Community > Posts By > IndianaJoans

 
IndianaJoans's photo
Fri 03/07/08 10:44 PM



Key words;
IN TIME OF PEACE!!

I found this on the link you posted. Interesting.
The Flag Code [see below] requires that the US flag be flown on federal institutions, including public schools. It does not require you to fly the US flag and it does not forbid you from displaying a foreign flag. For example, someone with Irish heritage may proudly fly an Irish flag and is not required to fly the US flag. In the early 1900s there was hostility when the German flag was flown in the US, prompting Theodore Roosevelt to state that we had one flag, and one language. We are again revisiting tensions, this time it is the Mexican flag. We understand the emotional tensions of the situation, however, the Flag Code [see below] does not support those who wish to forbid the flying of the Mexican flag within our borders without also flying the US flag.



He was flying it with the American Flag though!
What does it say about that???

I know what it says and I agree. I (again) said I found it interesting that someone can fly the flag of another country and that it is not bad etiquette if flown alone. I have seen Mexican, Swedish, and Swiss flags flown here alone and I felt that it was improper but I stand corrected.

IndianaJoans's photo
Fri 03/07/08 10:39 PM

hell, they can fly their own flag all they want. And they should it's their heritage. Just don't fly it above ours. It's just like those illegal immigrant rallies they have from time to time where the mexicans fly their flags instead of the u.s. flags. THAT says to me that they remain true to mexico but just wanna live in the U.S. Come on guys, if you want to be an American then be an American, if you wanna be Mexican then be Mexican (or whatever country you belong to) just dont come to our country to abuse our system.

I understand. I was just pointing out something that I did not know and found interesting.

IndianaJoans's photo
Fri 03/07/08 10:30 PM

Key words;
IN TIME OF PEACE!!

I found this on the link you posted. Interesting.
The Flag Code [see below] requires that the US flag be flown on federal institutions, including public schools. It does not require you to fly the US flag and it does not forbid you from displaying a foreign flag. For example, someone with Irish heritage may proudly fly an Irish flag and is not required to fly the US flag. In the early 1900s there was hostility when the German flag was flown in the US, prompting Theodore Roosevelt to state that we had one flag, and one language. We are again revisiting tensions, this time it is the Mexican flag. We understand the emotional tensions of the situation, however, the Flag Code [see below] does not support those who wish to forbid the flying of the Mexican flag within our borders without also flying the US flag.

IndianaJoans's photo
Fri 03/07/08 10:09 PM




What does that signify so pride inspiring? All flags should be hung together signifying solidarity, we should not be divisive but being conducive to togetherness.
Because in America, the American flag is flown above all others.... Just wait and see... Google North American Union... It's coming quicker than you think.....


no flag is supose to be flone over the other they are supose to be flone at the same hight.

You are wrong.

I stand corrected! You are right.
From Wiki:
When flown with flags of states, communities, or societies on separate flag poles which are of the same height and in a straight line, the flag of the United States is always placed in the position of honor - to its own right.
..The other flags may be smaller but none may be larger.
..No other flag ever should be placed above it.
..The flag of the United States is always the first flag raised and the last to be lowered.

When flown with the national banner of other countries, each flag must be displayed from a separate pole of the same height. Each flag should be the same size. They should be raised and lowered simultaneously. The flag of one nation may not be displayed above that of another nation. drinker

IndianaJoans's photo
Fri 03/07/08 10:04 PM



What does that signify so pride inspiring? All flags should be hung together signifying solidarity, we should not be divisive but being conducive to togetherness.
Because in America, the American flag is flown above all others.... Just wait and see... Google North American Union... It's coming quicker than you think.....


no flag is supose to be flone over the other they are supose to be flone at the same hight.

You are wrong.

IndianaJoans's photo
Fri 03/07/08 02:53 PM

heading west to do a strip search


blushing blushing
laugh :wink:

IndianaJoans's photo
Fri 03/07/08 02:52 PM


Does anyone else think that there will eventually be a different set of laws pertaining to the internet? Perhaps an INTERPOL thing? Just curious. I think this thread can explore an issue that will surely come up but is not in the news that much yet.


I think that is inevitable since the internet knows no borders and if there were different laws/rules depending on which country you were in the criminals would use that to their advantage...criminals are very good at exposing loopholes..

