Community > Posts By > Tomishereagain
Topic:
What's for dinner tonight?
|
|
Stouffer's Lasagna
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
God or Religion?
|
|
You write like a drunken duck flapping around in a thunderstorm. I don't have the patience to try to make sense of any of it.
Hahaha, Nice one! |
|
|
|
Why is there 60 minutes in an hour
60 seconds in a minute but 10 tenths in a second? Who determined that North is up? Who determined that the solar system spins in a flat plane horizontally and not vertically? Why are the land masses all pointy at the bottom except Australia? Why do we think the Sun is above the Earth when it is actually beside it? Why are names passed down by Father's names but genealogy is traced by mothers? |
|
|
|
Edited by
Tomishereagain
on
Wed 11/04/15 09:11 PM
|
|
http://www.google.com/search?q=four+corners+of+the+earth&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8
http://www.christiananswers.net/q-eden/edn-c017.html http://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/the+four+corners+of+the+earth The Spirit The Body The Intellect The Emotion If you think of the world as a projection of yourself, The four corners might represent the extremes of Self |
|
|
|
Topic:
What's for dinner tonight?
|
|
Cajun Roast Beef PoBoy
|
|
|
|
400 Days (2015) ~ bluray
After Death (2015) Agoraphobia (2015) American Nightmare (2002) Blood Punch (2013) Born of Earth (2011) Broken (2006) Coneheads (1993) Cripple Creek (2005) Cyber Case (2015) ~ lifetime David & Goliath (2015) Done The Impossible (2006) Firefly/Serenity Hell's Threshold (2006) Howard The Duck (1986) ~ bluray In The Dark (2015) Keepsake (2008) Killing Brooke (2012) Krampus The Reckoning (2015) Miskatonic University (2012) ~ short Monster Roll (2012) ~ short Night of the Living Deb (2015) No Escape (2015) Paranoid (2000) Piranha Man VS Werewolf Man (2010) Savage Harvest October Blood (2006) Scarewaves (2014) Suspension (2015) The Christmas Dragon (2014) The Dark (1979) The Dartmoor Killings (2015) The Fear of Darkness (2014) The Four (2012) The Quiet Hour (2014) Trace (2015) TS/CAM (Awaiting better copy) Antman (2015) HDTS Everest (2015) CAM/TS Maze Runner Scorched Trails (2015) HDTS The Last Witch Hunter (2015) HDTS The Martian (2015) HDTS |
|
|
|
Topic:
What's for dinner tonight?
|
|
Cracker Crumbs & Steam
|
|
|
|
Topic:
What's for dinner tonight?
|
|
Salad tonight:
Cucumbers, baby corn, fresh mushrooms, roma tomatoes, sweet onions, fresh mozzerella balls, new york sharp cheddar & pickled hot sausage chunks tossed with x-virg olive oil and basalmic vinegar. Added sea salt and cracked black peppercorns |
|
|
|
Topic:
God and Science Merge
|
|
Excerpt - Dr. Carl Baugh and Dr. Grady
McMurtry. Both are former atheists who believed in evolution, but like Douglas Ell, they eventually realized that scientific evidence supports the existence of God and creation. Dr. Baugh has doctorate degrees in education, theology and biblical archaeology. Dr. McMurtry has a science degree from UC Berkeley and a doctorate in Divinity. Impressive! Here are some REAL science references on Precision Dating Methods The zeta age calibration of fission-track dating Abstract
Uranium dosimeter glasses SRM 612, CN1 and CN2 have been calibrated against Co monitors in 79 irradiations in the Herald reactor over seven years. Mean values of the calibration factors B for each glass are B612 = (5.736 ± 0.055)·109 (74 irradiations), BCN1 = (1.883 ± 0.026)·109 (21 irradiations) and BCN2 = (2.014 ± 0.0 26)·109 (21 irradiations). Comparison of relative responses of the four dosimeters reveals that unaccounted errors exist in the response of the Co monitors and, to a lesser extent, in the response of SRM 612. The errors associated with the response of the natural uranium glasses CN1 and CN2 are represented by conventional (Poisson) “counting statistics”. These results show that attempts to calibrate a uranium glass against an activation monitor in only a small number of irradiations may produce results radically discrepant from the true value. The importance of systematic errors in neutron dosimetry for fission-track dating is also discussed. An alternative zeta (ζ) calibration approach is described, which circumvents absolute φ and λf evaluation: each dosimeter glass is calibrated repeatedly against zircon age standards from the Fish Canyon and Bishop tuffs, the Tardree rhyolite and Southern African kimberlites, to obtain empirical calibration