Community > Posts By > splendidlife

 
splendidlife's photo
Thu 03/19/09 07:17 PM

right back at ya there. AND i wore the pointed toed boots bigsmile


Ouch!

It suggests a new kind of church...

splendidlife's photo
Thu 03/19/09 07:14 PM
Edited by splendidlife on Thu 03/19/09 07:17 PM


Is there no passion left in this world beside the ego driven argument?

You're wrong. :laughing:


Oh, yeah...

Well...

That's not true as far as you know!

:tongue:

splendidlife's photo
Thu 03/19/09 07:13 PM


ducks, sheep and cats????

don't wanna know....don't ask don't tell laugh


I don't know bout ducks and cats, but you know what they say about shepherds and their sheep.


...AND Clergy Men

splendidlife's photo
Thu 03/19/09 07:11 PM

ducks, sheep and cats????

don't wanna know....don't ask don't tell laugh


Duck (verb)!

Incomming sheep!

splendidlife's photo
Thu 03/19/09 07:09 PM






GREAT!!!! so where can i pee?

Anywhere you want if you're wearing a diaper. :banana:


Diapers are for conformists!

Yeah, so are clothes. devil devil devil


Anti-Sheep, Unite!


I don’t want to be a zombie so stop throwing sheep at me


Duck!

Baaaaaah!

splendidlife's photo
Thu 03/19/09 07:07 PM



GREAT!!!! so where can i pee?

Anywhere you want if you're wearing a diaper. :banana:
why not it will stop the blood from today.i never got bent over like i did today.it will hurt for years.laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh


Tell us brother...

How did you get bent over?

splendidlife's photo
Thu 03/19/09 07:05 PM




GREAT!!!! so where can i pee?

Anywhere you want if you're wearing a diaper. :banana:


Diapers are for conformists!

Yeah, so are clothes. devil devil devil


Anti-Sheep, Unite!

splendidlife's photo
Thu 03/19/09 07:04 PM


GREAT!!!! so where can i pee?

Anywhere you want if you're wearing a diaper. :banana:


Diapers are for conformists!

splendidlife's photo
Thu 03/19/09 07:03 PM



careful....thomas will pee in the sandbox bigsmile


Hell, if cats can do it, why can't we?
rofl


oh there is a joke there somewhere about calling you another name for a cat but..........i'll be good laugh flowerforyou


Nani Nani Boo Boo: Verse 12.

splendidlife's photo
Thu 03/19/09 07:00 PM

careful....thomas will pee in the sandbox bigsmile

I pee in swimming pools

splendidlife's photo
Thu 03/19/09 06:57 PM
Toddlerhood at best...


splendidlife's photo
Thu 03/19/09 06:55 PM
Is there no passion left in this world beside the ego driven argument?

splendidlife's photo
Thu 03/19/09 01:10 PM
Edited by splendidlife on Thu 03/19/09 02:03 PM

with or without religion....people will do good or evil....people just use it to hide behind.

so if an athiest does evil (no religion attached) then does it really have to do with religion or a sick mind? same with any religion....if they do evil, does it have to do with religion or a sick mind?


Some of the greatest unbalance involved in the making of a "sick mind" has its origins in the relentless thrust by society/family/individual (religious or not) to always HAVE to be "good". It shows up more in religion

In the running from our own negative aspects, without allowing them any expression whatsoever, we foster them to grow... We incubate them until, perhaps, all it takes is one perfect spark to fully ignite the "beast".

In this respect, we're all "sick".... It's human nature.

Even the non-religious are bound by ideals of stomping out ALL negative. This could be a root cause of most emotional pain.

splendidlife's photo
Thu 03/19/09 09:26 AM



The notion that one needs a god to validate or even explain morality is absurd. People knew long ago that murder was "wrong" in that they did not want to be murdered. They knew that stealing was wrong in that they saw the effects of stealing and so, again, did not want to be a victim of theft.

I think it's interesting when people talk about the idea that without being born again, sinners would simply act in a vile and disgusting way. If so, perhaps someone will explain to me please why we are not seeing mobs of atheists roaming the streets, zombie-like in their destruction of everything they come in contact with?

I heard someone say once that the reason they did not rob or steal was directly related to being saved by Jesus. Fine and while I'm not going to beat up on the guy for that belief, when I turned the question around (i.e., why then aren't atheists being picked up and locked up for crimes against humanity on a regular basis) he had no real answer. And that begs the point. We are either totally depraved and incapable of doing one good thing (without God) or we are not so depraved and are capable of doing many good things, despite God.