And we think political problems are bad now? Coming up with international laws pertaining to internet crimes that we can all agree on will be like trying to walk through a cow barn without stepping in a butt pie.laugh

IndianaJoans's photo
Fri 03/07/08 02:20 PM




We are there for the gold,
there for the oil
there to protect Israel.


is that what your cards told you?...

it's the first time I heard gold is in Iraq but I do know that the only ones making money from Iraqi's oil is the Iraqi people...and I have no idea how you think Israel is involved.....maybe you didn't shuffle your cards well enough...noway



laugh laugh laugh

huh Israel is ALWAYS involved.

The gold was there, but it has been removed. The currency that was used in Iraq before we invaded, was backed by gold. Now, it is just paper credit money. The gold was taken out.


well if iraq was a gold based market

and we took all of the gold

then i guess the war paid for its self

can't have it both ways


I doubt that "WE" got any of the gold. "THEY" got it.
The gold went to the few men who control the world, and the wars and the banks. All "WE" get is the worthless paper money and mountains of dept.

Do you think there is any gold left in the U.S Treasury? It is all gone. Our dollar has no gold to back it.



Ummmmmm, we don't have the gold standard. Congress got rid of that decades ago didn't they?

IndianaJoans's photo
Fri 03/07/08 02:17 PM
I confess! I stashed it in my bra! Anyone for a strip search by some FBI men?:wink: bigsmile

IndianaJoans's photo
Fri 03/07/08 02:14 PM

I found this in an Urban dictionary. And again thought I would share.

Sleep Slut


One who sleeps frequently and is able to accumulate excess hours of sleep above beyond the mean. Sleep sluts are able to fall asleep indiscriminately and value sleep above all else.

Example Given From The Dictionary

Within minutes of boarding the commuter train Mark was fast asleep. Marks sleep slut powers were legendary in that he was always able to wake before his stop.


I am just like Mark. If I know I am going for a long trip (an hour or more) I will fall asleep in minutes and wake up just as we are pulling into out destination.




I thought the question was "are you asleep slut?" and though I have never been asked that my response would have been a fist to the groin acorns. laugh

IndianaJoans's photo
Fri 03/07/08 02:01 PM

Is this the part where we throw the rotten tomatoes???huh
laugh laugh laugh

IndianaJoans's photo
Fri 03/07/08 01:55 PM


still waiting for that lightening bolt to strike me down....wait....nope.....still here...sorry.


for starters i never directed that comment at you. I directed it at anyone that wants to damage our pride for this country. Place it where it applies. Or are you trying to make fun of my belief in god? Anyhow i am a former paratrooper and veteran. I have been born and raised in the USA. I say god bless America.

mazeltov....you have pride in your country, your comment was directed at people like me. Your pedigree doesnt impress me. But you are a well spoken man with strong beliefs. THAT impresses me.

Yaaaaaay! Group hug!laugh

IndianaJoans's photo
Fri 03/07/08 01:51 PM
Does anyone else think that there will eventually be a different set of laws pertaining to the internet? Perhaps an INTERPOL thing? Just curious. I think this thread can explore an issue that will surely come up but is not in the news that much yet.

IndianaJoans's photo
Fri 03/07/08 01:48 PM

Of course posting an article that points out how law enforcement hands are tied with it comes to pedophiles and then using that as a justification for violating the privacy of individuals is manipulative and cheap reporting. It gives the one who posted this thread the arrogant air of being able to point his finger and claim that all those who are against wire-tapping must be in favor of pedophiles.
Low-brow, FOX news, tactics.....

Git-R-done (Larry the cable guy) laugh :wink:

IndianaJoans's photo
Fri 03/07/08 01:42 PM


Our nation reveres the flag, not out of a sense of unquestioning worship but out of a deep sense of our national heritage. Strengthened by our noble deeds, splendid accomplishments, and untold sacrifices, the flag reflects America's pledge to uphold democracy and work for peace throughout the world. It is America's strength in honor, as dignified in the stars and stripes of the flag, which helps to establish the moral character of our national foundation.

and why would anyone not know? It says it right here-

"I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."


right, thats why you find it on underwear, rolling papers, car deoderizers and anything else made in China that you can slap a flag on and sell it....pleeeeeze.
huh

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! I know that was tongue in cheek but dammit it is funny. I had a bikini (years ago sad) that was like the flag.

IndianaJoans's photo
Fri 03/07/08 01:15 PM
Edited by IndianaJoans on Fri 03/07/08 01:21 PM

Some people have complained about wire taps without a search warrant thinking their right to privacy has been infringed upon. Here's the other side of the coin and see if you wouldn't consider the rules should be loosened a bit in the interest of public safety...