factors ζ. The weighted mean ζ-values are 339 ± 5 for SRM 612, 113.0 ± 2.6 for CN1 and 121.0 ± 3.6 for CN2. Independent K/Ar, 40Ar/39Ar and Rb/Sr calibrating ages for the standards are discussed. For two of the three glasses, the presented ζ-values derived from each of the zircon standards are consistent within error. Compatibility of the kimberlite data with that of the other samples is discussed. Age calculation by direct comparison of track density ratios in sample and standard is rejected as grossly imprecise. Examination of the reproducibility of results from repeated measurements indicates the conventional calculation of error to be reasonable, but shows the approach of Johnson et al. (1979) to give a serious over-estimate of precision. * Present address: Department of Geology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic. 3052, Australia. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009254183800266 STIMULATED LUMINESCENCE DATING OF SEDIMENTARY QUARTZ: A STATUS REVIEW ANDREW S. MURRAY and JON M. OLLEY The Nordic Laboratory for Luminescence Dating, Department of Earth Sciences, Aarhus University, Ris ̄ National Laboratory, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark (e-mail: andrew.murray@risoe.dk) 2 CSIRO Water and Land, and Co-operative Centre for Catchment Hydrology, P.O. Box 1666, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia Abstract:
Optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dating of light-exposed sediments is used increasingly as a mean of establishing a sediment deposition chronology in a wide variety of late Quaternary studies. There has been considerable technological development in the last few years ñ in instrumentation, in the preferred mineral, and in various measurement proto- cols. New approaches to the latter, especially with the introduction of the single-aliquot regenerative-dose (SAR) protocol, have given rise to an increasing number of ages in the li- terature based on the OSL signals from quartz. This paper examines the reliability of these results by reviewing both published and unpublished SAR quartz ages for which some independent age control exists. It first discusses studies of modern (zero age) sediments, and the implications of these results for the importance of incomplete bleaching, especially in water-lain sediments, i.e. sediments for which the initial light exposure is expected to have been insufficient to reduce the apparent dose at deposition to a negligible fraction of the final burial dose. It then compares OSL and independent ages derived from various types of sedi- ments, including aeolian, fluvial/lacustrine, marine and glacio-fluvial/lacustrine. It is concluded that, in general, the ages are accurate, in that there is no evidence for systematic errors over an age range from the last century to at least 350 ka. Nevertheless, the published uncertain- ties of a small fraction of OSL ages are probably underestimated. We conclude that OSL dating of quartz is a reliable chronological tool; this conclusion is reflected in its growing popularity in Quaternary studies. http://www.geochronometria.pl/pdf/Geo21.pdf Precise and accurate in situ U–Pb dating of zircon with high sample throughput by automated LA-SF-ICP-MS Abstract
We present an automated method for U–Pb age dating of zircon by single collector laser ablation-magnetic sectorfield-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LA-SF-ICP-MS). The high sensitivity of SF-ICP-MS allows routine analysis with spot diameter of 20 to 30 μm and ablation time of 30 s, resulting in an ablation crater depth of ∼ 15–20 μm (∼ 35 to ∼ 65 ng of zircon). Zircon consumption is therefore limited to < 3% of a typical crystal and only by a factor of 6–10 times larger compared to secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) based techniques. Precision and accuracy has been assessed using a number of well-characterised zircons as secondary quality control standards and are comparable to those of laser ablation- and ion-microprobe based techniques that use more complex and time-consuming approaches. Average measurement uncertainties (2σ, mean analytical uncertainty) based on 402 analyses of the Plešovice zircon standard were 2.2%, 3.1% and 2.1% for the 206Pb/238U, 207Pb/235U and 207Pb/206Pb ratios, respectively, comparable with those attainable by SIMS. The weighted mean of all 402 analyses yielded a 206Pb/238U age of 338 ± 1 Ma, which is in excellent