Topic: NEW PROOF 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB! | |
---|---|
The twin towers fell in exactly the way one would predict if doused with thousands of gallons of jet fuel. There were no demolition charges used. Building 7 was never hit by anything and yet collapsed from sporadic fire on a few levels. |
|
|
|
you people are completely nuts
|
|
|
|
you people are completely nuts You said you read the thread, but you didn't. Now you don't know who you are accusing of what. |
|
|
|
The twin towers fell in exactly the way one would predict if doused with thousands of gallons of jet fuel. There were no demolition charges used. Building 7 was never hit by anything and yet collapsed from sporadic fire on a few levels. BBC Reports Building 7 Collapse, 23 Minutes BEFORE it Fell! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qHxOeNXSUcM |
|
|
|
oh my. i guess when you play video games all day. you people come up with stuff like this. every through about going outside. or does sunlight hurt your eyes.
|
|
|
|
oh my. i guess when you play video games all day. you people come up with stuff like this. every through about going outside. or does sunlight hurt your eyes. Again, answer the question. Transportation Sec. under Bush, Norman Mineta testified that he was in the same bunker as Mr. Cheney and that it was Mr. Cheney who was ordering Norad to stand down. How did the building hit by no plane fall into it's footprint perfectly? You can insult people all day, but all it does is show ignorance, until you can answer the questions, I suggest you do some reading. |
|
|
|
first off. i,m not insulting anyone. do you no how dumb you sound. you can look at all my post.i don't like the government at all.how do you people come up with stuff.
|
|
|
|
first off. i,m not insulting anyone. do you no how dumb you sound. you can look at all my post.i don't like the government at all.how do you people come up with stuff. At least you and I agree on one thing. I don't even bother posting in these type of threads much... Should be in the jokes thread. |
|
|
|
yes and anyone who nos me. nos i dislike the American government.so if anyone would suspect the government i would. but this is nothing more then a good laugh. these people cant be taking serially.
|
|
|
|
I have a hard time believing that it was a giant gov't consipriacy as well. But, that being said, there are a lot of questions and circumstances that don't really add up either.
|
|
|
|
even as must as i dislike the us government. they will have to more then show me pictures,when 9/11 happen i was in japan watch the news. i wonder why news kept showing same thing over and over. come to find out it was two planes.i just wonder where they come up with these ideas.
|
|
|
|
I have a hard time believing that it was a giant gov't consipriacy as well. But, that being said, there are a lot of questions and circumstances that don't really add up either. there is an old thread on this... I have no idea which one. In it are logical and scientific reasons why things happened has it did. Course that is probably why someone started a new thread... Kinda hard to stir up a wild tangent when the answers are already in the thread. |
|
|
|
Actually there were 4 planes. Two hit the towers in NYC and another hit the Pentagon, and the 4th was taken down in a field in PA. They were only showing the two that they had footage of. It's not like it was scheduled to happen so that all the news crews could be there ahead of time to capture it on video. Most of the video of the first tower hit are just tourists who happened to be in the area. That's why you kept seeing the same thing over and over.
|
|
|
|
i guess when you got nothing more to do. but be on Internet all day. they think this stuff up.
|
|
|
|
I have a hard time believing that it was a giant gov't consipriacy as well. But, that being said, there are a lot of questions and circumstances that don't really add up either. there is an old thread on this... I have no idea which one. In it are logical and scientific reasons why things happened has it did. Course that is probably why someone started a new thread... Kinda hard to stir up a wild tangent when the answers are already in the thread. |
|
|
|
i,m sure there is a logic answer to all of this.
|
|
|
|
Sometimes answers are completely illogical.
|
|
|
|
someone may need to explain why the government would kill 3000 people. i,m still not buying it.
|
|
|
|
someone may need to explain why the government would kill 3000 people. i,m still not buying it. Collateral Damage. The real target was the financial systems housed in those two buildings.(mho). |
|
|
|
ok maybe i can see that. then of course blame it on the Muslim. can see where that would be true. but not sure if i still buy it. or either i try not to think this could happen in USA.
|
|
|