of entity. Do you think the entity was released because the tapes were played? That's what I was thinking because of the scenes that were shown while the evidence box was being opened. But remember that when Bill was showing them around and inquired about the graffiti? He said that punks were shooting at something? I was thinking maybe there was already something even then, that the entity lurked the asylum and was preying on the weak of mind. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Session 9 is one of my favorite horror films from the 2000's. The director Brad Anderson was at one time attached to direct The Crazies remake. It's mine too! What did you think was the creepiest moment in the film? Mine was when Hank went back for the coins! Listening to the sessions is a another good one. And the fact we still don't quite know what really happened. The thing that I liked about this movie is that the suspense and creepiness factor is almost palpable. You know there is something evil, but you don't know if it's external or internal. What are your thoughts about this? That's what I mean about no knowing what really happened- were the session tapes with someone is was just crazy, or was there some kind of evil spirit. Was the patient making the things happen, or was she just possessed and it got passed on? Exactly! It's clear there's evil at work. However, as disturbing as the backstory is, it doesn't tie in well enough with present events to tell us for certain where this evil originates. Is it something dormant in the asylum, awakening with the team's intrusion? Or is it a potential for harm within all of us? In the last part of the session tapes, you hear Simon talk and answer the doctor when he was questioned upon where he resides. The answer he gave, gave me the impression that he was a malevolent entity after all that may have invaded Gordon's susceptible mind. What do you think? That's what I'm thinking too, it was some kind of entity. Do you think the entity was released because the tapes were played? That's what I was thinking because of the scenes that were shown while the evidence box was being opened. But remember that when Bill was showing them around and inquired about the graffiti? He said that punks were shooting at something? I was thinking maybe there was already something even then, that the entity lurked the asylum and was preying on the weak of mind. I need to watch it again, it's been awhile. The DVD has some great extras, especially The Haunted Palace which tells about the asylum(Danvers State Mental Institution) where it was filmed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Session 9 is one of my favorite horror films from the 2000's. The director Brad Anderson was at one time attached to direct The Crazies remake. It's mine too! What did you think was the creepiest moment in the film? Mine was when Hank went back for the coins! Listening to the sessions is a another good one. And the fact we still don't quite know what really happened. The thing that I liked about this movie is that the suspense and creepiness factor is almost palpable. You know there is something evil, but you don't know if it's external or internal. What are your thoughts about this? That's what I mean about no knowing what really happened- were the session tapes with someone is was just crazy, or was there some kind of evil spirit. Was the patient making the things happen, or was she just possessed and it got passed on? Exactly! It's clear there's evil at work. However, as disturbing as the backstory is, it doesn't tie in well enough with present events to tell us for certain where this evil originates. Is it something dormant in the asylum, awakening with the team's intrusion? Or is it a potential for harm within all of us? In the last part of the session tapes, you hear Simon talk and answer the doctor when he was questioned upon where he resides. The answer he gave, gave me the impression that he was a malevolent entity after all that may have invaded Gordon's susceptible mind. What do you think? That's what I'm thinking too, it was some kind of entity. Do you think the entity was released because the tapes were played? That's what I was thinking because of the scenes that were shown while the evidence box was being opened. But remember that when Bill was showing them around and inquired about the graffiti? He said that punks were shooting at something? I was thinking maybe there was already something even then, that the entity lurked the asylum and was preying on the weak of mind. I need to watch it again, it's been awhile. The DVD has some great extras, especially The Haunted Palace which tells about the asylum(Danvers State Mental Institution) where it was filmed Ooooh, watch it alone with the lights off like I did! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Session 9 is one of my favorite horror films from the 2000's. The director Brad Anderson was at one time attached to direct The Crazies remake. It's mine too! What did you think was the creepiest moment in the film? Mine was when Hank went back for the coins! Listening to the sessions is a another good one. And the fact we still don't quite know what really happened. The thing that I liked about this movie is that the suspense and creepiness factor is almost palpable. You know there is something evil, but you don't know if it's external or internal. What are your thoughts about this? That's what I mean about no knowing what really happened- were the session tapes with someone is was just crazy, or was there some kind of evil spirit. Was the patient making the things happen, or was she just possessed and it got passed on? Exactly! It's clear there's evil at work. However, as disturbing as the backstory is, it doesn't tie in well enough with present events to tell us for certain where this evil originates. Is it something dormant in the asylum, awakening with the team's intrusion? Or is it a potential for harm within all of us? In the last part of the session tapes, you hear Simon talk and answer the doctor when he was questioned upon where he resides. The answer he gave, gave me the impression that he was a malevolent entity after all that may have invaded Gordon's susceptible mind. What do you think? That's what I'm thinking too, it was some kind of entity. Do you think the entity was released because the tapes were played? That's what I was thinking because of the scenes that were shown while the evidence box was being opened. But remember that when Bill was showing them around and inquired about the graffiti? He said that punks were shooting at something? I was thinking maybe there was already something even then, that the entity lurked the asylum and was preying on the weak of mind. I need to watch it again, it's been awhile. The DVD has some great extras, especially The Haunted Palace which tells about the asylum(Danvers State Mental Institution) where it was filmed Ooooh, watch it alone with the lights off like I did! That's the best way! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Torgo70