agreement with the ID-TIMS 206Pb/238U age of 337.1 ± 0.4 Ma reported for the Plešovice zircon. Data acquisition is done in automated mode for up to 16 h/day with analytical points pre-set with only minimal operator presence during the data acquisition. Individual U–Pb zircon analysis last ≤ 75 s, and sample throughput is more than an order of magnitude higher (∼ 1000 U–Pb ages/day) compared to SIMS techniques and 3–5 fold higher compared to conventional LA-ICP-MS techniques. The methods presented here are therefore expected to have significant impact on many aspects of zircon U–Pb geochronology, with particular benefits for studies on the Archean crustal evolution and the provenance of detrital zircon crystals from clastic sediments where a large number of high-quality stand-alone in situ zircon U–Pb age determinations are needed. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009254108003471 Sources: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?start=10&q=precision+dating+method+geology&hl=en&as_sdt=0,25 One thing that is not present in these references is the need to justify their 'beliefs'. There is no personal history of their belief structure just the scientific process, which can be demonstrated and repeated with predictable results. Granted the articles talk of dating precise elements not the Grand Canyon but the process is sound. As for identifying age and the processes itself there is much info out there Prooving & Disproving. Guess it all boils down to what we Choose to Believe
Not really. You can choose to believe anything you want but the reality is still there. If you Choose to Believe inaccurately it is called delusion. |
|
|
|
Topic:
What's for dinner tonight?
|
|
6:30 and it was awesome. Sweet & savory
|
|
|
|
Topic:
God and Science Merge
|
|
I Believe God created Science
Well, if you fathom that the Universe is everything that exists including mankind then entertain the idea that the Universe could be God then yes. I could see how that works, |
|
|
|
Topic:
God and Science Merge
|
|
they pretty much have it figured out how long it took the GC to form, and it wasn't three months...
yup Next we will hear how the Rocky Mountains are nothing more than drifted build-up from the winds of the plains. That would take what, 6 years or so? |
|
|
|
Topic:
What's for dinner tonight?
|
|
Sunday Supper at My House: Picked up a jar of Imported Bavarian Sauerkraut at Big Lots. Crock pot pork country ribs, a can or two of New Potatoes and sauerkraut in an apple cider/brown sugar sauce with carrots on the side. Baked up some biscuits to go with it.
|
|
|
|
Topic:
God and Science Merge
|
|
Grand Canyon could have been created in 3 months.
The Channeled Scablands were created in a few days. An Ice dam blocking a giant glacier lake broke and washed away the sediment. No Gasp here. The canyon may have been washed bare in an epic flood but the evidence left behind shows the sedimentary layers that can be dated using isotope decay. There is not only evidence of water erosion there is evidence of Yellowstone super-eruptions that date back millions of years. So not only was there a flood, there was fire and brimstone as well. None of which proves religious dogma. There was no civilization to witness the last Yellowstone Super-Eruption yet we know it happened because there is EVIDENCE. |
|
|
|
Topic:
God and Science Merge
|
|
Delenn: We believe that the universe itself is conscious in a way that we can never truly understand. It is engaged in a search for meaning. So it breaks itself apart, investing its own consciousness in every form of life. We are the universe trying to understand itself.
Everything you have ever heard, learned or experienced is the Universe doing so. You are not separate from it. if matter gets to a certain speed if becomes energy.
All matter is made of energy. Energy in serious abundance. The Atomic Bomb is a good example of this. When nearing the speed of light, Relativity changes not time or matter. If you consider that we are all part of the Universe and we are conscious then by normal sensibilities the Universe is conscious. If science could prove that the Universe is conscious as a whole and not by individual strands then the Universe might be considered God. Until this is proven, my speculation is merely a Belief, but I don't require proof of something I believe. I see the complexity and try to understand it. |
|
|
|
Why isn't phonetic spelled the way it sounds?
