Topic: ticket for no seat belt | |
---|---|
I'm with you on this *****Willow. I wear my seatbelt because it's the
law. I can see how a seatbelt might save your life, I can also see how it might cost you your life. As for the statistics, they are based on assumptions...if you die in an accident, not wearing your seatbelt, they assume that you would not have died had you been wearing it. If you survive the same type accident, without the seatbelt, you are a lucky lawbreaker, and that'll be $50 to $500 tax, excuse me fine. The same goes for airbags, but I think more deaths are caused by airbags than seatbelts. Seatbelts and airbags have helped drive the cost of vehicles up...the higher the price, the more the tax. |
|
|
|
While it is certainly possible that not wearing a seatbelt might not
have been a factor in a person's death, simple common sense of the laws of inertia would state that your head smashing through a windshield just MIGHT have something to do with the outcome of a fatal accident. Sheesh. |
|
|
|
LMAO, now Jean what ever would give you the ideal that hitting a
windshield going 60 would give anyone a headache lmao I mean ya the sealtbelt would give you a good bruise from your shoulders to your hip hummmmmmmmm but now hitting the windshield no telling what it would do. The best law they ever came up with was that children had to wear seatbelts and had to sit in the back seat and no more passagers in the back of a pickup. But knew of someones friend riding in the back of a pickup was not going fast they were jacking around hit a bump he flew out was sitting on the side like an idot which we all did at one time hit his head on the pavemet the head injures killed him at the time they were going less than 30 miles an hour. But I do understand that some don't like being told what to do , bottom line they can't make you wear one just make you wish you had when your paying that ticket been there done that and my ticket was $75 and that was almost 5 years ago now the tickets here are almost $200 thanks I'll wear mine for it has helped me more than once so that is the first thing I do now. |
|
|
|
hehe
Well, if nothing else, it might just knock some sense into some people ...or not. I rolled a car over (onto it's roof..took a curve too fast) and, interestingly enough, the first thing I thought was, "Wow, these things really work! -- referring to the seatbelt, of course.) My entire thigh was black and blue (guess I hit it on something) and I was stiff and sore (whiplash), later developed back problems that I assume was caused, or at least exacerbated, by the accident...BUT...the seatbelt kept me from rolling all over the place and hitting God only knows what and breaking or puncturing God only knows what. Like I say, anyone who Bs and Ms about having to wear them should go visit patients at a rehab hospital who were not wearing seatbelts because they thought the law was "unfair" and that they shouldn't "have" to, just because the government says they do. No skin off my teeth. |
|
|
|
ooohhhhhhh!! got to correct this cuz it's a MAJOR pet peeve of mine:
"its" roof, not "it's" roof...whew. |
|
|
|
Well my little sister was in a wreak about 11 years ago no sealtbelt was
sitting in the passagers lap in the front he saw what was coming threw her to the back seat she landed on top of the one sleeping in the back seat he ended up with a broken leg she ended up with a broken neck they flipped head over head 4 times the driver and passager was not hurt. She was lucky she fully recovered. But doctors said if the bone had moved a hair more it would have killed her and lucky she was thrown to the back seat or she would have been through the windshield humm ones in the front had seatbelts on go figure. |
|
|
|
Wow, that's a bone-chilling story. Thank God she recovered from it.
|
|
|
|
Yeah it was very scary at the moment and a bit funny should have seen
her in the ER having it out with the Dr's cause she did not want her clothes cut off of her lmao I got there and my step-mom as soon as I walked in the door which was less than 15 min after I recieved the call at 4am. Said would you please do something with your sister she will listen to you. Believe me I look back on that night many times knowing how lucky she really was. |
|
|
|
seahawk...i was talking to the basher who called me a baby and a whiner
because i dont like my freedom of choice stomped on so some self rightous douchebags can feel better about themselves.if you think it is the governments place to protect citizens from their own idiocy..then you are a fasciast...thats all i was saying to jean...jean keeps going on about how i am a crybaby and such(last recoarse for the witless i might ad)and the whole time missing my point...it is not any ones place to protect people from THEMSELVES...if i speed and wreck that is wreckless and i could hurt others...therefore it is a good idea to have speed limits..if i dont wear a seatbelt and wreck i hurt no one but me and as such this issue falls under"freedom of choice". |
|
|
|
OK COOL I HEARYA BRO CHEERS MAN
|
|
|
|
how dare you talk to me about being grown up..you know nothing of
me...or where ive been or what ive done...you keep making this an argument about me not wanting to wear a seatbelt....for the last time,and i will type real big so you can follow it...I WEAR A SEATBELT 90% OF THE TIME...BUT IT IS NOT YOURS OR ANYONES PLACE TO TELL ME TO DO IT OR ELSE..LAWS ARE TO STIPULATE WHAT NOT TO DO...NOT WHAT TO DO.get it?if you agree that municipalitys have the right to tell you what to do and how to do it when in the end the decision only effects you...you are a fasciast...its the damned definition of it...and if you dont like that im sorry...but no ammount of name calling will change what you are..only you can do that |
|
|
|
i think of a quote and by whom i forget but it goes something like this
"while i do not agree with what you say,i will fight to the death for your right to say it".you think that because you have never been ticketed for no seat belt because you wear it that it is ok for those that CHOOSE not to wear it to be penalized.that makes me just a little scared.everyone should be pissed about this law whether they wear one or not.that isnt the issue really..the issue is its none of your business or the local governments.gotta love self-rightous complacency |
