Community > Posts By > Single_Rob
Topic:
I want to cry for him..
|
|
I am in love with a man who lives in another state. He has 6 kids I have 4..That means we can't live together. I feel so in love with him I just wat to cry, at night I just can't stop thinking how adorable and nice and sexy and smart and funny and cute...I feel like a teenager, last week I was crying at the airport like a baby..I LOVE HIM SO MUCH... I don't see how the number of children you have automatically means you can't live together. Did I miss something? Visitation rights and divorce decrees can make things more difficult, but not impossible. |
|
|
|
sounds like 10 things that men could care less if they understood
|
|
|
|
Topic:
happy cows?
|
|
see the story about the farmer installing waterbeds for the cows because they produce more milk if they sleep on them? True story
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Ever heard a recording
|
|
I sound like mickey mouse on helium
|
|
|
|
Topic:
how many
|
|
i have 4 |
|
|
|
well kids will be what you let them be and then they become adults hhhhmmmmmmmmm insert head scratching emoticon here |
|
|
|
My local news broadcasted a story about a couple of seniors that threw 15 to 20 water balloons in the direction of some teachers. The teachers did not get hit by the balloons, but they did get hit by the water. The Seniors were suspended from school and according to school policy, they are not allowed to participate in any extracurricular activities. Which means they will not be able to participate in the graduation ceremony. They will have to pick up their diplomas from the school. The families of the Seniors feel that the punishment is to harsh and that they are being punished as well because they are being deprived the privilege of seeing their children walk across the stage to receive the diploma. So what do you think? The punishment is too severe. Those teachers should remember some of the pranks they pulled when they were that age. |
|
|
|
he funniest thing about this thread is self proclaimed socialists defending the action taken against the children, then want to scream about accountability. Sonce when has a socialist ever been accountable for their actions? I thought the whole backbone of that movement was to never be responsible for anything, always be the victim, and others who will be accountable will take care of you forever. WOrkers of the world Unite you might want to educate yourself on what socialism is before spouting your anti-socialist rhetoric..your confusing the issue here with typical spoiled american/victim too used to getting away with murder and then crying about it when they are caught and held accountable. |
|
|
|
Topic:
A wink ?.
|
|
it means I want to give them the one eyed pirate, arrrgghhh
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Do you always
|
|
throw food away if it falls on the floor? |
|
|
|
Topic:
no names
|
|
Rob..how are ya sweets! |
|
|
|
Topic:
I want to cry for him..
|
|
I am in love with a man who lives in another state. He has 6 kids I have 4..That means we can't live together. I feel so in love with him I just wat to cry, at night I just can't stop thinking how adorable and nice and sexy and smart and funny and cute...I feel like a teenager, last week I was crying at the airport like a baby..I LOVE HIM SO MUCH... I don't see how the number of children you have automatically means you can't live together. Did I miss something? |
|
|
|
Topic:
no names
|
|
bodies
|
|
|
|
Topic:
new to the scene
|
|
come, no, but it sho be a lot of fun
|
|
|
|
Topic:
I'm gonna hurl
|
|
miz it in with the chicken livers
|
|
|
|
he funniest thing about this thread is self proclaimed socialists defending the action taken against the children, then want to scream about accountability. Sonce when has a socialist ever been accountable for their actions? I thought the whole backbone of that movement was to never be responsible for anything, always be the victim, and others who will be accountable will take care of you forever. WOrkers of the world Unite
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Single_Rob
on
Tue 05/27/08 12:26 PM
|
|
You arrogant sob. I could care less if you are friendly or nasty with me, lol. So nice of you to decide your opinion carries so much more weight than mine. Fire away all you want, you will not affect my mood, direction, or line of thinking. Have a great day Fanta, I have my dd-214, my ribbons, and my medals, I could care less what you think of my terms of service.
Ahh heres the answer Fanta... We have ourselves a "ribbon boy". You know, the ones who think they know more and better than every one else because they have a few ribbons on their chest, and plaques on their walls. And before someone tries and nail me to the wall for that comment, keep in mind I had a decent chest of ribbons and awards myself when I got out of service. If I remember correctly, I had mroe ribbons on my chest than my first sergeant, when I was restationed in '95, and was waiting on authorization for two more. Ticked her off too. But in my case, I don't let the ribbons and awards go to my head and make me think I am better than others, or that I know more. One specific reason is, I receioved an AAR (Army Achievement Medal) simply for stepping forward as a pfc (2nd lowest ranking person on site) and showing the training general around the site, when he appeared and my chain of command was elsewhere. The General was impressed that I knew the site well enough that I was able to describe the daily routine, and what would likely happen on our part iof we were "overran". He like the fact that I was capable of taking charge when the leadership wasnt there. Personally, every shoulder should have been able to do what I did, to a point. Yes a new soldier may nothave had as much training experience, and may have been a bit more intimidated by the Generals appearance, but still, it was my job and I did it. So personally, the AAR that time was nothing but a slap on the back for doing my job to standards. |
|
|
|
There were others before 9/11 that served in a combat Zone Rob, like Panama, Granada, Lebanon, Desert Storm, etc. Do you think you are that exclusive or special? I understand the bill would never reach approval by considering all Vets. I support this bill not for me, but for my brothers. So that they may have better. What you are suggesting would leave out a lot of post 9/11 vets as well. What about the Navy? Are they considered as serving in a combat Zone? Its not as if the Iraqi insurgents have a Navy capable of qualifying them does it? And What about the AF pilots and personnel who serve out of Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and other bases? Its not like the Insurgents have an AF either? Then there are those serving in S Korea and Europe. Not to mention the ones in Bosnia/Serbia/Kosovo. That has yet to be declared a combat Zone. Don't you think your statement is a little selfish? Very well put Fanta, and I am not gonna bothre with responding seeing as you too kthe words out of my heart and stated them far better thanI could have. I will say one thing though. Just because an area has not been declared hostile, or war or whatever you want to call it, doe snot mean the troops there are not under fire, are not under pressure, or any of that. |
|
|
|
we are not rude, we are socially challenged
|
|
|
|
Topic:
heaven or hell
|
|
In a hole in the ground. Thats where I will go. |
|
|