100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Mc Cain picks Alaska Governor Palin | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
Wow. This has to be one of the lamest arguments yet. I don't think everyone should use birth control, but I most certainly believe that if less men were "getting it up," we wouldn't need all the birth control anyway!! How stupid is this conversation?!!? The only reason McCain would support that is because he NEEDS VIAGRA! Those are terrible arguments. I hope you realize that. They might just be about as retarded as yours... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The answers are obvious. 1) Some men cannot have sex without Viagra. I'm sure you are trying to make a point with this, which is why I noted that Viagra should only be covered by insurance if it is prescribed by a doctor. 2) Already answered this one. The ability to get pregnant isn't a medical condition, it's the normal condition. A woman doesn't have to be on "the pill" in order to have sex. There is no infirmity. So, because birth control is not required in order to have sex, you believe women should not be able to obtain it with the help of insurance? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The answers are obvious. 1) Some men cannot have sex without Viagra. I'm sure you are trying to make a point with this, which is why I noted that Viagra should only be covered by insurance if it is prescribed by a doctor. 2) Already answered this one. The ability to get pregnant isn't a medical condition, it's the normal condition. A woman doesn't have to be on "the pill" in order to have sex. There is no infirmity. So, because birth control is not required in order to have sex, you believe women should not be able to obtain it with the help of insurance? Yes. Maybe a price break, not it shouldn't be fully covered, it's an elective drug. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The answers are obvious. 1) Some men cannot have sex without Viagra. I'm sure you are trying to make a point with this, which is why I noted that Viagra should only be covered by insurance if it is prescribed by a doctor. 2) Already answered this one. The ability to get pregnant isn't a medical condition, it's the normal condition. A woman doesn't have to be on "the pill" in order to have sex. There is no infirmity. So, because birth control is not required in order to have sex, you believe women should not be able to obtain it with the help of insurance? Yes. Maybe a price break, not it shouldn't be fully covered, it's an elective drug. Mine isn't fully covered now. Same as many other women I know. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wow. This has to be one of the lamest arguments yet. I don't think everyone should use birth control, but I most certainly believe that if less men were "getting it up," we wouldn't need all the birth control anyway!! How stupid is this conversation?!!? The only reason McCain would support that is because he NEEDS VIAGRA! Those are terrible arguments. I hope you realize that. They might just be about as retarded as yours... Try to use a less offensive word. Stupid is fine. Ignorant. Silly. Illogical. The use of that word in that way is offensive. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I say insurance should cover it as a contribution to world peace. Everyone is happier with wood.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The answers are obvious. 1) Some men cannot have sex without Viagra. I'm sure you are trying to make a point with this, which is why I noted that Viagra should only be covered by insurance if it is prescribed by a doctor. 2) Already answered this one. The ability to get pregnant isn't a medical condition, it's the normal condition. A woman doesn't have to be on "the pill" in order to have sex. There is no infirmity. So, because birth control is not required in order to have sex, you believe women should not be able to obtain it with the help of insurance? Yes. Maybe a price break, not it shouldn't be fully covered, it's an elective drug. Mine isn't fully covered now. Same as many other women I know. I have no problem with a price break for the pill through insurance, but since it doesn't cure or treat a medical condition, I see no reason why the insurance should cover the full cost. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The answers are obvious. 1) Some men cannot have sex without Viagra. I'm sure you are trying to make a point with this, which is why I noted that Viagra should only be covered by insurance if it is prescribed by a doctor. 2) Already answered this one. The ability to get pregnant isn't a medical condition, it's the normal condition. A woman doesn't have to be on "the pill" in order to have sex. There is no infirmity. So, because birth control is not required in order to have sex, you believe women should not be able to obtain it with the help of insurance? Yes. Maybe a price break, not it shouldn't be fully covered, it's an elective drug. Mine isn't fully covered now. Same as many other women I know. I have no problem with a price break for the pill through insurance, but since it doesn't cure or treat a medical condition, I see no reason why the insurance should cover the full cost. As I just said, for many, it doesn't cover the full cost. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As I just said, for many, it doesn't cover the full cost. And as I said, I don't have a problem with that. Hopefully we can declare peace and let the thread get back on topic. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So... how is that a correct analogy? A woman can have sex, without the pill, right? A man cannot have sex without Viagra, right? Pregnancy is due to the natural workings of her body, right? Impotence is the result of a medical condition, right? There is no commonality between "The Pill" and "Viagra", there are two completely different reasons for those drugs. So, all men can't have sex without Viagra? And why shouldn't insurance cover birth control? Well don't you know by the republican philosophy women should keep their legs closed and that way they won't have that problem. And since by their analogy women are the control of a man's sexual organs, give the men viagra and make it the woman's fault if sex happens. As it has been for most of our history in a male biased society. Take away abortion, take away birth control, but make it the woman's fault if she has an unwanted pregnancy and perhaps may be unable to take care of the child. That is still no reason to kill a baby, there is adoption, if you don't want the baby give it a chance in life, let the baby have the same chance that they got. Pregnancy is one of the hazards of having a Sex life,, What about all those unwanted kids who are out there now? It is not the Kids fault, I am sure there are a lot of Families that would love to adopt them, I would... If the couple having sex didn't want a Kid, they should have taken the proper precautions. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That explains why she's a feminist.  