Why are there interstate highways in Hawaii? Why are there flotation devices under plane seats instead of parachutes? Why are cigarettes sold in gas stations when smoking is prohibited there? Why do fat chance and slim chance mean the same thing? If you can't drink and drive, why do you need a driver's license to buy liquor, and why do bars have parking lots? Do you need a silencer if you are going to shoot a mime? Have you ever imagined a world with no hypothetical situations? How does the guy who drives the snowplow get to work in the mornings? If 7-11 is open 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, why are there locks on the doors? If a cow laughed real hard, would milk come out her nose? If nothing ever sticks to Teflon, how do they make Teflon stick to the pan? If you tied buttered toast to the back of a cat and dropped it from a height, what would happen? If you're in a vehicle going the speed of light, what happens when you turn on the headlights? Why do they put Braille dots on the keypad of the drive-up ATM? Why do we drive on parkways and park on driveways? Why isn't "palindrome" spelled the same way backwards as it is forwards? Why is it that when you transport something by car, it's called a shipment, but when you transport something by ship, it's called cargo? If a black box in a plane is indestructible, why can't they make the whole plane out of it? Why is it that when you're driving and looking for an address, you turn down the volume on the radio? Why is it so hard to remember how to spell 'mnemonic'? If someone invented instant water, what would they mix it with? Why is it called a TV "set" when you only get one? Why does your nose run and your feet smell? Why does an alarm clock "go off" when it begins ringing? If pro is the opposite of con, is progress the opposite of congress? Why does "cleave" mean both split apart and stick together? Why is it, whether you sit up or sit down, the result is the same? Why is there an expiry date on my sour cream container? Why call it a building if it's already been built? Why do kamikaze pilots wear helmets? How do you know when it's time to tune your bagpipes? Is it true that cannibals don't eat clowns because they taste funny? Does 'virgin wool' come from sheep the shepherd hasn't caught yet? If the front of your car says 'DODGE', do you really need a horn? What do sheep count when they can't get to sleep? When you choke a Smurf, what color does it turn? Does fuzzy logic tickle? Do blind Eskimos heave seeing-eye sled dogs? Do they have reserved parking for non-handicap people at the Special Olympics? How come wrong numbers are never busy? Do radioactive cats have 18 half-lives? Why call it "take" a dump, when you leave something behind? What was the best thing before sliced bread? Why do we call it a hot water heater if the water is already hot? If you throw a cat out a car window does it become kitty litter? If corn oil comes from corn, where does baby oil come from? If there is no God, who pops up the next Kleenex in the box? How do they get a deer to cross at that yellow road sign? If it's tourist season, why can't we shoot them? Is there another word for thesaurus? Is the color orange called that because it's the color of the fruit of the same name, or was the fruit called orange because that's its color? Which came first, the color or the fruit? After eating, do amphibians have to wait one hour before getting out of the water? How can there be self-help "groups"? If white wine goes with fish, do white grapes go with sushi? If a mute swears, does his mother make him wash his hands with soap? If someone with multiple personalities threatens to kill himself, is it considered a hostage situation? Instead of talking to your plants, if you yelled at them would they still grow, but only to be troubled and insecure? Is there another word for synonym? Isn't it a bit unnerving that doctors call what they do "practice"? Just before someone gets nervous, do they experience cocoons in their stomach? It is hard to understand how a cemetery raised its burial cost and blamed it on the cost of living. If Barbie is so popular, why do you have to buy her friends? Why is a pear called a pear when there is only one? What do they pack Styrofoam in? Why did God give men nipples? Is grass really greener on the other side? Do boxer shorts box? Why do you wear a pair of panties and only one bra? Why don't sheep shrink when it rains? Why are they called apartments when they are all stuck together? Why is it called a "near miss" when you don't hit something? When sign makers go on strike, is there anything written on their signs? Before the light bulb was invented, what appeared over peoples heads when they had an idea? If you spin an Oriental person around and around, does he become disorientated? If a vegetable goes into a coma, is it called a person? If you try to fail, and succeed, which have you done? Why does the word monosyllabic contain five syllables? If you wear an antennae to a wedding, would the reception be better? Why is abbreviated such a long word? If you put a chameleon in a mirrored box what color would it change to? Why do people point to their wrist when they want to know the time? Do I point to my crotch when I want to know where the bathroom is? Why is there an 's' in lisp? If you were scared half to death twice, would you be 3/4 dead or 100% dead? If the cops arrest a mime, do they tell him he has the right to remain silent? If you ate pasta and antipasti, would you still be hungry? If one synchronized swimmer drowns, do the rest end up drowning as well? What should you do if you see an endangered animal eating an endangered plant? If a man is standing in the middle of the forest speaking and there is no woman around to hear him, is he still wrong? If you asked a librarian where the books on self help were would they tell you, or would that defeat the purpose? If ATM stands for Automatic Teller Machine, why do we call it an ATM machine? And if PIN stands for Personal Identification Number, why do we call it a PIN number? ? |
|
|
|
Topic:
The Silver Fox Club
|
|
This year, my jar of Daylight Savings is full! |
|
|
|
Topic:
God or Religion?
