Yes poor but worked. Taxes came from that.

And before e mails it was memo's and tapes.. nothing new here.

Politicians (on ALL sides) have never been good at covering their tracks.

Never..

Why do you always have to bring up the issue of liberals & start bashing them? A conservative can be just as bad. Bottom line - if a person is a jerk, they're a jerk - being liberal or conservative has nothing to with it. Extremism is extremism, and a jerk is a jerk -whether you are liberal, conservative, middle of the road or apolitical.
Contrary to popular belief, politics does not rule the world or govern everything that people do.

Are any of you here aware of DEW?, Directed Energy Weapons?, if so your comments on them and ,question for you all, so do you think the fires are natural?going on in much of the state of California?

yes. no doubt he brings a totally different mind set to the White House. And it is not politics as usual. He pisses off Dem, Reps, Independent, ect.

which is good.

America had enough of the " good ole boys clubs.

There will be those who will condemn him regardless of his accomplishment.. he could cure cancer and they would find fault in it. and I am sure she will be chiming in soon. But that goes back to the sour grapes defeat that was soo hard to swallow for some.

I voted for him. Basically because I could not stomach Clinton. ( that Benghazi thing)

That being said, IMO, he needs to stay off the twitter and shut the F up once in a while.

How exactly was he a perv?

All I have 'heard' is he had an affair. Are all men who have affairs or ever had affairs now open to being fired from their jobs?

had nothing to do with the conservatives... All liberal peoples involved... And they started the PC Crap to begin with...haha

Just another case of the liberal mindset "do as I say, don't do as I do"...

hell know what trumpy thinking about....since he congress the Obama care policy......there must policy proof to improving such kind of "thing" but trumpy had resist it.....Bah~~~~~the federal preveil!~~~~

hell know what trumpy thinking about....since he congress the Obama care policy......there must policy proof to improving such kind of "thing" but trumpy had resist it.....Bah~~~~~the federal preveil!~~~~

if only hard work and study were TRULY 'all' it took ... because minorities have been some of the hardest 'working' in the country ...

The headline is so far, inaccurate.

Aside from what has been reported being accusation and not yet substantiated entirely, even the reports as far as they have gone, have NOT said that the so-called Trump Dossier was "funded" by the Clinton campaign. It has been reported that the Clinton campaign, just like the Trump campaign, paid people who said they had "dirt" on the opponent, in order to try to acquire that "dirt."

Posting this as you have, implies that the Clinton campaign actively caused the so-called trump Dossier to be created entirely, and that is FALSE.

Obama ambassador's testimony on intelligence unmasking raises new questions

Congressional testimony by President Barack Obama’s former ambassador to the United Nations, Samantha Power, about the “unmasking” of U.S. citizens’ names she requested in hundreds of foreign intelligence intercepts by the National Security Agency, has raised new questions about how the sensitive information was ordered up, and subsequently handled.

Power spoke to the House Intelligence Committee on Oct. 13 behind closed doors, and what she said is still cloaked in secrecy. But on Oct. 17, House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy, who also sits on the Intelligence Committee, told Fox News: “Her testimony is they [the unmasking requests] may be under my name, but I did not make those requests.” Gowdy said little else about the session.

The sheer volume of such requests submitted to U.S. intelligence authorities in her name was already unusual. But if she did not initiate them, then who did, and why? Was the resulting information delivered to Power, as the normal protocols of handling such constitutionally-protected information require? Was she even aware of the gush of highly sensitive and secret information solicited under her name?
According to former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton, a Fox News contributor, if someone submitted unmasking requests in Power’s name without her knowledge or consent, it would be “potentially criminal.”

“Unmasking” involves asking U.S. intelligence authorities to fill in the redacted names of U.S. citizens whose comments are caught up in the NSA’s foreign intelligence intercepts, which are routinely removed to protect their Fourth Amendment rights. Such revelations are supposed to be relatively rare, clearly justified and tightly controlled.
Interestingly enough, for purposes of congressional inquiries into the unmasking issue, all three of the politically appointed former Obama administration officials — Power, Rhodes and Rice — have something else in common: lawyers who served alongside them in the Obama White House, adding another layer of insider complexity to the issue.

In July, for a meeting with investigators from the Senate Intelligence Committee, Power was represented by David Pressman, a former Obama administration official, who was described in news accounts at the time simply as her attorney. At the time, Pressman declared, among other things, that “any insinuation that Ambassador Power was involved in leaking classified information is absolutely false.”

As reported by Fox News on Sept. 12, Pressman’s ties to Power were closer and rather more extensive than simply legal representation. He had worked intensively with Power during most of the interval under scrutiny in the unmasking probe.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/10/20/obama-ambassadors-testimony-on-intelligence-unmasking-raises-new-questions.html

Actually this is a dating site AND social site. The forums are for discussions, which is why there is a political forum

Looks around did I just enter the USSR..?