on
Fri 03/04/11 02:54 PM
|
|
Danvers State Hospital(where Session 9 was filmed)
  
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Can you imagine being in that creepy asylum at night where it was rumored to have been the birthplace of the pre-frontal lobotomy?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MY SOUL TO TAKE (2010)
You know. Normally when a horror film is helmed by the "Master" Wes Craven, you tend to feel secure that the film will be good. I know directors can have movies that they totally just muck up. Well...consider this film to be Craven's muck up. And he mucked it up bad (and not in a good way). If the opening segment doesn't have you going "Am I high on shrooms", then perhaps you have died and gone to heaven or hell. I have never seen one dude (regular ordinary dude. Not super duper Freddy or Jason) take a shot to the head, then several in the chest, and then be strapped down to a gurney, escape that to cut a chicks throat and almost....ALMOST....escape before he gets killed. Sorry if I spoiled it, but trust me. When you watch it, you will either be looking for the shrooms, gnawing your arm off, or jacking it to porn on your Iphone. Either way, your gonna just lose all hope for this movie. And trust me....it doesn't get better. Here is the gist of the plot. Riverton has a serial killer, and he happens to be in the body of a nice, family dude with schizophrenia. I say nice family dude because dude is trying to fix himself. But his other self (the other soul) loves to kill, and so this bad soul (yes. This soul has a voice that sounds like any demoic sound you have heard in a horror film before. Why can't we try something different? Say...Justin Beiber's voice on roids? That would be scary right?) makes a deal with the good dude. Kill people, and good dude's family lives. Awesome right? Anyways, I already told you about the opening segment, so let's skip forward. Seven kids were born the night that the Riverton killer was....killed. Can you guess where this is going? Cause, if you can, then once you watch this movie, it won't take you long to figure out which one of these seven the "Bad Soul" (Yup. He LIVES!) possesses. Kids gets killed, no sex, and oh yeah...the main kid character (of the seven) has an awesome name. Bug. Yup. Bug is gonna either kill em all or save the day. Either way, I knew the movie was done for once I heard his name. How can you take a guy with the name "Bug" seriously...be it killer or hero? Simply....you F'n can't! I'm guessing that once this film wrapped shooting, Craven realized he had made a piece o' crap, and then frantically called studios to pitch Scream 4. If that is so, then I guess My Soul To Take did serve a purpose. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MY SOUL TO TAKE (2010) You know. Normally when a horror film is helmed by the "Master" Wes Craven, you tend to feel secure that the film will be good. I know directors can have movies that they totally just muck up. Well...consider this film to be Craven's muck up. And he mucked it up bad (and not in a good way). If the opening segment doesn't have you going "Am I high on shrooms", then perhaps you have died and gone to heaven or hell. I have never seen one dude (regular ordinary dude. Not super duper Freddy or Jason) take a shot to the head, then several in the chest, and then be strapped down to a gurney, escape that to cut a chicks throat and almost....ALMOST....escape before he gets killed. Sorry if I spoiled it, but trust me. When you watch it, you will either be looking for the shrooms, gnawing your arm off, or jacking it to porn on your Iphone. Either way, your gonna just lose all hope for this movie. And trust me....it doesn't get better. Here is the gist of the plot. Riverton has a serial killer, and he happens to be in the body of a nice, family dude with schizophrenia. I say nice family dude because dude is trying to fix himself. But his other self (the other soul) loves to kill, and so this bad soul (yes. This soul has a voice that sounds like any demoic sound you have heard in a horror film before. Why can't we try something different? Say...Justin Beiber's voice on roids? That would be scary right?) makes a deal with the good dude. Kill people, and good dude's family lives. Awesome right? Anyways, I already told you about the opening segment, so let's skip forward. Seven kids were born the night that the Riverton killer was....killed. Can you guess where this is going? Cause, if you can, then once you watch this movie, it won't take you long to figure out which one of these seven the "Bad Soul" (Yup. He LIVES!) possesses. Kids gets killed, no sex, and oh yeah...the main kid character (of the seven) has an awesome name. Bug. Yup. Bug is gonna either kill em all or save the day. Either way, I knew the movie was done for once I heard his name. How can you take a guy with the name "Bug" seriously...be it killer or hero? Simply....you F'n can't! I'm guessing that once this film wrapped shooting, Craven realized he had made a piece o' crap, and then frantically called studios to pitch Scream 4. If that is so, then I guess My Soul To Take did serve a purpose. Dude, they should rename the movie, My Money To Take. I agree with you here. It was one of the worst movies I have had the misfortune to lay my eyes on. I don't even know why they had to use 3D since it was practically useless. |
|
|
|
|