-D


We are designed to be depraved. pitchfork


Just what we'd expect from perfect design, huh? ;)


Everything is perfect!

splendidlife's photo
Wed 03/18/09 03:08 PM
Edited by splendidlife on Wed 03/18/09 03:08 PM

The notion that one needs a god to validate or even explain morality is absurd. People knew long ago that murder was "wrong" in that they did not want to be murdered. They knew that stealing was wrong in that they saw the effects of stealing and so, again, did not want to be a victim of theft.

I think it's interesting when people talk about the idea that without being born again, sinners would simply act in a vile and disgusting way. If so, perhaps someone will explain to me please why we are not seeing mobs of atheists roaming the streets, zombie-like in their destruction of everything they come in contact with?

I heard someone say once that the reason they did not rob or steal was directly related to being saved by Jesus. Fine and while I'm not going to beat up on the guy for that belief, when I turned the question around (i.e., why then aren't atheists being picked up and locked up for crimes against humanity on a regular basis) he had no real answer. And that begs the point. We are either totally depraved and incapable of doing one good thing (without God) or we are not so depraved and are capable of doing many good things, despite God.


-D


We are designed to be depraved. pitchfork

splendidlife's photo
Wed 03/18/09 10:16 AM
In nature, "Good" and "Evil" exist in balance. It is in the denial of evil and acceptance of only good that we create unbalance and an outpicturing or more evil.

splendidlife's photo
Wed 03/18/09 10:13 AM






I've lived my life so focused on self



These words we take literally seem to mean utter brutality!

Perhaps they're more like code for greater understanding of relationship between self and higher self.

No illusion/delusion dissolved (of only self as most important) until one actually identifies, acknowledges and accepts that they've been operating purely for self all along. Further faulting self for operating this way seems to only lead straight back to looking only at self. More of the same.

Challenging one's own perception at the cost of utter abandonment of anything once believed.

Will the Higher Self carry me through?


How is anything not about yourself. Even if you only do something to help someone else, most would say it makes them feel good to do so. That is a selfish motive in and of itself. You only do good as long as it makes you feel better about yourself. We need to move away from this idea that there is such a thing as an unselfish motive. Even if one was to do good with no expectation of reciprocity immediate or at some point in the future, it either makes you feel good or you are just dutifully depositing with expectations of divine dividends.


When I'm driven only by self preservation, I'm blind to what every other human has to teach me. That leaves me miserable and utterly isolated. Can't help but be aware of the self that I am at any given moment, but tired of doing so at the expense of seeing another.

Dog-tired of the isolation.

No formula to suggest that I "must not" focus on self. Just ideas that what I was living in kept me as an island.

I'm not suggesting that we our lives as islands. I'm only suggesting that all actions at their lowest level are based in self preservation and satisfaction and that we should not feel any guilt in that. I further suggest that we stop putting those who purport to act selflessly on pedestals when in fact their motives boiled down to their purest from are no different than ours.


The statement I made was not so much based on my guilt, but rather was an observation of results of my individual modus operandi and was more a question of this possibly being a common thread.

You suggest we not put people on pedestals that purport to act selflessly. ACT is the operative word.

Were all acting...

I've lived my life so focused on self that it's cost me plenty (Yup... about me).

Now that I have a child, I believe it's costing her and will continue to affect her (yes, there's some guilt). Is my wanting her happiness and fulfillment all about me? It is, in part, about me… for sure.

Speaking only for myself, I believe it's imperative that I acknowledge how being completely self-driven can't serve any greater good… FOR ME... in this little corner of the world.


I'm not trying to promote living a completely self-driven lifestyles or selfishness or narcissism, I guess my point is more academic.
It doesn't have to be that one cannot find self-satisfaction in being a good parent. There are many things in life that can bring self satisfaction and many ways to pursue self-preservation that are not isolationistic.


Off Topic, I know... But, your OP and the direction it takes, has raised important questions in me.

In the realization that I have been driven by the needs of self in relationship with my daughter, I look to increasing my awareness of her needs as a human being and in fostering her own knowledge of who she is in this world... Not merely as a reflection of me, but as a wholly unique and powerful individual.

Thank you, Thomas, for what you bring.


And in that you have broken the chains that bind our children to our past foolishness!
You have made a very fantastic leap of evolution in thinking!
You have given your daughter a gift so many parents refuse their children and that is self discovery and guidance to that end.