She's not She's a Republican. Being a feminist is more than being a woman.  McCain would LOSE republican votes if he picked a feminist. You have a tendency to demonize those who disagree with you. That's sad really. I suppose all Republicans are also racists? Any other slanders you want to use to describe half the nation?  Republicans love America but hate half the people in it. I'm truly sorry that you are so blinded by hate. Maybe you are trying to be funny? I don't know, maybe you really believe this stuff. If you truly believe this way, then you might want to see if there are medicines which can reduce the number of delusions you experience. I wasnt the first person to say that. Itsa quote from John Stewart. And it seems to be true because Republicans are against half the groups in this country (gays,abortion rights activists,ACLU,PETA,the media,etc.) It just seems like they are against everyone. Painting a group with a giant brush is the perfect way to demonize and eventually illegalize their beliefs. You and John Stewart learned well from Hitler. And would that be the stuff Hitler learned from the state of Michigan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 I just heard that Sara Palin has been slaughtering animals from helicopters. As a lifelong hunter(rifle and bow) I dont agree with that and I think its the actions of a gutless coward with no respect of nature. So much for her tough gal image. She's just another spoiled little rich girl flying around in her helicopter killing animals.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I just heard that Sara Palin has been slaughtering animals from helicopters. As a lifelong hunter(rifle and bow) I dont agree with that and I think its the actions of a gutless coward with no respect of nature. So much for her tough gal image. She's just another spoiled little rich girl flying around in her helicopter killing animals. I would like to see that source, copy paste and Link please |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I say insurance should cover it as a contribution to world peace. Everyone is happier with wood. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Zapchaser
on
Fri 08/29/08 09:11 PM
|
|
I just heard that Sara Palin has been slaughtering animals from helicopters. As a lifelong hunter(rifle and bow) I dont agree with that and I think its the actions of a gutless coward with no respect of nature. So much for her tough gal image. She's just another spoiled little rich girl flying around in her helicopter killing animals. If that is true then I agree it is a cowardly form of hunting but as far as "spoiled little rich girl" goes, I think that is inaccurate. Her mother was a public school secretary and her father was a science teacher and track coach. Not exactly what you would consider wealthy by Democrat standards wherein anyone who makes over ten bucks per year is considered wealthy and therefore needs to be taxed until they bleed- at the point where they are in need of the government to provide for them. She went to college on a grant for taking first runner up in the state's beauty contest. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I just heard that Sara Palin has been slaughtering animals from helicopters. As a lifelong hunter(rifle and bow) I dont agree with that and I think its the actions of a gutless coward with no respect of nature. So much for her tough gal image. She's just another spoiled little rich girl flying around in her helicopter killing animals. If that is true then I agree it is a cowardly form of hunting but as far as "spoiled little rich girl" goes, I think that is inaccurate. Her parents were public school teachers. She went to college on a grant for taking first runner up in the state's beauty contest. They all say that. Those beauty pageants are entirely rich girls.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I just heard that Sara Palin has been slaughtering animals from helicopters. As a lifelong hunter(rifle and bow) I dont agree with that and I think its the actions of a gutless coward with no respect of nature. So much for her tough gal image. She's just another spoiled little rich girl flying around in her helicopter killing animals. If that is true then I agree it is a cowardly form of hunting but as far as "spoiled little rich girl" goes, I think that is inaccurate. Her parents were public school teachers. She went to college on a grant for taking first runner up in the state's beauty contest. They all say that. Those beauty pageants are entirely rich girls. Is that your opinion or fact? Can you support your comment? Who is "they" by the way? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I just heard that Sara Palin has been slaughtering animals from helicopters. As a lifelong hunter(rifle and bow) I dont agree with that and I think its the actions of a gutless coward with no respect of nature. So much for her tough gal image. She's just another spoiled little rich girl flying around in her helicopter killing animals. If that is true then I agree it is a cowardly form of hunting but as far as "spoiled little rich girl" goes, I think that is inaccurate. Her parents were public school teachers. She went to college on a grant for taking first runner up in the state's beauty contest. They all say that. Those beauty pageants are entirely rich girls. Is that your opinion or fact? Can you support your comment? Who is "they" by the way? The politicians always say that. And those pageants cost a LOT of money not to mention buying the dresses and all that kinda stuff.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I just heard that Sara Palin has been slaughtering animals from helicopters. As a lifelong hunter(rifle and bow) I dont agree with that and I think its the actions of a gutless coward with no respect of nature. So much for her tough gal image. She's just another spoiled little rich girl flying around in her helicopter killing animals. If that is true then I agree it is a cowardly form of hunting but as far as "spoiled little rich girl" goes, I think that is inaccurate. Her parents were public school teachers. She went to college on a grant for taking first runner up in the state's beauty contest. They all say that. Those beauty pageants are entirely rich girls. Is that your opinion or fact? Can you support your comment? Who is "they" by the way? The politicians always say that. And those pageants cost a LOT of money not to mention buying the dresses and all that kinda stuff. Do you realize how lame the comments you just made are? The politicians say what? That she wasn't a spoiled rich kid? That you know what dresses cost leaves room for concern. Say a dress costs..... God, I can't believe I am even entertaining this discussion. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Zapchaser
on
Fri 08/29/08 09:31 PM
|
|
Mirror, why don't you quit with the Texas two step and just admit that you can't stand her because she is a Republican? I believe that if she could sh!t gold bricks and hand them to you you would b!tch at her for caring. Come on.
|
|
|
|
|