Kid porn cops need warrant
Newmarket judge tosses out chat room evidence against man
By SAM PAZZANO, COURTS BUREAU
The Toronto Sun
The world is a screwed up place. With the internet it seems that national borders are transparent so I wonder what will become of all of this when the issue involves crossed borders? Something to think about. There are a lot of sick people out there. Please let us all know what happens with this.




Police must get a warrant to secretly record conversations on private Internet chat rooms, even if they are chatting with suspected kiddie-porn peddlers, a Newmarket judge has ruled.

In what may be a precedent-setting judgment -- and one that could hamper police in the fight against child pornography -- Justice William Gorewich threw out evidence against a Markham man because it was illegally obtained.

With the evidence ruled out, the Newmarket Crown withdrew charges in January. The decision is being appealed.

The judge stated the accused's Charter rights were violated by Toronto Police Det. Paul Krawcyzk, who recorded the conversation without a warrant.

His boss, Det. Sgt. Kim Scanlan of the Child Exploitation Section of Sex Crimes Unit in Toronto, said the "disappointing" decision will have a "direct impact on our ability to keep kids safe.

'DEAD END'

"We've gone to Internet service providers with the IP address and the providers give us an address and name, similar to a MTO search for a driver's licence or a 411 phone inquiry," Scanlan said. "It's important we have access to that information. Otherwise it's a dead end for investigators."

Defence lawyer Richard Posner, who successfully argued his client's rights were violated, said the law is "Big Brother for the state at its whim and discretion to seize private business information and it's completely unnecessary."

On June 24, 2006, Krawczyk was working undercover and posing as a trader on an Internet Rely Chat, where he knew the exchange of child porn images and movies occurred.

He found a man known as "Step Tosh" and engaged him in a private conversation which was recorded.

Based on this information, York Regional Police executed a search of the man's home on Stonebridge Dr. and found 14 graphic images of child pornography.

"The fact this officer had conducted such investigations in the same manner hundreds or thousands of times before doesn't justify his actions," Gorewich wrote.

"I find the evidence that the officer stated the need for the information to be acquired quickly to save children from the abuse of child pornography is somewhat far-fetched, given the widespread nature of this illegal activity.

CHAT ROOM

"There was nothing to prevent this officer from obtaining a warrant (for) the private chat room ... "

The judge ruled that people on private chat rooms have the same expectation of privacy as people in private phone calls and police routinely get warrants.

"It's a straightforward and simple procedure to get a warrant and the officers know it's like fishing in a barrel, going after people transacting child porn," Posner said yesterday.


I worry about the transparent borders of the internet and the issues that will arise from these sicko perverts. This is scary stuff. Maybe the laws concerning the internet will be a bit different than the national laws? Something to think about I guess.

IndianaJoans's photo
Fri 03/07/08 01:04 PM

its the same all over the world, the flag of the country of origin is always flown over others....does anyone know if the restaurant owner did it intentionally or was it an act of ignorance on his part???
Did the so-called hero talk to the restaurant owner first? Or just go ahead and put on a "Patriotic" show for his buddy to tape and put on the internet....?
yawn

Good question.

IndianaJoans's photo
Fri 03/07/08 01:01 PM
Edited by IndianaJoans on Fri 03/07/08 01:05 PM
sorry double posted

IndianaJoans's photo
Fri 03/07/08 12:59 PM
Edited by IndianaJoans on Fri 03/07/08 01:07 PM

this should have been done a loooooooooong time ago

American to the bone and I know that my country is my country, no flag position signifies my patriotism. My patriotism comes from my heart and soul no physical thing regardless to what it is is a measure of my patriotism to my country. I am not unsure of my patriotism so I do not need to exert it for it to be seen. Nor do I need to move or remove flags for my patriotism to be true, it is true no matter where the flag hangs.


it doesn't effect you that the mexican flag was purposely put above the american flag?

People can fly any country's flag they choose as long as it is flown lower than and in proximity to the American flag. Any other way is disrespectful. For me it is not just cloth it is what that cloth represents. It is a sovereignty issue, not a superiority issue.

IndianaJoans's photo
Fri 03/07/08 12:41 PM




adj4u
if i may ask

where were you the other 33 years


Rome Italy...


That explains a lot


I know, centuries of history , art, inventions and culture.

Oh! And I got my US citizenship last year...so you can keep your sarcasm for yourself...fellow american.




Perhaps you were able to acquire your US citizenship TOO easily! Perhaps one should have to sacrifice a little first before becoming a US citizen.

Lindyy
:heart: :heart:

My parents escaped Castro's Cuba. They were proud Americans! Can you please explain what requirement of sacrifice you would like to see to become a citizen?