You have my deepest heart felt praise!
drinker

It is unfortunate that EVERYONE acts in all ways towards self interest and rising above that is one of the greatest things we can do in our lives and that means rising above religion! This is also apparent in the way parents guide their children in light of THEIR own idealism even if they conflict with the person that is the child who seek their own way after about 12.

I think part of it is that parents do not like feeling their mortality as their children become self reliant and also parents have a hard time coping with the fact that eventually the Goslings will spread their wings and fly away. I think it is called 'empty nest syndrome.'


If only I could just break those chains one-and-for all. I still catch myself reacting in the same old ways. All I can do is correct it each time. It's hard not faulting myself... Again... THAT'S about me.

Beyond the tyranny of my thinking (like religion), I seek greater understanding and capability.

splendidlife's photo
Wed 03/18/09 08:22 AM






I've lived my life so focused on self



These words we take literally seem to mean utter brutality!

Perhaps they're more like code for greater understanding of relationship between self and higher self.

No illusion/delusion dissolved (of only self as most important) until one actually identifies, acknowledges and accepts that they've been operating purely for self all along. Further faulting self for operating this way seems to only lead straight back to looking only at self. More of the same.

Challenging one's own perception at the cost of utter abandonment of anything once believed.

Will the Higher Self carry me through?


How is anything not about yourself. Even if you only do something to help someone else, most would say it makes them feel good to do so. That is a selfish motive in and of itself. You only do good as long as it makes you feel better about yourself. We need to move away from this idea that there is such a thing as an unselfish motive. Even if one was to do good with no expectation of reciprocity immediate or at some point in the future, it either makes you feel good or you are just dutifully depositing with expectations of divine dividends.


When I'm driven only by self preservation, I'm blind to what every other human has to teach me. That leaves me miserable and utterly isolated. Can't help but be aware of the self that I am at any given moment, but tired of doing so at the expense of seeing another.

Dog-tired of the isolation.

No formula to suggest that I "must not" focus on self. Just ideas that what I was living in kept me as an island.

I'm not suggesting that we our lives as islands. I'm only suggesting that all actions at their lowest level are based in self preservation and satisfaction and that we should not feel any guilt in that. I further suggest that we stop putting those who purport to act selflessly on pedestals when in fact their motives boiled down to their purest from are no different than ours.


The statement I made was not so much based on my guilt, but rather was an observation of results of my individual modus operandi and was more a question of this possibly being a common thread.

You suggest we not put people on pedestals that purport to act selflessly. ACT is the operative word.

Were all acting...

I've lived my life so focused on self that it's cost me plenty (Yup... about me).

Now that I have a child, I believe it's costing her and will continue to affect her (yes, there's some guilt). Is my wanting her happiness and fulfillment all about me? It is, in part, about me… for sure.

Speaking only for myself, I believe it's imperative that I acknowledge how being completely self-driven can't serve any greater good… FOR ME... in this little corner of the world.


I'm not trying to promote living a completely self-driven lifestyles or selfishness or narcissism, I guess my point is more academic.
It doesn't have to be that one cannot find self-satisfaction in being a good parent. There are many things in life that can bring self satisfaction and many ways to pursue self-preservation that are not isolationistic.


Off Topic, I know... But, your OP and the direction it takes, has raised important questions in me.

In the realization that I have been driven by the needs of self in relationship with my daughter, I look to increasing my awareness of her needs as a human being and in fostering her own knowledge of who she is in this world... Not merely as a reflection of me, but as a wholly unique and powerful individual.

Thank you, Thomas, for what you bring.

Who knew being sarcastic smart azz would be of benefit to someone. biggrin I'm honoured to be of help.


Always beneficial... No matter what reactions you get.
waving

splendidlife's photo
Wed 03/18/09 07:37 AM




I've lived my life so focused on self



These words we take literally seem to mean utter brutality!

Perhaps they're more like code for greater understanding of relationship between self and higher self.

No illusion/delusion dissolved (of only self as most important) until one actually identifies, acknowledges and accepts that they've been operating purely for self all along. Further faulting self for operating this way seems to only lead straight back to looking only at self. More of the same.

Challenging one's own perception at the cost of utter abandonment of anything once believed.

Will the Higher Self carry me through?