|
|
LOL, WOW, I just looked at what I wrote and sheesh, took me a lot of typing to get a simple point across.
|
|
|
|
Topic:
God or Religion?
|
|
You seem well intentioned, but very, very confused about Christian theology. Your list of sins above...it makes no sense. God created the universe in 6 days, how is that prideful? I can't make any sense of that. God must be worshiped through faith, how does that make God lazy? If God were lazy, wouldn't God just reveal himself to the world, rather than working in the hearts of believers? I'm sorry, I just can't follow your reasoning at all.
Thank you for acknowledging my attempt to relate how I see a religion that I don't study. As for that list, now you know how I feel. Religion doesn't make sense. I recall something about false prophets which by any other term is simply liars. From what I understand, a false prophet is one that twists the word of God to make it say something it wasn't intended to say...Which is lying of course. So in religion I am supposed to never trust a liar - Good Idea. Open most bibles, go into most churches and you find a few things that must be lies. The only churches I have been to are Christ churches and the only books I have ever looked into are christian bibles in this context, These observations may or may not hold across all religions. It is established that a church is a representation of the house of God. It is somehow divine. They are usually dressed in the finest construction materials, impeccably clean and dressed with ornaments and religious artifacts. People entering them are supposed to feel humbled. I have seen churches that are in the backs of old run down warehouses, out of the back of vans, in school buses and just about any vacant lot or field. Those churches usually are of few people and lack the grandiose of the 'established' ones. Inside the churches you will find at least one cross, usually a big one behind the stage. People wear a cross, place crosses on their walls, use crosses on advertisements and they will kiss it, hug it and pray to it. Back 2,000 plus years ago in the region of the middle east people were hung on crosses. Problem is the crosses didn't look like the ones in church. They resembled an X more than a T. Some false prophet one day decided that the cross should be a T and implemented that to the visual reinforcement of the religion. But a lie is still a lie. I have seen many depictions of Jesus Christ in many formats. I have actually walked the same Earth as Jesus Christ when I was deployed in Lebanon. I looked around in awe of how close I was to His lands. Then I noticed that the people around me looked NOTHING like the Jesus I knew. When I had liberty in England, I noticed that the people closely resembled the Jesus I knew. So, I did a search for the true face of Jesus. I found a representation of a face that would closely match what Jesus really looked like and he had more facial features in common with Saddam Hussein than the Prime Minister. It appears that I was taught to worship the wrong person. Some religious artist somewhere decided how Jesus should look and that became the basis of belief. But a Lie is still a lie. Seeing that they got the look of Jesus wrong I took a close look at Mary. His mom. Not only is she the same nationality as her son, she has perfect symmetry. Perfect symmetry gives the observer pleasure when gazing upon that visage. Yet, Another lie. Now God cannot tolerate other Gods or representations of other Gods. I recall something about Him destroying the idols at the grouping at the mountain where He decreed his Laws to mankind. It makes no sense to me why He would tolerate such misrepresentations in a religion meant to glorify his only son? Perhaps He feels accuracy is not important? But knowing something is inaccurate and allowing a whole religion to practice for 2,000+ years based on a lie is False Prophesying. Yet, we are told to beware of False Prophets? Shall I go on?...Yeah, for a little bit, just a few more things... Here is something that really gets me, The age of the Earth. I have been told that the world is only 6,000 years old or something like that. It has been suggested that dinosaurs existed along with mankind. Science dates the planet around 4.5 Billion years old. They do that by measuring the atomic rate of decay of known isotopes. That rate of decay can be applied to a mathematical formula to determine the age of something. It is