Community > Posts By > Single_Rob

 
Single_Rob's photo
Wed 05/28/08 02:15 PM




:cry: I am in love with a man who lives in another state. He has 6 kids I have 4..That means we can't live together.
I feel so in love with him I just wat to cry, at night I just can't stop thinking how adorable and nice and sexy and smart and funny and cute...I feel like a teenager, last week I was crying at the airport like a baby..I LOVE HIM SO MUCH...:cry:


I don't see how the number of children you have automatically means you can't live together. Did I miss something?
it is possible with visitation rights and divorce decrees that they may not be able to leave their respective states with the children, might not be the caswe, just a thought



Visitation rights and divorce decrees can make things more difficult, but not impossible.
lol, try to get across state lines with kids if the bitter ex does not agree to it. An ex can infact make it impossible for you to leave the state (I know for a fact some, maybe not all) without their permission

Single_Rob's photo
Wed 05/28/08 11:17 AM
sounds like 10 things that men could care less if they understood laugh laugh laugh

Single_Rob's photo
Wed 05/28/08 11:17 AM
see the story about the farmer installing waterbeds for the cows because they produce more milk if they sleep on them? True story

Single_Rob's photo
Wed 05/28/08 11:16 AM
I sound like mickey mouse on helium

Single_Rob's photo
Wed 05/28/08 11:15 AM

i have 4
well I am very proud of you drinker drinker drinker

Single_Rob's photo
Wed 05/28/08 11:14 AM

well kids will be


what you let them be

and then they become adults

hhhhmmmmmmmmm

insert head scratching emoticon here
nobody ever said they should not be held accountable, or be punished. There were many other options available to these people, yet they took the most harsh action available, just because they could. I am betting that there will be more issues there than water balloons in the future

Single_Rob's photo
Wed 05/28/08 11:11 AM


My local news broadcasted a story about a couple of seniors that threw 15 to 20 water balloons in the direction of some teachers. The teachers did not get hit by the balloons, but they did get hit by the water.

The Seniors were suspended from school and according to school policy, they are not allowed to participate in any extracurricular activities. Which means they will not be able to participate in the graduation ceremony. They will have to pick up their diplomas from the school.

The families of the Seniors feel that the punishment is to harsh and that they are being punished as well because they are being deprived the privilege of seeing their children walk across the stage to receive the diploma.

So what do you think?




The punishment is too severe.

Those teachers should remember some of the pranks they pulled when they were that age.
drinker drinker drinker drinker

Single_Rob's photo
Wed 05/28/08 11:10 AM


he funniest thing about this thread is self proclaimed socialists defending the action taken against the children, then want to scream about accountability. Sonce when has a socialist ever been accountable for their actions? I thought the whole backbone of that movement was to never be responsible for anything, always be the victim, and others who will be accountable will take care of you forever. WOrkers of the world Unite


you might want to educate yourself on what socialism is before spouting your anti-socialist rhetoric..your confusing the issue here with typical spoiled american/victim too used to getting away with murder and then crying about it when they are caught and held accountable.
where are you from?

Single_Rob's photo
Wed 05/28/08 12:15 AM
it means I want to give them the one eyed pirate, arrrgghhh

Single_Rob's photo
Wed 05/28/08 12:11 AM

throw food away if it falls on the floor?
yup

Single_Rob's photo
Wed 05/28/08 12:09 AM

flowerforyou Rob..how are ya sweets!
I am well, and you? flowerforyou

Single_Rob's photo
Wed 05/28/08 12:08 AM


:cry: I am in love with a man who lives in another state. He has 6 kids I have 4..That means we can't live together.
I feel so in love with him I just wat to cry, at night I just can't stop thinking how adorable and nice and sexy and smart and funny and cute...I feel like a teenager, last week I was crying at the airport like a baby..I LOVE HIM SO MUCH...:cry:


I don't see how the number of children you have automatically means you can't live together. Did I miss something?
it is possible with visitation rights and divorce decrees that they may not be able to leave their respective states with the children, might not be the caswe, just a thought

Single_Rob's photo
Wed 05/28/08 12:06 AM
bodies

Single_Rob's photo
Tue 05/27/08 12:31 PM
come, no, but it sho be a lot of fun

Single_Rob's photo
Tue 05/27/08 12:30 PM
miz it in with the chicken livers :wink:

Single_Rob's photo
Tue 05/27/08 12:28 PM
he funniest thing about this thread is self proclaimed socialists defending the action taken against the children, then want to scream about accountability. Sonce when has a socialist ever been accountable for their actions? I thought the whole backbone of that movement was to never be responsible for anything, always be the victim, and others who will be accountable will take care of you forever. WOrkers of the world Unite

Single_Rob's photo
Tue 05/27/08 12:25 PM
Edited by Single_Rob on Tue 05/27/08 12:26 PM


You arrogant sob. I could care less if you are friendly or nasty with me, lol. So nice of you to decide your opinion carries so much more weight than mine. Fire away all you want, you will not affect my mood, direction, or line of thinking. Have a great day Fanta, I have my dd-214, my ribbons, and my medals, I could care less what you think of my terms of service.


Ahh heres the answer Fanta... We have ourselves a "ribbon boy".
You know, the ones who think they know more and better than every one else because they have a few ribbons on their chest, and plaques on their walls.

And before someone tries and nail me to the wall for that comment, keep in mind I had a decent chest of ribbons and awards myself when I got out of service. If I remember correctly, I had mroe ribbons on my chest than my first sergeant, when I was restationed in '95, and was waiting on authorization for two more. Ticked her off too. But in my case, I don't let the ribbons and awards go to my head and make me think I am better than others, or that I know more.

One specific reason is, I receioved an AAR (Army Achievement Medal) simply for stepping forward as a pfc (2nd lowest ranking person on site) and showing the training general around the site, when he appeared and my chain of command was elsewhere.

The General was impressed that I knew the site well enough that I was able to describe the daily routine, and what would likely happen on our part iof we were "overran". He like the fact that I was capable of taking charge when the leadership wasnt there.

Personally, every shoulder should have been able to do what I did, to a point. Yes a new soldier may nothave had as much training experience, and may have been a bit more intimidated by the Generals appearance, but still, it was my job and I did it.
So personally, the AAR that time was nothing but a slap on the back for doing my job to standards.
lol, I was tslking about real medals Daniel. I was not referring to being some brass's tour guide, lol. I never once mentioned what my ribbons were for, actually they are all from the wal mart fabric section in a wonderful array of pink and blue colors. Thanks for sharing that wonderful story of showing you have the past history of being the first one to sniff the brass's crotch when they showed up. I am sure nobody could get out of your way fast enough as you went to make your presence known. I give you 10:1 odds you were always the mofo whining and snitching everyone out...........first sgt, first sgt spc Single_Rob threw a water balloon at me.......

Single_Rob's photo
Tue 05/27/08 06:53 AM


There were others before 9/11 that served in a combat Zone Rob, like Panama, Granada, Lebanon, Desert Storm, etc. Do you think you are that exclusive or special? I understand the bill would never reach approval by considering all Vets.

I support this bill not for me, but for my brothers. So that they may have better. What you are suggesting would leave out a lot of post 9/11 vets as well.

What about the Navy? Are they considered as serving in a combat Zone? Its not as if the Iraqi insurgents have a Navy capable of qualifying them does it? And What about the AF pilots and personnel who serve out of Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and other bases? Its not like the Insurgents have an AF either? Then there are those serving in S Korea and Europe. Not to mention the ones in Bosnia/Serbia/Kosovo. That has yet to be declared a combat Zone.

Don't you think your statement is a little selfish?




Very well put Fanta, and I am not gonna bothre with responding seeing as you too kthe words out of my heart and stated them far better thanI could have.

I will say one thing though. Just because an area has not been declared hostile, or war or whatever you want to call it, doe snot mean the troops there are not under fire, are not under pressure, or any of that.
You have no credibility with me Daniel. Your only concern for this bill is what you could come back and suck out of the United States taxpayers for yourself. Why would you think they should make benefits retroactive when they cannot do the same with laws. It wasn't in play when you were active duty, why should you be able to take the taxpayers for a ride now?

Single_Rob's photo
Tue 05/27/08 06:25 AM
we are not rude, we are socially challenged

Single_Rob's photo
Mon 05/26/08 11:51 PM

In a hole in the ground. Thats where I will go.
I am being burned and having the carbon crushed into a diamond

1 2 11 12 13 15 17 18 19 24 25