|
|
|
i do not wear my seatbelt. it is a right of mine. i told the last cop
when you put seatbelts on school buses mandatory then i will. my daughter is on a bus everyday and would be seriously injured if the bus was to crash. i got 6 seatbelt tickets in one year at $75 a pop. thats also my right |
|
|
|
Ooooh...we're obviously dealing with immaturity and anger issues here,
to boot. All I'm saying here, *****wussy, is that the government shouldn't HAVE to enact laws to make up for your idiocy. That's mainly why the government HAS to enact laws, because of people who cannot or will not see the common sense in abiding by those laws. Again, you admitted to using your seatbelt "90 percent of the time." Why? I presume because you understand they serve a PURPOSE...that purpose specifically being to save LIVES. However, since you don't seem to give a damn about yours, you might also want to consider this: "Not wearing seat belts also imposes a tremendous burden to society. As noted previously, motor vehicle crashes cost society over $150 billion annually. When a person is injured in a crash, society often absorbs most of the costs. In fact, 85 percent of all medical costs for crash victims fall on society, not on the individuals involved. The public suffers by having to pay higher insurance premiums because of decisions made by those refusing to wear seat belts. In addition to higher insurance premiums for policy holders, taxpayers are also burdened as government at all levels—community, State, and Federal—pays many of the costs associated with crashes. NHTSA estimates that if the current seat belt use rate increased to 90 percent, Medicare and Medicaid alone would save $356 million each year." Now, having quoted that, in the interest of your "personal liberties" (and we all know that's the priority here, right?) would you be willing to sign a statement waiving your rights to any monetary awards and insurance payments for negligence or compensatory damages, etc., that you might be entitled to, had you been abiding by the law? If your injuries could have been prevented by seatbelt use (or injuries inflicted upon, or caused by, unbelted passengers in your car), do you think it's "fair" for society to have to pay for treatment of those injuries via jacked-up insurance premiums, stiffer fines, legal defense in determining percentage of negligence, etc? I sure don't. |
|
|
|
i will only note that i have not said one derogatory thing twords you
and you have called me quite a few things...everything i have writen is in responce to what you have writen..that being said i will just use some qoutes of my own...because you my freind are hopeless...experience and only experience gains you an opinion,so if you have an opinion on anything you have been told,despite what you may think you are being the sheep those in power need you to be to keep it.............and.........vaigue and generalized you wait,pounce,then demoralize,always taking the high road but never realize, see through are you to those with experienced eyes......i will now say i gracefully bow out of this thread..agreeing to disagree |
|
|
|
You mean, other than calling me a fascist, simply because I'm a
law-abiding citizen (or at least, for those laws I choose not to abide by, I don't act like a crybaby when I get ticketed for not doing them, whining that it's "not fair," that *I* shouldn't have to abide by laws if i don't want to. You act as though, out of MILLIONS of people, not to mention the vast majority of people in this thread, that I'm the only one who thinks the way I do about seatbelt use. Most of us don't NEED a law telling us to wear a seatbelt. WHY? Because we have enough COMMON SENSE to wear them without being told to do so. The seatbelt law isn't intended for those who do wear their seatbelt; it's intended for those who refuse to...or for those who, from time to time, "forget." It's nothing against you personally, so why it angers you so much is anyone's guess. I didn't call you any names; I said that anyone who doesn't see the sense in wearing a seatbelt is an idiot. If you choose to place yourself in that category, that's on you, not me. |
|
|
|
cybaby whiner and idiot is what you said.....and you still miss the
point..you keep saying we NEED a law to MAKE ppl wear seatbelts...and i say those exact statements make you fasciast...i even gave you the definition of it...so it is you...not i who is angry...and completely taking this thread and my opinion on the subject personaly....i will be very careful to voice my opinions on here in the future for open discussion for fear i may be hit with such verbal 2x4`s as "your a crybaby" and '***** and moan all you want"....stimulating...really |
|
|
|
i will truley be done after this post...these are your statements
jean"drive into a lot of phone polls do you jean?" What an absurd question. Of course not. In fact, I've never had a wreck or a ticket in my entire life.............some paragraphs later....Well, if nothing else, it might just knock some sense into some people ...or not. I rolled a car over (onto it's roof..took a curve too fast) and, interestingly enough, the first thing I thought was, "Wow, these things really work! -- referring to the seatbelt, of course......what does that make you now jean?GOOD DAY! |
|
|
|
jean the facist? doubtful. you know i love ya. lol
I dont like the govt protecting me from myself either. I buckle up to protect myself.... from the police state. . I once talked my way out of a seat belt ticket.. I was on the Mackinaw Bridge, I told the orficer that I liked to be able to jump out if something happened on the bridge. pretty weak, but it worked. |
|
|
|
actually i got pulled over the other day. was doing 78 in a 55 zone, no
seatbelt, and had a bad taillight. he wrote me up for 5 over. got lucky on that one. I would have written me up for the taillight for sure, thats a safety issue. hmmmm |
|
|