known that dinosaurs and other animals and plants existed millions, hundreds of million years before man. Mankind and its evidence of civilization extends roughly 15,000 years into the past. 4,500,000,000 VS 15,000. That is a lot of time difference. The man animal can be traced back roughly 2 million years. that's 2,000,000 VS 4,500,000,000 still a large difference. Another thing that gets me right here is the age of man. Noah & Moses supposedly lived into their hundreds. Not just hundreds, multiple hundreds. Living in a time where not much was known about disease, people didn't eat right, there was rampant inbreeding and life was hard, I am supposed to buy into the idea that someone could live for hundreds of years? Even if seasons were represented as years the time frames still make no sense. I am 54 years old. I am also 19,710 days old. Calculated at that rate. Months gets the result of a lower number. At 54 years I am 648 months old. At 900 months I will be about 75 years old. Now given that astronomy was not an established science back then, perhaps calculations were done considering months to be years. But God, who instructed the book to be written, is almighty and all-knowing. Why would there be an inconsistency in time? The book has a disclaimer that it may not be changed in any way. Why would God, Knowing all, write a book that is going to be proven wrong by simple observation? Was the Bible written for the simple minds of the times? Did God expect the world to end earlier than actual? Was the book meant to be rewritten to reflect the knowledge as time passed. A new chapter was written after Christ. What other new chapters have been written and where are they? In some musky basement being studied and rewritten by priests? What about the discovery of newfound dead sea scrolls? Are they added to the book? I don't speak dead sea scroll. Someone does obviously because they transcribed the scrolls into our language. What if the scribes had a bad harvest one year and instead of transcribing exactly the intent and the word of the scrolls they shortened it so they could get done with the day's scribbling so they could have some food? What if they just read it wrong? What if it was a key factor in the whole scroll. Sometimes a false prophet has no idea they are being false. Their references may be tainted. But a lie is still a lie. Today on facebook I saw a caterpillar with a face on it. The face looked like a picture of Edgar Allen Poe. Is Edgar Allen Poe divine now? More likely it just appears to be a face because we are conditioned to recognize the human face. Was it a miracle? No. So why is it that when someone sees a resemblance of the 'known' virgin Mary or the 'known' Jesus Christ in an inanimate object do we decide that it is a miracle? Why is it that when someone beats cancer or survives a terrible car crash we decide that it was a miracle or a gift from God. We say it wasn't his time or He has more work for him to do. What if it is just the result of not being subjected to fatal circumstances or that the science of medicine was accurate for that individual? How is it that a thought process can affect reality. If that were the case, certainly by now someone would have mastered telekinesis. Albino-ism manifests in a population after a certain number of generations. It does this with no input or methodology. Certainly telekinesis should manifest over generations because it is practiced by many. If you think about how many albinos exist in the human gene pool and how many people have telekinesis you realize that telekinesis just isn't possible. Chaos has more to do with miracles than praying does. Shall I go on? Frankly I am getting tired of typing. To me, religion is based on false prophets (Lies). How I see God works in reality. The most important thing is that you should believe what you wish. If your beliefs make sense to you, why should my belief give you trouble? I can allow everyone else to have any religion they choose. Why are my views on God so wrong that you must argue that I am wrong? If my views threaten yours you might want to take a look at your own to see why they need defending. There is something inside you that makes you feel threatened. Its not like religion needs to be explained, most of it is common knowledge. It is the views of God that don't fall into religion that should be explained, a different look at things. Blind faith in anything is perilous. |
|
|