How is anything not about yourself. Even if you only do something to help someone else, most would say it makes them feel good to do so. That is a selfish motive in and of itself. You only do good as long as it makes you feel better about yourself. We need to move away from this idea that there is such a thing as an unselfish motive. Even if one was to do good with no expectation of reciprocity immediate or at some point in the future, it either makes you feel good or you are just dutifully depositing with expectations of divine dividends.


When I'm driven only by self preservation, I'm blind to what every other human has to teach me. That leaves me miserable and utterly isolated. Can't help but be aware of the self that I am at any given moment, but tired of doing so at the expense of seeing another.

Dog-tired of the isolation.

No formula to suggest that I "must not" focus on self. Just ideas that what I was living in kept me as an island.

I'm not suggesting that we our lives as islands. I'm only suggesting that all actions at their lowest level are based in self preservation and satisfaction and that we should not feel any guilt in that. I further suggest that we stop putting those who purport to act selflessly on pedestals when in fact their motives boiled down to their purest from are no different than ours.


The statement I made was not so much based on my guilt, but rather was an observation of results of my individual modus operandi and was more a question of this possibly being a common thread.

You suggest we not put people on pedestals that purport to act selflessly. ACT is the operative word.

Were all acting...

I've lived my life so focused on self that it's cost me plenty (Yup... about me).

Now that I have a child, I believe it's costing her and will continue to affect her (yes, there's some guilt). Is my wanting her happiness and fulfillment all about me? It is, in part, about me… for sure.

Speaking only for myself, I believe it's imperative that I acknowledge how being completely self-driven can't serve any greater good… FOR ME... in this little corner of the world.


I'm not trying to promote living a completely self-driven lifestyles or selfishness or narcissism, I guess my point is more academic.
It doesn't have to be that one cannot find self-satisfaction in being a good parent. There are many things in life that can bring self satisfaction and many ways to pursue self-preservation that are not isolationistic.


Off Topic, I know... But, your OP and the direction it takes, has raised important questions in me.

In the realization that I have been driven by the needs of self in relationship with my daughter, I look to increasing my awareness of her needs as a human being and in fostering her own knowledge of who she is in this world... Not merely as a reflection of me, but as a wholly unique and powerful individual.

Thank you, Thomas, for what you bring.

splendidlife's photo
Wed 03/18/09 05:14 AM
Edited by splendidlife on Wed 03/18/09 05:22 AM


I've lived my life so focused on self



These words we take literally seem to mean utter brutality!

Perhaps they're more like code for greater understanding of relationship between self and higher self.

No illusion/delusion dissolved (of only self as most important) until one actually identifies, acknowledges and accepts that they've been operating purely for self all along. Further faulting self for operating this way seems to only lead straight back to looking only at self. More of the same.

Challenging one's own perception at the cost of utter abandonment of anything once believed.

Will the Higher Self carry me through?


How is anything not about yourself. Even if you only do something to help someone else, most would say it makes them feel good to do so. That is a selfish motive in and of itself. You only do good as long as it makes you feel better about yourself. We need to move away from this idea that there is such a thing as an unselfish motive. Even if one was to do good with no expectation of reciprocity immediate or at some point in the future, it either makes you feel good or you are just dutifully depositing with expectations of divine dividends.


When I'm driven only by self preservation, I'm blind to what every other human has to teach me. That leaves me miserable and utterly isolated. Can't help but be aware of the self that I am at any given moment, but tired of doing so at the expense of seeing another.

Dog-tired of the isolation.

No formula to suggest that I "must not" focus on self. Just ideas that what I was living in kept me as an island.

I'm not suggesting that we our lives as islands. I'm only suggesting that all actions at their lowest level are based in self preservation and satisfaction and that we should not feel any guilt in that. I further suggest that we stop putting those who purport to act selflessly on pedestals when in fact their motives boiled down to their purest from are no different than ours.


The statement I made was not so much based on my guilt, but rather was an observation of results of my individual modus operandi and was more a question of this possibly being a common thread.

You suggest we not put people on pedestals that purport to act selflessly. ACT is the operative word.

Were all acting...

I've lived my life so focused on self that it's cost me plenty (Yup... about me).

Now that I have a child, I believe it's costing her and will continue to affect her (yes, there's some guilt). Is my wanting her happiness and fulfillment all about me? It is, in part, about me… for sure.

Speaking only for myself, I believe it's imperative that I acknowledge how being completely self-driven can't serve any greater good… FOR ME... in this little corner of the world.

1 2 3 5 7 8 9 24 25